TPM: Vitriol from Sanders' campaign coming from the top

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its not fucking rigged. She won more pledged delegates then he did. Simple as that. Its not her fault that he ran an amateur hour campaign and didn't bother to campaign in the south or to right off people of color as low information voters.

Super delegates didn't decide this race, and I'm certainly glad they exist so we never end up with nominee Alan Grayson or Lyndon Larouche.

Or Bernie Sanders :p :D
 
yeah while we're on the subject of "absurd and complete detriments of what democracy is all about"

let's just exclude the net 144 pledged delegates Sanders has gained from caucuses, which are objectively the most absurd and non-democratic process in the entire primary system
 

GhaleonEB

Member
Jesus Fucking Christ.

He had one job. ONE fucking job. Just say "we all condemned it" and stop there.

Just Stop.

Then he adds in "BUT..." and spouts more wink-wink "they kinda deserved it" dog-whistle bullshit.
I'm thinking that's what the real message is, given the volume of time they spend on it vs the condemnations.
 

Risette

A Good Citizen
Complaints about superdelegates ring extremely hollow to me. As far as I can tell, they have said they'd vote with the popular vote and historically it has worked that way. There's nothing undemocratic about it.

The problem is, of course, that the popular vote is also with Clinton. By a wide margin.
 

Blader

Member
The system has actually helped Bernie quite a bit. Without caucuses and without the momentum narrative that comes with a spread out primary schedule, Bernie would be completely sunk.

Someone tell DWS that her stupid rigged system isn't working!

http://www.politifact.com/nevada/st...tions-fraud-and-misconduct-nevada-democratic/

This is a great piece from politifact. Really happy someone did the leg work on this.

But the howls of unfairness and corruption by the Sanders campaign during Nevada’s state Democratic Convention can’t change the simple fact that Clinton’s supporters simply turned out in larger numbers and helped her solidify her delegate lead in Nevada.

The revolution begins!!...eh, if we remember to show up.
 
Most human beings. Including most in this or any political thread.
Over the last few days I've noticed a lot of members here on gaf saying they were big supporters of Sanders in the past, but have now changed their opinion. I don't think you give 'most' people enough credit for using their ability to change their mind.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Over the last few days I've noticed a lot of members here on gaf saying they were big supporters of Sanders in the past, but have now changed their opinion. I don't think you give 'most' people enough credit for using their ability to change their mind.

Yeah, it's come in waves from each dumpster fire Sanders starts.

I started this primary cycle hoping for a good discussion on liberal issues and having a neutral to neutral good opinion of sanders. It's devolved into me despising Sanders.
 
I'm thinking that's what the real message is, given the volume of time they spend on it vs the condemnations.

Oh it absolutely was, his response literally was all about how Roberta Lange, called only The Chair in the press release, was directly responsible for Sanders losing delegates, it outright accuses her of stealing votes and fraud. His response to Lange getting deaths threats and harassment was to literally accuse her of election fraud. You'd literally believe Lange had 64 Sanders delegates turned away unjustly and thus cost him the win, though what the release doesn't say is that only 8 of those 64 actually showed up to the convention (and none of them had proper registration or identification or whatever) the other 56 didn't show up to the convention, which means even if those 8 had been admitted he still lost. But why be honet when you can claim she had 64 delegates denied and cost Sanders the election, might as well have said she deserved it.


Everything he accused her of is also all total bullshit.
 
Over the last few days I've noticed a lot of members here on gaf saying they were big supporters of Sanders in the past, but have now changed their opinion. I don't think you give 'most' people enough credit for using their ability to change their mind.
Those folks always realized that election is more than just your guy, and they see a bloviating blowhard on the other side and realize it's not wise to fight within ourselves. The diehard folks were never serious about the process and majority never paid much attention to politics anyway.
 

Timedog

good credit (by proxy)
Over the last few days I've noticed a lot of members here on gaf saying they were big supporters of Sanders in the past, but have now changed their opinion. I don't think you give 'most' people enough credit for using their ability to change their mind.
Didn't say people can't change their mind, although most people are averse to that too. This entire thread is filled to the brim with people on both sides saying that other people who have opposing views are the enemy. It's human nature.
 

Eppy Thatcher

God's had his chance.
Is it ok to like Bernie Sanders as an idea but not a reality?

Also - if i hear too many more people non-ironically throw some type of support or another behind Trump as a kind of poo onto Hillary's head or what not ... i just don't ... i just don't know what i'll do. I've lost decent work-friends over this shit. I hate election years.
 
Didn't say people can't change their mind, although most people are averse to that too. This entire thread is filled to the brim with people on both sides saying that other people who have opposing views are the enemy. It's human nature.

It might be human nature, but it's also uncivilized and profoundly stupid. I would hope people could come to their senses and realize this level of tribalism in any topic, culture or discussion is ridiculous.

Politics is no different.
 
Is it ok to like Bernie Sanders as an idea but not a reality?
I did that online poll thing that tells you what candidate you most align with, and I think I had Bernie at 92% and Hillary at 86%. But if was eligible to vote (I'm Canadian) I'd vote for Hillary because I have more faith in her getting things done.

It's politics, compromise is the name of the game. Bernie just doesn't seem to be the type to compromise. I can see that being a plus to some of his supporters, but it doesn't actually get shit done.
 
Yeah, it's come in waves from each dumpster fire Sanders starts.

I started this primary cycle hoping for a good discussion on liberal issues and having a neutral to neutral good opinion of sanders. It's devolved into me despising Sanders.

Exactly the same, except I actually used to really respect the guy. Now I wish he'd just go away.

Also - if i hear too many more people non-ironically throw some type of support or another behind Trump as a kind of poo onto Hillary's head or what not ... i just don't ... i just don't know what i'll do. I've lost decent work-friends over this shit. I hate election years.

Yeah, I can't stand those Bernie or Bust people. Must be nice to have no real skin in the game.

IMG_0808.JPG


IMG_0812.JPG
 

MIMIC

Banned
Bernie or bust is not new or unique.


Were they also anti establishment Ron Paul and Trump types? Of course not. This is just part of how primaries work.

How big of an impact internet communities have on people is questionable, but it's not unreasonable to suggest hostility can push people away.

Oh wow. I don't even remember that. Mind you, I don't think I paid any attention to any of her supporters back then (and I certainly didn't care whether she kept running or not).

But yes....THIS TIME, a certain party's supporters will destroy the party/country. Because THIS election is the most important of any election ever (think differently during the next one).

Elections certainly bring out the hyperbole.
 

Blader

Member
Oh wow. I don't even remember that. Mind you, I don't think I paid any attention to any of her supporters back then (and I certainly didn't care whether she kept running or not).

But yes....THIS TIME, a certain party's supporters will destroy the party/country. Because THIS election is the most important of any election ever (think differently during the next one).

Elections certainly bring out the hyperbole.

Every new election is always the most important one. It's the only one you can do anything about.
 

giga

Member
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/u...nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=0

Defiant and determined to transform the Democratic Party, Senator Bernie Sanders is opening a two-month phase of his presidential campaign aimed at inflicting a heavy blow on Hillary Clinton in California and amassing enough leverage to advance his agenda at the convention in July — or even wrest the nomination from her.

Advisers to Mr. Sanders said on Wednesday that he was newly resolved to remain in the race, seeing an aggressive campaign as his only chance to pressure Democrats into making fundamental changes to how presidential primaries and debates are held in the future. They said he also held out hope of capitalizing on any late stumbles by Mrs. Clinton or any damage to her candidacy, whether by scandal or by the presumptive Republican nominee, Donald J. Trump.

Oh lord.
 

Blader

Member
Mr. Sanders, his advisers said, has been buoyed by a stream of polls showing him beating Mr. Trump by larger margins than Mrs. Clinton in some battleground states, and by his belief that an upset victory in California could have a psychological impact on convention delegates who already have doubts about Mrs. Clinton.

Weaver and Devine are GAFers, confirmed.
 

Laughing Banana

Weeping Pickle
That the Democratic side of the race has turned into such a chaos while the Republican has basically calmed down and focused (with Trump, of all the people in the world, leading the way) is really.............. something else.
 
Exactly the same, except I actually used to really respect the guy. Now I wish he'd just go away.



Yeah, I can't stand those Bernie or Bust people. Must be nice to have no real skin in the game.

IMG_0808.JPG


IMG_0812.JPG

Ether'd! Are there more of these, they're amazing


Like I've said before turns out his "revolution" isn't against the racists, the sexists, the oppressors, it's against the only fucking political party that can stop them.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Oh wow. I don't even remember that. Mind you, I don't think I paid any attention to any of her supporters back then (and I certainly didn't care whether she kept running or not).

But yes....THIS TIME, a certain party's supporters will destroy the party/country. Because THIS election is the most important of any election ever (think differently during the next one).

Elections certainly bring out the hyperbole.


The close proximity of both of these posts gave me a good laugh. It's like the nytimes wrote a response to MIMIC
 
I don't see a problem with that coming from Bernie himself. Is he wrong? He isn't. If you want to be naive and everything, sure go ahead and believe the Democratic party is full of people caring about the average american and not about the people who puts money in their bank accounts. Or full of people who will put aside their personal interests and "obligations"/favors to work for the average joe.

Aside from that, even the way the election works with super delegates is absurd and complete detriment of what democracy is all about. Even Obama has said in public that the current political system in USA is broken, ffs. The way the congressional seats are distruted, etc.

The system is in fact rigged, but not just to fuck Bernie, is rigged to prevent people who doesn't want to play by the "rules" imposed by the people with the biggest pockets in the country.

Grow up a bit with this "Hillary vs Bernie", it goes way beyond that.

If Superdelegates didn't exist and all delegates were awarded proportionally, Clinton would have already won.

If states were winner take all/winner take most like the GOP does, Clinton would have already won. If all contests where open primaries, Clinton would have already won.

She has won more open primaries than Sanders, whose biggest wins have come from Caucuses. The higher the turnout, the better Clinton does, the lower the turnout, the better Sanders does.

Clinton wins the states that look like the Democratic party. The more diverse a state is, the better she does. She has gotten more than 3 million votes more than Sanders. People have broadly responded to her platform. Sanders' platform has reached a smaller slice of the electorate. This is all how this should have gone. How is this rigged again?
 

giga

Member
For weeks, some current and former Sanders campaign workers have privately acknowledged feeling disheartened about Mr. Weaver’s determination to go after the Democratic National Committee, fearing a pitched battle with the party they hope to support in the general election. The intraparty fighting has affected morale, they say, and raised concerns that Mr. Weaver, a longtime Sanders aide who more recently ran a comic book store, was not devoted to achieving Democratic unity. Several described the campaign’s message as having devolved into a near-obsession with perceived conspiracies on the part of Mrs. Clinton’s allies.

Democratic leaders said they wanted to do everything possible to avoid having Clinton-Sanders tensions send the Philadelphia convention into the sort of chaos they had expected to mar the Republican convention. So far, though, Mr. Sanders has not indicated that he would ask his delegates to support Mrs. Clinton, as she did in 2008 for Barack Obama.
GfAD7Bl016Gfm.gif
 

Prax

Member
I feel like going negative again at this point will probably embolden the more conspiratorial/reactionary/alarmist supporters though. I wouldn't be surprised of more "out there" screamings and possibly vandalism and doxxing attempts from it.
 

Cheebo

Banned
I feel like going negative again at this point will probably embolden the more conspiratorial/reactionary/alarmist supporters though. I wouldn't be surprised of more "out there" screamings and possibly vandalism and doxxing attempts from it.

Bernie fans have already been doxxing female Hillary surrogates, that is nothing new.
 

Prax

Member
Bernie fans have already been doxxing female Hillary surrogates, that is nothing new.

My key words were "more out there".. Things can always.. escalate.
Though I guess this is more of a downward spiral unless Bernie decides to plug the drain before all these very people turn against him too. (Which some of them are, seeing as a bunch are poised to jump to Trump or Stein or w/e).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom