Is Kotaku in danger of shutting down?

Gawker deserved to lose the case but I'd be very sad to see Kotaku go. They've been doing a lot of great things recently and have some great people writing for them.
There like, what, the 2nd or 3rd most popular gaming site around? All this talk of gloom about even the most popular getting no more clicks due to other distractions yet they get taken out over something else?
 
Kotaku is a site that is capable of some good actual journalism, I always refer to their piece on the final years of LucasArts as an example that there are people out there who can provide good work in the gaming media.

I don't go there often as I used to for various reasons but it would be shitty to see many jobs lost like that. It's terrible being laid off especially if you have a family of your own.
 
I'm very pleased with this decision because what happened with Hogan was complete bullshit. I stopped liking Kotaku a long time ago and most of the current writers are pretty awful and just try and write shitty clickbait articles or inject their opinions on bullshit that isn't related to gaming in their articles. Those are the writers at risk and I can say I'm glad they are at risk. The few writers at kotaku who dont spout garbage will be fine and most likely able to easily find a new job at another gaming related site.
 
Shit happens in journalism. Hell I was disappointed in Gawker when I outed that CEO a few months back. But still good people worked there and actively cheering for their demise (especially for a gaming site that had nothing to do with it) is a rather childish way of thinking.

There are good people at lots of organizations. Some of those organizations are better off gone. Tough.
 
There's no way they'll break up Kotaku, they'll sell it onto someone else. It's a v. profitable site.


Kotaku has peddled a lot of shit over the years, has been pretty cancerous really. But unfortunately they also have Jason Schreier and are the only guys who are big enough to give publishers the two fingers and release leaks.
 
The subsites in the Gawker network are not equally bad by association. I dunno where that's coming from. There are plenty of subsites that never participated in the awfulness of Gawker, and also have decent and good journalists.

Gawker, the specific site and the owner of them all was bad and tried to ruin people's lives.

--

Just trying to help clarify matters for some.
 
The hell? I used to respect Jamie for her work for The Wayne Foundation but maybe she's not the person I thought she was.

Apparently related to this article of his, which quotes an email from her to him. Tried following the thread on twitter because they seem to converse with one another about it but it turns into an indiscernible fucking mess and i can't figure out the specifics of it.
 
A site you have absolutely no obligation to read whatsoever? A site with some incredibly informative articles for an audience that borderline hates learning about the nitty gritty of game's development or how projects can go wrong.

Yeah exactly.

I would love to never see retweets from their site on my feed or just seeing the name in thread titles.

It's that simple.
 
Sorry for all the people dragged into this as a result of one of many really dumb and kinda nasty decisions made by the Gawker editorial staff, but siding with Hogan was the right thing to do. Regardless of how you view the guy, everybody deserves a basic right to privacy. Shame that Kotaku will be collateral damage as they do some good stuff, but the guys working there know what kind of organisation they are representing.
 
They weren't, but by being part of that brand, if the brand is shady and gets shot for it..well, those linked in the same "body" take the same "wounds" so to speak.

Nobody here is calling Kotaku a bunch of shysters
. It's that if Gawker is getting buried, Kotaku will be dragged with them. That's just what it is: not good, not bad, but what it is.
Except the guy openly admitted to loathing Kotaku.

Yeah exactly.

I would love to never see retweets from their site on my feed or just seeing the name in thread titles.

It's that simple.
That's pretty sad. Seriously it is. There are a multitude of rational ways to prevent seeing Kotaku articles besides "Yay these people lost their jobs and the site closed down because of someone else's fuckery," (hide thread GAF extension for instance).
 
The subsites in the Gawker network are not equally bad by association. I dunno where that's coming from. There are plenty of subsites that never participated in the awfulness of Gawker, and also have decent and good journalists.

Gawker, the specific site and the owner of them all was bad and tried to ruin people's lives.

--

Just trying to help clarify matters for some.

Would you be equally compassionate if breitbart went under?
 
Hope the people at Kotaku find a good place for themselves if it comes down to it. At the same time good riddance to the shady nonsense that Gawker peddles. They deserved to lose.

Man i hope one day you need to provide for a family and get fired. Thats some cold wishes no matter how bad you dislike someone. It still puts you in a financial predicament

That sounds rather hypocritical of you.
 
n his final appeal to the jury, Bollea attorney Kenneth Turkel described Gawker as a website run by morally debased, traffic-hungry writers who don't believe the right to privacy exists for anyone. Pointing to an interview in which Denton said, "privacy invasion has a positive effect on society," Turkel scoffed.

Ouch. Damn.
 
Probably the most excited I've been for anything related to Pro Wrestling in decades.
Lol. Damn dude, that is so cold, but it did make me laugh.


Anyway, I do feel sympathy for the people who may lose jobs who had nothing to do with this, HOWEVER, Gawker deserved to get their asses sued for this, it's not okay to post someone else's sex tapes, nor is it legal.
 
Hope the people at Kotaku find a good place for themselves if it comes down to it. At the same time good riddance to the shady nonsense that Gawker peddles. They deserved to lose.



That sounds rather hypocritical of you.
Oh i know just saying as an example
 
There are good people at lots of organizations. Some of those organizations are better off gone. Tough.

Yeah god I forbid I empathize with people. I mean imagine if you were apart of a subsidiary of a shady organization where you had nothing to do with their shady dealings. That organization goes under and you lose your job. Tough.
 
The subsites in the Gawker network are not equally bad by association. I dunno where that's coming from. There are plenty of subsites that never participated in the awfulness of Gawker, and also have decent and good journalists.

Gawker, the specific site and the owner of them all was bad and tried to ruin people's lives.

--

Just trying to help clarify matters for some.

To be fair, there's some people who were disappointed with how the Kotaku staff handled the Conde Nast scandal.
 
Yeah god I forbid I empathize with people. I mean imagine if you were apart of a subsidiary of a shady organization where you had nothing to do with their shady dealings. That organization goes under and you lose your job. Tough.

Things come and things go.

The people worth their weight will probably be able to carry on.
 
Would you be equally compassionate if breitbart went under?

I don't even know their network, but I know Breitbart is dedicated in trying to ruin people's lives with or without facts or evidence.

I have no compassion for that, same for Gawker, but I do feel bad for those caught in the crossfire like Kotaku which has decent journalists and put in more effort in journalism than any other gaming site.
 
2016 and Hulk Hogan still refuses to put people over ;) Hope the people that dont deserves to loose there jobs find work if Kotaku goes down.
 
To be honest, what the fuck was gawker thinking? Did they honestly think they were above the law when they refused to do the judge's direct order? Too bad that kotaku is associated with this garbage association.
 
The precedent is worth 100 Kotaku's. That's why people are happy.

If this verdict means Kotaku dies, then it dies. It's a shame but the collateral damage is more than worth it. Gawker is scum.
 
Yeah god I forbid I empathize with people. I mean imagine if you were apart of a subsidiary of a shady organization where you had nothing to do with their shady dealings. That organization goes under and you lose your job. Tough.

But if you know the org you work for is shady and you are happy to continue being a part of it, you can't complain too much when it all goes wrong. You're effectively turning a blind eye.
 
What a shitty situation. It sucks that Kotaku folks may be affected by this, but Gawker really needs to go. They've done some shady shit over the past few years, and this is just an example of that.
 
Yeah god I forbid I empathize with people. I mean imagine if you were apart of a subsidiary of a shady organization where you had nothing to do with their shady dealings. That organization goes under and you lose your job. Tough.

Yes, and you know what? I would direct my ire at those actually responsible for me losing my job instead of trying to pin it on people who have rightful reason to dislike the aforementioned shady organization.
 
He's happy that an organization built on ruining people's lives for clicks is going under.

This is really the best news I've heard all day. I just hope they actually do go under for all the shit they've pulled.

No opinion on Kotaku, but this lawsuit is way way bigger than some people in the enthusiast press losing their jobs.
 
Mixed emotions.

Gawker is a toxic company run by ass holes.

Hogan is a racist ass hole who deserters little sympathy.


But there are at least 3 people at kotaku I like and respect and I hope they are not effected by this bullshit.
 
Top Bottom