fastford58
Member
That thing is smaller than the officer's heal. If it's a gun, it's a tiny handbag gun or something. Nothing a cop with a vest should really be afraid of.
Derp. Do people even think about what they are typing?
That thing is smaller than the officer's heal. If it's a gun, it's a tiny handbag gun or something. Nothing a cop with a vest should really be afraid of.
Holy shit, this might be the most ignorant thing I've seen in this thread.That thing is smaller than the officer's heal. If it's a gun, it's a tiny handbag gun or something. Nothing a cop with a vest should really be afraid of.
What, it's smaller than a pack of cigarettes? Sure it can be dangerous, but not to the point where a cop freaks out and shoots someone over. I've always heard that little .22 pistols weren't much more powerful than a bb gun.
.......it's a goddamn fucking gun for Christ's sake.What, it's smaller than a pack of cigarettes? Sure it can be dangerous, but not to the point where a cop freaks out and shoots someone over. I've always heard that little .22 pistols weren't much more powerful than a bb gun.
First Google result for .22 gun deaths. "Harmless .22 calibre Rabbit Rifles
Kill More People Than Any Other Type of Gun"
.......it's a goddamn fucking gun for Christ's sake.
Those are .22 rifles.
Okay, fine. Cops should treat every gun like it's an assault rifle.
The mayor just confirmed that the new law about police video needing a court order to be released doesn't go into effect until 10/1. She left it at that.
The mayor just confirmed that the new law about police video needing a court order to be released doesn't go into effect until 10/1. She left it at that.
Will the law allow them to immediately release this video on the 1st?
I agree with you. However, and this is not in defense of cops going trigger happy, but IF he even has the gun in his hands cops have no way of knowing what is going through his head or how fast the gun could be pointed at them. He should have never had the gun in his hands (if this is what the video ends up showing) while having ANY interaction with the cops.I edit my post.
In regards to the second quote. IF he point it at the police, you get shot. Period. You point a gun at a cop you get shot. What we don't know is if he did or not. We need the video to know what really happened. Is this Tulsa or did he confront the police. We have no idea unless the video is released.
I edit my post.
In regards to the second quote. IF he point it at the police, you get shot. Period. You point a gun at a cop you get shot. What we don't know is if he did or not. We need the video to know what really happened. Is this Tulsa or did he confront the police. We have no idea unless the video is released.
I edit my post.
In regards to the second quote. IF he point it at the police, you get shot. Period. You point a gun at a cop you get shot. What we don't know is if he did or not. We need the video to know what really happened. Is this Tulsa or did he confront the police. We have no idea unless the video is released.
http://urbanintellectuals.com/2016/...im-alive-but-unarmed-black-people-are-killed/I edit my post.
In regards to the second quote. IF he point it at the police, you get shot. Period. You point a gun at a cop you get shot. What we don't know is if he did or not. We need the video to know what really happened. Is this Tulsa or did he confront the police. We have no idea unless the video is released.
This isn't judge dread. Not long ago cops wouldn't shoot first. They would try many descalation tactics first. Most news reports of a police shooting would include a statement that the perp started firing and they took him down. Now it's just "he had a gun, I was scared".
]When officers arrived at the scene, they said the man fired at them through the door.
Uh huh.All things being equal, the stats about deadly force used against black people vs white people are compelling, but a story about cops not blindly firing into a door isn't surprising.
A man who was at the protest claims that the civilian was shot by an officer and things escalated afterwards. Shaun King shared the post if interested.
OK, fine, move it to Duke.
Duke hosted the Rose Bowl one year during WW2, they have experience in these things. Still have the same stadium, too, and much of the same staff (I can't back that last part up).
A man who was at the protest claims that the civilian was shot by an officer and things escalated afterwards. Shaun King shared the post if interested.
https://twitter.com/CrashnDaPlane/status/778775841262022656
Unless the officer was stood in the middle of the protest then I can't see how.
.
The idea of defying a cop while holding a gun in your hand seems completely beyond the pale for me. (Owning a gun period is fucking crazy)
I just cant get my head around not following the instructions of someone pointing a gun at you. Police or not.
I agree with you. However, and this is not in defense of cops going trigger happy, but IF he even has the gun in his hands cops have no way of knowing what is going through his head or how fast the gun could be pointed at them. He should have never had the gun in his hands (if this is what the video ends up showing) while having ANY interaction with the cops.
I edit my post.
In regards to the second quote. IF he point it at the police, you get shot. Period. You point a gun at a cop you get shot. What we don't know is if he did or not. We need the video to know what really happened. Is this Tulsa or did he confront the police. We have no idea unless the video is released.
Yes. This isn't a movie. If you raise a gun at a cop he opens fire. There has never been a time where cops would let you get a few shots off first. You can't seriously believe this.
Dude on CNN sayin some really weird shit. Saying Charlotte is going to become the next Dallas/Baton Rouge/ect. Not exactly cool to incite that.
Edit : Fuck me I really wish I wouldn't have watched that video
Witness account of what happened. He says he helped treat the man who was hit.
https://www.facebook.com/jimmy.j.tyson/posts/632882019065
I dont get it. If the video shows the cops did the right thing. they could end this all by releasing it.
Ive been away from charlotte for a week so im not sure whats the full story.
Show the video.
Here's an interesting caveat regarding footage:They have to make sure procedure is followed. If you release evidence improperly it can compromise an investigation. Something is supposed to be shown tomorrow, but to who I don't know.
Since it looks like a plain clothes cop carried this out, I'm wondering if he was even wearing a camera.This is the sixth time in the past year that Charlotte-Mecklenburg officers have been involved in the fatal shooting of a civilian, according to police data. The district attorney found police to be justified in the five previous killings, according to local news channel WSOC-9.
All of the department’s officers began wearing body cameras a year ago. Three of four fatal shootings that happened from September 2015 to May weren’t captured on cameras. It’s unclear if a June 3 shooting was filmed by the department’s body cameras.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg’s tactical and SWAT units do not wear body cameras, the Charlotte Observer reported.
Here's an interesting caveat regarding footage:
Since it looks like a plain clothes cop carried this out, I'm wondering if he was even wearing a camera.
Here's an interesting caveat regarding footage:
Since it looks like a plain clothes cop carried this out, I'm wondering if he was even wearing a camera.
Hardly think they'll release it. Seems like they wanna drag it out until you need a court order to get it.Patiently awaiting the video... I want to see what really happened.
https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/778803793924231168
Law professor. USA Today columnist. 63K followers.
Blood boiling.
Account suspended. What did it say?
Account suspended. What did it say?
Thank you. Some sense in this thread. Until the video is released everything is hearsay and 100% unreliable FROM BOTH SIDES. People don't seem to get that.
Tulsa looks like 100% murder (probably inexperience/fear but still murder) while this case is completely unknown until we get real facts.
A man who was at the protest claims that the civilian was shot by an officer and things escalated afterwards. Shaun King shared the post if interested.
There were multiple cops there when it happened, so I'd say the odds are in the favor of there being a body camera on at least one of them.
Ok, good. So no excuse then.They confirmed the officer who shot didn't and the footage is from the other officers' cameras.
If they don't release the footage, or claim some bullshit like the footage is "missing" or "cameras malfunctioned", I'm inclined not to believe a word they say.Hardly think they'll release it. Seems like they wanna drag it out until you need a court order to get it.
That thing is smaller than the officer's heal. If it's a gun, it's a tiny handbag gun or something. Nothing a cop with a vest should really be afraid of.