Nintendo announces Zelda: Breath of the Wild season pass, $20, contents detailed

Which part of the Zelda season pass are you most excited for?


Results are only viewable after voting.

NSESN

Member
Most like...
People that are not going to buy the game: This is insane, oh God. Expensive.
People that already have the game preordered: Excellent, Day 1. More Zelda, great. Nintendo DLC are awesome, look at MK8 DLC, totally worth it.

I am in the middle, I like it for the most part, but the "new hard mode" makes me worried.
 
I don't understand the hate. It releases well after the game does. The day one stuff is just minor and cosmetic stuff. Do people just hate DLC as a concept that much?

Some people want a complete experience ...
Some people want to pay for a game , experience it without waiting for an additionnal story content many many more months afterwards.

heck some people waited for the withcer 3 complete edition before jumping in. It's not that hard to accept that people don't want to feel like they've missed something.
And it happens
 
It is, though. By definition it is not complete.

When I talk to people about Mass effect 3 eventually someone will say 'at least javik was good and my initial response was 'wait, who?'

I never experienced the same things as them because the game I was playing was an incomplete experience due to lacking the dlc. It did not have all of the content. Incomplete.

This is preposterous. Was Witcher 3 incomplete before Hearts of Stone? Blood & Wine?
 

Anteo

Member
I just read this as the bonus content and content for Pack 1 are junk and they know people wouldn't pay for them separately once they know exactly what they include. The real meat will be Pack 2.

Its clear to me that the 1st pack is there to try to hold the attention of the players until tje new dungeon and/or story is ready.
 

MarkusRJR

Member
Meh, hardly surprising. Every other company does it, it seemed inevitable especially after Mario, Mario Kart and Smash started having DLC. For $20 that's about the same value compared to other offerings on the Xbox/PS side.

May not be a MK8 level of value but nothing outrageous tbh. I'm curious what they mean by new original story though. Playable Zelda campaign would be awesome.
 

Nerazar

Member
Why are you comparing ME3 DLC to Zelda?

The vanilla Witcher 3 was a complete game and it had DLC.

I sure hope that Nintendo would be able to copy the DLC treatment for Witcher 3. It was just amazing. Some of the DLC had more content than some full-price AAA titles. And the game was improved continuously.

However, no other company was able to match CD Project on this one and think this will still be the case in the years to come.
 

Morts

Member
It is, though. By definition it is not complete.

When I talk to people about Mass effect 3 eventually someone will say 'at least javik was good and my initial response was 'wait, who?'

I never experienced the same things as them because the game I was playing was an incomplete experience due to lacking the dlc. It did not have all of the content. Incomplete.

Mass Effect 3 is one of the few examples I can think of where it actually felt like some of the DLC (Javik) was cut from the main game to be dlc. I think that's the exception rather than the rule though. Most DLC would not exist if it wasn't developed under its own budget with the intention to charge for it.
 

what-ok

Member
When you're selling hard mode separately then yeah, it's incomplete.

Agreed. Difficulty being a additional cost makes little sense.
maybe it adds more enemies, new enemies and maybe different placement of items as well as more damage? I am trying to rationalize the reason.
 

OCD Guy

Member
. Do people just hate DLC as a concept that much?

If I'm honest I do.

But I grew up playing videogames where cosmetic items were things you could unlock for free in a game, and harder difficulty modes were unlocked after completing a game.

I'm all for expansions like say The lost and the Damned and The ballad of Gay Tony. I feel like I'm paying for something that adds value.

But when it's a car pack in a game, or additional weapons I feel like I shouldn't be paying for it.

There's no denying that often dlc (and micro transactions) are there to milk the consumer, and it's a trend that I wish didn't exist.
 
I would be more excited about this DLC if they included a use for the Wii U tablet. Maybe the Map DLC will add that to the gamepad?! Or maybe its an Amiibo unlockable?
 
people should wait until we have more information to make a judgment, like, wait for the actual game to be released, it's not like it's a pre launch promotion... it's a season pass

We don't know the extent of this as of now, we only have a small idea of it

But i guess it's easier to just explode in anger and rant about everything with no idea at all.
 

boxter432

Member
Impressions from people who have played extensively up until this announcement: "game is huge" "game is hard"

Thoughts from people who haven't played, after hearing about dlc: "game is unfinished" "hiding hard gameplay"
 

Aroll

Member
Why does everyone expect this game to be an instant hit? Some of the design decisions seem very questionable. It is not just hiding parts of the game behind DLC when it should have been about the full experience.

I get that you have your reservations, but it's obvious why they expect it to be an instant hit. #1, it's Zelda. 2, it's open world Zelda. #3, every person that has played it has literally nothing but amazingly glowing praise - from Zelda veterans to those that aren't typically into Zelda games. (myself included, as I spent 3 hours with the game).

Just take a look at the map, if it is true what they say about the map being huge than it is fair to assume that most of it will be barren and consists of dynamically generated content. So there goes the detailed world design we have come to expect.

In any case, hopefully it will be good but I certainly hope that reviewers will be fair and not biased.

Detailed world design... you mean like completely flat and empty Hyrule field where there are like, 6 trees? :p Setting aside that obviously biased statement of yours about a detailed world, the world doesn't look barren nor does it look like "content is dynamically generated" beyond things like weather. Everything in the game was specifically placed. Game Informer's recent playing of the game stated that there is always something going on. SOmething happening. SOmething you want to do. That doesn't sound like some "barren" world. It sounds like one full of interesting things happening all the time.

I also find it funny when folks complain about "barren worlds" but then praise past Zelda games, when they literally had Hyrule fields that were flat texture, barren worlds. Like, man...

BoTW is going to be an instant hit, not just because of what it promises, but because it's backing it up. Every person who has gone hands on agrees.
 

WhyMe6

Member
There's a surprising amount of people complaining about this, but as always if it wasn't DLC then it wouldn't be in the game as it was intended to be launched and would needed to have been delayed yet again.

Where's that wonderful DLC timeline pic that shows the flow of work from main game to DLC for different employees? (I didn't go through all eleven pages so maybe it's been posted).
 
I can't breathe. $20 for stuff that should already be in the game? Hard mode? This company

Most of your GAF posts are based around criticizing/shitposting Nintendo.

Screen-Shot-2014-01-31-at-8.04.15-PM-e1391217526830.png
 
People here doesn't freaking know what the hell is this NEW hard more and they are just telling to themselves that it's just Hero Mode.

We have to wait and see what is this mode before judging the damn price, it may be more than just makibg the damage double and worth the price.
 
What does it matter?

Because they haven't said what's in it yet?

Maybe they're not just flipping a switch on the amount of damage you take. Maybe they're creating 2 all new enemy types and reskinning the rest to reflect a harsher world. Maybe they're not adding new enemy types but they're modeling new weapons for the old enemies to wield and making new animations for them to use. Wouldn't that be somewhat of a value-add?
 

Oddish1

Member
People jumping to conclusions in this thread:


It says new hard mode.Very possible it is the only hard mode but let's find out more.

Having to buy everything does suck, but I think it's a little silly tosay "stuff that should be in the game from the start."

They charge for it: "why is Nintendo making me buy stuff that should be included"
If they didn't charge for it: "why is Nintendo releasing an unfinished game!!"
If they delayed it to put this stuff in from the beginning: "they delayed it! Nintendoomed"

Can't win :( But I do agree they should be separate purchases.

If everything you say is true then at the very least Nintendo should be dinged for the awful way they're presenting this. They've never confirmed a hard mode in the base game so of course people are going to rightfully be concerned whether it's being locked off in the DLC. And I don't think anyone would be complaining if Nintendo didn't charge for it and just released it later.
 
Second DLC sounds like what DLC should be

The first one is a difficulty mode, a "feature", and a Cave of Trials (I don't think I've ever completed one of those anyways)

Thinking I should just wait to buy the second DLC, I don't really want a real-world logo t-shirt in-game... I guess it depends on what this vague "feature" is.

Does scanning my Zelda amiibo get me a DLC discount? :p

I do wonder though, would the Wii U Breath of the Wild have a Wii U t-shirt, or still a Switch t-shirt?

Just a black t-shirt with white comic sans text saying: "Inferior Version, Please Understand"
 
The comparison with the MK8 season pass is moot. The DLCs packs for MK8 were equal in content and could be bought separately.

This is selling nice things and poor things in one pricey package.

Your entire post history is near enough going into Nintendo threads and making negative comments.

You'll be getting one of the biggest and best games of the generation for the standard price.

They're offering optional extras for an extra fee like every other dev.
 
I don't think Nintendo understands the concept of making DLC that people would actually want to buy. I'm hyped as can be about BoTW... But this "expansion pass" sounds like kind of garbage that should be free DLC.
 

Kinsei

Banned
-> NEW <- Hard mode.

New.

That tells me there's already hard mode in the game.

Geez guys...

It says new because it's new content being added to the game.

The game is out in just over two weeks and there hasn't been a peep about any sort of hard mode in the base game.

Because they haven't said what's in it yet?

Maybe they're not just flipping a switch on the amount of damage you take. Maybe they're creating 2 all new enemy types and reskinning the rest to reflect a harsher world. Maybe they're not adding new enemy types but they're modeling new weapons for the old enemies to wield and making new animations for them to use. Wouldn't that be somewhat of a value-add?

Stuff like that certainly isn't worth any extra money.
 

koss424

Member
When its story DLC with an entirely new dungeon, yeah its incomplete.

You haven't seen the actual game yet and you are already saying the game is incomplete due to additional content being available a few months from now. Like every other Nintendo thread everyone is jumping over each other to proudly point out how much smarter they are than Nintendo without any facts.
 
Hard mode and dungeon should not be part of this. I'm glad there will be more content to look forward to even after finishing the game later down the line, but just like with anybody else that does this it rubs me the wrong way.
 

Oddish1

Member
Second DLC sounds like what DLC should be

The first one is a difficulty mode, a "feature", and a Cave of Trials (I don't think I've ever completed one of those anyways)

Thinking I should just wait to buy the second DLC, I don't really want a real-world logo t-shirt in-game... I guess it depends on what this vague "feature" is.

Does scanning my Zelda amiibo get me a DLC discount? :p

You can't just buy the second DLC. You have to buy the whole season pass to get anything.
 
So much salt in here. I guess if you don't have much money I can understand. I'm pretty confident that this massive game will not disappoint, even if you don't buy the pass. All these anti-DLC warriors railing against "incomplete" games. I don't mind playing this for months, and then suddenly have more reason to play for a paltry amount of money. People make $20 out to be some grand sum of money. Again, if you are really strapped for cash, then that's unfortunate and I feel for you.
 
Most like...
People that are not going to buy the game: This is insane, oh God. Expensive.
People that already have the game preordered: Excellent, Day 1. More Zelda, great. Nintendo DLC are awesome, look at MK8 DLC, totally worth it.
Except for the reasonable people who are both buying the game and looking at this as rather lackluster DLC in terms of content, and disagree with locking away a difficulty mode behind it.

So much salt in here. I guess if you don't have much money I can understand.
Jesus
 

koss424

Member
I don't think Nintendo understands the concept of making DLC that people would actually want to buy. I'm hyped as can be about BoTW... But this "expansion pass" sounds like kind of garbage that should be free DLC.

If anything Nintendo has the reputation of doing DLC right with the WIiU.
 

Griss

Member
Why are you comparing ME3 DLC to Zelda?

The vanilla Witcher 3 was a complete game and it had DLC.

It was a complete game. Was. As much as I love the Witcher 3, I'd argue it isn't a compete game any more. If I'm talking to you and I've beaten the (incredible) dlcs and you haven't, then I've seen geralts story through to the satisfying conclusions and you haven't. You've had an incomplete experience.
 

JB2448

Member
Im sad they are learning from the worst intead of the best. I prefered them when they did their own thing even if they didnt modernise themselves.
Sometimes, you don't appreciate what you had until it's gone. This is likely going to be a trend for their software planning practices going forward.
 
Top Bottom