Fair enough. My friend is a huge fan, but as I say I didn't really gel with it and I can't really recall why at the moment. Perhaps it was because it expected me to figure it out myself and I didn't feel inclined at the time.Everything else is so much worse compared to it. Or it wont be finished, like ASOIAF. :lol What i especially like is that Erikson doesnt consider the reader an idiot, but just drops you into his world and expects you to figure it out. Which makes the first book a bit hard to start, but on a reread its amazing how everything fits together.
The first book is also the worst in the series, written at least ten years before the other books. I still really liked it though.
Only thing that sticks in my mind about it right now is rooftop assassins, and I'm now doubting I'm thinking of the right book...
I loved this the first time I read it, but I've read it again recently and it definitely lost something on second time through. I remember loving the mystery of it initially, which perhaps explains why I enjoyed it less this time around, although it's not like I didn't know most of the story.Next up:
![]()
Something about his description of Hyde captured my imagination first time through. I dunno, perhaps it says more about me than the book itself.