I don't see why anyone should care what the US constitution currently says. You're treating like it's some religious document.
The goal should be enact legislation that forms a happy, healthy and safe society. If there's an amendment in the current constitution that prevents that, it should be removed.
I don't see why anyone should care what the US constitution currently says. You're treating like it's some religious document.
The goal should be enact legislation that forms a happy, healthy and safe society. If there's an amendment in the current constitution that prevents that, it should be removed.
And yet most of them don't go on killing sprees all while they are almost able to buy a gun like I buy milk in Europe.But the majority of believers in these archaic Abrahamic religions still hold disgusting, violent, bigoted beliefs about LGBT individuals.
There are millions of Jewish, Christian and Muslim people who are very progressive when it comes to LGBT rights, but they are in the minority and I don't think their existence should stop us from calling out the majority's tendencies of hatred and violence.
Nonono. Fucking hell this is heartbreaking to read.![]()
FUCK
I would guess, raging homophobia?
Nonono. Fucking hell this is heartbreaking to read.
I just think if you're on a watch list your gun/bare arms rights should be taken away. There should be exceptions, That is all. Just add another damn amendment for that. Last night would be different.
That is the Old Testament. Paul in Galations 5:1 refers to to the old law as "the yoke of slavery" and how Jesus set them free from it. He calls it a curse.
When you want to use Leviticus as a tool to show how the bible condemns homosexuality by death, you should choose a different scipture. Not sure if there is one. Just saying.
Yeah, I can totally see people supporting it here on Brazil too. I don't know, sometimes I just lose hope.Was reading the comments of a Jamaican news site and too many were terrifyingly supportive of the shooting. Wtf is everything.
![]()
FUCK
Call them mommy
I'm gonna die
Were the police too slow? The first text was at 7:09, the last at 7:39
It's real.
apparently, no one hiding in that bathroom survived.![]()
You can be denied a gun if you don't pass the background check. Reasons can include having a felony on your record to having a serious mental problem. These things aren't put on your record without due process. The issue is that a government watch-list doesn't allow for due process.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause
Was reading the comments of a Jamaican news site and too many were terrifyingly supportive of the shooting. Wtf is everything.
Can you share some references?. Is this saving a million lives per year of people that currently die because of blood shortage, or is it 'we'd have enough blood to use on a million more patients, an undetermined number who would have died without it', or is it something else? I'd like to learn, but whenever this topic comes up it's almost always people just complaining about how it's discriminating (but the explicit argument that it's wrong because it wouldn't stand if it was a ban on straight people is a new one to me). I'm interested in the science. Yes, even the new relaxed standards are probably overly conservative based on a fear of repeating tragedies of the 80s, but with any luck as they get more data and testing improves, they'll be able to further reduce or even eliminate the current deferral with minimal or no risk to the blood supply.
Meanwhile, before the ban was changed last year, the Williams Institute, an LGBT think tank at the University of California, Los Angeles, said lifting the ban completely, would increase the national blood supply by as many as 615,300 additional pints of blood each year, and possibly save about a million lives per year.
Were the police too slow? The first text was at 7:06, the last at 7:39
![]()
FUCK
![]()
FUCK
The Islamic Society of North America (the largest - by far - Muslim group in the US) has for many years supported and even lobbied Congress for LGBT anti-discrimination legislation. Just as there are many LGBT-friendly churches, there are also numerous LGBT-friendly mosques and Islamic meeting places in the US.
Homophobic interpretations of Islam are not representative of American Muslims.
If people on no-fly lists dont have the right have to fly , why in hell are they able to buy a gun? How is the right to a fucking gun something explicitly fabricated with the intent of killing, something no civilian person has a reason to have, a bigger, more defended right than the right to use a mode of transportation.So do you hate all civil liberties or just the fifth and second amendments. Please tell me what other rights you'd like to violate and other things you would like the government to make lists about to control it's citizens. Sounds like authoritarianism to me.
I don't want to comment on that because that is going open a nasty can of worms. It just doesn't make sense from what I'm reading about the situation.
If people on no-fly lists dont have the right have to fly , why in hell are they able to buy a gun? How is the right to a fucking gun something explicitly fabricated with the intent of killing, something no civilian person has a reason to have, a bigger, more defended right than the right to use a mode of transportation.
And this is what people don't get. You can't take away people's rights without due process. There is even a debate on whether being found guilty through due process is enough of a justification to take away people's rights such as for voting. There is no allowance in the Constitution to take away rights for any reason. We kind of just interpreted that people have been convicted lose those rights. Some of them anyway, it's pretty arbitrary.
Sure, change the Constitution. Let's have the conversation about eliminating civil rights given in the BOR. But do it the correct way and legal way. Not pretending the right doesn't exist. Sorry if you can't see the danger in that and why it is much more than some old text.
That's really horrible.
When you talk about a lone wolf, do we know more ? Cause if European terrorism teached us something, it's that there is generally a link, some help from a bigger group, at some point, some communication by internet or something.. There was never really any lone wolf here.
If the legislation in USA facilitates lone wolfs, it's indeed part of the problem, but still. I feel like this, if ISIS is behind it, even vaguely, is different than usually in America. There IS a problem with weapon in america, sure, and unfortunatly there are many opportunities to talk about it, but this is about Isis and an international problem here.
Except if he's a mad man with zero connection with anyone. And even like that the ideology is still a problem. I mean i feel like this may (i can be wrong) be part of an other pattern. Not the "america's gun problem" pattern, but a more global one in this case. It seems a little weird that it's all what everyone talks about everywhere.
Yet, we passed the PATRIOT act, waterboarded people, indefinite detention, wiretapping, etc. etc.
Accept it we can and will take away peoples rights so long as it isn't their 2nd amendment, some reason that one has to be secured.
What are you implying here?
It was a hostage situation.
No exceptions. The right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
Obama even brought this up a couple weeks ago. It's because a huge chunk of Congress is being bribed by the NRA.If people on no-fly lists dont have the right have to fly , why in hell are they able to buy a gun?
In countries where it's very hard to obtain a gun legally, people who want them for nefarious reasons obtain them illegally on the black market. Sort of like drugs.
I'm no gundamentalist, but I'm not convinced that stricter gun laws will be a magic bullet (so to speak). This is a social issue having to do with the way people think. Indeed, the mass killings are often a reflection of America's social issues. In the Charleston church shooting it was racism, here homophobia.
Don't worry everyone will change their Facebook photo to add a flag or some shit.America is a place where you can be shot by whomever, wherever, whenever, and that's that. Things need to be changed. Offering prayers and then forgetting about it until the next tragic event comes and re-offering more prayers is NOT how to go about this.
What do you consider homophobic? No right for marriage consider homophobic?
Sorry I have not been keeping with the news and this thread. What was the motive exactly? Is he associated with any terrorist group? or was declared as one of those "mentally unstable" smh
Sorry I have not been keeping with the news and this thread. What was the motive exactly? Is he associated with any terrorist group? or was declared as one of those "mentally unstable" smh
That's really horrible.
When you talk about a lone wolf, do we know more ? Cause if European terrorism teached us something, it's that there is generally a link, some help from a bigger group, at some point, some communication by internet or something.. There was never really any lone wolf here.
If the legislation in USA facilitates lone wolfs, it's indeed part of the problem, but still. I feel like this, if ISIS is behind it, even vaguely, is different than usually in America. There IS a problem with weapon in america, sure, and unfortunatly there are many opportunities to talk about it, but this is about Isis and an international problem here.
Except if he's a mad man with zero connection with anyone. And even like that the ideology is still a problem. I mean i feel like this may (i can be wrong) be part of an other pattern. Not the "america's gun problem" pattern, but a more global one in this case. It seems a little weird that it's all what everyone talks about everywhere.
People once used similar arguments to justify keeping women from voting and to endorse slavery.Yeah, I agree, it should be discussed and handled properly. I don't even think the amendment has to be removed or guns banned. I'm just for more regulation. But I ain't even American, so ehI guess what I'm mostly saying is that arguments like
"It's in the constitution"
or
"It's the way this country was founded"
are non-arguments to me. They have as much weight as someone saying the Bible is true because it's the Bible.
If people on no-fly lists dont have the right have to fly , why in hell are they able to buy a gun? How is the right to a fucking gun something explicitly fabricated with the intent of killing, something no civilian person has a reason to have, a bigger, more defended right than the right to use a mode of transportation.
So they're saying the incident in California was unrelated?
What a bizarre coincidence @_@ (then again, the Orlando incident is multifaceted)