There was a quote from Ken Levine getting passed around Twitter the other day, where he rather clunkily talked about BioShock 1 & Infinite - and how it related to the plights of Jewish Americans.
Source
Essentially, it sounds like Levine is saying that the moral of BioShock Infinite is that oppression breeds oppression. But some questionable connections pop up once you think about the real world. Is he saying that in contemporary society, Jews (and in the case of Infinite, African-Americans) have taken on roles as oppressors?
I still love both games, but it's become clear over time that Levine's view on the subjects he wrote about may be a bit questionable.
I'm not sure his base argument that oppression does breed oppression is incorrect at all. It's generally accepted that family violence is passed down, with few exceptions. And it's certainly not untrue when he's discussing the Russian revolution with characters such as Stalin eventually "winning" the power struggles with telling insights of him asking his mother later "why did you beat me so hard?" (Edvard Radzinsky, p. 32). Note Stalin's would revert to calling for beatings to extract confessions "Beat and Beat and Beat again .Put them in chains, grind them to powder."
His views is also in line with the Indonesian revolution where unarmed dutch/mixed/sympathisers were publicly raped/impaled in a running amok or revenge due pent up grievances against a colonial power and threat of return.
Never mind the sepoy rebellion where rebelling units also executed and/or raped unarmed civilians.
Levine's view/argument is historically correct, monstrous systems of oppression that lead to violent uprisings do tend to bring out the same impulses usually motivated by revenge against the oppressors.
He points out that Ayn Rand wrote and was who she was due to the brutality of the Bolshevik revolution in particular to her and her families experience, which is mirrored in the character Andrew Ryan.
Darkly, as any dog owner knows that old saying; if you beat a dog don't be surprised when it finally attacks/turns viscious.
He literally points out that it's a dark feature about oppression, it brutalises everyone. He's not making some asinine false equivalence argument of the lower classes are beasties, he's pointing out that oppression causes some of the oppressed to react in a beasitial fashion, it's what their horrific society has taught them, everyone.