Quantum Break has many more layers of production, budget, production values, and teams. It's a fully curated campaign with actors, complex textures and capturing, fully planned maps, battles, object placement, writing, and more. No Man's Sky has none of that and its value right now looks similar to Minecraft in that it has far fewer produced and curated elements, no plot or characters, and very limited staff - so like the much much cheaper Minecraft, the "hundreds of hours" are entirely tied to how many ways elements repeating in a largely aimless scenario can be turned into fun by yourself.
No Man's Sky is a photo frame priced like hardcover art books. It can be argued theres going to be plenty filling it with value and that it's a different class of game and done of a quality that justifies the price, but for many, it looks pretty empty for the cost and its chosen a cost reserved for thorough production, artists, texturers (hell No Man's Sky seems to simply have many surfaces, if not most just being flatly colored or gradient filled surfaces, smooth and missing mapping and texture by design, which also makes it look simple), actors, designed encounters and places, etc.
I don't see it on the production level that gaming normally sets for the $60 tier but maybe there's more to it for me I can't pinpoint.
