-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
BATTLEFIELD World Premiere Event May 6 4PM ET/9PM BST
- Thread starter JumPeRJumPzZ
- Start date
- Status
I'm guessing it will since Battlefront was made on an artificially compressed time scale due to the movie.
With Battlefield content was never an issue if you ask me. If you're willing to pay for it of course.
Tal Shiar Agent
Banned
Battlefront has a lot of content, don't know what you are talking about.
ElzarTheBam
Member
Technically speaking it had more maps and game modes at launch than launch BF3/4
But of course some people were looking for more (sp/more weapons etc).
But we as gamers should be asking for better, more cohesive content.
More (content) of it is always welcome, sure, but I'd rather not have 15 versions of Metro designed maps.
Tal Shiar Agent
Banned
Best thing about Battlefront (other than it not being bloated with shit like weapon attachments) was that the maps were designed for game modes and didn't just have game modes shoved in. Rush is practically unplayable in Battlefield 4 because of this.
ElzarTheBam
Member
Absolutely.
yes, its nice having more maps in every game mode.
But, at it's simplest, you're trying to make it work on on something it doesn't work on.
Then throw in game mode specifics (rush rules for example) on top of that, and you are left wanting to like it, but you can't because it doesn't gel.
Raven77
Member
I agree with you about everything, however, their is one big flaw. I love having maps designed specifically for certain modes (I think it was BF3 that tried to make every map work with every mode and it just failed miserably). HOWEVER, their simply werent enough maps for each mode. I only really liked walker assault and the BF style control point one but having just 3-4 maps to rotate through got old very quickly.
If those large scale modes had just 3-4 more maps I would still be playing the game.
VincentMatts
Member
Ya, Battlefield always had content. Its honestly never been a problem until Star wars which is why i have not and will never buy that season pass.
PintSizedSlasher
Member
Battlefront now has 7 "large" maps, so you can go back and play.
Psychoward
Banned
Still 3 less than BF4 launched with.
PintSizedSlasher
Member
I was responding to his comment about the lack of large maps in Battlefront (which was the case to be honest, before the free maps dropped), not comparing it to the number of maps that shipped with BF4.
And if you want to go down that road: Battlefront's small maps are all (but one) unique, not sectioned off parts of the larger maps. Taking that in to account Battlefront shipped with more than 10 maps.
Psychoward
Banned
And I'm saying even now with more large maps, it still has less large maps than BF4 launched with.
PintSizedSlasher
Member
That is correct. So what of it?
MilkyJoe
Member
The speculation of This game has gone from being a WWI game to WWI alternate history to Modern Day to 1943 back to Modern to 2143, and now it might a remaster medley of 1942+Nam+Bf2+2142.
so DICE, my question is
Wibble
AMD is hyping up the BF5 unveil event
https://twitter.com/AMDGaming/status/727226204839923712
https://twitter.com/AMDGaming/status/727226204839923712
AMD must be the partner for the event
Makes sense, AMD was the sponsor for Battlefront. Lets hope this means the PC port will be as well-optimized as Battlefront's was.
Hidden One
Member
Fuckin do it DICE. Just do it. The signs are there! You put the Bad Company logo on that Battle Pick up in the community map in BF4.
MAKE BAD COMPANY 3.
OR REMASTER BC2. KEEP EVERYTHING THE SAME JUST UPGRADE THE GRAPHICS 
AuthenticM
Member
There's only one remaster that I want, and it's Bad Company 2.
I just want proper Rush maps and that level of destruction back.
Reckless Onion
Member
bc2 style rush maps would be amazing
Kölsch Bloot
Member
BATTLEFIELD 1944
BATTLEFIELD BAD COMPANY 3
Just. Fucking. Do. It.
BATTLEFIELD BAD COMPANY 3
Just. Fucking. Do. It.
Evil Beaver
Member
If it's a WW2 FPS how would they handle the insane level of customization people are used to on their weapons? I'm no history/weapons expert but weren't attachments/optics almost non-existent for weapons in that time period?
Fuckin do it DICE. Just do it. The signs are there! You put the Bad Company logo on that Battle Pick up in the community map in BF4.
MAKE BAD COMPANY 3.
OR REMASTER BC2. KEEP EVERYTHING THE SAME JUST UPGRADE THE GRAPHICS
And then you'll all bitch cuz it doesnt feel "BC" enough and that the leads dont know what theyre doing and whens locust9 back, etc etc.
Folks dont remember the bitching when BC2 released, about how bad and lineal was compared to BC1.
But hey, im chill. IM CHILL!
Tal Shiar Agent
Banned
I want a 1944 with no class customization, no weapon customization, no vehicle customization.
Basically 1943 with 64 players, a dozen more maps, and 5 classes.
Basically 1943 with 64 players, a dozen more maps, and 5 classes.
Sidewinder
Member
Psychological Intellect
Banned
After Battlefront im curious to see the visuals here.
Tal Shiar Agent
Banned
Can you imagine a World War II game with the photogrammery and PBR that they used in Battlefront?
KnightHart
Member
I can totally see a lot of AMD cards coming bundled with BF5. It'd be a great way to help sell the new Polaris line. I'm saying this as someone considering jumping ship onto AMD if their new GPU's are as amazing as the rumors led me to believe
I just hope Rainbow 6 and Overwatch's relative success all push EA and DICE to focus on MP and just completely cut out SP. Just have SP be MP maps with bots or something like in 1942 and BF2
Yep. BF1943 gameplay was fun because of this.
legacyzero
Banned
Would LOVE a BC3. At least it'll come with a campaign thats actually fucking enjoyable.
If it's BF, I don't mind which way it goes. It's not like COD where besides exosuits, multiplayer setting has always just been a coat of paint.
If they go future, we'll have hover ships etc. in dystopian futuristic maps in Frostbite 3 (4? Can't remember) and if it's WW2, we'll get fresh, next-gen take on the period.
If they go future, we'll have hover ships etc. in dystopian futuristic maps in Frostbite 3 (4? Can't remember) and if it's WW2, we'll get fresh, next-gen take on the period.
Tal Shiar Agent
Banned
I'd rather DICE not waste time and resources on a campaign. Just have offline bots on multiplayer maps or something.
RadioactiveLobster
Member
This please.
speedomodel
Member
This is a very good point. Would love it if they were involved in some way, remastering BC or BF3, or anything really I love those guys.
TheSinkingKnight
Member
Wasn't it said that they are the ones who started lead development on this new BF and that WW1 was their idea? I might be misremembering...
I love them too, but EA said they didn't care enough about remasters to put time into them, so at most I can see BC and BC2 becoming backwards compatible on Xbox One, or maybe they implement a solution to fix the earlier BF games on PC since Gamespy shut down, or both.
speedomodel
Member
Forgot about that. You're probably right.
I guess I secretly hope they are working on MoH title haha
I don't know... those buildings looked so plain because of that level of destruction.
I'm not going to believe it's BF5 until proven otherwise.
Didn't play it, but where the carrot? How do you get people to keep playing and coming back without having unlocks?
Smokey_Run
Member
This novel idea, the game actually being fun to play.
Yeah, that worked real well for Titanfall... even when the game was really fun.
Smokey_Run
Member
I don't get the "I need to chase a carrot" in a competitive shooter. I played the SOCOM series on PS2 where everything was unlocked from day one and it was about learning maps, improving your skills, and doing clan wars. I've spent thousands of hours on that franchise. I feel you should be playing a game because the game is actually fun, not because you need to see a bar fill up to get another worthless attachment.
- Status