shadow2810
Member
Unfortunately the stand cannot be removed and so the screen is not VESA compliant.
I really have no idea what Acer team was smoking when they designed this monitor. Ugly base design and you aren't allowed to change it.
Unfortunately the stand cannot be removed and so the screen is not VESA compliant.
I really have no idea what Acer team was smoking when they designed this monitor. Ugly base design and you aren't allowed to change it.
Just got my LG a couple of days ago!
Im well chuffed!
Thanks for the link. Looks like the pixel response timings appears to be slow in some parts, and it causes an RTC overshoot. They recommend using 120 hertz for monitor. The contrast appears to be much higher than what Acer advertised, and that's really good. It turns out that VA panels have really good contrast when compared to TN, and IPS panels. What are some of the pros, and cons for you d00d3n? I am curious to hear your thoughts on it since you have had it for a couple of weeks.
Edit: Just wanted to highlight the RTC Overshoot indicator. The colorless outline at the back of the car is the RTC Overshoot. You can see an example of it in the picture linked in this website http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/advancedcontent.htm#overdrive
The biggest con imo is inherent to the screen format. A lot of game content is incompatible with 21:9 aspect ratios out of the box. You will either get black borders, cut screen space or nasty stretching. The programs flawless widescreen, widescreen fixer and www.wsgf.com have you covered in many cases, but it is a hassle to have to go that extra step every time you want a game to work nicely.
Pros? Like they say in the tftcentral review, the screen feels like a larger and more wide version of Eizo Foris FG2421. It is true that higher Hz is a gimmicky feature here, that it is best to run the screen in 120Hz mode, but you still get the insane VA contrast ratio (see real blacks) with a screen that updates really fast and also supports gsync. The relatively low resolution is a good thing imo, because you will actually be able to reach 120 fps in more modern games.
Another (possibly self-serving) note is that VA screens seem to struggle to go beyond 120Hz refresh rates (is soft max on the Z35, was hard maximum on the Eizo Foris FG2421). So, unless the VA technology takes a leap forward, or unless you want higher resolution, there is no need to wait for a refresh of this screen with new HDMI and Displayport standards.
Asus PG348Q vs. Acer X34.
Can't wait for a comparison.
I joined the club yesterday too! (my x34 showed up finally)
I was coming from a 27" 1440p monitor, and the size of this thing still feels massive. Have not had a chance to play too many games on it yet, but played a few more hours of Witcher 3 this morning.
(Cross post pic from the gaming setup thread)
Nice setup, a little off topic but what speakers are those?
I ended up just giving in, and purchasing the Acer Z35 (Will be here Monday). And in the process of doing so, I changed my mind several times, and canceled my order multiple times. Word of advice. Do not order, and then cancel when you are using Newegg. They will charge you, and keep the payment in pending. And as a result of that, you will lose the money in your bank account (Over five grand in my case), but you will be able to get it back within three to five business days (At least I hope so).
Not a game related question, but how movies look on these 21:9 monitors in terms of black bars at the top and bottom of the screen? Because no matter what technology comes out there always seem to be black bars. 4:3 has black bars for 16:9 but 16:9 TVs also show black bars for 2.35:1 movies. Just wondering how they look if anyone watches movies on them.
You are still going to get some black bars on pretty much everything just because nothing is really shot in 21:9 (which is actually 2.370:1).
You can use the crop/zoom options to get a fullscreen image that is close, but that will be a personal preference thing.
You are still going to get some black bars on pretty much everything just because nothing is really shot in 21:9 (which is actually 2.370:1).
You can use the crop/zoom options to get a fullscreen image that is close, but that will be a personal preference thing.
I don't know if I'll regret this decision if I go through with it. However, the monitor I'm looking at is only $190. If I bump it up to 29", it is much more expensive. It's also only 1080p. But I'm hoping that I can use NVIDIA DSR to get 1440p downsampling. At least so that the are less jaggies on the screen.
Knowing me it could easily turn into my primary. I currently have a TN panel and the IPS screen might sway my eyes. Ugh... The 29" and 34" 21:9 monitors are also significantly more expensive. But I honestly think it will slowly become my primary.I was originally going to go for 25", but people explicitly told me to go for the 29" instead because of the size of the screen when playing 16:9 or 4:3 content. I think I made the right choice there listening to them personally. However in your case you're going to be using it as a secondary to a 16:9 monitor so...
Knowing me it could easily turn into my primary. I currently have a TN panel and the IPS screen might sway my eyes. Ugh... The 29" and 34" 21:9 monitors are also significantly more expensive. But I honestly think it will slowly become my primary.
Can the 21:9 screens accommodate dual inputs simultaneously? For instance, I'm wondering if it would be possible to hook up my console to the monitor and have a separate part of the screen dedicated to my computer desktop? I think it would be great to game and keep up with things on the internet at the same time.
Just got the Dell U3415W, previously had the LG 34 inch 21:9 (non-curved). Didn't like the LG because it didn't have a PIP option, and a screen this wide and close needs to be curved for better viewing. First impressions is that the Dell is much better than the LG, here's a couple pics, including an example of PIP:
![]()
![]()
Will post more screens as I get more games up and running...
Figures. I think I'm not going to completely cheap out then. I'm going for the LG 29UM67. It's going to be glorious.I went from a 21.5" ASUS TN panel to a 29" LG 21:9 IPS. My mind is still blown away at how much richer the colors are.
I got mine (the LG 29UB55-B) on sale tho, so the jump from 25" to 29" was only $50 more.
Can the 21:9 screens accommodate dual inputs simultaneously? For instance, I'm wondering if it would be possible to hook up my console to the monitor and have a separate part of the screen dedicated to my computer desktop? I think it would be great to game and keep up with things on the internet at the same time.
Figures. I think I'm not going to completely cheap out then. I'm going for the LG 29UM67. It's going to be glorious.
Is that a good model?
Can the 21:9 screens accommodate dual inputs simultaneously? For instance, I'm wondering if it would be possible to hook up my console to the monitor and have a separate part of the screen dedicated to my computer desktop? I think it would be great to game and keep up with things on the internet at the same time.
I like it, yeah. It's fantastic, and a huge upgrade from what I had. Very similar to the one you're looking at, but with a slightly different set of features. It doesn't have FreeSync tho.
Ok cool. Sweet. I'll go for that model instead. It's a few bucks cheaper on Amazon than the model you have. I don't think I'll benefit from FreeSync. I have an NVIDIA card.
That's way over the budget I'm willing to spend. GSync only applies when frames dip right? I don't usually have that problem because I have a good video card and I can vsync/60fps without too many dips.Then do yourself a favour and get a monitor with gsync.
That's way over the budget I'm willing to spend. GSync only applies when frames dip right? I don't usually have that problem because I have a good video card and I can vsync/60fps without too many dips.
But which monitor did you have in mind? I don't know of many gsync ultra wide monitors other than the X34.
Is that holy holy Asus monitor ever coming out? What's the deal with that thing?! There's basically information about it.
No TVs have 21:9 format but I think Panasonic or some other company tried it and it flopped real hard years ago.Guys, I'm a comfy couch gamer most and foremost, but 21:9 monitors picked my interest.
Is there any big 21:9 TV worth buying these days? Don't care about GSYNC or framerates above 60 FPS, just a wide and nice looking wide view for games.
No TVs have 21:9 format but I think Panasonic or some other company tried it and it flopped real hard years ago.
That 35" Acer is probably the largest 21:9 I know.
I can see why, its a great aspect ratio for movies but watching the news/tvshows in 21:9 super stretched or with black bars would be horrible.No TVs have 21:9 format but I think Panasonic or some other company tried it and it flopped real hard years ago.
I can see why, its a great aspect ratio for movies but watching the news/tvshows in 21:9 super stretched or with black bars would be horrible.
You'll get used it. Like watching 21:9 movies on a 16:9 screen.I can see why, its a great aspect ratio for movies but watching the news/tvshows in 21:9 super stretched or with black bars would be horrible.