Yes they do especially on the internet. Reddit, 4chan, mens rights, pick up artists, "nice guys" etc etc.Losers exist everywhere, but they don't THRIVE everywhere. I think that was the point being made.
Yes they do especially on the internet. Reddit, 4chan, mens rights, pick up artists, "nice guys" etc etc.Losers exist everywhere, but they don't THRIVE everywhere. I think that was the point being made.
Did Gamer Gate even bother to read her paper? I mean, like the first paragraph sums up how odd it is to go after her...
It's literally about how we shouldn't try and enforce our Western values on Japanese entertainment we deem worthy of being censored---she's on their side when it comes to censoring Japanese media!
This is what pisses me off the most about Gamer Gate, they don't fucking care how obvious they make it that they're hypocrites.
While the Internet isn't exactly responsible for GG, many websites, such as Twitter, condone their existence by allowing them a space to voice their stupid shit and to continue harassing others.
Isn't this what GAF does all the time?
Whatever.
I hope Nintendo doesn't do anything but support this girl. That's some real shit what these people are doing to her.
You need to relax.
Yes...Gamergate is a bunch of rabid dogs but the "internet" isn't the problem.
To the latter point, I saw a tweet floating around where she talks about how she's advocated for lowering the age of consent. I can see how that could end up being used against her to make that argument.
edit: found it -- https://twitter.com/alisonrapp/status/663605234485235712
![]()
wat
I googled and found this quote of hers-
Well, those goobergate assholes really want a shitshow, but well, this is one of those things you don't touch with a 20 foot pole.
Because she's a woman?Based on that thesis title, why did they decide that she was the one who was denying their God given right to have face rubbing minigames and teenage characters in fetish costumes in their NoA games?
Games absolutely were part of the equation, the constant terrible portrayals of women and lack of inclusiveness in the the industry that still continues in many ways, (look at many high profile Japanese games released this year and last year for instance), bred a large community of misogynists who go crazy when minorities and women want to be treated like actual people instead of stereotyped and idealized for the an intended 18-35 year old hetero white male audience, ofc not all gamers are like that, and at this point the number of them will most definitely get smaller because a lot o high profile developers finally got the memo but it's a fucking shame that there is such a large contingent of them that they have a movement that has been active for years dedicated to shit like this.Losers exist everywhere.
This is a bunch of lonely pests that exist anywhere. They are the problem not games.
Man, imagine getting so rattled by not seeing underboob and shit in your videogames that you make a coordinated effort to get someone fired and unemployable. And then framing it as some sort of culture war.
Just checked: http://www.gaming-age.com/forums
Looks like GAF no longer exists
Are you talking about a different GAF? Do you have any specific examples of the GAF doing what you are accusing it of or are you just making accusations up out of thin air?
![]()
i don't know what gamergate quite is and i haven't been involved in that discussion. or the fire emblem discussion. i don't know who this woman is or know about any agenda against her. But if she is arguing in favor of lowering age of consent (which is where i imagine the pedo comments come from?) and laxer porn laws, and also arguing in favor of "depictions of sexualized minors", would Nintendo really want someone like that to represent their company?
Do I or have I grossly misinterpreted something from those tweets? i'm seriously asking, i'm honestly not in the know about gamergate and i don't have a pitchfork hunting anyone or anything.
![]()
i don't know what gamergate quite is and i haven't been involved in that discussion. or the fire emblem discussion. i don't know who this woman is or know about any agenda against her. But if she is arguing in favor of lowering age of consent (which is where i imagine the pedo comments come from?) and laxer porn laws, and also arguing in favor of "depictions of sexualized minors", would Nintendo really want someone like that to represent their company?
Do I or have I grossly misinterpreted something from those tweets? i'm seriously asking, i'm honestly not in the know about gamergate and i don't have a pitchfork hunting anyone or anything.
To be honest if someone said they sided with laxing child porn possession laws depicting manga characters in that offtopic thread 5-6 months ago about Japan banning it, hell would of dawned on them. Yet she states it there on 48.
I admit: I'm confused.
Where did Gamergate convince Jamie Walton to go after Alison Rapp? Did this happen in private messaging where we won't be able to see it? Or does Jamie identify with Gamergate? I'm not defending those idiots, I'm just not seeing the connection here.
I don't buy it. If it wasn't games for this brand of losers it'd be movies or tv or "sjws" or any number of things.Games absolutely were part of the equation, the constant terrible portrayals of women and inclusiveness of the industry that still continues in many ways, (look at many high profile Japanese games for instance), bred a large community of misogynists who go crazy when minorities and women want to be treated like actual people instead of stereotyped and idealized for the an intended 18-35 year old hetero white male audience, ofc not all gamers are like that, but it's a fucking shame that such a large contingent of them are that they have a movement that has been active for years.
I don't understand what they are even after?
GG supporters should go outside, talk a walk, and think about what they are doing with their life, maybe have a social interaction.
Without the internet, Gamergate wouldn't have thrived.
Considering that her thesis is available to read right on her LinkIn, I would imagine Nintendo is aware of it. But no, GGers think they found some dark secret of hers. They make me ill.
Something along the lines of "I'm a woman, I work for [videogame company]," I'm sure. That absolute bitch.Jesus. What the fuck did she say that pissed off Gamergate so much?
I just looked at this woman's thesis and it made me queasy as the father of two girls. No question she's a child porn apologist. I don't care about this Gamergate crap but it is weird to me that someone with those extreme views would be employed in such a public-facing position by Nintendo.
I just looked at this woman's thesis and it made me queasy as the father of two girls. No question she's a child porn apologist. I don't care about this Gamergate crap but it is weird to me that someone with those extreme views would be employed in such a public-facing position by Nintendo.
It ofc is a social problem, however, considering it's called gamergate, it can be inferred the majority of GG supporters were affected by gaming first and foremost. Especially considering that the movement was started for the sole purpose of harassing the hell of a developer who was a woman while hiding under the thinly veiled excuse of "ethics in games journalism." That's not saying that they weren't influenced by other similar stupid shit in other mediums.I don't buy it. If it wasn't games for this brand of losers it'd be movies or tv or "sjws" or any number of things.
This type of impotent right wing rage is going strong in places totally unrelated to gaming. Whilst issues around depictions obviously exist I don't buy the argument that this is purely a video game problem than a social one.
I just looked at this woman's thesis and it made me queasy as the father of two girls. No question she's a child porn apologist. I don't care about this Gamergate crap but it is weird to me that someone with those extreme views would be employed in such a public-facing position by Nintendo.
![]()
Do I or have I grossly misinterpreted something from those tweets? i'm seriously asking, i'm honestly not in the know about gamergate and i don't have a pitchfork hunting anyone or anything.
I just looked at this woman's thesis and it made me queasy as the father of two girls. No question she's a child porn apologist. I don't care about this Gamergate crap but it is weird to me that someone with those extreme views would be employed in such a public-facing position by Nintendo.
As mentioned above a lot of academic papers, particularly those focused on ethics make arguments that the writer may not actually hold. Thinking about these things, taking positions contrary to one's own and having views at 20 that would not be palatable to someone five years later is not unusual.
Yeah, I'm sure I'm missing something as this is absolutely mind-boggling to me.So to recap, GG is hurling accusations of pedophilia advocacy as a retaliatory strike against... NOA not including a slice of content in their game that encouraged the player to stroke the faces and tousle the hair of cooing young girls?
Jesus kickboxing Christ, the obliviousness to irony in the GG movement is astounding.
Something along the lines of "I'm a woman, I work for [videogame company]," I'm sure. That absolute bitch.
This puts Nintendo in a bad spot
If it wasn't games it'd be something else. Reddit, mens rights, anti pc bullshit existed before gamergate. I put zero stock in what they choose to call it.It ofc is a social problem, however, considering it's called gamergate, it can be inferred the majority of GG supporters were affected by gaming first and foremost. Especially considering that the movement was started for the sole purpose of harassing the hell of a developer who was a woman while hiding under the thinly veiled excuse of "ethics in games journalism."
You write all sorts of shit in academia, they are the definition of scholarly hot takes.
I once wrote an argument in favor of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a moderate leader in Iran, like a year before he cancelled elections and attempted to become a despot. It was a devil's advocate position paper, essentially.
But you can also add Miss Rapp to the long list of people that really don't know how to manage their social media presence.
Yeah, I'm sure I'm missing something as this is absolutely mind-boggling to me.
Is it because she's just the easiest NoA target they could find, who happened to make a random statement they don't like?