No Man's Sky - Early Impressions/Reviews-in-progress Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
There will definitely be some complete edition later on, but that's not the point. The physical release shouldn't have to relie on servers in order to be a complete experience.

It's a complete experience. You can beat the game, you can play it forever as it is. What's a complete experience to you? No bugs? Impossible.
 
Did you double down like this in Halo 5, Halo MCC, UC4, etc.?

Or wait for it... 90%+ retail games that have had day 1 patches this gen?

What is it about this game that is making people's perspectives all coo coo (for cocoa puffs)?

Wasn't UC4 and Halo MCC single player completely playable without these patches? The patches sorted out a bunch of bugs. They didn't change the gameplay or add a bunch of features.
 
Is an online review really that helpful to people that can't get online?

qm2fahE.jpg
 
Wasn't UC4 and Halo MCC single player completely playable without these patches? The patches sorted out a bunch of bugs. They didn't change the gameplay or add a bunch of features.

But it was not, 'a complete game' then by your argument. Move them goalposts.

And this game, can be played, without the patch to boot. Wowzah!
 
And thats fine, I really hope it does provide the depth that I want to see. I liked Elite Dangerous a lot too I had a HOTAS and all the stuff, and I'm glad that the developers are adding stuff in the make the game much more interesting, but that initial run where it lacked a lot of depth really hurt the idea of the genre not only for me but many people.

Yeah I've got HOTAS too.

Honestly Elite even NOW has less "to do" than pre-patch NMS imo. NMS is literally like "do this, go here, try this thing, explore a little, do this, prepare this" etc for hours and hours, and the quest system and lore/mystery is far more compelling immediately.
 
That's not exactly the point I'm trying to make.

Yes the developers should continue to improve their games, of course.

But if the game changes/upgrades dramatically over a day 1 patch, there is a problem.

I'll be more precise in order to be understood better. When The Evil Within came out I bought it on my way to a vacation spot where there is no Wi-Fi nor internet anywhere nearby. Thing is, game is an atrocity, performance-wise, without the Day 1 patch.

I do think that a game that needs a Day 1 patch to be 'the game' it's supposed to be basically makes your package (when bought physically) worthless in the long run.

In many years, when I'll want to revisit The Evil Within on a PS4 on which I won't be able to download a patch because the service will be gone, my disc will be worth jack because it'll be a total mess of framerate to play, cool huh? I was expecting a GOTY edition to come out but it never did, so yeah, to preservation version of TEW is on PC only it seems because all discs available in the entire market represents the game in an unfinished state.

I think it's called having to meet the release date. They could've:

a) Met the august release date by printing the discs in july and patching the game on release day right after patch approval or

b) delay the game to september, get the patch approval around august and start printing discs.

I think the former is way more preferable, especially when it's a hugely hyped game such as NMS. It's a way of respecting fans who've been waiting for the game for so long.

Moreover, nothing prevents them from updating the build they print on discs right after monday, they probably just needed to get the launch copies in stores to honour the august release date.
People are making a fuss over a patch that probably won't even be that big, considering how the game is programmed. I wouldn't be surprised if it was below 200MB (but then again, it depends whether they've added assets or not).
 
Internet was a mistake. No but honestly, I miss developers having to deliver complete games day one. These patches are kinda insulting and I agree reviewing a game in its 1.0 version. Waiting is just giving devs a reason to continue patching day one and deliver incomplete/buggy games. I understand it is more a problem with publishers but still.

This game is going to be incomplete after the day 1 patch also. It's a game that is meant to evolve. Those who are uncomfortable with that, should just not buy it.

Or buy the GOG version on PC, make a box of their own (they're plenty of sites that uploads fantastic cover's for that purpose, and replace the disc themselves at regular intervals). And that's an honest serious suggestion.
 
Internet was a mistake. No but honestly, I miss developers having to deliver complete games day one. These patches are kinda insulting and I agree reviewing a game in its 1.0 version. Waiting is just giving devs a reason to continue patching day one and deliver incomplete/buggy games. I understand it is more a problem with publishers but still.

I'm completely fine with day 1 patches. I'm not fine with games still being unfinished, buggy, broken messed after that date. I appreciate the plight of people with limited Internet access, but the market has shifted so much it's unrealistic to consider pubs making then a priority for this.
 
I think it's called having to meet the release date. They could've:

a) Met the august release date by printing the discs in july and patching the game on release day right after patch approval or

b) delay the game to september, get the patch approval around august and start printing discs.

I think the former is way more preferable, especially when it's a hugely hyped game such as NMS. It's a way of respecting fans who've been waiting for the game for so long.

Moreover, nothing prevents them from updating the build they print on discs right after monday, they probably just needed to get the launch copies in stores to honour the august release date.
People are making a fuss over a patch that probably won't even be that big, considering how the game is programmed. I wouldn't be surprised if it was below 200MB (but then again, it depends whether they've added assets or not).

It's 800MB.
 
Is an online review really that helpful to people that can't get online?

Maybe they are away from home at a place that has WiFi like a restaurant or library? But yes, perhaps a person has agoraphobia and therefore is forever unable to get online since their house doesn't have it.
 
Internet was a mistake. No but honestly, I miss developers having to deliver complete games day one. These patches are kinda insulting and I agree reviewing a game in its 1.0 version. Waiting is just giving devs a reason to continue patching day one and deliver incomplete/buggy games. I understand it is more a problem with publishers but still.

Games were always released incomplete. You just didn't know because you didn't had the internet.
 
There will definitely be some complete edition later on, but that's not the point. The physical release shouldn't have to relie on servers in order to be a complete experience.

But the game itself relies on servers in order to be a complete experience...
 
Meltdowns gonna be glorious.

They've been glorious the last month or two.

Sad part is, the meltdowns are from those who are not interested in the game, or hoping it fails. Such an opposite effect than what we are used to. Like a shift of consciousness, lol.

Those who are interested, and excited to play or are playing, are all like this... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
This game is going to be incomplete after the day 1 patch also. It's a game that is meant to evolve. Those who are uncomfortable with that, should just not buy it.

But surely a full price retail game should be.

You don't expect to buy CoD (for example) at launch and then months/years later get the multiplayer.
 
Sad part is, the meltdowns are from those who are not interested in the game, or hoping it fails. Such an opposite effect than what we are used to. Like a shift of consciousness, lol.

Those who are interested, and excited to play or are playing, are all like this... ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Provide proof of this please. Otherwise, it's tales from your ass. Where are the long lines of people with no interest in the game whatsoever furiously mashing out hot takes about the game's quality? And no, people excited to laugh at hysterical nerds melting down over review scores isn't hoping for the game to fail.
 
Why make assumptions about what may happen 15 years from now?
How many service shutdowns, DRM schemes, licensing messes and so on. Prevent games from being playable? There is a decent amount and it's going to get worse because of online reqs. It's not unreasonable question.
 
You miss the entire point of my argument. It changes nothing.

So is Halo 5 early access without the patch? I mean, some are saying NMS is, and all. ;)

No? Halo 5 really just couldn't fit the maps on disc as far as I know so MP had to be downloaded. Which in the grand scheme of things changes nothing. Without internet you couldn't have played MP anyway so you wouldn't need it. NMS is different. I believe the patch has things that should be on the disc. They seem to alter the experience of the game in major ways.
 
But surely a full price retail game should be.

No, not for a game like this. The day 1 patch of this is just one of many. What you get with the full price retail version of this is the base version and access to updates.

Retail is not suited for a game like this. The retail version most likely only exists because people demand it anyway.
 
It's actually very likely that you can connect your PS4 to the internet with your cell phone.
Data plans would be burned out in seconds. Not to mention when you run a PS4 there are a ton of things using the Internet in the background as well making the connection even slower.

Its not realistic. Some people have to cut Internet but keep their phones. Some could be moving and hooking up internet just to move it again at another house is exhausting. Having to choose between your phone or home WiFi bill. Things in that nature come up all the time.
 
Sad part is, the meltdowns are from those who are not interested in the game, or hoping it fails. Such an opposite effect than what we are used to. Like a shift of consciousness, lol.

Those who are interested, and excited to play or are playing, are all like this... ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Some people are losing their minds over the "bullshit business practice" of fixing bugs, adding features, and improving performance. Says it all, really. It's nuts.
 
What? Didn't Tony Hawks patch come out much later than release?

Point being the disc was an incomplete product. Actual advertised features were only delivered by the first really big patch.

I don't usually complain about it because it's so commonplace now to ship broken games and patch them later, but then usually it is just bugs or minor improvements. This one upsets me through a combination of being a game I've been really looking forward to for a long time, and being an example of an instance where the physical non updated product is actually not representative of the core 'day 1' experience. Faulty. Incomplete.
 
Data plans would be burned out in seconds. Not to mention when you run a PS4 there are a ton of things using the Internet in the background as well making the connection even slower.

Its not realistic. Some people have to cut Internet but keep their phones. Some could be moving and hooking up internet just to move it again at another house is exhausting. Having to choose between your phone or home WiFi bill. Things in that nature come up all the time.

The patch is 800 mb, hardly taxing for most plans.
 
Data plans would be burned out in seconds. Not to mention when you run a PS4 there are a ton of things using the Internet in the background as well making the connection even slower.

Its not realistic. Some people have to cut Internet but keep their phones. Some could be moving and hooking up internet just to move it again at another house is exhausting. Having to choose between your phone or home WiFi bill. Things in that nature come up all the time.
This is just throwing in a bunch of what ifs to at this point. Point was yes you could use your phone
 
Why is it? Apply it to any full price retail game and people would be pissed and saying just wait for the GOTY/complete edition.
Because the core game is there, on the disc, at this very moment. The patch is just adding tweaks and bug fixes.

Point being the disc was an incomplete product. Actual advertised features were only delivered by the first really big patch.

I don't usually complain about it because it's so commonplace now to ship broken games and patch them later, but then usually it is just bugs or minor improvements. This one upsets me through a combination of being a game I've been really looking forward to for a long time, and being an example of an instance where the physical non updated product is actually not representative of the core 'day 1' experience. Faulty. Incomplete.

I would definitely argue with you that the core experience is there on the disc right now, from the streams I have seen.
 
Man. I really hope this game will be good. Seems like such a relaxing title. Perfect for winding down. Hopefully.
In a way I'm hoping for it to be a spiritual successor to Journey. I haven't had a game wow me like that since playing it. They perfected in-game ambience with it. NMS should really hit home runs in that department.
 
No, not for a game like this. The day 1 patch of this is just one of many. What you get with the full price retail version of this is the base version and access to updates.

Retail is not suited for a game like this. The retail version most likely only exists because people demand it anyway.
Then they should not have a retail release. They could do LE with a PSN/Steam code. Since they wanted money from retail customers they should have the game in a somewhat decent state on release on disk. Mind you, they aren't the first, but it is annoying.
 
Point being the disc was an incomplete product. Actual advertised features were only delivered by the first really big patch.

I don't usually complain about it because it's so commonplace now to ship broken games and patch them later, but then usually it is just bugs or minor improvements. This one upsets me through a combination of being a game I've been really looking forward to for a long time, and being an example of an instance where the physical non updated product is actually not representative of the core 'day 1' experience. Faulty. Incomplete.

So your entire point of contention is that you're upset they are making a free, major content patch for a game that is unreleased, which somehow might (in some unlikely scenario) prevent you from playing it more than a decade from now? But at the same time you are OK with patches that DON'T add features and only fix bugs?

I can't even keep up with this. Seriously, perspective here. Buy the game, spend 10 minutes downloading the patch, play it. It's very easy. It's not going to stop working any time in the immediate future.
 
I'm hopeful the game eventually gets a Game of the Year, or a Complete edition version released on disc since its a game I would probably want to play years later. Obviously the limited online aspects won't be available years later but that doesn't matter much.
 
Then they should not have a retail release. They could do LE with a PSN/Steam code. Since they wanted money from retail customers they should have the game in a somewhat decent state on release on disk. Mind you, they aren't the first, but it is annoying.

Ok, now the game isn't in a decent state on disc? What?
 
Then they should not have a retail release. They could do LE with a PSN/Steam code. Since they wanted money from retail customers they should have the game in a somewhat decent state on release on disk. Mind you, they aren't the first, but it is annoying.
this is exactly the case with no mans sky
 
Point being the disc was an incomplete product. Actual advertised features were only delivered by the first really big patch.

I don't usually complain about it because it's so commonplace now to ship broken games and patch them later, but then usually it is just bugs or minor improvements. This one upsets me through a combination of being a game I've been really looking forward to for a long time, and being an example of an instance where the physical non updated product is actually not representative of the core 'day 1' experience. Faulty. Incomplete.

The game is playable and complete. Would it make you feel better if they waited 2 weeks or a month before dropping this patch?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom