ronaldthump
Member
Well, if this is true, I cannot believe we need 45 hours to complete 100%. I hope more.
45 hours is plenty of hours. lol
Well, if this is true, I cannot believe we need 45 hours to complete 100%. I hope more.
Why? Okay dude last year they said knack 2 was going to be at e3 2016, dead don't ride/days gone was gonna be about a dude with a flaming skull or some kind of malarkey. In the past, they also said vergil from dmc was going into a trex. So yeahhh they're really credible huh?
It is not about 4chan. I was hoping for quest variety like Witcher 3, means, hundred of hours of gameplay, fucking huge open-world.Why? Okay dude last year they said knack 2 was going to be at e3 2016, dead don't ride/days gone was gonna be about a dude with a flaming skull or some kind of malarkey. In the past, they also said vergil from dmc was going into a trex. So yeahhh they're really credible huh?
45 hours is plenty of hours. lol
It is not about 4chan. I was hoping for quest variety like Witcher 3, means, hundred of hours of gameplay, fucking huge open-world.
I was hoping for ~80 hours![]()
But we still don't know that? And some of us can't spare 80 or 200 hours of gameplayIt is not about 4chan. I was hoping for quest variety like Witcher 3, means, hundred of hours of gameplay, fucking huge open-world.
It is not about 4chan. I was hoping for quest variety like Witcher 3, means, hundred of hours of gameplay, fucking huge open-world.
I was hoping for ~80 hours![]()
The Witcher III level of content doesn't exist outside The Witcher III. I think Guerrilla was open an said that the game wasn't super big but more focused. Although yeah, I did (kinda still do) expect a 100hs game.
If it's less it'll depends of how much sense it makes for the game and how good it is.
~45 hours is great for me. A packed RPG that avoids being overly long.
The Witcher III level of content doesn't exist outside The Witcher III. I think Guerrilla was open an said that the game wasn't super big but more focused. Although yeah, I did (kinda still do) expect a 100hs game.
If it's less it'll depends of how much sense it makes for the game and how good it is.
Maybe a monkey will appear this year? We've had werewolves, robodinos, a cat and a dogbird so there's a recurring theme thereIts so early yet im already lookingahead to see the type of show Sony puts on at e3 this year. Potential is just as good as last year's (for me at least)
Don't do this to me..You know how I feel about thatMaybe a monkey will appear this year? We've had werewolves, robodinos, a cat and a dogbird so there's a recurring theme there
Yeah I would rather have a 45-50 hour experience than a drawn out 200 hour one, CDPR is the only studio I trust to do that
4chan rumors aren't worth getting worried about though
What else was there? PM me if you can't post here. No story stuff obviouslyEither way, everything I read about those rumors were super exciting and very plausible (except the ending, I didn't read that shit or course!).
45h of content is much bigger than I was anticipating, and would be fine with me.
Same here. I thought this would be like ~20 hour game. 45 hours would be way beyond my wildest expectation for this
What else was there? PM me if you can't post here. No story stuff obviously
The spoiler tagged part is music to my ears. Hope that's trueI don't think it's really that spoilery but i'll keep it vague:
Different biomes, most of what people wants in the game.
Something about hacking animals, I'll post it in spoilers but it's really inoffensive:Almost every animal is hackable.
And a fantastic gameplay element that you get late in the game. It was the biggest spoiler I read.![]()
Don't wanna do it too hard, you might go blindRolls eyes
Play time means nothing, you're just comparing how much game padding one game has compared to the other.
If 4chan is to be believed its 20 hours for main quest and 45 to 100%. But it's 4chan so we should stop talking about it. Even though I've instigated part of the discussion about itIs someone really complaining about the prospect of 45 hours for Horizon?
I'd be happy with 30 hours.
15 hours for the main quest, 15 hours for side quests and exploration. I think that would be perfect for an action focused RPG. Keeps unnecessary bloat out of the game.
if the 4chan rumor is true then the game is 20 hours, 45 is just to get 100% completion
20 hrs is kinda disappointing to me
https://mobile.twitter.com/popply90/status/820654446170537984
This guy is called sawtooth.
sorry just want an excuse to post that awesome cover art
Right, what is that quality looking like? 20 hours of greatness? 40 hours of goodness?I can understand that. For me I think 20 hours for completion works since I have a lot less time to play now. Hopefully all 20 hours are really fun
Haha yea wellDon't wanna do it too hard, you might go blind![]()
When I play these open world RPG's I spend so much time just walking around doing nothing, so if there's 45 hours of quests I'll still end up putting in way more
Me neither. Also I interpreted it as 45 hours to complete every quest. That doesn't take exploration into considerationI think that often those times take fast travel into account and I don't do fast travel.
If I was the real Kazuo Hirai, I would like to tell House: " You're fired!"
~45 hours is great for me. A packed RPG that avoids being overly long.
When I was younger, yeah, give me all the hours. Now, nah lol.
It is also fine if Horizon is more tightened and focused.
I doubt Andrew House oversees low-level things like marketing budgets on smaller releases per territory. If someone at Sony America isn't doing their job it should be up to Shawn Laydon to shout at one of his lackeys to sort it, or allocate a bigger marketing budget.
Yeah, it feels to me that someone over at SIEA's marketing team with enough influencing power has a strong belief that more "niche" games aren't worth pushing over big AAA games, and that rather than give it a 90:10 treatment, it's more worth it 99:1 treatment in terms of ratio of marketing.
Part of me would love a scenario where SIE's leadership board mandates a preferential treatment for all first-party titles in marketing/support/etc no matter how bomba they're likely to be, but as someone who has worked in marketing before, that is a nightmare to work with.
Serious question, why exclusive deal is different in different region?
For example, Yakuza 0 Chinese version is "Only on Playstation", but western version is "Console exclusive". But if it release on PC, it would be non-regionlock, Sony pay this game for "Only on Playstaion" but get nothing in the end?
Wattam is not platform exclusive any longer bud
Also mlb the unsung hero of sony studios
What about SIEE? Any Europe GAF here, have you see marketing of GR2/Nioh?
And the lack of Cosmic Star Heroine is shameful.
Huh.. I thought I remember hearing them saying it's console exclusive nowWattam is no longer to be published and funded by Sony but I don't think multiplats has been announced yet?