Roberts
Member
8/10 sounds about right. Near the end of chapter 6 and the game oozes passion. Dark, chill, beautiful, funny, weird and sad in equal measure.Nearly done with this. Really enjoyed it so far. Solid 8/10.
8/10 sounds about right. Near the end of chapter 6 and the game oozes passion. Dark, chill, beautiful, funny, weird and sad in equal measure.Nearly done with this. Really enjoyed it so far. Solid 8/10.
Does Gamespot's scale say that 6/10 means the reviewer gets fired or did they leave that off?![]()
Blame the retarded illiterate mainstream journalists for making that the standard.Thats not how math works.
Don’t worry; at the end of the day, this is a business and no matter what kind of “unique” ideas a game has, it still has to make money. If Tango with The Evil Within, Ghostwire, and the breakout hit Hi-Fi Rush was shut down, then there’s absolutely no reason why a subpar studio like Compulsion can justify its existence anymore."Where are all the unique ideas?!"
"Screw this game. DEI trash"
Can't make this shit up...
Don’t worry; at the end of the day, this is a business and no matter what kind of “unique” ideas a game has, it still has to make money. If Tango with The Evil Within, Ghostwire, and the breakout hit Hi-Fi Rush was shut down, then there’s absolutely no reason why a subpar studio like Compulsion can justify its existence anymore.
Nah. A mid game is a 7. Performance is okay, no crashes, but nothing spectacular gameplay or story-wise.
A 5 would be a game that barely works in the first place, frequent bugs, performance issues and has meh/terrible gameplay/story.
I don’t blame critics entirely. If I remember correctly Gamespot got harassed for giving LOZ Twilight Princess an 8.8. How dare they gave a Zelda game below 9.I don't think it is a "standard", thankfully. It is just a narrative born out of console wars. In any other rating system, folks would look at a 7/10 as pretty good. But in gaming some act like a game fell off a cliff if its drops below an 8.
This is a warrior mentality of thinking.
What unique ideas are in this game?"Where are all the unique ideas?!"
"Screw this game. DEI trash"
Can't make this shit up...
Maybe treating player like an idiot with negative IQ? Though even that isn't unique anymoreWhat unique ideas are in this game?
Was there really a big shift on Death Stranding when it came to Xbox? Especially here, maybe a couple came around on it but I think most still rightfully see it as a piece of shit.
That is the point. I mean you wouldn’t criticize Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland because Dorothy and Alice contrasts too much with everything else, right?The game looks pretty and actually interesting, but I can't stand main character design, the "current days" setup it has constrasts too much with everything else, like there's a design disonance I can't stand
Oh... Now I have even less interest lol but yeah, kinda get what you say, it's just it makes some uncanny noise when I see itThat is the point. I mean you wouldn’t criticize Wizard of Oz or Alice in Wonderland because Dorothy and Alice contrasts too much with everything else, right?
The game is about a teenager witnessing mistakes made by older generations.
How ?
And noboby answered to me on this: the Switch ports of games get lower MC scored than their PS4/5 counterparts.
Or how come The Last of us Part 1 as an awful score on PC (59/100) despite the game being recognized as one of the best games ever ?
How is that possible if technical aspects aren't taken into consideration ?
MK1 is a day one version (for eg), not the only example.Games like TLOU and Switch ports have already been seen elsewhere and so when the game is ported and looks like shit, pretty hard for the reviewer to ignore that. Games can be docked for being a technical mess (although typically only in extreme situations), but that doesn't mean games that are technically sound will have points added.
MK1 is a day one version (for eg), not the only example.
And its technical shortcomings definitly impacted its score.
Same as for eg deadly premonition 2, a Switch exclusive but terrible performance.
Which goes along with what I said.
"Games can be docked for being a technical mess (although typically only in extreme situations), but that doesn't mean games that are technically sound will have points added."
Which goes along with waht I said, aka I didn't say you have automatically 5 points added if the game is good technically.
But I discuessed this with you, no issue for me if you don't agree. I was mostly answering to the "but the math isn't mathing" and "this is warrior mentality" (which I don't really understand how)
In this case, I would say the sum is greater than the parts.What unique ideas are in this game?
While the setting is refreshing, from a gameplay perspective, the game does nothing new that hasn't already been done and hasn't already been done better.
Unlocks in an hour. You place your bets.![]()
South of Concord.
Guess we’ll see how it does after the full release, but it’s pretty unusual for a game to do worse on Sunday than on Saturday. Maybe people finished it in 2 days?
849Unlocks in an hour. You place your bets.
897Unlocks in an hour. You place your bets.
Unlocks in an hour. You place your bets.
Sure, it's a AA game. It doesn't change the facts that the budget is probably between 30-50mil. Even a AA game like SOM has metrics of success. All indications point to this game being a massive bomb. Someone has to answer for that. Hopefully the studio survivesI don't think anyone expected this game to do outstanding numbers, at least I'd hope not, lmao. The game always gave me AA energy, I thought it was pretty weird when MS took time to talk about it like it was something bigger. Just another one of those, "People that are interested in it will play it and likely enjoy it to some degree, while those that aren't won't." and that's really it.
Millions of people playing on Game Pass > some weird Steam graph.