From a filmmaking standpoint, SS is kind of an objective shitshow. It's so poorly edited that even a layman can point it out.Look, I was disappointed in SS but to say it's objectively bad is bullshit because the movie had serious legs, which means a lot of people liked it. It played to the masses well enough that you really can't give WB that much shit for it. It really was their Guardians, like it or loathe it.
Thats not true tho, aggregators put it out as average roughly 4.9/10. That ain't absolutely awful. Even tho it really was.BvS is widely considered to be an absolutely awful movie. I'll give you Man of Steel having a mixed reaction but let's not rewrite history on BvS.![]()
It really doesn't take a comic nerd to see it was a poorly made movie.Everyone talking about their circle of friends and their opinions, are they all fellow nerds and comic book fans? Because my 12 year old niece and all of her friends fucking LOVE Suicide Squad. There is a market for everything, simple as that.
From a filmmaking standpoint, SS is kind of an objective shitshow. It's so poorly edited that even a layman can point it out.
And yet the movie overperformed, had great legs, made as much as Guardians without opening in China, has a sequel and an spin off in development. Movie was successful as hell.It really doesn't take a comic nerd to see it was a poorly made movie.
Those other films are gone now guys. They can't hurt you anymore.
I find critics score for films don't mean much since there are many different scales with many different interpretations of what a score means.
The RT way of "is this positive or not" is clearer to me, and only 28% of critics liking the movie is pretty dour. It wasn't received well at all.
Edit: Also 44 at metacritic is awful too.
It really doesn't take a comic nerd to see it was a poorly made movie.
Those other films are gone now guys. They can't hurt you anymore.
Crow will be served.
4.9/10 translates to an F-Thats not true tho, aggregators put it out as average roughly 4.9/10. That ain't absolutely awful. Even tho it really was.
I mean...ok..but that's not what the conversation was about is all I'm saying. And I only brought it up because someone said BvS was a 5/10 for most, and another called him out for "rewriting the past" when that was pretty close to the truth. Not sure why 44 is awful. It's bad, but awful to me would be 1-2/10
From a filmmaking standpoint, SS is kind of an objective shitshow. It's so poorly edited that even a layman can point it out.
I mean...ok..but that's not what the conversation was about is all I'm saying. And I only brought it up because someone said BvS was a 5/10 for most, and another called him out for "rewriting the past" when that was pretty close to the truth. Not sure why 44 is awful. It's bad, but awful to me would be 1-2/10
I mean...ok..but that's not what the conversation was about is all I'm saying. And I only brought it up because someone said BvS was a 5/10 for most, and another called him out for "rewriting the past" when that was pretty close to the truth. Not sure why 44 is awful. It's bad, but awful to me would be 1-2/10
Doesn't take a genius to see that that's not what I was talking about, at all.
Yeh. It's pretty established lens cap on would have been a vast improvement.Lens cap off? Sound boom out of frame? Actor didn't look at the camera? 5/10!
Not saying that applies to BvS in particular.
I'm honestly both relieved that Wonder Woman is both good and the only DCEU film so far that isn't a complete garbage fire, and also hoping it has a positive influence on the rest of the DCEU as a whole, because everything else Warner has been doing so far has been, again, a massive garbage fire, but with Justice League likely already too deep in production for Joss Whedon to save it from Snyder (though I'm gonna lay off the Synder hate for now due to his recent personal tragedy), I'm not hopeful that'll occur soon enough if ever, because Warner's approach to the DCEU has, again, been mostly a garbage fire and I'm surprised Wonder Woman actually made it through their incompetence while still being a good movie.
I've said this before but I don't think Wonder Woman being good does a ton for the DCEU concept. She is a household name, and it has nothing to do with Batman v Superman - they could have made a Wonder Woman film anytime they wanted, DCEU or not.
This seems like the most standalone movie in the DCEU yet. I really think the onus in still on Justice League to be good, as that is the real proof of concept for the DCEU - that you can get people to like a film with Cyborg and Aquaman in it.
Aren't you the most stand up dude all around.I'm honestly both relieved that Wonder Woman is both good and the only DCEU film so far that isn't a complete garbage fire, and also hoping it has a positive influence on the rest of the DCEU as a whole, because everything else Warner has been doing so far has been, again, a massive garbage fire, but with Justice League likely already too deep in production for Joss Whedon to save it from Snyder (though I'm gonna lay off the Synder hate for now due to his recent personal tragedy), I'm not hopeful that'll occur soon enough if ever, because Warner's approach to the DCEU has, again, been mostly a garbage fire and I'm surprised Wonder Woman actually made it through their incompetence while still being a good movie.
Oh, I guess I just disagree with the base notion that 4/10 is not an awful score. I would consider that a fail on most grading scales.
EDIT: Also like I said, a quarter of the critics liking it is more telling to me than a score in regards to judging what the majority consensus on a movie was.
ha, that was meIGN really went with that 7.9, huh? Just as someone in the old thread said they would.
So tell me, how many critics liked the Lynch movies, or more specifically, Fire Walk with Me, mister Dale Cooper avatar ? And is this movie now considered a cult movie ?
Ok then. I rest my case.
Uh what case?
Well yeah, the majority of critics all hated Fire Walk With Me when it released and now everyone loves it. I'm not trying to rewrite or shy away from history. Maybe the same reception change will happen with Batman v Superman, probably not.
I mean, I'm not saying anyone can't like BvS if they want to. I'm just saying that the majority of critics didn't like it, which is true.
Well yeah, the majority of critics all hated Fire Walk With Me when it released and now everyone loves it.
I've said this before but I don't think Wonder Woman being good does a ton for the DCEU concept. She is a household name, and it has nothing to do with Batman v Superman - they could have made a Wonder Woman film anytime they wanted, DCEU or not.
This seems like the most standalone movie in the DCEU yet. I really think the onus in still on Justice League to be good, as that is the real proof of concept for the DCEU - that you can get people to like a film with Cyborg and Aquaman in it.
I still think it was a huge mistake to have team-up movies like BvS and Justice League so early.
They should have just focused on standalone movies like Wonder Woman, The Flash, Aquaman, etc, before having them team up.
I really don't think Justice League matters all that much for the DCEU, as crazy as that might sound.
The train is rolling, Aquaman is shooting and a bunch of pretty safe commercial bets are on the way like Batman, Gotham City Sirens and Batgirl. And we'll propably hear about WB greenlighting a WW sequel in a few days.
JL might hurt Aquaman's box-office but even then, regardless of the quality of the film, if Momoa shines in it the same way Gadot did in BvS (for some people at least), it'll do fine. Well, fine for an Aquaman movie. And Cyborg... Yeah, it'll only happen if somehow the character ends up being beloved in JL. But it's not like anybody actually took that movie's announcement seriously.
Thor 3 will save us.
I still think it was a huge mistake to have team-up movies like BvS and Justice League so early.
They should have just focused on standalone movies like Wonder Woman, The Flash, Aquaman, etc, before having them team up.
If I get a 44, I fail a class. Not just like a finger wag, but I have to do that class over again.
This isn't school. You can't tell me that a movie with a 1/10 is just as bad as a 4/10. One is inherently worse than the other. If you or whoever wants to call 4/10 absolutely awful that's fine. I do wonder what 3 2 1 would be labelled as though.