Shots fired at Police during Dallas Police anti-violence protest (5 officers killed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mega

Banned
So kblowing up the guy who knows where he planted bombs is the safest and most appropriate approach?

You sound vindictive in the last sentence of your first paragraph. You shouldn't let emotion get in the way of doing what is right. Setting off a bomb is dangerous regardless of who does it.

And you seem incredibly clueless. You talk about this like it's a video game where officers are Solid Snake and can run around non-lethally incapacitating enemies with ease. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
 

Ray Wonder

Founder of the Wounded Tagless Children
So kblowing up the guy who knows where he planted bombs is the safest and most appropriate approach?

You sound vindictive in the last sentence of your first paragraph. You shouldn't let emotion get in the way of doing what is right. Setting off a bomb is dangerous regardless of who does it.

I'm not emotional at all. I barely have feelings in the first place. I'm saying what they did is correct, because they're professionals, and it worked exactly as intended. Try to criticize the outcome, not the what ifs. See where that gets you.
 
It genuinely terrifies me that there are people acting like the whole robot situation was excessive use of force. What the hell is wrong with people?

I must have missed the meeting where we authorized our police force to use bomb-carrying robots to execute citizens on US soil, my bad.
 
People second guessing the decisions to blow the dude up is some incredibly silly shit.

Once he claimed to have a bomb--in an area where civilians probably weren't completely evacuated--anything was fair game as far as I am concerned.

This wasn't some heat of the moment crime of passion, or a person who is legitimately unstable (as in mental illness etc.)

This amount of planning and premeditation is disgusting and I doubt they truly believed the situation could be de-escalated safely without putting more officers in danger.

Edit: some of you need to remember their priority is to protect innocent people, not this piece of shit. As far as they knew, he could have had some serious hardware (not a bad assumption considering their other hardware) and other's lives were in danger as a result.

I didn't expect to come back to this thread and start fuming at members here. Seriously. Sit back and think about what you are criticizing.
 
Calling the protesters respectful and decent was important for him to say coming from a Republican. Pretty good statement.

I can't say that anything that will actually be gained from that. Police Reform Activism, BLM in particular will still be in the crosshairs of his party, and the news orgs that benefit them.

Racist will feel emboldened here, expect much more ugliness, and the police shootings before this will be an afterthought, or simply drowned out.

Everything is a mess.
 

Gattsu25

Banned
How did he get access to bomb material and sniper rifles? It was a short time between the shootings and the protest.

We have no clue if he actually had bombs or was just bluffing. All you need to make a sniper rifle is a hunting rifle and a scope.
It's been said a few times in this thread, but DPD has a decent reputation. Certainly a lot better than the surrounding suburbs PDs. DPD police chief is a good dude.

Yeah, they seem like extremely caring and compassionate people. My heart goes out to them.
 

Ponn

Banned
So kblowing up the guy who knows where he planted bombs is the safest and most appropriate approach?

You sound vindictive in the last sentence of your first paragraph. You shouldn't let emotion get in the way of doing what is right. Setting off a bomb is dangerous regardless of who does it.

They obviously should have activated bullet time, entered the room doing cartwheels to avoid fire and used their targeting reticules to aim for the weak point in the shooters limbs.
 
A violent well trained racist cop killer doesn't deserve your pity. Whatever your feelings may be about the status of systemic racism in no way justifies murdering people based on their job or the color of their skin.

Considering the video where he quickly takes down someone that surprised him from behind, I see no problem in using unorthodox methods to take him down.
 

Sulik2

Member
This is going to end poorly. Police are going to be even more jumpy, more civilians will end up dead and likely more people will start declaring war on the Police. Be extra careful with any police interactions Gaffers.

Maybe a citizen/police war can be avoided if the Justice Department jumped in and started some sweeping changes on the police in this country ASAP, but somehow I don't see that happening.
 

Tecnniqe

Banned
So kblowing up the guy who knows where he planted bombs is the safest and most appropriate approach?

You sound vindictive in the last sentence of your first paragraph. You shouldn't let emotion get in the way of doing what is right. Setting off a bomb is dangerous regardless of who does it.

You make it sound like hes the victim and the police are the bad guys for setting off a small controlled charge that neutralized the crazy ass murdered who just took part in killing 5 officer in the middle of a street and injuring 7+ more.


Its not like they strapped 5 C4s to a robot and drove in and leveled the whole building. Cmon.
 
How did he get access to bomb material and sniper rifles? It was a short time between the shootings and the protest.

AFAIK there is no bomb materials, he just shouted threats about bombs. The "sniper rifle" here is probably a hunting rifle with a scope, not some kind of special weapon.
 

Lombax

Banned
This is all far too much for one week. 2 people executed in the streets, and now 5 police officers killed.
All of this is disgusting. How the fuck has our country regressed this much so quickly?
 
I must have missed the meeting where we authorized our police force to use bomb-carrying robots to execute citizens on US soil, my bad.

They weren't just "executing a citizen" though. It's not like this dude was just chilling in a parking garage minding his own business. Do you really see this so black and white?
 
I'm not emotional at all. I barely have feelings in the first place. I'm saying what they did is correct, because they're professionals, and it worked exactly as intended. Try to criticize the outcome, not the what ifs. See where that gets you.


The outcome is they killed a guy who claims to have planted bombs...
 

Mahonay

Banned
I can't say that anything that will actually be gained from that. Police Reform Activism, BLM in particular will still be in the crosshairs of his party, and the news orgs that benefit them.

Racist will feel emboldened here, expect much more ugliness, and the police shootings before this will be an afterthought, or simply drowned out.

Everything is a mess.
Oh no doubt they will still use this as a weapon of propaganda, 100 percent. But Paul Ryan's statement is important to show that the leader of the house is not going that direction.
 

Violet_0

Banned
I'm sure they'll have more information to come. If someone who has already murdered individuals state they have a bomb, you send in a bomb robot.

If your back right brake light is out and they send out a robot...

just a thought, but a remote controled robot would less likely to kill a person since the police officer doesn't have to fear for their own life
 
I must have missed the meeting where we authorized our police force to use bomb-carrying robots to execute citizens on US soil, my bad.

What exactly is the difference between that and other forms of lethal force? Is it the fact that it's a robot? ANd how exactly was this an execution with someone who refused to surrender peacefully?
 

hupla

Member
Hey I feel asleep last night during the stand off what's the best place to get up to date on everything that's happened? Is there a mega post?
 

TheFuzz

Member
I must have missed the meeting where we authorized our police force to use bomb-carrying robots to execute citizens on US soil, my bad.

Execute? Are you friggin kiddin me?

If we could have saved lives in Orlando, Sandy Hook, or any other mass shooting by using a robot to "execute" the perpetrator, you wouldn't do it?
 

Future

Member
Exactly, that's what I'm wondering too. Why the hell did they have to use an exposive on a pinned down guy? They could have used something not lethal to knock him out.

This is the excessive force used by police that people have been complaining about.

I hope his is trolling. Because if not.... Damn. This is NOT what anyone is complaining about. And damn if you or Anyone else actually think like this.
 

pigeon

Banned
Don't like the legal precedent of purposefully killing someone with a robot. I understand he's a dangerous suspect in a standoff but in the age of drone warfare this seems like a dangerous path to go down.

I dunno. I feel strongly about police violence, but if this guy is barricaded in and taking shots at officers, if they flew an actual drone in I doubt I'd be too concerned.

I think the topic is a complex one. There's a big difference between the amount of force the police should use day to day and the amount I'm okay with them having access to in appropriate situations. Controlling the definition of those situations is a problem.
 

Gaz_RB

Member
A violent well trained racist cop killer doesn't deserve your pity. Whatever your feelings may be about the status of systemic racism in no way justifies murdering people based on their job or the color of their skin.

Considering the video where he quickly takes down someone that surprised him from behind, I see no problem in using unorthodox methods to take him down.

I feel the same way. This was a perfect example of why police are armed and this was the correct use of force. The police killed last night had nothing to do with whatever motivations the shooter had other than the color of their skin and their job. He should get no sympathy.
 

BokehKing

Banned
Don't like the legal precedent of purposefully killing someone with a robot. I understand he's a dangerous suspect in a standoff but in the age of drone warfare this seems like a dangerous path to go down.
How many more officers had to die before the suspect was taken into custody if we did it your way? Which by the way was what suggestions again?
 
So kblowing up the guy who knows where he planted bombs is the safest and most appropriate approach?

You sound vindictive in the last sentence of your first paragraph. You shouldn't let emotion get in the way of doing what is right. Setting off a bomb is dangerous regardless of who does it.

You know detonating bombs with bombs isn't exactly a new concept right?
 

cr0w

Old Member
Just woke up


Did we ever find out his name and motivations?
Sigh...and I guess his race and religion?

Micah Xavier Jackson. He wanted to kill white people and white police officers. That's all I know so far, and until it's confirmed take it with a grain of salt.
 

Adaren

Member
I couldn't care less about the exact means by which a dangerous terrorist was killed. I'm much more upset by the innocent people who were senselessly murdered in the last few days.
 

Kreed

Member
He wanted to kill cops. There was no safe way to enter that room, even with concussion or tear gas

What would you have used to 'knock him out'?

If the police got a robot in there with an explosive you could argue they could have been able to get a robot in there with tear gas. But considering we're talking about a suspect who killed innocent police/shot innocent police and people, and the guy refused to surrender to police, I don't see an issue with the explosives outside of not being able to get more info out of the suspect.
 
I feel the same way. This was a perfect example of why police are armed and this was the correct use of force. The police killed last night had nothing to do with whatever motivations the shooter had other than the color of their skin and their job. He should get no sympathy.

Police being armed did nothing to stop this man. A SWAT team had to be called and then a robot had to aproach him with a bomb.
 

Ray Wonder

Founder of the Wounded Tagless Children
The outcome is they killed a guy who claims to have planted bombs...

You propose that they all risk their lives and attempt to stun the guy, while hoping he doesn't set off these hypothetical bombs in the stun process, and use him to figure out where the bombs are? They have a trained bomb squad for all that. That's how they determined there was no bomb after the fact.
 

Gaz_RB

Member
Don't like the legal precedent of purposefully killing someone with a robot. I understand he's a dangerous suspect in a standoff but in the age of drone warfare this seems like a dangerous path to go down.

What's the difference in this situation between a cop piloting a drone to take a violent attacker out versus a cop putting themselves in even more danger to shoot them with a gun? It's not like they didn't try other avenues of de-escalation first.

Police being armed did nothing to stop this man. A SWAT team had to be called and then a robot had to aproach him with a bomb.

When I say police I'm referring to SWAT as well.
 

_Ryo_

Member
I'm just now learning about this, can someone give me a summary about what happened? (I don't have TV at home so I can't really find out about stuff on the news, also my internet is shit so visiting news sites is nigh impossible)
 

Bearjewpiter

Neo Member
I dunno. I feel strongly about police violence, but if this guy is barricaded in and taking shots at officers, if they flew an actual drone in I doubt I'd be too concerned.

I think the topic is a complex one. There's a big difference between the amount of force the police should use day to day and the amount I'm okay with them having access to in appropriate situations. Controlling the definition of those situations is a problem.

This is important. If the police could have taken a shot at him or rushed in and stunned him with a big flare of heroic music then they probably would have. But if the situation is extreme then alternatives have to be used.

Speaking purely monetarily that robot was probably damn expensive and they probably would have preferred to deal with the shooter without it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom