• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Canadian General Election (OT) - #elxn42: October 19, 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm interested in seeing how Quito's prediction pans out. If it goes tits-up, my friend is going to give him so much shit next time he sees him.
 
Campaign ads have to stop before Monday right? And the news cycle this weekend will probably just focus on "campaign as a whole" type stuff rather than real coverage since not so many people watch news on weekend.

So... this is it? I honestly expected a call around now from Trudeau for NDP voters to switch to stop Harper but I guess they didn't want to cause bad blood post election. It was good to hear him call for Conservative voters to switch instead.
 
If anyone is curious here's the actual seat count that sauder school of business site predicts.

CPC: 112 seats
LPC 137 seats
NDP 79 seats
BQ 5 seats
Green 2 seats
Independent: 0 seats

Rounding errors won't result in 338 seats if I use this model.

I'm using the last bid section to calculate this.
 
Incidentally, I really hate this:

IVBQ16T.png


(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)

It's basically a push poll. :/
 
Speaking as an American, I would be despondent about how your campaign finance oversight has been eroded and how a working statistics system has been flushed down the drain. You'll find the culture that follows such things harder to expunge, sadly.
Seriously. This election is so important to fix these things. Fixing the electoral system is the first step and then bringing back the long form census. So much damage has been done this past decade. It will take a long time to fix it.
 
So I'll freely admit that I haven't exercised my vote as much as I should have. Mostly due to confusion. I like what the Liberal party is promising overall, but I like what my local MP has done, who is NDP and prefer that candidate over the others. What do?
 
How is it irrelevant? You're suggesting the Liberals are clearly involved in a nefarious plot to help the energy industry because their volunteer co-chair wrote a letter to Transcanada explaining how a change of government works. If we're operating under the assumption that all lobbyists are lobbying at all times, why isn't the NDP's senior strategist being called to task for being a paid lobbyist for Shell/Irving Oil/Imperial Oil/etc. at the same time he's been providing advice to Mulcair?

Take off your Trudeau goggles and re-read my post.

The issue isn't the general amount of lobbying in government, nor is it the parts of the letter explaining the change in government.

At issue here is the interpretation of the final two paragraphs I quoted. I'm not an expert enough to discern whether Gagnier did something illegal or fineable, but I do know that there's an easy to see possible interpretation of the document where Gagnier comes across as a shady influence peddler.

If your reaction is "I don't see it that way" FINE. But the text can be read that way. If it couldn't be there then he wouldn't have resigned and we wouldn't be talking about this right now.

I'm not alone on this. I just watched the CBC At Issue episode on this and all panelists thought this was a bizarre misstep by Gagnier.

People were asking what's wrong with the letter, and I provided the answer.
 
What makes me wonder about the tories is that the tory campaign itself appears to be tepid about their chances right now. It's important because from what I've seen, Tories have more reliable data on who will get them what seats than anyone working polling. So if they're worried, something must look bad.
 
Incidentally, I really hate this:

IVBQ16T.png


(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)

It's basically a push poll. :/
Facebook ads are targeted so you're getting that because you either liked them on Facebook or have posted stuff pertaining to the Liberals/Justin Trudeau. I get them too and 0 NPD/CPC ads.
 
So I'll freely admit that I haven't exercised my vote as much as I should have. Mostly due to confusion. I like what the Liberal party is promising overall, but I like what my local MP has done, who is NDP and prefer that candidate over the others. What do?
If you like your local NDP MP, vote for him/her. The key is that a Tory doesn't win it.

What riding, incidentally?
 
Incidentally, I really hate this:

IVBQ16T.png


(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)

It's basically a push poll. :/

are you with TRUDEAU-SENPAI or are you the ENEMY

yeah I wouldn't be shocked if the NDP would pull the same if they were in the lead
 
What makes me wonder about the tories is that the tory campaign itself appears to be tepid about their chances right now. It's important because from what I've seen, Tories have more reliable data on who will get them what seats than anyone working polling. So if they're worried, something must look bad.

I wonder if the tories internal polls are actually worse than all the polls that have been released in the last few days or so.I have a funny feeling that the tories will do worse than a lot of polls suggested in the last week or so.
 
Incidentally, I really hate this:

IVBQ16T.png


(note: I'm sure the NDP and CPC do something similar, but only the liberals seem to be buying ads that hit me on facebook)

It's basically a push poll. :/
Does clicking on "undecided" take you to some sort of argument for why you should vote Liberal?
 
My favourite part about the tories is that one guy talking about how the liberals are going to introduce weed and brothels into neighbourhoods. Like they're trying to warn us that voting Liberal means good times.
Whilst campaigning with a crackhead.
 
Facebook ads are targeted so you're getting that because you either liked them on Facebook or have posted stuff pertaining to the Liberals/Justin Trudeau. I get them too and 0 NPD/CPC ads.

Nah, I explicitly try to keep my facebook relatively politics free. I've made one post on this election that mentions the liberals and it was recently, been seeing this ad for weeks.

It's actually probably demographically targeted.

Does clicking on "undecided" take you to some sort of argument for why you should vote Liberal?

I shall never know.
 
leger conducted it online. I probably should post the QC numbers : 31 LPC, 20 CPC, 25 NDP, and 23 BQ
I've been wondering if, with the Francophone vote potentially splitting so heavily, we're going to see the Liberals win a few ridings which they would never have won with a fairly unified Francophone vote, but where now their Anglo/Allophone dominance + some Francophones is enough for a plurality.
 
Take off your Trudeau goggles and re-read my post.

The issue isn't the general amount of lobbying in government, nor is it the parts of the letter explaining the change in government.

At issue here is the interpretation of the final two paragraphs I quoted. I'm not an expert enough to discern whether Gagnier did something illegal or fineable, but I do know that there's an easy to see possible interpretation of the document where Gagnier comes across as a shady influence peddler.

If your reaction is "I don't see it that way" FINE. But the text can be read that way. If it couldn't be there then he wouldn't have resigned and we wouldn't be talking about this right now.

I'm not alone on this. I just watched the CBC At Issue episode on this and all panelists thought this was a bizarre misstep by Gagnier.

People were asking what's wrong with the letter, and I provided the answer.

His resigning was a strategic move to show how expendable he was, and how far from Trudeau's government he actually was.
 
His resigning was a strategic move to show how expendable he was, and how far from Trudeau's government he actually was.

Yes. His actions came across as questionable, and Trudeau wanted to make the statement that his government would never stand for any behaviour of that sort, and so Gagnier was asked to resign. Trudeau made the correct move here.
 
I wonder if the tories internal polls are actually worse than all the polls that have been released in the last few days or so.I have a funny feeling that the tories will do worse than a lot of polls suggested in the last week or so.

I think the results will probably be within the MOE of the last polls on sunday, with maybe some momentum swing accounted for, but I expect uniform swing is going to do very very badly at predicting riding outcomes this time around. Efficiencies are going to be very different with such vast swings from last election.

If the CPC are doing a lot of riding polls, or just have better methodology for their voter id techniques than the other parties, what they might be seeing is a more complete picture of where they're losing out on seats they would previously have won.
 
I think the results will probably be within the MOE of the last polls on sunday, with maybe some momentum swing accounted for, but I expect uniform swing is going to do very very badly at predicting riding outcomes this time around. Efficiencies are going to be very different with such vast swings from last election.

From this Oct 10th post http://cdnelectionwatch.blogspot.ca/2015/10/understanding-projections-i-uniform-vs.html

C-L-N-B
Uniform swing models
129-115-86-7 (Canadian Election Watch, unadjusted, 10/9)
131-113-91-2 (Too Close to Call, 10/9)*
127-115-88-7 (Le calcul électoral, 10/8)
123-113-98-3 (LISPOP, 10/4)
(The Globe's Election Forecast, which provides probabilities, is also based on uniform swing.)
*Includes slight turnout adjustment (smaller than this blog's).

Proportional swing models
122-131-80-4 (Three Hundred Eight, 10/9)
130-136-67-4 (The Signal, 10/9)
126-129-80-2 (Election Almanac, 10/8)
123-125-81-8 (Election Atlas, 10/8)
 
From this Oct 10th post http://cdnelectionwatch.blogspot.ca/2015/10/understanding-projections-i-uniform-vs.html

C-L-N-B
Uniform swing models
129-115-86-7 (Canadian Election Watch, unadjusted, 10/9)
131-113-91-2 (Too Close to Call, 10/9)*
127-115-88-7 (Le calcul électoral, 10/8)
123-113-98-3 (LISPOP, 10/4)
(The Globe's Election Forecast, which provides probabilities, is also based on uniform swing.)
*Includes slight turnout adjustment (smaller than this blog's).

Proportional swing models
122-131-80-4 (Three Hundred Eight, 10/9)
130-136-67-4 (The Signal, 10/9)
126-129-80-2 (Election Almanac, 10/8)
123-125-81-8 (Election Atlas, 10/8)

To clarify (which is fair enough), I mean any kind of swing model.
 
There is nothing wrong with being a master of the dark arts. I to practice the craft and I'm a wholesome person (I think).

surely you jest

A Sorcerer will clearly toss us into despair... He will spawn brothels and drug stations across the country and turn the Peace Tower into the eye of Sauron
 
A new TV ad, which the Conservatives say will be played during Saturday’s Blue Jays game against the Kansas City Royals, is a compendium of familiar shots at Mr. Trudeau. But the ad also attempts to build a connection between Mr. Trudeau’s policies and those of Liberal Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne. It’s aimed at stirring up animosity among Ontario voters about the fiscal record of the Wynne government and tars Mr. Trudeau with the same brush.

Would that actually work? Wynne had a much worse gas plant scandal and still emerged victorious so I think at least Ontarian didn't hate her fiscal record that much. But then you cannot compare Hudak to Harper/
 
We bought Red streamers, a carton of maple syrup, and Canadian flags for our office for Monday.

We are American. Yay LPC.

Haha that's awesome. :D Do you guys work in politics? Or you just like watching election nights? :P

I'm guessing 63% or 64% turnout. Young people are more motivated to vote, but still not very motivated overall.

Would that actually work? Wynne had a much worse gas plant scandal and still emerged victorious so I think at least Ontarian didn't hate her fiscal record that much. But then you cannot compare Hudak to Harper/

Ughh, the provincial-federal infighting is so lame. If people 15 years ago saw what Canada is today, it would be unrecognizable.
 
Would that actually work? Wynne had a much worse gas plant scandal and still emerged victorious. But then Hudak sucks.


That ad aired tonight, meh

She has been campaigning pretty strongly for the past few weeks and Trudeau's numbers keep going up, don't know how much of an effect it'll have
 
I didn't know rogers was hosting local debates. Right now they have Beaches- East York. It's nice to see them include other candidates such as those from the marxist-leninist party. James Sears is also running as an Independent and this guy is crazy haha. I remember him in the Toronto municipal election debates.
 
Would that actually work? Wynne had a much worse gas plant scandal and still emerged victorious so I think at least Ontarian didn't hate her fiscal record that much. But then you cannot compare Hudak to Harper/

At this point, I'm amazed that the CPC didn't already air TV ads claiming that Trudeau would let terrorists into the country -_-
 

Wow, look at those Quebec numbers. 873 Quebeckers polled, decent sample size.

31% LPC
25% NDP
23% BQ
20% CPC

Depending on the Franco/Anglo split, that might be some disasterous crash for the NDP O_o

The Ontario numbers from all these polls make me happy. 43-47% are really solid numbers, and will ensure that Conservatives won't even get minority. Conservatives are going to get wiped clean in urban Ontario. Bye bye Chris Alexander.

45% LPC
33% CPC
20% NDP
2% GPC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom