Waypoint: I Hope ‘The Last of Us Part II’ is Super Gay (Spoilers)

All I said was your use of the word was "interesting" and you think I'm judging you negatively, it sounds like you *do* need re-assurance.

Get it now?
 
It's a sick and twisted world we live in but it's no different to the experience some people are having in the world right now. You're not alone in the plight to survive.

Singling out one particular variable is almost like flaunting some sort of privilege in itself. Which is ironic given that the argument quite often made is 'privilege.' Dangerous word in the right hands. Language can be as dangerous as any bullet and the word itself easily commands a kind of moral high ground that I don't feel suitable for most conversations. I mean I've met stuck up rich people here in England who believe that because they're from a higher class they have god given rights and are have a certain 'privilege' for it but I've never felt that way because I'm straight and someone else is gay? A persons happiness is more important to me than trying to define or stereotype them.

I've liked your posts up until now but this is straight up "All Lives Matter" rhetoric.

20141204-patreon-590x210.png


We should avoid stereotypes - I've dealt with anti-gay stereotypes my whole life and they fucking piss me off. But it's safe to say Ellie is not in danger of becoming a stereotype. She was already a fleshed-out, established character long before she was revealed to be attracted to women in the DLC. Her relationship with Riley just added onto the already existing characterization she had going for her, making her an even stronger character. I don't think we have to worry about stereotypes in her case.
 
No. You really can't understand it if you haven't lived it. That's it. That's literally it. Just like you can suddenly understand what it's like to be black, or hispanic, or muslim.

Because you haven't lived it.

You empathize with it. That's not the same thing. Even then, do you really? Do you know what it's like to have people spit on you for holding hands with someone? Do you know what it's like to be beaten for being who you are? Do you know what it's like to never be able to go to an unfamiliar area because you're worried about what someone might do because you're different and leave your child fatherless? Have you ever had to march for your rights and dignity?

Just because you empathize doesn't mean you understand. And you trying to equate me to someone who would literally fucking beat me half to death because I say you don't understand is the height of such outlandish privilege and the blinders effect. You don't understand, that point showcases that you are utterly and entirely incapable of doing so.
 
No one is mad we're having a discussion about bathroom tiles and the meaning of the word "re-assured" it's pretty interesting, no need for apologies
 
I trust Naughty Dog to do this right, they chose the hard path for a reason and I applaud them for it, they could have easily made Ellie a straight boy in Part I but they didn't and they actually treated her like a human being.
 
My other half is actually looking at having them removed and replaced with these plastic boards that cover the walls in strips. Don't think I'll like them as much as I really appreciate the blue colour scheme we have going.

What can I say? This topic has been a big thing for me in my life, for many loved ones and many people I know. I just came to terms with things on my own grounds. It's a shitty world we live in. I can't make it better by myself y'know?

Then your attitude should be "more inclusion is better" not going on some long diatribe about how it's not important.
 
If Ellie finds a new boo thang I don't mind. ND has proven time and time again they know how to deliver, so yea if it'll add to the story then Ellies gone have to scissor a chick. No modesty pls
 
Then your attitude should be "more inclusion is better" not going on some long diatribe about how it's not important.

But it's not important, he's already assured! I think if you look deeper into the meaning of assured you'll find that you both really agree when you get into it.
 
Right but let's be honest, as someone who studied design the biggest thing I hard to learn how to cope with is killing my babies. By that I mean I would have an amazing idea for plot twist and nobody would like it. You can love that idea to death and it can be your baby or magnum opus but if you tell 100 people about it and 12 of them say 'man that's a great idea,' you still know that 88 of those people didn't like it. And as an artist I still have to be cautious that my product has to make a profit to be sustainable and allow me to further explore my vision. If nobody likes it then nobody buys it then as much as people can love and appreciate art it's just not financially viable or worth bothering with. If a game was failing popularity tests during the green-light process then it wouldn't be approved.

I have to say, I disagree wholeheartedly. Killing your darlings isn't about ditching anything that doesn't appeal to a mass market. It's about having the courage to abandon something when it's not working - even if you've invested a lot into it.

'Art' has already been debased enough by playing to lowest common denominators - it's why certain conventions are already so immovably cemented in our media diets -including those of representation.

Making homosexuality a key story theme for a game could certainly turn off a certain type of gamer - no doubt - but that's their problem not the developer's. This isn't a darling that needs to killed, just a small price that has to paid for doing something original and bold.
 
That's all well and good but the person I was quoting was talking about Ellie and Joel being in a sexual relationship which feels semi-incestuous given she's become his surrogate daughter. That post has nothing to do with Ellie's sexuality.

If it's about a sexual relationship I'm pretty sure that is related to sexuality.
 
nvm, misread

edit; i'm actually not gonna respond to all that garbage, because it reads to me like minimizing the importance that representation can have on people's lives just because you seem to be fine with where you are in life. news flash: i'm fine where I am in life too, but it's still cool as fuck every time there's a queer character on a show I watch or in a game I play, because seeing parts of my life recreated in media feels good and is very affirming.
 
Sorry I can't help myself sometimes, I think you're right incest isn't really a sexual orientation. Like I said before though there's a fascinating part of the Bible with Lot and his daughters that seemed like gafneo's post about repopulating the world in a The Last of Us context.
 
Why? Because I've made peace with who I am? Do you judge me for being who I am?



Yes, some people still murder gay people for being gay. Some people murder black people for being black. Some people murder white people for being white. Some people murder others for being of another religion. Some people murder people because they are from another race.

It's a sick and twisted world we live in but it's no different to the experience some people are having in the world right now. You're not alone in the plight to survive.

Singling out one particular variable is almost like flaunting some sort of privilege in itself. Which is ironic given that the argument quite often made is 'privilege.' Dangerous word in the right hands. Language can be as dangerous as any bullet and the word itself easily commands a kind of moral high ground that I don't feel suitable for most conversations. I mean I've met stuck up rich people here in England who believe that because they're from a higher class they have god given rights and are have a certain 'privilege' for it but I've never felt that way because I'm straight and someone else is gay? A persons happiness is more important to me than trying to define or stereotype them.
Why are you equating one with another? You dont see that Gay , Black, Latino people are often treated lesser because they are a bit different? Maybe Kill is a strong word, but society certainly gives a lot of trouble to minorities (non White Straight Males, sometimes Catholic)

Its not only about killing/Survival, but lack of representation in media, discrimination, bullying,ignorance, etc.

Privilege is still a word that can be used imo.
 
No never mind never mind. I'm not queer, I experimented in college and found out that I am not gay. I openly tried a relationship with another man because I thought there was something and there wasn't. I do not get turned on by other men. I can push the boundaries between friends and lovers happily but I don't get excited by the sexual side of being gay which is not fair on the other person.

And I didn't compare them, I was pointing out that all over the world people are being persecuted for a multitude of reasons, whether it is their orientation or their race or religion. I stand by what I said, it's a fucked up world that suffers from a major lack of love, tolerance and understanding. Jesus I'm sorry if you're offended by that but I'm trying to be open minded, tactile and respectful.



You know through high school I've read so much of the Qu'ran that I've never read a great deal about the bible. I know there is a book of Daniel which I partly read because we share a name, but I'll have to look more into that. I suppose if it had some sort of symbolic or biblical meaning I could understand it in the right context.

That's funny, the Quran mentions the people of Lut (Lot) but only in the context of the destruction of Sodom (but not Gomorroah! Never mentioned in the Quran), they gloss over the part of the Pentateuch where Lut's daughters get it on with Lut after they get him drunk in order to produce children because they think the world (sodom) has been destroyed.
 
Whatever you like, I thought the contrast of the two would lead people to their own conclusions.

That's why I'm asking because I'm not sure what to conclude from that. Plus I hate when people make wrong conclusions about something I've said then create a strawman argument out of it, hence me wanting you to elaborate further please.
 
That's why I'm asking because I'm not sure what to conclude from that. Plus I hate when people make wrong conclusions about something I've said then create a strawman argument out of it, hence me wanting you to elaborate further please.

Whenever people use words to explain something people will probably accuse you of a strawman even if it doesn't exist so don't worry, some people's brains can only operate on beep boop numbers so I just gave the digits.
 
I know man, I understand all this. I also agree, I read about a woman the other week who as a hispanic actress played a cleaner in over 80 film roles and she's only now in her older age getting to play proper characters and not a latino stereotype. Man I don't know what the US is like, I can only gauge you guys are from that way because of the way you're speaking and example you're using but the UK is a different kind of monster. I mean there's more and more representation here than ever before. People from all races, religions and sexualities are being shown on television and in the media. All the classic soaps like Coronation Street, Eastenders and Emmerdale all have a cast of diverse characters, gay, lesbian, black, asian etc. More and more advertisements are using more diverse casts. Hell even the Fifa 17 story chose to use a young black male because the top upcoming footballers in the UK just so happen to be black. I.e. Sturridge, Sterling and Welbeck.

I'm all for it. What I don't like is being told that I don't know, understand or care just because of an apparent privilege I get for being born the way I was. Like I have any kind of control over it.

The US is 1000 times better for Black actors, hence UK actors come here to play African American roles.
 
No never mind never mind. I'm not queer, I experimented in college and found out that I am not gay. I openly tried a relationship with another man because I thought there was something and there wasn't. I do not get turned on by other men. I can push the boundaries between friends and lovers happily but I don't get excited by the sexual side of being gay which is not fair on the other person.

And I didn't compare them, I was pointing out that all over the world people are being persecuted for a multitude of reasons, whether it is their orientation or their race or religion. I stand by what I said, it's a fucked up world that suffers from a major lack of love, tolerance and understanding. Jesus I'm sorry if you're offended by that but I'm trying to be open minded, tactile and respectful.

okay but your question was 'why can't people just be people' and the answer, when it comes to queer folks, is because straight people keep killing us. we did not ask to be 'othered', or to be demonized, marginalized, harassed, have fewer rights, make less money, be made to be more prone to self-harm and suicide, or to not feel safe holding the hand of the person we love. straight people did that to us.

and you're not queer, so you can miss me with that 'but i feel fine, why doesn't everyone else? :(' bullshit.

I know man, I understand all this. I also agree, I read about a woman the other week who as a hispanic actress played a cleaner in over 80 film roles and she's only now in her older age getting to play proper characters and not a latino stereotype. Man I don't know what the US is like, I can only gauge you guys are from that way because of the way you're speaking and example you're using but the UK is a different kind of monster. I mean there's more and more representation here than ever before. People from all races, religions and sexualities are being shown on television and in the media. All the classic soaps like Coronation Street, Eastenders and Emmerdale all have a cast of diverse characters, gay, lesbian, black, asian etc. More and more advertisements are using more diverse casts. Hell even the Fifa 17 story chose to use a young black male because the top upcoming footballers in the UK just so happen to be black. I.e. Sturridge, Sterling and Welbeck.

I'm all for it. What I don't like is being told that I don't know, understand or care just because of an apparent privilege I get for being born the way I was. Like I have any kind of control over it.

and naughty dog is an american game developer, making a game about an american environment, with american characters. it's nice that things are going great over in the UK though.

also just because you don't think you have privilege doesn't mean you don't. even as a queer brown guy, i absolutely have privilege when it comes to my identity. i don't have control over it either, but i can acknowledge it, and use it in a positive way. and using your lack of lived experiences as some kind of weird shut down of queer people who are actually affected in some way by representation in media is..well, weird.
 
I did not pick up on the implications of Ellies clothing, although I did play through and love TLOU and LB. When I see a young lady dressed like that it only reminds me of my youth, when grunge was a thing. It wasn't unusual to see girls wear clothing like this, and in some circles I still see it around town, but I think now its a bit of a bygone era. Not sure what that means when Ellie's wearing it in terms of timeline.
 
I just hope the game is super good with great gameplay and the multiplayer has the roots and soul of the current one. Do not care about main characters sexual orientation because that no adds or quits value to a game.
 
wow the UK governmental institutions sure bend over backwards for Islam like just read the bible and the quran on your own it won't really take that long?
 
Man, I'm sick of straight people's discomfort with queer people being masqueraded (especially to themselves) as progressive concern. Two things I want to say about this:

1. As a gay person, I'm really annoyed by the sentiment that gay characters' sexuality should just be a "sublte" trait that "doesn't define them." My sexuality absolutely friggin defines me. I think about the fact that I'm gay literally every single day. It defines who I love, the TV shows and comics I find myself drawn to, how I relate to society, what my politics are, how I view myself- my insecurities and my pride. It defines how people treat me. And It defines the community I find myself in, who my friends are and what my dating pool is- and our communities absolutely come to define us as people.

And this idea that our sexuality shouldn't define us is also a bullshit double-standard, because straight characters are allowed to have their sexuality define them all the time and nobody complains about it. straight people in the real world too. Straight people talk about their sexuality *all the time* and yet nobody complains that they are "letting" it define them. The only reason straight people don't realize how much your sexuality defines you is because you're all surrounded by people just like you. And when I see people say that gay characters like Ellie can't be too in-your-face, that her sexuality should be "sublte" like some kind of footnote in the textbook of her life, all I see is heterosexuals being uncomfortable.


2. Gay people are a community and subculture, and we have shared practices that we use to express our identites- the way we dress for example. Yes, it's true that clothing is inherently neutral and anybody can wear what they want- but it seems that whenever gay people find a way to express themselves in a way that becomes a shared marker of queerness between us, y'all are complaining about "stereotypes." We can't let certain hairstyles, ways of dressing, etc. becomes markers of queerness, you say, lest we perpetuate stereotypes. But these "stereotypes" aren't just made up stuff, these are real queer people who are adopting styles of presentation to celebrate ourselves. I spend so much time in lesbian circles and so many girls proudly wear flannel as a way to express their sexuality, talking about how gay their fashion is. And yeah, of course plenty of queer women don't wear flannel and dress in ways you moght consider "straight." And no matter how you dress doesn't literally define your sexuality and you should dress however you like. But the fact is that for a sizable portion of the LGBT population, certain things become something we positively mark as being "gay" and for a lot of gay people that becomes a really important part of expressing themselves and loving themselves. And when we talk about these things we love that have become part of our shared gay culture, you get concerned straight people coming in warning us "But clothing and hobbies and music and hair don't have a sexuality!! Stop perpetuating stereotypes!" And you might be well-intentioned in that, but I can't help but feel this is another example of straight people being uncomfortable with us and expressing that discomfort in progressive language.

I'm officially in love with you (but I'm a gay man, so it will be only a platonic love XD)
 
you could also try not minimizing how important things like this can be to people who actually care, if you're so indifferent.
 
<snip>
I can't trust you on that because you're basing it on a belief that I don't believe myself to be true. More and more and I seeing diversity in the media. The world is opening up to a new age and those more closed minded are gradually opening their minds to new concepts. If you think I feel over powered by the fact that there are so many straight white men on television then that's just wrong. Because I don't and I'm not. Why should I seek refuge in such a thing?

<snip>

I think that maybe the fact that we're talking through a forum and not actually communicating face to face as human beings doesn't help. I mean it's easy to type something and to say something but to truly mean it an understand it is a different component entirely. The place I live in has a very large asian community and in that a very sizeable muslim community. They face their own challenges on a day to day basis. There is an unfolding European community that continues to grow and again faces it's own challenge. I've been lucky to meet a wide range of people from all different walks of life and from my own family experience I've seen just how badly LGBT people can be made to feel and how they can feel oppressed. I know that when you are different, no matter how it is, representation is sometimes all you have to show you who you are.

<snip>

Singling out one particular variable is almost like flaunting some sort of privilege in itself. Which is ironic given that the argument quite often made is 'privilege.' Dangerous word in the right hands. Language can be as dangerous as any bullet and the word itself easily commands a kind of moral high ground that I don't feel suitable for most conversations. I mean I've met stuck up rich people here in England who believe that because they're from a higher class they have god given rights and are have a certain 'privilege' for it but I've never felt that way because I'm straight and someone else is gay? A persons happiness is more important to me than trying to define or stereotype them.

Snipping to focus on certain paragraphs for the coherence of my thoughts.

I must admit that I don't really understand what you're getting at, here. You said yourself that representation is sometimes all you have to show you who you are. Then what's the problem with people wanting to be represented, then?

Are you perhaps simply objecting to the words "privilege"? Like you felt accused of being a stuck up person who believe that they are of the higher class? That you are automatically a happier person who feel powerful due to the media catering to you? Because that's not what it means. At least, not in the context of this conversation.

It means that you can afford to be in certain position that others can't. To actually be able to choose to the mindset of not feeling overpowered by media representations of your orientation/race/gender, to not have some little representation be all you have to show who you are... That's a position of privilege.
 
I didn't realise that I was? I'm trying to prove, if anything, that just because of who I am doesn't make me part of the problem. I want to make the problem better but it's a gradual process that's going to take a long time.

all your talk about not having to be reassured of who you are and how okay it is to be who you are, along with all your kumbaya shit, sure reads like that, to be honest with you.
 
I just hope the game is super good with great gameplay and the multiplayer has the roots and soul of the current one. Do not care about main characters sexual orientation because that no adds or quits value to a game.
Really? No value? When we're talking about a sequel to a game that among other things was renowned for its writing and characters and narrative?

Did you read Schreier's post on the first page? If you haven't, go back and do so. If you have, go back and give it another read anyway, then walk away and think about it for a few minutes, and tell me that adds no value to a game. Even if it has no value to you personally, it clearly does add value to others whereas you can just skip the cutscene or whatever if you really don't care about it, no harm no foul. But it definitely does add value and improve the lives of others, even if you yourself are not one of those, and the fact that this type of thing does improve the lives of minorities even just a little should be reason enough for everyone to be fighting tooth and nail for it, to help each other out and see each other smile and make each other's lives as positive and respected and meaningful as possible, even in as small ways as this, because as the link Schreier posted shows even "small things" like this can indeed have tremendous impacts and strong reverberations. That's more than reason enough and more than value enough.
 
You know I'm just not sure about having this prominent lesbian thing going on here we need to keep Naughty Dog characters more like Nathan "Nate" Drake the jarheaded orientalist. More dog and less naughty y'all!
 
the UK is a different kind of monster. I mean there's more and more representation here than ever before. People from all races, religions and sexualities are being shown on television and in the media. All the classic soaps like Coronation Street, Eastenders and Emmerdale all have a cast of diverse characters, gay, lesbian, black, asian etc. More and more advertisements are using more diverse casts. Hell even the Fifa 17 story chose to use a young black male because the top upcoming footballers in the UK just so happen to be black. I.e. Sturridge, Sterling and Welbeck.

Don't get me wrong, all this is fantastic and a good thing. The UK has made fantastic strides in this kind of thing. However, speaking as a gay man from the UK, do you know what I care about a lot more than soap operas? Video games. As such, I'd like video games to be a diverse medium too. We don't have to choose.

I didn't realise that I was?

You are. Take a step back and think about the things you've been saying. You've found a thousand ways to avoid agreeing with the simple idea that having representation in video games is a positive thing for LGBT people and something to be praised.
 
"Why can't gay people just like, stop letting the fact that they are gay and face tons of discrimination over major aspects of their lives and just like, say nothing about it?"

Man, some times I wonder how people formulate these thoughts. If humanity wanted people to just be people we would have abandoned the social aspects of the concepts of race and gender a long time ago. There is obvious difference between people. It's just so dumb when we act like there isn't on some Kumbaya shit. Where does that get us? If you are a progressive person what exactly are you achieving by pretending there are no differences between people when the rest of the world doesn't operate on that reality? How about you use your progressiveness to actual push for something positive?
 
I just hope the game is super good with great gameplay and the multiplayer has the roots and soul of the current one. Do not care about main characters sexual orientation because that no adds or quits value to a game.
This type of comment keeps popping up, but it makes no sense in a thread about naughty dog, who since the ps3 have worried about the gameplay about as much as, if not less than, the story and characters.
 
You know I'm just not sure about having this prominent lesbian thing going on here we need to keep Naughty Dog characters more like Nathan "Nate" Drake the jarheaded orientalist. More dog and less naughty y'all!

I wonder what hot foreign bond girl he's gonna drag his dick across next?
 
Nathan "Nate" Drake draws his privilege from Sir Francis Drake, I think it's a UK title thing. The lore of these Naughty Dog games.
 
Ouch, that hurt man. Well sorry I'm not the knight in shining armour to save the world. If a person can't wish for a little more love, tolerance and understanding in the world then just continue to hate man. Label me part of the problem, ship me off to some horrible place and let me squalor. Be as honest as you want my man. I don't know you and you don't know me but with a good beer and a proper forum to talk person to person we might find some common ground and maybe agree on stuff and have a proper discussion without need for insulting each other like this. You think I'm full of shit, then fine. Sorry you feel that way.

Sorry all whom I've enjoyed a good discussion with tonight but it's nearly 2am here in the UK and after an 8 hour shift and a long evening, I am bamboozled and need some sleep.

So as previously mentioned, apologies to all who feel offended or upset by my posts. It's not my intention to hurt or offend others, simply to have a good discussion and keep the learning process rolling.

I hope The Last of Us 2 is going to be everything I hoped for and I hope for the LGBT community here on GAF that you can find some solace and maybe a little hope from whatever may come from this game. If not there's plenty of other opportunities to provide the kind of representation that people are striving for and clearly it can't come soon enough.

Peace all.

At least you're feeling something, and that's better than indifference. I didn't ask you to be a knight in shining armour, because I know I'm not either, and that's not either of our jobs. But asking someone to not minimize the importance of representation when they aren't the one affected by it isn't exactly asking the world of you. A lot of people want more love and tolerance in the world, but some are more affected by the lack of it than others. I don't hate you, I just think you're not as in tune with the struggles that people face as you think you are. I didn't say anything about you being part of a problem, or make up any weird as fuck hypothetical about shipping you out. You said that.

I'm sure we agree on lots of stuff, but I don't think I've insulted you at all. I've spoken with you the way I would speak with anyone who says unreasonable shit, and digs their heels in instead of just listening. I hope you go and work on your own learning process, especially as it relates to representation and why it's so important for minorities.

bye felicia
 
No. Killing one half of a gay relationship is an overplayed trope at this point. It's like gay couples can never have happy endings in fiction.

Again, even The Last of Us did it TWICE in the first game.
On the other hand, almost everyone with a speaking role died in the game. Doesn't really fall in the trope trap
 
As I brought up before, the series really hasn't dealt with how a relationship would work in a world like that. So, that would be an obvious aspect that it could bring to the game. Especially for someone like Ellie whose first love died after being bitten and whose had to watch other die the same way.

If it's organic then by all means. I thought left behind was great.
 
The wikipedia of Nathan "Nate" Drake is gold

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Drake_(character)

wikipedia said:
Drake has a distinct personality, as the creators did not want him to appear as a caricature or "cardboard cutout".

wikipedia said:
Commenting on Drake's "everyman" persona, Tom Hoggins of the Daily Telegraph called the character's vulnerability "endearing"

Drake is a complex man of contradictions. We must examine through Hegelian dialectics.
 
Well, I don't really care about her sexuality. I just want an another masterpiece from ND.
I just hope they won't focus on romance too much.
 
Why is anyone asking ND to focus on anything?



Let's let the story tellers tell the story they want to tell. If the story they want to tell is "super gay" then fantastic. If not, equally fantastic.


There shouldn't be pressure for them to do or do not though.
 
Why is anyone asking ND to focus on anything?



Let's let the story tellers tell the story they want to tell. If the story they want to tell is "super gay" then fantastic. If not, equally fantastic.


There shouldn't be pressure for them to do or do not though.

Eh, developers make decisions informed by culture norms and restrictions all the time. Stories don't come out in a vacuum, they are heavily influenced. We know Ellie is gay, she will be the first gay character in a AAA game. That's a huge deal. It would be cool if they actually referenced that in some form rather than the usual, "she's gay wink". I don't really see an issue with these requests, gamers request things all the time
 
Top Bottom