First Horizon review [Engadget]

Status
Not open for further replies.
If this game doesn't get good ratings... the review thread will be interesting. Might be like the Order 1886 thread.

Depends on how you look at it, but there's no way it'll be as bad as Order(63MC). That said, even if it doesn't get as bad as the latest Killzone (73MC), that Final Fantasy XV (81MC)thread was something...
 
What a weird review, it starts off with how open world RPGs never hold her interest for more than a few hours... why the hell would you let a person who isn't that much into open world RPGs review an open world RPG?

People who only like certain games should review them why? If anything people who normally don't like a certain genre give more valuable reviews. She ended up loving it.
 
What a weird review, it starts off with how open world RPGs never hold her interest for more than a few hours... why the hell would you let a person who isn't that much into open world RPGs review an open world RPG?
Why should she have to specialize in it? If it hooked her shouldnt be something of note to take away

Depends on how you look at it, but there's no way it'll be as bad as Order(63MC). That said, even if it doesn't get as bad as the latest Killzone (73MC), that Final Fantasy XV (81MC)thread was something...
There's still salt being formed from this thread 3 months later
 
I am not a fan of people fanning the flames in review threads. Its almost just as embarrassing as the stupid hype/defender/fanboy people shitting threads.

Lets be honest some want this game to score low just for the reactions.
 
FC3_Blood_Dragon_Cover.jpg


I mean, this is a joke post (BD is still a fun game), but you are kinda reaching about Horizon's quality before its in your hands
Ok, this really made me laugh. Curse you ubisoft, lol
 
You're making statements like you've played it, just like the poster you're clashing with.

And you seem to only accept the positive part of the feedback/reviews from those that did.

Funny how it's only a post or two from someone defending the game making assumptions that brings out certain posters who don't bat an eye at (Or are quick to defend/agree with, even?) relentless "Ubisoft" posts.
 
There were the usual suspects attacking reviews and such but it was in no way comparable to the dumbsterfire that was the U3 review thread.

I specifically mean UC4 review thread was filled with people waiting for meltdowns when everyone was pretty calm
 
It's so weird ppl keep trying to pin this as a Sony thing to me. Like the Zelda review thread bout to be the biggest pile of shit as soon as a low score comes in.

People will be freaking out over a 8.8 review because "it's low". Still find it to be hilarious people lost their shit over that.
 
Yep.

That seems to have been an outlier. The rest aren't of that quality.

It might also be due to the fact I hate the fact the characters are talking about "holy spirits and the all-mother" in a world where there are giant fucking robot dinosaurs. The clashing elements felt way to jarring when spoken, while it seemed cool aesthetically.
 
It's so weird ppl keep trying to pin this as a Sony thing to me. Like the Zelda review thread bout to be the biggest pile of shit as soon as a low score comes in.

Zelda threads have been calm so far.

However there is a ridiculous amount of hype for that game currently, could go either way.

Horizon thread will be messy, a few comments from one reviewer turned this thread a bit crazy.
 
What a weird review, it starts off with how open world RPGs never hold her interest for more than a few hours... why the hell would you let a person who isn't that much into open world RPGs review an open world RPG?
Because you need differents perspectives.

You are saying the game is supposed to sell only to die hard open RPG fans but it not. It is suppose to sell to everybody so review based in non-open RPG fans are welcome.

Options, opinions are a good thing... don't close yourself in a bubble.
 
People will be freaking out over a 8.8 review because "it's low". Still find it to be hilarious people lost their shit over that.

I really hope I will be able to say "a different time a different place" but I really don't have my hopes up for the zelda review thread because Zelda WILL get a few reviews under 9/10 even if it was one of the best games EVER made because of how scores has changed in the last generation, and I expect people to not count that and get outraged.
 
There were the usual suspects attacking reviews and such but it was in no way comparable to the dumbsterfire that was the U3 review thread.

Yeah the UC4 thread was clam compare to UC3 that was crazy lol.
I think people were expecting more outrage in the UC4 review thread.
 
Yeah the UC4 thread was clam compare to UC3 that was crazy lol.
I think people were expecting more outrage in the UC4 review thread.

I think there were posters subconsciously/or consciously trying to actual start shit when the UC3 level dumbsterfire did not occur.
 
I still love that dumb change.org petition about removing the 5/10 review (Or was it 4/10 can't remember)

Yeah bit of a weird thing, even though it really felt like a click bait review but it didn't stop it being one of the highest reviewed games this gen, so it made little difference anyway.
 
Yeah bit of a weird thing, even though it really felt like a click bait review but it didn't stop it being one of the highest reviewed games this gen, so it made little difference anyway.

I remember some ND employees being kind of mad. And I don't really blame them.
 
There were the usual suspects attacking reviews and such but it was in no way comparable to the dumbsterfire that was the U3 review thread.

Wasn't even comparable to some of the other review threads in 2016 tbh. Did you see the Forza Horizon 3 and Recore ones for example? Those actually were what so many wanted the UC4 review thread to be.
 
Based on the earliest previews/impressions, coupled with the more recent 4 hour preview/impressions, plus the way Sony is pushing it really hard, it's an 88-93 metacritic kind of game. Sure Sony would want to try and recoup their costs even if the game was bad but they wouldn't be out there saying it's their next big franchise or that Aloy is the next Playstation icon, or posting Horizon videos practically daily lately, or running commercials on tv and in theatres, and putting up billboards and posters.
 
On a seperate note, Horizon has been above zelda and is currently at #3, 1.5 weeks prior to release. Going to be a hit for Sony.

I'd be surprised if Horizon didn't have a stronger opening than Zelda considering the size of the userbases.
In terms of legs though...
 
I'd be surprised if Horizon didn't have a stronger opening than Zelda considering the size of the userbases.
In terms of legs though...

Zedla is not a massive seller you know right? Not sure where this "Zelda is a huge franchise" comes from, look at the franchises sales. It's popular but not huge, not even close to Nintendos biggest. Would not surprise me if horizon outsells Zelda's LTD, especially if Sony bundles it. We shall see can go either way. Zelda looks great though.

I didn't follow the game well, since it's an RPG, is there gear and weapons or just skills to upgrade?

There is gear.
 
Zedla is not a massive seller you know right? Not sure where this "Zelda is a huge franchise" comes from, look at the franchises sales. It's popular but not huge, not even close to Nintendos biggest. Would not surprise me if horizon outsells Horizon LTD, especially if Sony bundles it. We shall see.

I take it you mean Zelda LTD lol .
 
I'd be surprised if Horizon didn't have a stronger opening than Zelda considering the size of the userbases.
In terms of legs though...

why zelda is an established brand on a newly anticipated console
userbase didn't make yakuza blow up from its nicheness

horizon is a new ip coming from a studio where their last release wasn't entirely favorable

it would be more surprising if zelda didn't open more
 
I remember some ND employees being kind of mad. And I don't really blame them.

Yeah. I could understand if it got lots of mixed or low review scores but when most scored were 9's, one review giving a 4/10 really stands out but not in a good way and just makes that reviewer look like they have an agenda.

They would have been better giving a 6 or 7 if they didn't like it because from a technical standpoint, the game was not a broken mess and was well made, certainly not enough to give a 4 anyway.
 
Zedla is not a big seller you know right? Not sure where this "Zelda is a huge franchise" comes from, look at the franchises sales. It's popular but not huge, not even close to Nintendos biggest. Would not surprise me if horizon outsells Horizon LTD, especially if Sony bundles it. We shall see.
Mainline Zelda is a multi-million seller though. Why isn't it huge?
 
Zedla is not a massive seller you know right? Not sure where this "Zelda is a huge franchise" comes from, look at the franchises sales. It's popular but not huge, not even close to Nintendos biggest. Would not surprise me if horizon outsells Horizon LTD, especially if Sony bundles it. We shall see.

Well of course it's not close to Nintendo's biggest. Most games aren't.
You should go look at this thread though, Zelda is still a big franchise in the west, is a multi-million seller regularly, and there has been a reason TP was delayed to be a Wii launch title (like BOTW to be a Switch launch title).

edit:
why zelda is an established brand on a newly anticipated console
userbase didn't make yakuza blow up from its nicheness

horizon is a new ip coming from a studio where their last release wasn't entirely favorable

it would be more surprising if zelda didn't open more

Zelda is opening on a new console and their biggest failure in terms of home consoles.

edit 2:
Few million is not huge...at all. For AAA games.

So you're saying that if Horizon sells 2-4M on PS4, it'll be bad, is that right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom