The South Carolina Primary & Nevada Caucuses |Feb 20, 23, 27| Continuing The Calm

Status
Not open for further replies.
So screw over minorities and LGBT members just because? That doesn't help anything and just makes things even worse.
This entire election cycle has opened my eyes to how many on the left who like to consider themselves progressive really are not that much better than often demonized racists and bigots on the far right. One group wants to throw me off the boat, the other is fine with letting the boat sink with me in it (since they're in a life raft). It's rather frustrating, and this is the first election where I'm finding myself exhausted even before the GE.
 
I feel like your country would be a lot better off If you got rid of mid terms completely. And changed to a parliamentary system. And had an independent federal electoral commission that drew maps for all elections.
 
Not to long ago he was up by 16 points, so this is good news!
But what other candidate is really better than Trump? Cruz? Rubio? If Trump does not win the Republican nomination, not much is won yet, because Cruz as the US president actually seems more threatening. Trump is obviously talking shit all the time, building walls that Mexico has to pay and such, things he's obviously not going to do and he very likely does not even intend to do. Cruz however seems to be to believed when he says that the law should be derived from the bible...
 
Bernie without the establishment is like Trump without Mexico, China, or the wall.

There is an establishment that backs Hillary, the huge numbers of Dems, the huge amount of corps, the huge portion of the media is that establishment.

They are lock step in their message that overwhelmingly tries to dispel any notion of Wall Street reform in the bigger sense, any notion of healthcare reform, any notion of social justice in general as not only not being plausible in the current congress, but not actually working in general in society. Hell, 99% of them don't even think money in politics as corruption even exists, and actively try to dispel that notion, Hillary included.

That is fucking dangerous to the average person as a viewpoint.
 
I feel like your country would be a lot better off If you got rid of mid terms completely. And changed to a parliamentary system. And had an independent federal electoral commission that drew maps for all elections.

Probably.

It would require sweeping constitutional amendments though, which won't happen any time soon.
 
Of course now, if i was him i'd probably run full scale as an independent if he loses the nom and continue to run to take away Hillary's fire throughout the country. If this party is going to run this way, he has to let everyone know that depending on the two party system (be it dem or GOP) to fight for what's right isn't going to happen.

If he loses the nomination, he'll endorse Hillary and urge his supporters to vote for her. Because, thankfully, he isn't as boneheaded as you'd like him to be.
 
This entire election cycle has opened my eyes to how many on the left who like to consider themselves progressive really are not that much better than often demonized racists and bigots on the far right. One group wants to throw me off the boat, the other is fine with letting the boat sink with me in it (since they're in a life raft). It's rather frustrating, and this is the first election where I'm finding myself exhausted even before the GE.

not a good year for "allies"
 
Ted Kennedy turned down a health care deal with Nixon because he believed he could get a better deal with the next president.

He died before the next time comprehensive healthcare reform was passed.
 
I'm not going to lie, that's how I feel right now. Hillary Clinton is just another 90s centrist who actively supported DOMA and NAFTA and only within the last five years has pushed for more progressive measures. I'll give her points for pushing for a single payer system but now that she's the highest donated candidate from pharmaceutical and insurance companies I don't see her doing much to push that forward if she became president.

If Hillary wins the nomination, I honestly don't know if I'll come out to vote. I don't want another centrist president that vaguely pushes the status quo that Reagan set in 1980. I'd rather watch the Republicans burn everything to the ground to prove that they're legitimately crazy than to have another term of stagnant progress.

Totally understand where you're coming from. At this point, I'm barely a Clinton voter. But if I hear another story about her taking corporate money or her connections to Goldman Sachs, it may push me over the edge.
 
This entire election cycle has opened my eyes to how many on the left who like to consider themselves progressive really are not that much better than often demonized racists and bigots on the far right. One group wants to throw me off the boat, the other is fine with letting the boat sink with me in it (since they're in a life raft). It's rather frustrating, and this is the first election where I'm finding myself exhausted even before the GE.

Its is the liberal version of "Fuck you, I got mine".
 
This entire election cycle has opened my eyes to how many on the left who like to consider themselves progressive really are not that much better than often demonized racists and bigots on the far right. One group wants to throw me off the boat, the other is fine with letting the boat sink with me in it (since they're in a life raft). It's rather frustrating, and this is the first election where I'm finding myself exhausted even before the GE.

It's honestly made me almost ashamed to call myself liberal.

We're supposed to be the big tent. But half the people under the tent seem totally fine with letting Republicans burn down the fairgrounds.
 
I didn't expect such a big victory for Clinton, gotta say this doesn't bode well for Bernie if he fails to make an impact Super Tuesday it's over for my candidate.
 
There is an establishment that backs Hillary, the huge numbers of Dems, the huge amount of corps, the huge portion of the media is that establishment.

They are lock step in their message that overwhelmingly tries to dispel any notion of Wall Street reform in the bigger sense, any notion of healthcare reform, any notion of social justice in general as not only not being plausible in the current congress, but not actually working in general in society.

That is fucking dangerous to the average person as a viewpoint.

When the fuck has Hillary Clinton, or any establishment Democrat, ever tried to dispel the need for healthcare reform, Wall Street reform, or and social justice? Even if you think Hillary is bought and owned by corporate interests, she's been advocating for healthcare reform and social justice causes for literally her entire political life, and well before it.

Some of you guys live in another world entirely.
 
Man, I don't understand why Bernie is going through the touch Democratic nomination route. He could've easily ran as an Independent and wouldn't have had to go through this and still have gotten votes. Am I missing something here?
It's not a coincidence that billionaires like Perot and Bloomberg are the only ones that have considered (or attempted) serious third party runs. It takes tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars to run for president of the US. You can't do it without party machinery from the democratic or republican parties.
Ted Kennedy turned down a health care deal with Nixon because he believed he could get a better deal with the next president.

He died before the next time comprehensive healthcare reform was passed.
oops
 
If he loses the nomination, he'll endorse Hillary and urge his supporters to vote for her. Because, thankfully, he isn't as boneheaded as you'd like him to be.
Indeed. Sanders will think of the long-term results of him going independent, which would essentially be handing the GOP the Presidency.

This entire election cycle has opened my eyes to how many on the left who like to consider themselves progressive really are not that much better than often demonized racists and bigots on the far right. One group wants to throw me off the boat, the other is fine with letting the boat sink with me in it (since they're in a life raft). It's rather frustrating, and this is the first election where I'm finding myself exhausted even before the GE.
While I prefer Sanders and am happy he's getting people involved in politics again, his fervent supporters opting not to vote if he loses is the part that worries me greatly and I've said so again and again.

The Presidency and Supreme Court is too important.
 
Ted Kennedy turned down a health care deal with Nixon because he believed he could get a better deal with the next president.

He died before the next time comprehensive healthcare reform was passed.

People want to believe it's as easy as "feeling the Bern."

It takes work. Decades and decades of long, arduous, dirty work that includes compromise and setbacks.

Nobody wants to hear that, but it's the truth. It's how our country is literally designed to run.
 
No they shouldn't, questioning a system which is progressively becoming more hostile towards them (college tuition, lack of career starting jobs, price of housing, etc...) is rational behavior. "Getting in line" is not. If she isn't pressed on said issues she has no incentive to not cater to special interests as they currently fund the majority of her campaign.

Exactly. And it honestly pisses me off seeing some of the responses because I refuse to fall in line and hold my nose because somehow that means Hillary will honestly appoint liberal judges. Hillary is not a liberal, she's a populist that will fall wherever the wind blows. If it's more lucrative politically for her to appoint a pro-corporate judge she'll do it. This is the same woman who went on TV to defend DOMA, and we're honestly supposed to just pretend that she's now an ally?

I just can't in good faith believe that she'll somehow do anything to help us. So I'll just abstain.
 
just seeing the results now

was the dem race supposed to be this close? I thought Hillary had a much bigger lead in Nevada?

Honestly, nobody was all that sure what the "leads" were in Nevada. Caucus polling is tough, and in this case there were only like 2 or 3 polls.
 
If he loses the nomination, he'll endorse Hillary and urge his supporters to vote for her. Because, thankfully, he isn't as boneheaded as you'd like him to be.

she'll need to do more than that though. it'd be best if he actively campaigns for her and if she has a position in her administration for him or someone like him. not sure if sanders would want that but she needs to embrace progressivism at least to some extent.

might be interesting to see a general election candidate have to tack away from the center.
 
Man, I don't understand why Bernie is going through the touch Democratic nomination route. He could've easily ran as an Independent and wouldn't have had to go through this and still have gotten votes. Am I missing something here?

It doesn't really make any sense to go as an independent.
In the US, the odds of winning as an independent are pretty much literally 0.
He's getting much (much much much much... 100 more times) farther even being second place in the democratic side.

Besides that even if he knew off the bat that he wasn't going to win, he still gets heard in this case.
Before the election, hardly anyone knew about him. Whereas everyone everyone knew Hillary Clinton. And now, he's losing, he's doing far far far better than anyone could have expected of him.
 
No they shouldn't, questioning a system which is progressively becoming more hostile towards them (college tuition, lack of career starting jobs, price of housing, etc...) is rational behavior. "Getting in line" is not. If she isn't pressed on said issues she has no incentive to not cater to special interests as they currently fund the majority of her campaign.

So the answer is to hand the election to people who, even if pressed on those issues, will spit in your face, call you a hippie, and have you arrested?

Good idea.
 
It's honestly made me almost ashamed to call myself liberal.

We're supposed to be the big tent. But half the people under the tent seem totally fine with letting Republicans burn down the fairgrounds.

Niddog doesnt speak for the millions of Sanders supporters, thanks.
 
When the fuck has Hillary Clinton, or any establishment Democrat, ever tried to dispel the need for healthcare reform, Wall Street reform, or and social justice? Even if you think Hillary is bought and owned by corporate interests, she's been advocating for healthcare reform and social justice causes for literally her entire political life, and well before it.

Some of you guys live in another world entirely.

Yep, they forget about Hilary care...a single payer system in the early 90s! It cost the dems massively in 94.

Not sure who I will vote for yet. I really like both Clinton and sanders. However I do find sanders supporters are very similar to Ron Paul fans. They have the same all or nothing attitude.
 
Exactly. And it honestly pisses me off seeing some of the responses because I refuse to fall in line and hold my nose because somehow that means Hillary will honestly appoint liberal judges. Hillary is not a liberal, she's a populist that will fall wherever the wind blows. If it's more lucrative politically for her to appoint a pro-corporate judge she'll do it. This is the same woman who went on TV to defend DOMA, and we're honestly supposed to just pretend that she's now an ally?

I just can't in good faith believe that she'll somehow do anything to help us. So I'll just abstain.

She is an ally so you can stop with that nonsense
and I'm fairly certain she said she wants to appoint a judge that will strike down citizens united which certainly isnt pro corporate
 
People want to believe it's as easy as "feeling the Bern."

It takes work. Decades and decades of long, arduous, dirty work that includes compromise and setbacks.

Nobody wants to hear that, but it's the truth. It's how our country is literally designed to run.

Change and progress is often slow, painful and bitter ass pill to swallow. It's much easier to undo things.

Do I agree with most things Bernie says? Yes of course. I think most liberals do. But I also understand his grand ideas just aren't realistic right now. Maybe in 20 years, but not right now.
 
When the fuck has Hillary Clinton, or any establishment Democrat, ever tried to dispel the need for healthcare reform, Wall Street reform, or and social justice? Even if you think Hillary is bought and owned by corporate interests, she's been advocating for healthcare reform and social justice causes for literally her entire political life, and well before it.

Some of you guys live in another world entirely.

her campaign claimed that the sanders healthcare plan would get rid of obamacare and that's somehow a bad thing

i do think hillary would be a good president overall but some of the positions she's taken this cycle and the negative campaigning against obama as the 2008 season closed out have really hurt her
 
Exactly. And it honestly pisses me off seeing some of the responses because I refuse to fall in line and hold my nose because somehow that means Hillary will honestly appoint liberal judges. Hillary is not a liberal, she's a populist that will fall wherever the wind blows. If it's more lucrative politically for her to appoint a pro-corporate judge she'll do it. This is the same woman who went on TV to defend DOMA, and we're honestly supposed to just pretend that she's now an ally?

I just can't in good faith believe that she'll somehow do anything to help us. So I'll just abstain.
Who is "us"?
 
Niddog doesnt speak for the millions of Sanders supporters, thanks.

Thankfully, polling shows that both candidates are even more-admired than Obama and Hillary were with each others' supporters at this point in 2008. We're just seeing a very loud, whiny minority online.

She is an ally so you can stop with that nonsense
and I'm fairly certain she said she wants to appoint a judge that will strike down citizens united which certainly isnt pro corporate
If "moderate/corporatist" Bill Clinton could nominate a justice as liberal as Ginsburg back in 1993, Hillary should have no problem nominating someone similarly liberal.

Those who think that the influence of corporate money (via Citizens) is a big root of our problems: this is your chance. You get to demonstrate how serious you are about this.
 
Niddog doesnt speak for the millions of Sanders supporters, thanks.

I'm friends with Sanders supporters. I go to school with Sanders supporters.

To a person, every last one of them has told a flabbergasted me that they'd rather not vote than vote for Hillary.

Anecdotal, sure. But it's what feeds my feelings of being ashamed of my fellow liberals.

Edit: Just asked my friend here and his wife. He said he'd vote for her but "through tears" and she just nodded. So I guess it's not everyone...
 
Thankfully, polling shows that both candidates are even more-admired than Obama and Hillary were with each others' supporters at this point in 2008. We're just seeing a very loud, whiny minority online.

Yeah there was a poll yesterday (?) that showed vast majority of Clinton/Sanders supporters would vote for the other in the general.
 
I'm friends with Sanders supporters. I go to school with Sanders supporters.

To a person, every last one of them has told a flabbergasted me that they'd rather not vote than vote for Hillary.

Anecdotal, sure. But it's what feeds my feelings of being ashamed of my fellow liberals.
I would rather not vote than vote for Hilary.
Of course I will but i'd rather not.
 
Exactly. And it honestly pisses me off seeing some of the responses because I refuse to fall in line and hold my nose because somehow that means Hillary will honestly appoint liberal judges. Hillary is not a liberal, she's a populist that will fall wherever the wind blows. If it's more lucrative politically for her to appoint a pro-corporate judge she'll do it. This is the same woman who went on TV to defend DOMA, and we're honestly supposed to just pretend that she's now an ally?

I just can't in good faith believe that she'll somehow do anything to help us. So I'll just abstain.

Then you were never serious about change to begin with.

Hillary has one of the most liberal voting records in the Senate, and sided with Bernie over 90 percent of the time. She was always more liberal than Bill, and was frequently seen as a liability by his campaign because of it. And she's been advocating for liberal causes, particularly healthcare reform and AA rights, her entire political career and before it. You're spectacularly uninformed about a candidate that you're so sure will fuck "us" over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom