PS4K information (~2x GPU power w/ clock+, new CPU, price, tent. Q1 2017)

Personally, I have little faith that the AAA players will suddenly restain themselves from flexing their graphical prowess when presented with even an incremental hardware upgrade.

Like I said earlier, if this new business model takes off, I'd fully expect some games to eventually eschew "mere" framerate/IQ improvements in favor of graphical features (think Gameworks) exclusive to the 4K version. It'd certainly make for easier marketing. And then we'd arrive back to the same issue of fluctuating framerates/dynamic resolutions we've always had.

Call me jaded, I guess.


You could totally be right about this, in which case that'd suck. I just want games to run more smoothly!
 
Thanks for posting!

Guess getting that PS4 for $300 wasn't the best purchase decision I made recently. Then again, who knows what $400-$500 USD will be in CAD when this launches.

At least I got the matte model!

I feel so conflicted right now. As it stands the reg ps4 is half a grand. This upgrade is likely to be more.

We need trade in values for this thing and best believe EB Games is gonna milk the trade-in promos hard.
 
The way I see this, the 4.5 guarantees you get the best out of the 4, even faster.

You're assuming that telltale or indies will spend lot of money in order to target the high end spec of the ps4k with his tiny userbase, instead of just targeting the ps4? That doesn't make any sense.

And as far as I know every telltale games and lot of indies are already being released on pc. Do you blame the pc version when their games doesn't run well on ps4?

THANK_YOU.gif~original

No way that SCE will just push away almost 40 millions of its install base for their new PS4! Sure the transition will be easier as devs and console makers get closer to the next gen of "platforms", but the publishers/indies will fully take advantage of the install base current numbers (PS4+XB1) to maximize its profitability on a longer term... or until the systems are maxed out to the brim. We are not witnessing a transition of something on the level of PS3 to PS4 (2013). We are going from PS4/XB1 to PS4K/XB1.5. SCE/MS will not ditch out their current fan/user base for the sake of devs asking for more power.
 
OP says the chip is smaller than ps4's

That means it uses polaris for sure, which is a 14nm new gen gpu (instead of ps4's gpu on 28nm)

A smaller chip means a lower cost, which means it'll be cheaper to make than the ps4


The cpu is unknown so there's no conclusions to be drawn for it

No. 14nm wafers are still more expensive than the more mature and available process of 28nm
 
Afaik studios can't undercut the price too soon because it will hurt their partnership with retailers. There have been many cases where a multi-platform is cheaper on Steam/ Origin/ uPlay than on PSN. The only possible explanation is that they have certain "contracts" with retailers for console games.

I'm saying: Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, & 3rd party publishers aren't going to lower the prices just because physical media "may be gone." They're going to want to make as much money off of people as possible. PC gaming can get away with lower prices of digital games because it's an open platform with many stores & because that no one truly owns the platform. With consoles, you're at the mercy of the manufacturer.

If anything, physical media provides competition on consoles. Why do you think 3rd party publishers want that out of the way? For complete control.
 
Having two machines with the same game will incentivize developers to make them work well on the worse one. Just like PCs, guys! This won't hold back anything at all!

/s
 
Honestly with this new cycle I could see myself simply alternating between Sony and MS every 3 years, thereby never missing an exclusive.
 
Wait a minute, didn't notice it before, according to the OP some games will target the PS4K and than will get downported to PS4? that's horrible and unfair toward early buyers and consumers in general, I thought all games will target PS4 till the PS5 and they will only get higher settings on PS4K.

OP implies some bad cross gen titles (toward the weaker hardware) like SOM, Forza and other late cross gen games that targeted the higher end hardware and got downported with mediocre to horrible results.
 
If the tentative date is Q1 2017, most likely the real date is holiday 2017. Of course MS is the wild card here and I wouldn't be surprised if their plan is fall 2016. Sony does have a habit of being reactionary and leaky for awhile now (psvr anyone). Its possible they are a year behind MS in new hardware and they know it, hence these "leaks" are out there intentionally to downplay MS hardware, to create a sense of "Well I'm already getting PS4K anyway, I know it exists so meh".

In this scenario Sony is rushing to market, hence the Q1 date. The beauty is, Sony has such a lead that you really cant tell if they are behind or ahead. I'm guessing Oculus and MS have a plan for holiday Xbone+ and Sony is reacting with legit leaked "rumors" and indeed are rushing to compete.

Or, If MS is really that far behind, they have an insane uphill battle with Sony. If they dont have an answer for PSVR and PS4K, they are done. Which leads me to believe the former, that MS has jumped the gun on XBO and Sony is playing damage control before anything official has been announced by either party.

MS were the only ones who have actually come out and said this was something they were gonna do. Everything we've gotten from Sony's end has been well-sourced leaks.

Nope. A Sony exec talked about the possibility of an upgraded ps4 last fall. There was a link to it in one of the previous ps4k threads.
 
I suspect it's mostly empty talk. This board makes for some fun drama.

It isn't empty talk in my case. If any of this is true, consoles as we know them are dead, and I want no place in a faux-PC market. I'll just buy into the real thing. I mean, why not? Consoles won't have much value anymore.
 
Wait a minute, didn't notice it before, according to the OP some games will target the PS4K and than will get downported to PS4? that's horrible and unfair toward early buyers and consumers in general, I thought all games will target PS4 till the PS5 and they will only get higher settings on PS4K.

OP implies some bad cross gen titles (toward the weaker hardware) like SOM, Forza and other late cross gen games that targeted the higher end hardware and got downported with mediocre to horrible results.

Yes, this is why the PS4K is terrible, and if real, quite possibly the worst thing to ever happen to the console market. If Xbox follows suit, it could even be the end of the console market, I think.
 
I would have been on board day one, but no improvements to performance in existing games?! Downgrading PS4 games instead of improving them on the new hardware?! Fuck this. Fuck PS4. Fuck Sony. Fuck everything.
 
No. 14nm wafers are still more expensive than the more mature and available process of 28nm

But as die size increases cost goes up more than linearly.

die size cost scales twice :

much more dies out of a wafer if they're smaller
much better yields as you have to toss or bin less dies (nr of faults per wafer stays the same, you have to toss or bin a much smaller percentage of dies)

This is how you justify paying silly prices like 700 euros for a 500mm^2 gpu , but it goes both ways.


Also you always hear that mature process line to justify high costs for gpus on new node shrinks, but then when prices don't actually drop when the new node matures *crickets*

Fresh 28nm 294mm^2 gtx 670: 300 dollar launch price
mature 28nm 294mm^2 gtx 970: 329 dollar launch price

not impressed by the mature process node argument anymore
 
It was also stated that these games will in fact work for the PS4 but with considerable sacrifices made to performance.

I'm fine with the idea of a considerable hardware upgrade for newer versions in theory, but its this bit that scares me. I didn't buy a PS4 to play games running like it were a PS3 last gen port released after the PS4 shipped.
 
Yes, this is why the PS4K is terrible, and if real, quite possibly the worst thing to ever happen to the console market. If Xbox follows suit, it could even be the end of the console market, I think.

Nintendo spoke about this device platform model first, then Sony, then Microsoft. Yes consoles are evolving. No there will not be traditional generations any longer. The 8th one (wii u, ps4, xb1) is technically the last

I would have been on board day one, but no improvements to performance in existing games?! Fuck this. Fuck PS4. Fuck Sony. Fuck everything.

If you want that, you should be in the PC gaming market, where you control your own upgrades and general destiny
 
Very good question.

Twice the spec means around 280X

Twice the performance of the PS4 GPU means more like a Radeon 290/390 or GTX 970.

When comparing the same family of GPU AMD GCN, twice the spec (which some are posting here) doesn't equate to twice the game performance. 280X is about 70% more. 290/390 GTX 970 gives you a clear 100% more.

Got any evidence to back any of this up?

Does the current PS4 operate at a higher level than the 1.8TF would indicate? No.

Why does the 750Ti at 1.3TF match the PS4 in most games?

Why does one of the newest games we can compare(The Division) show like for like GPUs matching the PS4?

The R7 370 a 1.9 TF GPU gets an average of 36 and a minimum of 29 in The Division.

WqzkUfC.png


This is from Techspots 1080p High Benchmark

This does not support your theory that the PS4 or PS4K will out perform equivalent PC hardware.
 
PS4k games are just PS4 games. That's why the panic in here is odd.

The panic is probably due to the fact current games can barely run on current hardware as it is. I could see this going a couple ways. On the one hand, the Ps4k takes off and alienates everybody who bought a regular Ps4, or it becomes somewhat of a pointless upgrade and hardly any developers take real advantage of it.

Nobody can know for sure at this point, as this is a new move in the console space. I would say it is more worrisome than hopeful with the current information though. Will have to wait and see.
 
I'm fine with the idea of a considerable hardware upgrade for newer versions in theory, but its this bit that scares me. I didn't buy a PS4 to play games running like it were a PS3 last gen port released after the PS4 shipped.

Same. Eventually, the PS4 would get replaced by a PS5 and be rendered obsolete after 5-10 years. But outright replacing the PS4 after only 3 years, and screwing over 40+ PS4 owners with horrible versions of games built for the "PS4K". That's awful. Absolutely unbelievable, honestly.
 
Wait... How big of a download file would a 4K game be? I am mostly digital so that is somewhat important

4K is just the resolution the game is rendered at. Makes no difference on the file size, although I have no idea if there will be extra assets for 4K enabled games.

You can go load up Half Life on a PC and kick it up for 4K resolution if you want is all I'm saying.
 
Got any evidence to back any of this up?

Does the current PS4 operate at a higher level than the 1.8TF would indicate? No.

Why does the 750Ti at 1.3TF match the PS4 in most games?

Why does one of the newest games we can compare(The Division) show like for like GPUs matching the PS4?

The R7 370 a 1.9 TF GPU gets an average of 36 and a minimum of 29 in The Division.

WqzkUfC.png


This is from Techspots 1080p High Benchmark

This does not support your theory that the PS4 or PS4K will out perform equivalent PC hardware.

Unfortunately people are still under the false belief that consoles have magic hardware with strange metal inside that's made of unicorn testicles and carmack's misunderstood pixie dust.
 
It isn't empty talk in my case. If any of this is true, consoles as we know them are dead, and I want no place in a faux-PC market. I'll just buy into the real thing. I mean, why not? Consoles won't have much value anymore.

So many posts of this nature.

Not directly to you but if you say Sony has switched to some upgrade cycle, wouldn't you or others be better staying on Playstation? Some have said "I'm a loyal PS gamer but I'm jumping to PC", If you're a console gamer or someone who like the Sony games or just the console ease of use, why would you swap that for a PC upgrade cycle? You'd be better under Sony's wing still, at least in general to most of these type of comments.

Also I doubt this will be every 2-3 years. They got caught short on old 28nm. Sony has VR as well. MS can't be doing 720p and 900p in 2017 beyond. They will take advantage of a new GPU and much improved CPU this time but that might not be worth it next time like Phil says.
 
Release + 1 year purchase for me - if I see enough games using 4k as the lead.. I'll easily buy a new PS every 4-5 years as long as the upgrade is worth ot
 
MS were the only ones who have actually come out and said this was something they were gonna do. Everything we've gotten from Sony's end has been well-sourced leaks.

Nope. A Sony exec talked about the possibility of an upgraded ps4 last fall. There was a link to it in one of the previous ps4k threads.

Found it:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1128578
http://www.4gamer.net/games/990/G999024/20151021121/

Just some rough translation, more on 4gamer

On PlayStation VR:
-"Prices and release date will be announced when it is time."

On 4K Blu-ray/Ultra HD Blu-ray:
-"Current PS4 doesn't support Ultra HD Blu-ray."
-"Support is still under consideration."

On PS4 Performance Boost:
-"Can't talk about the specific content."
-"Thinks performance boost might requires a lot of timing when using something better than x86 architecture."
-"So in other words, it is possible."
-"For example, there are ideas such as releasing a standard PS4 and a high performance PS4."

On PS Vita:
-"No first party titles in development for PS Vita currently."
-"Will leave third party devs to do their best."
-"SCE main focus will be on the PS4."
 
So many posts of this nature.

Not directly to you but if you say Sony has switched to some upgrade cycle, wouldn't you or others be better staying on Playstation? Some have said "I'm a loyal PS gamer but I'm jumping to PC", If you're a console gamer or someone who like the Sony games or just the console ease of use, why would you swap that for a PC upgrade cycle? You'd be better under Sony's wing still, at least in general to most of these type of comments.

Also I doubt this will be every 2-3 years. They got caught short on old 28nm. Sony has VR as well. MS can't be doing 720p and 900p in 2017 beyond. They will take advantage of a new GPU and much improved CPU this time but that might not be worth it next time like Phil says.

I very much doubt that. My PC builds have always lasted longer than 3 years. I'm willing to drop the quality of effects to get a better frame rate, and I can tinker with the game to make it work. Plus all of the games I already own and will continue to own can all be "upgraded" automatically.

On PC, I decide when it's time to upgrade, I decide what performance will be like. I simply don't trust Sony for this particular kind of task.
 
Nintendo spoke about this device platform model first, then Sony, then Microsoft. Yes consoles are evolving. No there will not be traditional generations any longer. The 8th one (wii u, ps4, xb1) is technically the last



If you want that, you should be in the PC gaming market, where you control your own upgrades and general destiny

When did either Sony or Nintendo say anything about upgraded consoles? When did any of the "big three" say this console generation would be cut short, or would be the "last"!? If you're referring to the NX, that's an entirely new console, and we don't know when it's coming out, or what it even is.
 
Posted dozens of pages back, but there were a number of us thinking that PS4 games after PS4K would essentially be what they are right now while PS4K would be closer to how they would look/run on PC.

Is that really such a bad thing? Multiplats on PS4 and Xbox One are already sacrificing performance to run properly compared to their PC versions. This would just be an opportunity for those interested to run games closer to what we see on solid gaming rigs. That line about how software would still run on original PS4s but with considerable sacrifices is essentially what's already going on with consoles and PC.
 
Top Bottom