Ontario in 1985 would be the most obvious comparison, though the animus wasn't anywhere near as strong.Yeah, it seems that the other four leaders will LITERALLY not support Harper at all. Has this sort of situation ever happened before in Canada?
Er, we don't know, and won't until Monday night.how accurate is this?
Seriously. This election is so important to fix these things. Fixing the electoral system is the first step and then bringing back the long form census. So much damage has been done this past decade. It will take a long time to fix it.Speaking as an American, I would be despondent about how your campaign finance oversight has been eroded and how a working statistics system has been flushed down the drain. You'll find the culture that follows such things harder to expunge, sadly.
Er, we don't know, and won't until Monday night.
How is it irrelevant? You're suggesting the Liberals are clearly involved in a nefarious plot to help the energy industry because their volunteer co-chair wrote a letter to Transcanada explaining how a change of government works. If we're operating under the assumption that all lobbyists are lobbying at all times, why isn't the NDP's senior strategist being called to task for being a paid lobbyist for Shell/Irving Oil/Imperial Oil/etc. at the same time he's been providing advice to Mulcair?
Hahaha, great choices.Incidentally, I really hate this:
http://i.imgur.com/IVBQ16T.png
(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)
It's basically a push poll. :/
Facebook ads are targeted so you're getting that because you either liked them on Facebook or have posted stuff pertaining to the Liberals/Justin Trudeau. I get them too and 0 NPD/CPC ads.Incidentally, I really hate this:
![]()
(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)
It's basically a push poll. :/
If you like your local NDP MP, vote for him/her. The key is that a Tory doesn't win it.So I'll freely admit that I haven't exercised my vote as much as I should have. Mostly due to confusion. I like what the Liberal party is promising overall, but I like what my local MP has done, who is NDP and prefer that candidate over the others. What do?
Incidentally, I really hate this:
![]()
(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)
It's basically a push poll. :/
What makes me wonder about the tories is that the tory campaign itself appears to be tepid about their chances right now. It's important because from what I've seen, Tories have more reliable data on who will get them what seats than anyone working polling. So if they're worried, something must look bad.
7% people said Harper most embodies change, lol wut
Does clicking on "undecided" take you to some sort of argument for why you should vote Liberal?Incidentally, I really hate this:
![]()
(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)
It's basically a push poll. :/
lol I mean how did they go about the process in getting these numbers?
the link isn't working for me for some reason so I can't see
Facebook ads are targeted so you're getting that because you either liked them on Facebook or have posted stuff pertaining to the Liberals/Justin Trudeau. I get them too and 0 NPD/CPC ads.
Does clicking on "undecided" take you to some sort of argument for why you should vote Liberal?
I've been wondering if, with the Francophone vote potentially splitting so heavily, we're going to see the Liberals win a few ridings which they would never have won with a fairly unified Francophone vote, but where now their Anglo/Allophone dominance + some Francophones is enough for a plurality.leger conducted it online. I probably should post the QC numbers : 31 LPC, 20 CPC, 25 NDP, and 23 BQ
Take off your Trudeau goggles and re-read my post.
The issue isn't the general amount of lobbying in government, nor is it the parts of the letter explaining the change in government.
At issue here is the interpretation of the final two paragraphs I quoted. I'm not an expert enough to discern whether Gagnier did something illegal or fineable, but I do know that there's an easy to see possible interpretation of the document where Gagnier comes across as a shady influence peddler.
If your reaction is "I don't see it that way" FINE. But the text can be read that way. If it couldn't be there then he wouldn't have resigned and we wouldn't be talking about this right now.
I'm not alone on this. I just watched the CBC At Issue episode on this and all panelists thought this was a bizarre misstep by Gagnier.
People were asking what's wrong with the letter, and I provided the answer.
His resigning was a strategic move to show how expendable he was, and how far from Trudeau's government he actually was.
I wonder if the tories internal polls are actually worse than all the polls that have been released in the last few days or so.I have a funny feeling that the tories will do worse than a lot of polls suggested in the last week or so.
I think the results will probably be within the MOE of the last polls on sunday, with maybe some momentum swing accounted for, but I expect uniform swing is going to do very very badly at predicting riding outcomes this time around. Efficiencies are going to be very different with such vast swings from last election.
I want Paul Calandra to run for Tory leadership just so his opponents can run ads of him talking about his fucking lemonade stand.
From this Oct 10th post http://cdnelectionwatch.blogspot.ca/2015/10/understanding-projections-i-uniform-vs.html
C-L-N-B
Uniform swing models
129-115-86-7 (Canadian Election Watch, unadjusted, 10/9)
131-113-91-2 (Too Close to Call, 10/9)*
127-115-88-7 (Le calcul électoral, 10/8)
123-113-98-3 (LISPOP, 10/4)
(The Globe's Election Forecast, which provides probabilities, is also based on uniform swing.)
*Includes slight turnout adjustment (smaller than this blog's).
Proportional swing models
122-131-80-4 (Three Hundred Eight, 10/9)
130-136-67-4 (The Signal, 10/9)
126-129-80-2 (Election Almanac, 10/8)
123-125-81-8 (Election Atlas, 10/8)
My dream is to have Chris Alexander, Jason Kenney, and Peter Kent fight for Tory leadership.
Easy there.....
To clarify (which is fair enough), I mean any kind of swing model.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper calls the Liberals economic plan all unicorns and rainbows
Well he is a master of the dark arts
There is nothing wrong with being a master of the dark arts. I to practice the craft and I'm a wholesome person (I think).
surely you jest
A Sorcery will clearly toss us into dispear... he will spawn brothels and drug stations across the country and turn the Peace Tower into the eye of Sauron
A new TV ad, which the Conservatives say will be played during Saturday’s Blue Jays game against the Kansas City Royals, is a compendium of familiar shots at Mr. Trudeau. But the ad also attempts to build a connection between Mr. Trudeau’s policies and those of Liberal Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne. It’s aimed at stirring up animosity among Ontario voters about the fiscal record of the Wynne government and tars Mr. Trudeau with the same brush.
We bought Red streamers, a carton of maple syrup, and Canadian flags for our office for Monday.
We are American. Yay LPC.
Would that actually work? Wynne had a much worse gas plant scandal and still emerged victorious so I think at least Ontarian didn't hate her fiscal record that much. But then you cannot compare Hudak to Harper/
Would that actually work? Wynne had a much worse gas plant scandal and still emerged victorious. But then Hudak sucks.
That ad aired tonight, meh
She has been campaigning pretty strongly for the past few weeks and Trudeau's numbers keep going up, don't know how much of an effect it'll have
Would that actually work? Wynne had a much worse gas plant scandal and still emerged victorious so I think at least Ontarian didn't hate her fiscal record that much. But then you cannot compare Hudak to Harper/