TPM: Vitriol from Sanders' campaign coming from the top

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mael

Member
Let's be honest here. These are two candidates who struggle with the public - Clinton is disliked but I mean Sanders is basically someone most of his supporters project on.

What's happening now is after his guff regarding superdelegates (after his supporters spent a year campaigning against him) he's worked out there is one way he can win;

Clinton pulls out and hands him victory.

Why? He's actually rather creepily trying to use either her good nature or pride. If he stacks things with Clinton set to lose against Trump - would she stand aside or help Trump into the White House?

She's stubborn so it will clearly fail but expect even more noise about her weaknesses vs Trump. It's the only option he has though however doomed it is.

Something has gone very wrong in the Dems that these are the two main candidates. Too many decided years ago Clinton had it ignoring the point of these long campaigns.

I can't believe anyone is actually making this plan.
This is stupider than "Ha! Good, man"'s usual articles.
 
Eww. Hey, you know you can have both, right? That's why Obama was 10x the presidential candidate that Clinton was. He hasn't always been on the progressive side of policy decisions, but by most accounts he has a deep-seated decency and overall consistency of beliefs. At the very least, Obama presents as someone who is sincere. Hillary Clinton has none of this.

God, I wish we could have a third term of Obama. I prefer Bernie's policies by far but Obama has been relatively effective at getting things done, given this Congress.
It's sooooooo weird when people say things like this. Hillary was generally to Obama's left in the senate and in her time as his SoS. She was still receiving Wall St. dollars then too. People generally perceive Obama as being far more left than he really is and Hillary as being far more right. In practice they've been pretty much the same.

Any other judgment is made entirely on perceived personality. I say perceived because man, no one knows any of these fucking people.
 
I remember Party Unity My Ass. In fact I wasted time arguing with them over the internet after Obama clinched his nom. So no its not a foregone conclusion.

You're always going to have a small contingent of people who are extreme beyond reason (I.e. Hillaryis44). Obama/Hillary was much closer than this race and once the writing was clearly on the wall, she knew what time it was. Bernie needs to man up and wrap this shit up, or at least make his platform about pushing policy rather than trying to attack the inevitable nominee and the DNC.

Bernie is soiling a large amount of young voters by playing this game. Whatever apathy that they have to the process going forward rests squarely on his shoulders.
 

game-boi

Member
Eww. Hey, you know you can have both, right? That's why Obama was 10x the presidential candidate that Clinton was. He hasn't always been on the progressive side of policy decisions, but by most accounts he has a deep-seated decency and overall consistency of beliefs. At the very least, Obama presents as someone who is sincere. Hillary Clinton has none of this.

God, I wish we could have a third term of Obama. I prefer Bernie's policies by far but Obama has been relatively effective at getting things done, given this Congress.

Not by mine account initially, but I still voted for him twice.

Maybe as a gay dude of a certain age it's easier for me to see past the less than perfect aspects of Clinton and Sanders (as I've always had to choose the lesser of two evils every presidential election in my lifetime), but I wish more people could see that either of these candidates will do the job and not resort to thinking that one or the other is some people of cartoon villain that just happens to have very similar stances on a broad range of topics.

EDIT: I would vote for "Second Term / Give No Fucks" Obama again in a heartbeat.
 

akira28

Member
You're always going to have a small contingent of people who are extreme beyond reason (I.e. Hillaryis44). Obama/Hillary was much closer than this race and once the writing was clearly on the wall, she knew what time it was. Bernie needs to man up and wrap this shit up, or at least make his platform about pushing policy rather than trying to attack the inevitable nominee and the DNC.

Bernie is soiling a large amount of young voters by playing this game. Whatever apathy that they have to the process going forward rests squarely on his shoulders.

The dems have been fucking up in local politics and nationally, and that goes beyond just presidential stuff. This isn't just liberal vs conservative rich vs poor bernie vs hillary, there are fundamental issues, and I'm not going to blame Bernie because he's not the source. DLC Democrats however...


I see the argument for 'lets sew this up' over 'hey we have real problems here'. I see it. But I also get the other side too.
 
I'm sure it's more like from his campaign managers, who in turn are converting Bernie into a Bernie bro. That might sound crazy but campaign managers can eventually influence the thoughts of who they're representing if they're close.
 

smurfx

get some go again
If Bernie ran 3rd party

Whats the worst that could happen?
he manages to steal enough votes from hillary to make trump president. nobody manages to get to 270 electoral votes and the republican congress gets to elect the new president. bernie running as an independent would make him a republican hero.
 
If Bernie ran 3rd party

Whats the worst that could happen?

trump%20president%20globe.jpg
 

akira28

Member
If Bernie ran 3rd party

Whats the worst that could happen?

people thinking he had a shot.

I wouldn't want him if he was victorious via a coalition of unhappy democrat and republican voters either. that kind of revolution is borne on poison wind and won't do me any good. who could trust him?
 
I don't have anything against Bernie, he seems like a nice enough guy, but it just seems like he won't be able to get the nomination.

Apparently having a thought like this is being a drone and part of "HillaryGAF", but I dunno, I'm not exactly sure how many kids Hillary eats every 15 minutes and how many evil dictators she has tea with every tuesday...seems there's a real concerted effort to paint Hillary like some fucking monster which honestly seems real weird.

Again, I don't fully understand what she's done to earn this ire, but this is the voting process, short of a national revolt I'm not sure there's much that can be done, especially regarding this election.
 

Acerac

Banned
Saddening, but not shocking.

He had to know he was a long shot this entire time, even if he got past Hillary there was little hope of a self proclaimed socialist being elected president.
 

Mael

Member
I%ve got a source that says Trump secretly is a pretty nice dude and is big into charity work.

Trump can be a callous asshole but there's people who really like the guy in private, worked for him and everything.
I think if he released his tax we could see if he's big on charity.
Don't assume that what you see on TV is the people the way they are in private.

From what I can gather from what the media reported Sanders is the least likable person currently running with Clinton as a close second and Trump being a rather brash dude you could have a beer with if a bit too arrogant.
 

bender

What time is it?
Again, I don't fully understand what she's done to earn this ire, but this is the voting process, short of a national revolt I'm not sure there's much that can be done, especially regarding this election.

It's probably a "where there is smoke, there is fire" mentality related to all of the Clinton scandals over the years.
 
Trump can be a callous asshole but there's people who really like the guy in private, worked for him and everything.
I think if he released his tax we could see if he's big on charity.
Don't assume that what you see on TV is the people the way they are in private.

From what I can gather from what the media reported Sanders is the least likable person currently running with Clinton as a close second and Trump being a rather brash dude you could have a beer with if a bit too arrogant.

I've never gotten the feeling that Trump would be someone to "grab a beer with".
 

TyrantII

Member
It's probably a "where there is smoke, there is fire" mentality related to all of the Clinton scandals over the years.

Except all that smoke is bellowing out off the ass of the political opposition. The media is then happy to cover the he said she said, as that's showcasing "both sides".

It's extreemly cynical, but it works wonders to bring down favoritiblity numbers. And it's been done to the Clinton's since the 90s almost nonstop.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
Except all that smoke is bellowing out off the ass of the political opposition. The media is then happy to cover the he said she said, as that's showcasing "both sides".

It's extreemly cynical, but it works wonders to bring down favoritiblity numbers. And it's been done to the Clinton's since the 90s almost nonstop.

Bingo. Come on guys, I was a goddamn kid when all of this started and its still been obvious to me as I've grown up just how much the Republicans hate her and how much they've tried for decades to get anything to stick
 

Risette

A Good Citizen
Starting to regret ever supporting Sanders now. He should've dropped two months ago when his path to victory was closed and campaigned for Clinton to strengthen her campaign, or at least last month after his string of losses.

Instead he chose to go down in flames and became a living meme. Shame.
 
Ya'll talking about a 3rd party run are crazy. Bernie won't do it for one simple reason: He can't win.

This hasn't stopped past third-party runs, or Bernie's current bid for the nomination.

What it usually does is stops someone in the two-party race from winning.
 

Maledict

Member
The thing I don't understand about all the 'Correct the Record' hysteria is that Sanders 'grassroots' Reddit movement is run by a paid for media consultancy, Revoltion Messaging. How come it's okay for Sanders to have a paid for media company pretending to be a grassroots activist organization, but it's not okay for a Hillary PAC to do stuff?
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
The thing I don't understand about all the 'Correct the Record' hysteria is that Sanders 'grassroots' Reddit movement is run by a paid for media consultancy, Revoltion Messaging. How come it's okay for Sanders to have a paid for media company pretending to be a grassroots activist organization, but it's not okay for a Hillary PAC to do stuff?

One guess.
 
Elizabeth Warren is establishment
Planned Parenthood is establishment
Barney Frank is establishment
Dolores Huerta is establishment
Emily’s List is establishment
John Lewis is establishment
TPM is establishment
 
The thing I don't understand about all the 'Correct the Record' hysteria is that Sanders 'grassroots' Reddit movement is run by a paid for media consultancy, Revoltion Messaging. How come it's okay for Sanders to have a paid for media company pretending to be a grassroots activist organization, but it's not okay for a Hillary PAC to do stuff?

I wouldn't try to logic it at this point. Just hold on for dear life for the next 19 days.
 
The thing I don't understand about all the 'Correct the Record' hysteria is that Sanders 'grassroots' Reddit movement is run by a paid for media consultancy, Revoltion Messaging. How come it's okay for Sanders to have a paid for media company pretending to be a grassroots activist organization, but it's not okay for a Hillary PAC to do stuff?

That's been the entire dynamic of this primary. Sanders behaving like a politician is him being principled and honest, whereas Clinton behaving like a politician is her being cynical and untrustworthy
 

hawk2025

Member
The thing I don't understand about all the 'Correct the Record' hysteria is that Sanders 'grassroots' Reddit movement is run by a paid for media consultancy, Revoltion Messaging. How come it's okay for Sanders to have a paid for media company pretending to be a grassroots activist organization, but it's not okay for a Hillary PAC to do stuff?

Revolution Messaging has done a much better job of it.
 
I'm just shocked Sanders still hasn't condemned the chair throwing and other bullshit from Nevada. Instead, he's giving speeches where he continues to push his supporters against the Democratic Party and says nothing to discourage splitting up the Party while they chant "Bernie or Bust."

His actions make it hard to believe that he cares at all for this country. It seems like he's only interested in his own fame and potential for power.

Which is funny given that the accusation against Clinton is that she's power hungry, and in it for herself.

Nevermind the amazing work she did the both Obama and the party during the 08 election. I have no doubt that if Sanders had won the nomination Clinton would be there to help him.
 
Elizabeth Warren is establishment
Planned Parenthood is establishment
Barney Frank is establishment
Dolores Huerta is establishment
Emily’s List is establishment
John Lewis is establishment
TPM is establishment

Math is establishment
Reality is establishment
People of color is establishment
 
Yep, seems like another bullshit article from Correct the Record

This author wrote three hit pieces on Bernie yesterday. I don't know if its part of Correct the Record but once the Clinton campaign started paying astroturfers, they wandered dangerously into Putin territory.
 

smurfx

get some go again
Which is funny given that the accusation against Clinton is that she's power hungry, and in it for herself.

Nevermind the amazing work she did the both Obama and the party during the 08 election. I have no doubt that if Sanders had won the nomination Clinton would be there to help him.
ambition is only evil if it's a woman having it.
 

Justin

Member
Elizabeth Warren is establishment
Planned Parenthood is establishment
Barney Frank is establishment
Dolores Huerta is establishment
Emily’s List is establishment
John Lewis is establishment
TPM is establishment

Ive posted it before but this is my favorite tweet of the election so far.

8tCCeOH.jpg
 
"Josh Marshall dislikes Sanders, ergo he must be a CTR shill" says a supporter of a candidate with a much more egregious astroturfing operation
 

Blader

Member
Which is funny given that the accusation against Clinton is that she's power hungry, and in it for herself.

Nevermind the amazing work she did the both Obama and the party during the 08 election. I have no doubt that if Sanders had won the nomination Clinton would be there to help him.

Of course she would. Hillary is intensely invested in the party. Bernie is a new member.
 

Elchele

Member
Sanders speech tonight was right in line with his statement out this afternoon. He identified the Democratic party as an essentially corrupt, moribund institution which is now on notice that it must let 'the people' in. What about the coalitions Barack Obama built in 2008 and 2012, the biggest and most diverse presidential coalitions ever constructed?

Sanders narrative today has essentially been that he is political legitimacy. The Democratic party needs to realize that. This, as I said earlier, is the problem with lying to your supporters. Sanders is telling his supporters that he can still win, which he can't. He's suggesting that the win is being stolen by a corrupt establishment, an impression which will be validated when his phony prediction turns out not to be true. Lying like this sets you up for stuff like happened over the weekend in Nevada.

I don't see a problem with that coming from Bernie himself. Is he wrong? He isn't. If you want to be naive and everything, sure go ahead and believe the Democratic party is full of people caring about the average american and not about the people who puts money in their bank accounts. Or full of people who will put aside their personal interests and "obligations"/favors to work for the average joe.

Aside from that, even the way the election works with super delegates is absurd and complete detriment of what democracy is all about. Even Obama has said in public that the current political system in USA is broken, ffs. The way the congressional seats are distruted, etc.

The system is in fact rigged, but not just to fuck Bernie, is rigged to prevent people who doesn't want to play by the "rules" imposed by the people with the biggest pockets in the country.

Grow up a bit with this "Hillary vs Bernie", it goes way beyond that.
 
I don't see a problem with that coming from Bernie himself. Is he wrong? He isn't. If you want to be naive and everything, sure go ahead and believe the Democratic party is full of people caring about the average american and not about the people who puts money in their bank accounts. Or full of people who will put aside their personal interests and "obligations"/favors to work for the average joe.

Aside from that, even the way the election works with super delegates is absurd and complete detriment of what democracy is all about. Even Obama has said in public that the current political system in USA is broken, ffs. The way the congressional seats are distruted, etc.

The system is in fact rigged, but not just to fuck Bernie, is rigged to prevent people who doesn't want to play by the "rules" imposed by the people with the biggest pockets in the country.

Grow up a bit with this "Hillary vs Bernie", it goes way beyond that.

Super delegates didn't decide this race, and I'm certainly glad they exist so we never end up with nominee Alan Grayson or Lyndon Larouche. It was the Republican's biggest mistake and now they have Trump. Also, if they're so bad, why is the guy who essentially created them working for Sanders?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom