• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

BATTLEFIELD World Premiere Event May 6 4PM ET/9PM BST

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think DICE is just happy that we still don't know what the setting is and they are having a blast teasing us before the reveal. Honestly, not knowing what it is makes the lead up to the reveal so much more fun.
I agree here. Very excited to learn the setting.

I never thought I would just completely skip a BF game, but after doing so with Hardline I am eager to get back. This is the series I've put the most hours into after Halo... Hope DICE delivers the goods.
 
WW2 would be crazy cool on modern tech.. will suck if it's anything other than an historical setting.
The biggest reason I want a historical setting is to hear what their audio team does with it. Audio got a huge upgrade this gen, and a WWII setting could sound incredible.
 
Battlefield LATAM just posted this video on Facebook:

NHTIMRF.png


https://www.facebook.com/BattlefieldLatam/videos/566305456876058/

The video has the Battlefield 1942 theme song!

Translation: which setting do you think will be the new setting?

HAPPENING.gif

Why didn't I notice this today, is this real or fake?
 
Thinking about the ww2 era is the lack of helicopters, i'm a fan of helicopters in bf3/4 and i can't play a next battlefield without helicopters.A fictional ww2 with vietnam helicopters would be ok for me.
 
Eh, I like BF and own both BF3 & BF4 but I don't like WW1 or WW2. I think I may have to skip this like hardline (but will wait until I see the actual game before making a call).
 
Please be bad company 3
Please be bad company 3
Please be bad company 3
Please be bad company 3


why cant they just make a fucking 3rd one :(
 
Really hoping for WW2.

Also, really hoping that Battlelog is a bit better...it's basically impossible to use the "quick match" options for BF4 and I hate server browsers.

I don't understand how people can still say things like "but im so burned out on WW2!" It's been like 8 years since we had a AAA world war 2 FPS.
 
While that asks if people think it's set in the past, there was another post with 2142 that asked if people thought it would be set in the future, so, eh. They're teasing us all.

That just means one thing:

Battlefield: Timesplitters, Play as Cortez traveling though different battlefields in history, guest starring the BFBC Crew.
 
From a narrative/setting I would like this, from a gameplay hell no. Old timey guns are so plodding and clunky.

That's part of what makes the setting appealing. Less reliance on spray and pray automatic weapons and more emphasis on single shot weapons where you have to make your shots count.
 
Bad time to announce it, everyone is gonna be on the Overwatch beta. Plus, a Friday?

Lol, overwatch, they don't need to worry about that one. Example, I played for a few hours with friends and we uninstalled and cancelled preorders for it.

I just hope BF5 is not current, near future, or future. Would prefer WW2, WW1 is acceptable as is Vietnam.
 
That's part of what makes the setting appealing. Less reliance on spray and pray automatic weapons and more emphasis on single shot weapons where you have to make your shots count.

Wouldn't older weapons have worse spray? I mean it's not like weapons got worse? (I'm seriously asking, I have no idea about weapons)

I also don't think even if they did go back, they'd have automatic weapons fall way to single shot ones... it would probably be balanced.
 
I done care what the setting is, as long as they fix the (literal) scale in the game so that we're not playing as Pygmy soldiers in scaled down vehicles. That aspect of BF3 and BF4 still grates with me. Reduce the FOV slightly if you need to, just fix the damn scale. It's so noticeable going from BFBC2 to the later games and waters down the whole battlefield experience.
 
From a narrative/setting I would like this, from a gameplay hell no. Old timey guns are so plodding and clunky.

Old timey? What the heck do you think they used in WWI? It's not the bloody revolutionary war lol.

WWI had Shotguns, SMG's, MG's, sniper rifles, semi and full auto rifles, melee weapons (everything from bloody maces, knives, to shovels were used), to artillery, horses, tanks, and airplanes.

Basically almost everything you can get in WWII in terms of gameplay, you can get in some form in WWI.

Also for those who might not know much about WWI, it wasn't simply a bunch of trench warfare. Trench warfare was a western front thing, the entire eastern front never devolved into that kind of fighting.

You had fighting in many varied environments, from deserts, to forest, to ice and snowy mountains (Where avalanches caused a whole mess of things, still to this day the most number of people lost to avalanches during war is WWI).
 
The differences between fronts don't even matter if it's alt history, really. Inconveniences like the trenches are vastly altered or just cut out at that point.
 
Im down for modern or future.
Definitely don't want any historical shooters. And I doubt we will go back to historical shooters anyways.
 
Calling it now, this will NOT be a WWI shooter. And we will never get one.

Right, its a Alternative History WW1 shooter


Im down for modern or future.
Definitely don't want any historical shooters. And I doubt we will go back to historical shooters anyways.

Why? We had modern day Battlefield for years now... and Future wouldnt be something new and great either.

EA has Star Wars and Titanfall for Future and Scifi stuff.

I dont think that EA is stupid like Activision.
 
BF3 was hands down with BC2, the best MP in the franchise. BF4 was terrible, I'll give you that.

Bf4 still sucks so much imo. Balancing,maps, damage model... Bf3 was awesome. Bc2 was awesome. And the Vietnam addon was unbelievable good.

I just hope it's not ww1 and there will be a Vietnam add on. And nothing like BF4, please.
 
Why? Just wait and see what they will do with that setting.




Thats interesting to hear :)

Ww1 wasn't that interesting imo while ww2 had already great weapons, gear and vehicles.

There would have been already 10 great big ww1 games if ww1 would be a good era for a multiplayer game.

Also, boring trench warfare etc.. ww2 is just better in every way imo.
 
There's no way they would do ww1 since that war was so boring (mostly trench warfare) so It's either ww2 or some more future crap...

I'm betting ww2 since the leaked single player script memo mentioned following a Japan soldier.
 
There's no way they would do ww1 since that war was so boring (mostly trench warfare) so It's either ww2 or some more future crap...

The rumor is that it's going to be an alternate take on WW1. So they're going to have flexibility in the setting, combat, and weaponry.

I'm betting ww2 since the leaked single player script memo mentioned following a Japan soldier.

This was confirmed to be fake. This goes for every other leaked image of BF5 as well. The only potential info we have is that Swiss retailer leak about it being set in WW1 and insiders saying that it's an alternate take on that war.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom