Exsctly. To win (peaceful) change, those are exactly the people whose minds one needs to change. Exactly the people you don't want to alienate.
Come off it. Nobody's changing shit unless they're forced to look it dead in the eyes.
Exsctly. To win (peaceful) change, those are exactly the people whose minds one needs to change. Exactly the people you don't want to alienate.
I understand the need for protests, but it's not like SF and the Bay Area are a hotbed of police violence. Of course that may be part of the reason for locals treating it the same way as the ranchers. It's seen as a problem for "other places" that aren't bothering to address the issues.
Exsctly. To win (peaceful) change, those are exactly the people whose minds one needs to change. Exactly the people you don't want to alienate.
There's almost certainly issues that you're willfully ignorant of.
Unfortunately, all it is a personal annoyance. You being annoyed for an hour or two is not as valuable as the message the protest is sending. If these protesters denied passage to emergency vehicles or people with pressing issues IE "hey, so I need to get my mom's medication from the pharmacy across the bridge" then, yeah, I'd agree, but that probably never happens (I'm going to bet on the probably part). Take the annoyance, don't try to tell them how to protest if it's not killing someone.
Telling them to not protest on the road is dialogue certain groups want to further because it's effective at getting people against certain protests because people will believe, "they're blocking emergency crews!" is 100% true.
If someone is just being an ass and construes your post in a certain way either ignore them or explain your position further. If explaining further yields nothing but more ass-ery then walk away.
calling them terrorists is a bit of a stretch
You guys realize that this kind of "they should protest the way I say" is exactly the kind of thing that defines systematic oppression, right?
It's ok to recognize that you're part of the problem.
I would prefer to either seriously talk about what you just said or it not be mentioned from the start. It's wrong to lightly talk about somebody's character like that and then move away from it. I take that as a serious claim about me and I'd expect absolute statements of deplorable behavior like that to be backed up. Even saying "I know off the top of my head that isn't true, but let's not get into the gritty details. It would be off topic" is pretty messed up. Either show it or don't say it.
Idiot ranchers taking over a building in the middle of nowhere doesn't impact the public.
People have different levels of tolerances of radical protesting. Personally, I draw the line at disrupting critical services. If I were in the group of people organizing this protest, I'd be the voice saying 'We shouldn't do a protest that could disruptive fire fighters or ambulances". I'm not comfortable with the potential consequences of that protest. That doesn't mean I am a part of systematic oppression.
I would prefer to either seriously talk about what you just said or it not be mentioned from the start. It's wrong to lightly talk about somebody's character like that and then move away from it. I take that as a serious claim about me and I'd expect absolute statements of deplorable behavior like that to be backed up. Even saying "I know off the top of my head that isn't true, but let's not get into the gritty details. It would be off topic" is pretty messed up. Either show it or don't say it.
It did, and it continues to do so. Some schools closed down for the week, people that are supposed to be working there aren't(getting paid though), you have people in the community railing against them, there's talk of use of intimidation, threats and harassment against locals and feds, destroyed federal property, and probably more than I'm forgetting.
So, yeah, that armed "militia" has absolutely done more harm than traffic-clogging, unarmed protest.
calling people racist is rude
so i'll just say you conveniently disagree from the correct position in nearly every discussion about civil rights, equality, race relations, and institutionalized racism, and it has begun to impact people's perceptions of your character
Update from my friend who got out after three hours because of the blockage: People turned off their cars. Black and white people pissed off at the stoppage (didn't know why it was stopped), dude was performing backflips since all the car stopped, people lane splitting bikes, skateboards and electric skateboards in the opposite direction of traffic and lots of selfies on the bridge.
You guys realize that this kind of "they should protest the way I say" is exactly the kind of thing that defines systematic oppression, right?
It's ok to recognize that you're part of the problem.
"Don't critique them" because I said so. Yeah no thanks we should be able to have a discussion about this.
People have different levels of tolerances of radical protesting. Personally, I draw the line at disrupting critical services. If I were in the group of people organizing this protest, I'd be the voice saying 'We shouldn't do a protest that could disruptive fire fighters or ambulances". I'm not comfortable with the potential consequences of that protest. That doesn't mean I am a part of systematic oppression.
The line is fairly blurry for anyone who has internet access.Ignorance and willful ignorance are not the same thing.
Indeed, people should at least admit that they would have the same response to MLK's tactics then that they have now - it's the same situation, what would be the reason for the discrepancy in response to the two identical situations?You would have marched with pieces of shit and monsters? Why would you do that?
Also all the money that it costs the town to not have that place in operation and all the money it will cost to fix all the stuff they've destroyed.
Institutionalized racism is still around because it's profitable, not because BLM hasn't been co-opted by the Soul Train awards
There's always reasons why there shouldn't be any inconvenience and why things should just keep on going the way they are, eh
What do you want to discuss, bud? What black people need to do to make this struggle more palatable to you?
Do you find a discussion worth having there?
Indeed, people should at least admit that they would have the same response to MLK's tactics then that they have now - it's the same situation, what would be the reason for the discrepancy in response to the two identical situations?
And I'm not even saying that to try and make people feel bad about themselves - from a coldly logical perspective, that is what you would have done. Simple as that.
To address some hypothetical as well: considering the ubiquity of traffic apps these days any emergency vehicle should be routed around the protest. And if they are caught by the very beginning of the protest before it registers in the systems, well then the protesters can easily let the emergency vehicle through since it is right up at the front. There is also no school today and it is a federal holiday - in fact, it is a federal holiday memorializing this very form of protest.
The line is fairly blurry for anyone who has internet access.
they are not the same thing, sorry to burst your bubble
like has been said, 2016 is a radically faster world than 1965
this kind is disruption is irresponsible and dangerous, does no favors to our cause
I don't view important services like fire fighters and ambulances being disrupted as simply "inconveniences".
they are not the same thing, sorry to burst your bubble
like has been said, 2016 is a radically faster world than 1965
this kind is disruption is irresponsible and dangerous, does no favors to our cause
Source?
That is a big negative good buddy
Schools, and Federal offices were shut down
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/schools-reopen-near-militia-showdown-in-oregon
http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/01/burns-area_schools_reopen_as_a.html
at least BLM did it on a holiday when federal offices and schools were closed normally.
People have different levels of tolerances of radical protesting. Personally, I draw the line at disrupting critical services. If I were in the group of people organizing this protest, I'd be the voice saying 'We shouldn't do a protest that could disruptive fire fighters or ambulances". I'm not comfortable with the potential consequences of that protest. That doesn't mean I am a part of systematic oppression.
I don't view important services like fire fighters and ambulances being disrupted as simply "inconveniences".
I tried googling it and I found #ShutItDown preventing an ambulance from passing but the person inside ended up OK.My GF who works at the hospital.
Like I said, today's protest would't have impacted it, but it's been done in the past. And Children's is far from a hospital that caters to "the rich." They take everyone, and because of their level of care, usually end up with transfers from other local hospitals.
huh?
Institutionalized racism is still around because it's profitable, not because BLM hasn't been co-opted by the Soul Train awards
I don't view important services like fire fighters and ambulances being disrupted as simply "inconveniences".
They staged an armed takeover of a Government building
They bought women and children as human shields
They've destroyed property
All in the name of striking fear into people.
they are not the same thing, sorry to burst your bubble
like has been said, 2016 is a radically faster world than 1965
this kind is disruption is irresponsible and dangerous, does no favors to our cause
if that fact falls flat on you, we're at odds ends with each other re: how we protest
The cause of monsters?
they are not the same thing, sorry to burst your bubble
like has been said, 2016 is a radically faster world than 1965
this kind is disruption is irresponsible and dangerous, does no favors to our cause
if that fact falls flat on you, we're at odds ends with each other re: how we protest
Well how dare they! All those drivers should have been smiling and sympathetic and left their cars and joined them.
You should reconsider a moral stance where the line is drawn is soon as it inconveniences you.
Also why is such a big deal made about ambulances and other emergency services? Unless someone is on fire ON the bridge, I recall San Francisco and Oakland having their own respective hospitals.
they are not the same thing, sorry to burst your bubble
like has been said, 2016 is a radically faster world than 1965
this kind is disruption is irresponsible and dangerous, does no favors to our cause
if that fact falls flat on you, we're at odds ends with each other re: how we protest
Not really? Willful ignorance is active, ignorance is inactive.
Are you still of a mind that MLK would reject this kind of protesting if he were still around?
It's true that I don't know the area at all and cannot speak to how it affects that exact area. I'm talking about blocking a busy road/bridge in general. It is possible that what I do not know about that exact area could change how I feel about the protest.
yes, i believe he'd advocade different approaches for a different time
It's true that I don't know the area at all and cannot speak to how it affects that exact area. I'm talking about blocking a busy road/bridge in general. It is possible that what I do not know about that exact area could change how I feel about the protest.
My GF who works at the hospital.
Like I said, today's protest would't have impacted it, but it's been done in the past. And Children's is far from a hospital that caters to "the rich." They take everyone, and because of their level of care, usually end up with transfers from other local hospitals.
I stand corrected on that point. Knew they had holed up in a building in a wildlife sanctuary. Didn't know that schools ~30 miles away had been shut down because of it.
The thing is, the sooner everybody joins in, the faster we can clear traffic.
Because you know how the whole systemic racism thing is the actual cause of the hold up.