That's totally fair, maybe I misunderstood.
I guess it's different from what I was thinking about - which is people who tend to just turn their back on and dismiss games that they have already gotten many hours of enjoyment out of. Happened with The Division, for example - I know people that played for over 100 hours before burning out all the content in the "endgame" and then once they've seen all there is to see, they just act like the game is some boring or half-finished junk that they'd never recommend.
Still no reviews? I mean I'm probably still gonna get the game regardless, it looked fucking great on JackSepticEye's let's play, but still would be nice to see some opinions from critics.
This is pathetic.
This whole thing is pathetic.
Play the game for what it is, not for what you want it to be. Fucking hell.
I had the time of my life last night. Six fucking hours. SIX. I'm 34 years old with a ten month old child. I don't game for six hours anymore.
Some people just seem to hit some sort of major malfunction when it comes to this game.
Amen to that. It is sickening to read things like "preoder cancelled".. I mean, do these people go in front of movie theaters to brag about the fact that they didn't go watch Suicide Squad because of a review they saw on Rotten Tomatoes?
I don't know what's up with people with this game, but it truly shows the problem between what developers can do based on their vision, and the limitless expectations of gamers that only understand what they dream of once they have watched a single trailer.
I'm 31 with a 4 month old child, and I'm having the time of my life as well(not so much for my very bad english)
For those who are enjoying NMS, have you played a survival game(s) previously?
So that's why Sony was going after impressions on YouTube. That lack of confidence was real.
Some impressions from Ian Bogost
![]()
Think I'm with Jim on this one. 3 hours in and it's already starting to feel repetitive. I typically love exploration but there just doesn't seem to be a lot of real payoff to it in this game. It doesn't help that movement and combat are absolutely terrible.
Think I'm with Jim on this one. 3 hours in and it's already starting to feel repetitive. I typically love exploration but there just doesn't seem to be a lot of real payoff to it in this game. It doesn't help that movement and combat are absolutely terrible.
Such smug condescension.
There IS no "Disneyland". The journey is the whole point. Enabling yourself to take that journey and being able to survive it is part of the fun. You're either aware of that and you gel with it, or you don't.
I look at the opening of the game more as "Here you go, here's the universe. Give yourself the ability to explore it."
This dude, whoever he is, jumped right into the game rubbing his hands saying "Okay, instant gratification time!!! Game, GIVE ME WHAT I HAD IN MIND!!!"
Pfft.
No doubt.I honestly can't tell if the bolded is in response to those tweets or a description of the post you were about to make.
My big question with this game is something that could never really be answered by reviews. It's where people who were hyped for the game and loving it stand in 2 weeks to a month.
I honestly can't tell if the bolded is in response to those tweets or a description of the post you were about to make.
Uh - am I blind or is he actually saying NO...?
Uh - am I blind or is he actually saying NO...?
The game just released today. There were no reviews prior to the day 1 patch. You won't see any for a few days.
Think I'm with Jim on this one. 3 hours in and it's already starting to feel repetitive. I typically love exploration but there just doesn't seem to be a lot of real payoff to it in this game. It doesn't help that movement and combat are absolutely terrible.
That's for me to know.
It's okay to not enjoy the game. Are you not enjoying it? Because people who don't enjoy it can move on to something they do enjoy, rather than pointing their raging hard-ons at the flaws they see, ready to champion them like they make their opinions on the game more valid than the next person's.
Just wanted to quote this because it felt like just a genuine thing to say as a gamer. No overhype and at the same time not trashing it eitherOK. Several things. Firstly, I haven't played it yet. Wouldn't mind trying, but my gut reaction to any of the footage I've seen is that this probably isn't going to be my cup of tea. I completely understand the appeal, but it doesn't really feel like something aimed at me. I have no ill will towards it however, and am open to being completely won over. I'm interested in reading impressions both positive and negative.
dumb question.
if there is 18 quintillion planets (18 * 10^18), and 1 million players, isn't there an infinitesimal chance that any player will actually visit a planet that has been named by another person? and yet its already happened.
What does the probability math say about the chances?
To be honest, if this game had co-op it would have been a #1 anticipated game, but the lack of it means I'll be waiting for a steam sale. Exploration in a sandbox doesn't mean much to me without friends to mess around with.
ok, but .. that implies a "spawn friendly" planet must be surrounded by totally inhospitable places. Not just like 5 to 1 but 1000s to 1.
But it seems every spawn planet is surrounded by not-too-awful systems?
Have you played already omni? Or waiting for pcHmmm seems like destiny. Everyone crapping on it because it got hyped but turns out it's an amazing game. I'll judge for myself.
No Man's Lie.![]()
dumb question.
if there is 18 quintillion planets (18 * 10^18), and 1 million players, isn't there an infinitesimal chance that any player will actually visit a planet that has been named by another person? and yet its already happened.
What does the probability math say about the chances?
OK. Several things. Firstly, I haven't played it yet. Wouldn't mind trying, but my gut reaction to any of the footage I've seen is that this probably isn't going to be my cup of tea. I completely understand the appeal, but it doesn't really feel like something aimed at me. I have no ill will towards it however, and am open to being completely won over. I'm interested in reading impressions both positive and negative.
Secondly, while I understand that sometimes negative voices can be obnoxious, I want to make it clear that threads about a game -- be they the official thread or the reviews thread or anything else -- are not designed to be hype safe havens where fans congregate in peace and the so-called haters shake their fists in vain from outside the door. Provided that you are participating in good faith, all opinions are welcome. We don't operate under the pretense of "if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all."
Finally, the whole reason I replied at all had absolutely nothing to do with my opinion of No Man's Sky and everything to do with your post completely lacking in self awareness. If you're going to call out what you perceive to be smug condescension, don't you think your rebuttal would read better if it aimed at displaying some level of humility? And by that I just mean perhaps omitting phrases like "This dude, whoever he is" and then presuming that the only explanation for the author's poor opinion is ignorance and impatience. To be clear, my aim wasn't to agree with or defend those tweets at all but to call your response tone deaf.
For those who are enjoying NMS, have you played a survival game(s) previously?
That's for me to know.
It's okay to not enjoy the game. Are you not enjoying it? Because people who don't enjoy it can move on to something they do enjoy, rather than pointing their raging hard-ons at the flaws they see, ready to champion them like they make their opinions on the game more valid than the next person's.
I really don't know (because I haven't played it yet) if the game's failures are a bad design or its failure is that it doesn't fulfill the people's expectations.
Maybe this game would have been received better without any hype or expectation.
Wait, it's a survival game? When did that happen? I thought this was a game about just exploring forever. Feel like I'm going to be disappointed if the element of discovery was removed in favor of the element of putting uninteresting things together. That seems... very MMO-y.7 hours in.
This is a niche game. If it's your thing, you are going to fucking love it. If it's not, you're going to be left wondering "how do people like this game?"
I'm not a fan because it feels pretty repetitive: gather materials, get an upgrade, repeat until you can "progress." But if you enjoy the exploration or survival elements, I think you'll probably love it.
For me, though, that "thrill of discovery" just isn't there :-/ Reading over all the impressions, I think this could be the line that divides the scores. Some critics feel it, others don't. I'm on the "don't" side.
I think expectations play a big part of it. I hadn't read or seen anything since the original reveal trailer and it's delivering exactly what I wanted - a massive space and planet exploration game.
I think the big marketing probably helped the game reach a wider audience, but probably also made it impossible to meet the expectations of players but, genuinely, I find the whole experience very relaxing.
The survival elements are there but not enough to make it a good survival game and just enough to make it a tedious chore.Wait, it's a survival game? When did that happen? I thought this was a game about just exploring forever. Feel like I'm going to be disappointed if the element of discovery was removed in favor of the element of putting uninteresting things together. That seems... very MMO-y.