Batman v. Superman RT Thread: like standing ovations in rain

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can we get rid of Snyder now please

NUP_170510_0238.jpg
 
Audience score before release: 110k reviews, 95%

Audience score after release: 124k reviews, 78%

This is just for all the "I just pay attention to user scores anyway" people.

134k reviews and 74% now. I'm also not seeing any places on the internet where the majority clearly liked the film. Just the 30% that'd like any superhero movie as long as it's "dark" or has action in it, same reason as how 30% of reviewers somehow like it. Really doesn't seem like it's going to see a critic/fan split some people were hoping for.
 
I've just watch it, I swear I want it to be good
Good God I reeeally want it to be good
Fuck Lex Luthor
Fuck the story
Fuck Doomsday
Dammit DC don't mix two story arc in to one
Fuck even Anry Joe hate it and he loves MOS

One thing for sure Batman and Zimmer are incredible
 
He's not a good director. Snyder focuses on the action of a scene rather than the characters/actors and it definitely shows with the amount of emptiness.

Nope, he's not not. He can make great trailers though.

This movie as 3-4 four movies in one single movie that should have been stadalone: it's a sequel to MoS, an introduction movie to the new Batman, Supes and Batman meeting and clashing against each other and sort of a build up movie to the Justice League.
 
I think they'll show that reviews don't matter. It's Bats vs Supes, people will flock to this.

Not only because it's a movie with both Batman and Superman, but the vast majority of the public a) do not read reviews, and just go off of advertising and b) most of the genreal public is probably expecting it to be about as good as any of the Marvel films that this film is leeching some good will from.

But come on. It's Zack Snyder. He's the epitome of eye-candy, brainless entertainment. I don't actually know who's the worst between him and Michael Bay in that regard.

He's a good Director, the films are just going to need better writers.

He has the potential to direct decent films (see: Dawn of the Dead and Watchmen), but everything else he's done has been hot garbage. Yes, that also includes the millennial favorite 300.
 
134k reviews and 74% now. I'm also not seeing any places on the internet where the majority clearly liked the film. Just the 30% that'd like any superhero movie as long as it's "dark" or has action in it, same reason as how 30% of reviewers somehow like it. Really doesn't seem like it's going to see a critic/fan split some people were hoping for.

74% is a clear majority. I'm not sure what you're talking about.
 
Xmen Origins: Wolverine is at 38% rt.
It's the superior film.

This this just hit me hard.

But, then again, having Batman and Superman so totally botched in this film did remind me of how much Origins: Wolverine missed the point with Deadpool too. At least BvS has them LOOK like how they're supposed to, even if they don't act like they should...
 
I think they'll show that reviews don't matter. It's Bats vs Supes, people will flock to this.


I agree in case of Batman and Superman, but the quality of this film matters a lot for the lesser known tie-in films. I deem chances of films about Aquaman, Green Lantern etc. etc. being a success much less now.

Sure, stuff like the recent awful Transformers, Turtles, and Spidey films will always do well, and this one will do so as well. But when they make lesser-known spin-offs, the core attraction really needs to make people want to see more of the universe/series. And I have my doubts from what I am reading. Maybe Suicide Squad manages to fix this a bit.
 
Plz, don't let zack snyder ever direct again.

Thank you.

He needs a top tier editor...someone that will fight him to the death to make sure his cinematography makes some goddamn sense.

This movie was all over the place.
Transitioning was none existent.
I felt like the Flash travailing through time and space between some scenes.

I hope there is some crazy fan out there that will take the bluray of this movie and do a proper edit.
 
I'm sure that's how alot of people are gonna feel after this weekend. The potential was there for a great movie.

The pieces were there, even if the premise was a little weak. If the movie had proper pacing and proper editing it could have been a good movie.
 
74% is a clear majority. I'm not sure what you're talking about.

The film had a massive (likely bot-driven) ballet stuff when user reviews were first allowed. BvS had over half the lifetime user ratings as Age of Ultron (which had enough viewers to hit $1.4B and the top 10 of all time) before it was even in general release outside of midnight showings in a few EU countries.
 
The film had a massive (likely bot-driven) ballet stuff when user reviews were first allowed. BvS had over half the lifetime user ratings as Age of Ultron (which had enough viewers to hit $1.4B and the top 10 of all time) before it was even in general release outside of midnight showings in a few EU countries.
Never trust usergenerated scores with franchises or brands that are loved by Fanboys.
 
The pieces were there, even if the premise was a little weak. If the movie had proper pacing and proper editing it could have been a good movie.

It could have been leagues better if it were streamlined and not as jumbled.
Editing won't save Eisenberg's terrible Luthor, or even the murderous Batman, but it would at least make the movie better.
 
Now that I've had a little more time to reflect on the movie.

LEX LUTHOR PISS JAR

WHO WROTE THAT SHIT IN?!!

Now that you mention the scene... I didn't notice that
the guy sends her loyal assitant into the capitol and blew her up like a prescindible asset

And that just hit my head hard as to what kind of character the guy is ._.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom