Batman v Superman Spoiler Thread: Don't believe everything you read, Son

Status
Not open for further replies.
So how do you do the Red Hood story now since the whole premise of the movie hangs on his no killing rule.

Also... why doesn't he just kill all future supervillains from here on out... including Joker.
Have him reform himself to his gentler ways by introducing a Robin to mellow him out. Batman going off the rails over grief only to be pulled back by Dick or Tim is pretty common.
 
HOLY sh*t what a movie.

Stays true to the comics unlike any other DC movie so far.

-Doomsday grows horns
-Death of Superman story line
-Flash time travel
-Injustice story line hinted
-AQUAMANNNN
-Dark Sied is coming
-Batman is bad a*s


Some things which are confusing/misunderstood by many and my interpretations for thesame:

1. That wasn't entirely a dream sequence. It was a nod to Injustice Storyline. In fact, the entire "dream sequence" was probably a future vision OR an alternate universe, where Superman becomes a tyrant after Lois is killed by Joker, and Superman blames Batman for it because he never killed Joker when he had a chance. Since they showed Parademons working with Superman's forces, it seems it was kind of a vision.

2. That guy warning Bruce, was actually Flash (Ezra Miller), from the future using Speedforce. It seems he went back too far by mistake i.e. before formation of Justice League, and hence Bruce doesn't know him. That's why he says: "Too soon Bruce, too soon?" Also he says Lois is the key, again the nod to point 1.

3. Superman dying is PERFECT. That is Death of Superman storyline. Doomsday kills Superman in comics. Its then revealed that Superman never died, his heart beat became so slow that everyone presumed he was dead. By slow I mean, one heart beat in weeks (or was it months???)

4. In the end when Lex says Devil is coming, and those in the stars know that god (Superman) is dead, he means that Darsied is coming. It seems all this was planned by Darksied, to systematically take out Superman before he can invade earth.

5. Batman killing is OKAY. This is TDKR version of Batman, not that pansy Nolan Batman

is... is this a troll post?
 
So how do you do the Red Hood story now since the whole premise of the movie hangs on his no killing rule.

Also... why doesn't he just kill all future supervillains from here on out... including Joker.

The film spells it out. Bats changed after Zod's attack; the branding, extreme measures started months ago. It's framed as him losing hope. By the end he is regretful of all that and changes, or returns, to how he was.
 
To be fair, this is a problem that affected the Nolan films too. Bruce is Batman for about a year, with the only major fights he has being his initial reveal and fight with Ra's and the whole Dent/Joker business. Between that time, we mostly know that he's been fighting low-level crooks. Then he disappears for eight years, shows up a couple more times and is assumed to be dead. Despite this, he's revered and given an honorary statue.

It seems BvS is even worse in this regard, as (despite the Bruce in that world having been around for 20+ years, apparently), Supes is around for six months apparently and has already become revered as a messiah, to the point that he has statues built for him.

I've said it in other topics before, but I wish we had received a straight Supes sequel to really build his mythos before jumping into this.

Yeah, but I said this from the audience PoV. Death of Superman should be something that really matters and not just something that lasts for a year. I know, they will using this as the reason the Justice League will assemble, but it felt so forced and so unecessary.
 
I was expecting mediocre. But this film was terrible.

I preferred Man of Steel which at the time I thought was average. This was many times confusing, poorly edited, and filled with odd/dumb things such as

- Young Bruce is being vacuumed up by swarming bats, oh no wait it was a dream
- Batman paints Superman as the bad guy but is just as reckless and actually more bloodthirsty and sadistic
- Senator just comes out of nowhere with blocking the kryptonite import license just because
- Flash warning from future has no explanation or setup
- Illegally imported kryptonite crate has handy Lexcorp label in case the authorities stumble on it or the mercenaries forget who it belongs to
- Advanced alien spaceship hijacked because it had the security equivalent of an iPhone Touch ID sensor
- All covert tracking devices have big red flashing lights and make beeping sounds
- Gotham and Metropolis are right next to each other?
- Oh Clark is dreaming, no wait he was hallucinating?
- Lois hadn't heard "Martha" from what I could tell but still said "That's his mother"?
- Clark Kent is "missing" but dozens of people are at his funeral?


On the plus side I liked

- Bruce racing around Metropolis
- Bruce training montage
- Affleck's take on Bruce in general
- Batman rescue of Martha Kent
- erm...


Should have gone to Kung Fu Panda 3.

Forgot to mention another annoyance. Martha Kent was gagged and had witch scrawled on her forehead in the polaroids, but was just chilling with a clean forehead (and no gag?) a couple of hours later.
 
Yep. He liked the movie. Must be a troll. Some of you are really silly. You didn't like it. He did. Move on. This incessant need to bash someone for their opinion is really getting out of hand now.

i don't care if people like the movie, but one of his reasons for liking it is "Doomsday grows horns"

maybe I just watch movies differently from other people, but i value things like plot, characterization, pacing, and a script over "omg they stayed true to the comics!"
 
I saw the movie about an hour or so ago and I wanted to like it so much but sadly it's average, if that...

I get what they were trying to do but they jammed 5 different movies into one, making it a convoluted mess. I liked the Snyder "dark and brooding" style but the story was a mess.

What really pissed me off was that the two heroes were not fighting over ideological differences (at least Sups wasn't) but because Luthor Jr kidnapped Clark's mommy... I believe that Luthor should have done to Superman what he did to Batman and let them hash it out until they find out that they were both deceived.

Also, the introduction to the rest of the JTL was horrible.

I quite liked MoS but can't say I liked BvS...

EDIT: Looks like I forgot to mention that Jessie Eisenberg as Luthor was atrocious and one of the worst written characters in the movie.
 
i don't care if people like the movie, but one of his reasons for liking it is "Doomsday grows horns"

maybe I just watch movies differently from other people, but i value things like plot, characterization, pacing, and a script over "omg they stayed true to the comics!"

Yup. Different people, different tastes.
 
i don't care if people like the movie, but one of his reasons for liking it is "Doomsday grows horns"

maybe I just watch movies differently from other people, but i value things like plot, characterization, pacing, and a script over "omg they stayed true to the comics!"

Maybe that's what he cared about. Does it matter?
 
What really pissed me off was that the two heroes were not fighting over ideological differences (at least Sups wasn't) but because Luthor Jr kidnapped Clark's mommy... I believe that Luthor should have done to Superman what he did to Batman and let them hash it out until they find out that they were both deceived.

Yep. It could have been so much better if we actually felt something during the conflict based on these characters' relationship... but we're just seeing two dudes punch each other who haven't met except for once for 30 whole seconds.

The reason Miller's TDKR worked so well in the comics is it played on the decades-long relationship between Bruce and Clark.

There was so much about this movie that just had no emotional weight because it was moving at a breakneck pace towards "we have to figure out how to get these guys to fight for 5 minutes" and doing it in the most hamfisted way possible
 
HOLY sh*t what a movie.

Stays true to the comics unlike any other DC movie so far.

-Doomsday grows horns
-Death of Superman story line
-Flash time travel
-Injustice story line hinted
-AQUAMANNNN
-Dark Sied is coming
-Batman is bad a*s


Some things which are confusing/misunderstood by many and my interpretations for thesame:

1. That wasn't entirely a dream sequence. It was a nod to Injustice Storyline. In fact, the entire "dream sequence" was probably a future vision OR an alternate universe, where Superman becomes a tyrant after Lois is killed by Joker, and Superman blames Batman for it because he never killed Joker when he had a chance. Since they showed Parademons working with Superman's forces, it seems it was kind of a vision.

2. That guy warning Bruce, was actually Flash (Ezra Miller), from the future using Speedforce. It seems he went back too far by mistake i.e. before formation of Justice League, and hence Bruce doesn't know him. That's why he says: "Too soon Bruce, too soon?" Also he says Lois is the key, again the nod to point 1.

3. Superman dying is PERFECT. That is Death of Superman storyline. Doomsday kills Superman in comics. Its then revealed that Superman never died, his heart beat became so slow that everyone presumed he was dead. By slow I mean, one heart beat in weeks (or was it months???)

4. In the end when Lex says Devil is coming, and those in the stars know that god (Superman) is dead, he means that Darsied is coming. It seems all this was planned by Darksied, to systematically take out Superman before he can invade earth.

5. Batman killing is OKAY. This is TDKR version of Batman, not that pansy Nolan Batman

I thought this was a joke at first but as I read on it became clear that this was serious...
You do realize that you're essentially saying you liked the movie because "it has lots of references" right? It really isn't "faithful to the comics" in any way because the most important thing they would be going for if they wanted to do that would have been to make sure that the characters felt true to the source material... which I think even fans of this movie would admit they didn't do, at least for Superman.

"Doomsday grows horns, 10/10 movie not like that BABY shit Nolan trilogy, that was for LITTLE KIDS."

Also lol at the fact that them just doing Death and Return is supposed to be a good thing because "it happened in the comics." Yeah it did, and although it was a great marketing gimmick as time has gone on it's become a pretty reviled storyline.

None of the things you listed in any way shape or form have any bearing on whether or not it was a good movie, at least not by conventional logic.
 
Just seen it.


I was actually ok with the first half of the movie, only thing that was off there was Clarks obsession with Batman. Dude must have heard about Batman growing up, he was 20 years on the job. A vigilante just like himself, I'm sure the positive press must have outweight the negative press so I don't uderstand the hostility at all.

I think the exact moment when the movie broke down and went to hell was when Superman randomly crasht the Batmobile. What was he even thinking doing that? Clark must have witnessed what happened there and that Batman was in pursuit of some heavily armed criminals, and Clark didn't even went after them, just let them go as if Batman was the more dangerous dude on the scene, ridiculous.

Then the entire movie went to shit, everything was rushed as hell. They didn't know how to introduce Wonder Woman, and even less so the other DC characters. How they were revealed to the audience was irritating as fuck. Most people didn't know what the hell went on there.
I like the idea of Superman being pressured into killing Batman, but the execution and the events that unfold there are nonsensical and rushed.

Everything was rushed and not thought through. I shook my head several times in the second half of the movie.

MoS was better!
 
"Doomsday grows horns, 10/10 movie not like that BABY shit Nolan trilogy, that was for LITTLE KIDS."

yeah, this is kinda what I was getting at when i called it a "troll post"

ok, like movies for whatever reason you want, but it's hard for me to take opinions like this seriously, at least in a way that matters to me
 
The problem is both of you took a thing he said he liked and combined it with another aspect of what he said that didn't entirely relate to create a new ridiculous statement to bash him for. Anyone can do that. For example...

Original statement:
"yeah, this is kinda what I was getting at when i called it a "troll post"

ok, like movies for whatever reason you want, but it's hard for me to take opinions like this seriously, at least in a way that matters to me"

New nitpick statement:
"Yea, like whatever you want it'll be a troll post"
 
Well I am very very forgiving when it comes to Superhero movies. In fact, except the last Fantastic Four, there isn't a SINGLE superhero movie I disliked.

Anyways the points part was for explaining what most non-comic reading people might have missed/misunderstood.
 
None of the things you listed in any way shape or form have any bearing on whether or not it was a good movie, at least not by conventional logic.

If you apply conventional logic to any random Superhero movie out there, then there is no such thing as a good superhero movie. I or anyone can find tons of faults in any superhero movie out there by applying conventional logic.
 
If you apply conventional logic to any random Superhero movie out there, then there is no such thing as a good superhero movie. I or anyone can find tons of faults in any superhero movie out there by applying conventional logic.

I don't think he means "were the things that happened in the movie grounded in reality."

I think he means:

  • Was the plot comprehensible?
  • Were the characters' actions and motivations justified?
  • Was the dialogue believable?
  • Was the movie edited well?
  • Was the soundtrack appropriate?
You know, things that people would generally agree make a good movie.

But again, please enjoy whatever you want to enjoy, I don't want to take that away from you.
 
If you apply conventional logic to any random Superhero movie out there, then there is no such thing as a good superhero movie. I or anyone can find tons of faults in any superhero movie out there by applying conventional logic.
Bullshit. There is one thing with human looking aliens and one thing with a move that fells apart when you think about it a second. Like why didnt flew Superman never over this small river to Gotham when there is so much crime while he is busy saving people in Mexico?
 
The problem is both of you took a thing he said he liked and combined it with another aspect of what he said that didn't entirely relate to create a new ridiculous statement to bash him for. Anyone can do that. For example...

Original statement:
"yeah, this is kinda what I was getting at when i called it a "troll post"

ok, like movies for whatever reason you want, but it's hard for me to take opinions like this seriously, at least in a way that matters to me"

New nitpick statement:
"Yea, like whatever you want it'll be a troll post"

You're right that I just used that one example, but if you look at the entire post every single thing on there ,these things that collectively made the movie "badass," were just references or shout outs. I addressed this in my original post as well, but my point was that all of those things, from "Death and Return storyline" to "Flash time travel" to "Darkseid is coming" aren't reasons that a movie is good or bad. That would be like if I praised Boyhood as a great movie and backed it up with "this movie features a clip of Dragon Ball Z on the TV."

Again I'm not trying to start something, just want to hear more about what he actually liked beyond the references. Often times I think people point to stuff like that as reasons why they like something but really haven't thought about it beyond this surface level stuff. It's obviously absolutely fine that he liked the movie.
 
Which begs the question, why does Superman even know that particular Bat signal is for him?

Hell, for all he knows, it could have be Gordon signaling the Batman.

There was nothing special about his usage of the signal that would make it Superman-centric.

Speaking of fires, wouldn't Superman's frozen breath have come in handy as a bomb is going off? As a building is burning?!?!?

WHY DIDN'T HE USE HIS FREEZE BREATH?!?!?

AND WHERE WAS HIS X RAY VISION ON THE BOMB WHEELCHAIR?!?!?!
I find it fascinating how some people manage to go out of their way to see a movie and then not even pay enough attention to it to understand it, because you clearly must have sat in the theater on your phone or something.
 
Bullshit. There is one thing with human looking aliens and one thing with a move that fells apart when you think about it a second. Like why didnt flew Superman never over this small river to Gotham when there is so much crime while he is busy saving people in Mexico?

Do you use that logic when it comes to the comics? Oh why doesn't Superman just fly over to Gotham and solve all their problems?
 
How the hell would he know to check? (X Ray)

Rewatch the movie.

He hears the tick and actually turns in the direction of the sounds. Being able to move faster than a speeding bullet and use freeze breath may have been helpful there.

Instead, the script called for him to completely asleep at the wheel through the entire scene.

I find it fascinating how some people manage to go out of their way to see a movie and then not even pay enough attention to it to understand it, because you clearly must have sat in the theater on your phone or something.

I don't get this. Is it a reference to something?
 
I find it fascinating how some people manage to go out of their way to see a movie and then not even pay enough attention to it to understand it, because you clearly must have sat in the theater on your phone or something.

my favorite type of post, the one where someone swoops in and says "pshaw, you clearly didn't understand [thing]" then conveniently doesn't explain what they think the thing meant
 
Do you use that logic when it comes to the comics? Oh why doesn't Superman just fly over to Gotham and solve all their problems?
Makes less sense when Gotham is just across the river. Go to the last couple of pages, Ive posted a couple of that things.
Like Clark Kent, working for a big Newspaper, who doesnt know who Bruce Wayne is.
The movie has tons of that things. The Gotham/Metropolis is even one of the smaller examples, it just came into my mind.
 
my favorite type of post, the one where someone swoops in and says "pshaw, you clearly didn't understand [thing]" then conveniently doesn't explain what they think the thing meant
Okay he's confused by how Superman knew the Bat-Signal was for him? Well immediately after Luthors Kryptonite is stolen Lex kidnaps Lois and Ma Kent and then tells Superman to go fight Batman or else his mom dies. And literally the scene following the bombing Clark tells Lois that he didn't see the bomb because he wasn't looking for it, because he was living in a dream world where men are good, and sees it as the world rejecting Superman so he flies off.
 
Makes less sense when Gotham is just across the river. Go to the last couple of pages, Ive posted a couple of that things.
Like Clark Kent, working for a big Newspaper, who doesnt know who Bruce Wayne is.
The movie has tons of that things. The Gotham/Metropolis is even one of the smaller examples, it just came into my mind.

Yeah and in some comics Gotham and Metropolis are just across the bay from each other.

It is odd however that he's never heard of Bruce Wayne but that's nitpick territory for me.
 
You're right that I just used that one example, but if you look at the entire post every single thing on there ,these things that collectively made the movie "badass," were just references or shout outs. I addressed this in my original post as well, but my point was that all of those things, from "Death and Return storyline" to "Flash time travel" to "Darkseid is coming" aren't reasons that a movie is good or bad. That would be like if I praised Boyhood as a great movie and backed it up with "this movie features a clip of Dragon Ball Z on the TV."

Again I'm not trying to start something, just want to hear more about what he actually liked beyond the references. Often times I think people point to stuff like that as reasons why they like something but really haven't thought about it beyond this surface level stuff. It's obviously absolutely fine that he liked the movie.

And that's what made the movie good to him. I don't understand why that personally matters to you. At least on such a way you feel the need to bash him for it. Is it too much to say you just don't agree with his assessment and maybe engage him in conversation? Or just outright ignore him instead of trying to tear his opinion apart like yours matters anymore than his does.

I'm kind of ranting here. I'm not trying to attack you but I've been seeing this a lot and not just for BvS.
 
Okay he's confused by how Superman knew the Bat-Signal was for him? Well immediately after Luthors Kryptonite is stolen Lex kidnaps Lois and Ma Kent and then tells Superman to go fight Batman or else his mom dies. And literally the scene following the bombing Clark tells Lois that he didn't see the bomb because he wasn't looking for it, because he was living in a dream world where men are good, and sees it as the world rejecting Superman so he flies off.

So how does Lex know that the signal is for him? There is nothing but the script that suggests that.

And your shitty explanation for the other plot point where Superman just falls asleep when a bomb goes off because the script needed it to.

GTFOOH, breh.
 
Bullshit. There is one thing with human looking aliens and one thing with a move that fells apart when you think about it a second. Like why didnt flew Superman never over this small river to Gotham when there is so much crime while he is busy saving people in Mexico?

All superhero movie fall apart when you apply similar logic.

Why doesn't Tony Stark build Iron Man armors for all Avengers. Imagine Hulk wearing a Hulk Buster armor OR Captain America flying around in Mark 52. Then can destroy all supervillains like they are nothing.
 
I find it fascinating how some people manage to go out of their way to see a movie and then not even pay enough attention to it to understand it, because you clearly must have sat in the theater on your phone or something.

image.php
 
Might have been more believable than that bullshit we saw on screen. I wouldn't know, since, you know, I was looking at my phone or whatever.

At an advanced screening.



Fantastic retort.

Ok, so I tell you to go find Batman or else your mom dies.

The Bat signal is activated, the signal used to call Batman.

Where do you think you'll find Batman?
 
Ok, so I tell you to go find Batman or else your mom dies.

The Bat signal is activated, the signal used to call Batman.

Where do you think you'll find Batman?

Superman doesn't need a Bat signal to know where Batman is. Also, Lex isn't coordinating with Batman so it's not like he said, "turn on the signal and I'll send him there". Batman, in a vacuum, is turning on his own signal, hoping to lure Superman there for a face off but has no idea if it will work or not.

In the movie, it makes abstract sense but in reasonable logic, it's clown shoes.
 
Superman doesn't need a Bat signal to know where Batman is. Also, Lex isn't coordinating with Batman so it's not like he said, "turn on the signal and I'll send him there". Batman, in a vacuum, is turning on his own signal, hoping to lure Superman there for a face off but has no idea if it will work or not.

In the movie, it makes abstract sense but in reasonable logic, it's clown shoes.

In reasonable logic there's also the "bury the signal" scene.
 
In reasonable logic there's also the "bury the signal" scene.

He tells him not to come to the signal if it goes up, implying that if Gordon or whoever summons him, don't bother going.

The signal being used to summon Superman (and more directly, Lex knowing it's him that turned it on) is a hilarious leap the script makes for reasons.
 
I saw it and don't get the hate the movie gets or the horrible reviews. I mean it might not be perfect but that low reviews are really questionable. I liked the movie and personally can't wait for justice league.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom