Wow...
The Witcher 3 4K Patch for Xbox One X
- Thread starter Oynox
- Start date
Wow...
Freeman76
Member
Lol thats what I thought.
I GOTTA see this running in 4K on a console with a jaguar lol. I specifically just upgraded to a 2600K because my CPU wasn't doing enough work on 4K 30! FPS with ini tweaks and mods.
The superior version of this game is always going to be PC so I have no interest in getting it for my Pro. With HD reworked constantly getting better along with super turbo lighting and weather mods yeah I'm good I think.
The superior version of this game is always going to be PC so I have no interest in getting it for my Pro. With HD reworked constantly getting better along with super turbo lighting and weather mods yeah I'm good I think.
jim2point0
Banned
I'm reminded of this...
Thing is, I'm now convinced he's just one of those troll posters that really makes you think he's serious from time to time.
AbandonedTrolley
Member
Nope, just loves Sony a little too much
Well medium looks terrible but do what you gotta do. But yes you will get 60FPS and probably be able to do a couple high settings.
Sir Vilhelm
Member
Guess I'll finally finish this game on the X
Why would the render time be the time it take to do half of the final frame? I'm not even sure why anyone would try to compare the time it take to sample part of the frame to the time it take to render a full native frame?
But I'm not sure what the further argument is about the point was that CBR isn't half the pixels of native resolution.
Freeman76
Member
I figured medium would be in line with ps4 but i guess thats wrong?
No one is saying the output is half of a native 4K resolution. It's been explained to you multiple times already.
Resolution has pretty much no effect on cpu load.
icecold1983
Member
Umm no. The gpus have quite different capabilities. XbX has almost 50% more alu power and bandwidth
Sweet, seriously can't wait for the Pro patch - been itching to dive back.
Depends. With the extra RAM on the One X, it is possible more things will live in RAM long term so less things will need to be loaded from disk during load screens.
What are you even talking about? Someone said that 2160p CBR is just 2.9x the pixels of 900P & I explained that it wasn't because 2160p CBR has the same amount of pixels as 2160p native.
So what are you talking about I would really like to know.
Colbert
Banned
We were talking about performance requirements for different resolutions NOT PIXELS! As a simplification I used 2.9x as indicator that 2160p CBR could be achievable on a Xbox One X if the base resolution was 900p on a Xbox One (X1X is 4.6x the X1). Something the tests MS made and were reported by Eurogamer confirms.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Oh shit !
I am DEFINITELY down to replay the entire Witcher 3 package on the Pro. I wonder what we might get .. guessing 1440p native or something higher via checker board rendering.
The best of both worlds will be an option between a higher resolution mode and a native 1080p mode with the higher resolution effects from the PC version.
Oh wow! That's terrific. I'm about half way through a Witcher 3 playthrough right now on my PS4P.
But honestly, since boost mode was released the performance has been pretty solid.
Freeman76
Member
That other guy was talking bollocks, its pretty much a solid 30 especially with beast mode activated
MosquitoSmasher
Member
Later this year for Xbox One X they say? Sure hope that just means on launch of the X.
Colbert
Banned
I was hoping "wersja" would mean "native" but its "version", rigth?
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Yeah, seems like it just says 4K Version. Not exactly a lot of info there.
A lot of companies call anything higher than 1080p on Pro a "4K mode" or something similar.
If they manage to bump it to 2160p even via checker boarding on the Pro, that'd be pretty fantastic.
Md Ray
Member
Rigth!
I hope we find out what's in the update soon.
Output being the key word in my post. Once resolved, 2160cp has the same amount of pixels on screen as 2160p. We all know that and the earlier posts weren't stating otherwise.
MosquitoSmasher
Member
Yup. Just looked it up on Wikipedia, version it is.
They do say 4K so you gotta wonder if that could mean native 4K. Then again what else could they have called it. Calling it checkerboard doesn't sound too great.
If it does end up being native, we probably shouldn't expect any additional improvements right?
Your 2.9x number paint a picture of it being half the pixels & needing only half the performance which isn't the case.
Colbert
Banned
Polygonal_Sprite
Member
Imagine if console gamers got a cent for every time a PC gamer uttered the term "shitty jaguar cores" or "laptop CPU"... After four years I think we get it, Jesus Christ the superiority complex of having better hardware to run games on lol.
Colbert
Banned
No it doesn't as you are the only one came to this conclusion as many others already tried to explain to you already! The 2.9x was a simplification, even it would be 3.1 or whatever it would change nothing about the statement X1X could do 2160p CBR just fine even the game was 900p on the X1.
SMH.
Ignore++
They haven't said much, but I assume it's on or around launch of the new console. From what I gather Microsoft paid or otherwise encouraged CDPR to provide the patch, and I think it was listed as one of the patched games at the reveal conference, so the wait time should be minimal if any.
Just let him pretend cb is as computationally impressove as native rendering lol
Colbert
Banned
I put him on ignore anyway.
He said it was 2.9x the pixels I responded directly to that & said it wasn't so , I'm not sure how you can say that no one said that when the post is right there for you to see.
thelastword
Banned
I think you could stop this Durante nonsense now, you either respond with something to say or say nothing at all...I made my statement and I stand by it, if that is the only statement you have to make following me in every thread with the same line, just use the ignore function.....
I never said they have the same capabilities in perf etc...I said they're based on the same Polaris card, the same base GPU...There are +/- refinements/differences on both sides of course....
I can substantiate that the two cards are based on the same Polaris arch from any reporting outlet, So I really don't know what the shock and awe is all about...However, my point was more to the tune, that if the Witcher 3 could have a 60fps version on the XBONEX, it will have one on the PRO...The uplift is not that great where you will see 60fps on XBONEX and only 30 on PRO....
If you guys saw the post I was referring to...
Alastor3 said:
He insinuated that XBONEX could do 60fps whilst PRO was not powerful enough to do the same...Of course that is wrong, so my response....so it may be good to follow the posts sometimes...Cheers.
Also, it's funny that nobody bat an eyelid when DF said that the XBONEX would be delivering on GTX 1070 levels, but now saying it's based on RX 480, just like the PRO, (which is actually true) is seen as a slight????
MosquitoSmasher
Member
Yep. If it hadn't been for MS there would have been nothing. Really cool.
It wouldn't surprise me if the Pro version is checkerboard 4K and X native with perhaps higher res textures or something else. Otherwise that would be a rather small difference when the hardware difference isn't exactly small.
If Checkerboard rendering was as computationally impressive (whatever that means ) as native rendering it wouldn't be a point in Checkerboard rendering.
To tell the truth I don't even think you know what you're auguring right now.
My decision to buy Xbox One X hinges on the difference.
Md Ray
Member
I don't have a Pro, but according to DF's John and Rich, cb 4K is as impressive as native 4K and basically indistinguishable from actual 4K. The only downside being is the addition of slight artefacts that can appear in some instances, primarily with transparencies. Also, when doing pixel count you actually see native 4K even though it technically isn't.
Colbert
Banned
I think the PS4 Pro version is a good baseline what to expect from the Xbox One X version! The better the PS4 Pro version is the better the Xbox One X version will be too!
MosquitoSmasher
Member
You already have a Pro then I assume?
Since it's CDPR, who really know their stuff you'd think they will take advantage of what the X offers. I see no reason not to. Similar to what Nixxes is doing with Rise of the Tomb Raider. And other games like Project Cars 2 and such.
thelastword
Banned
Ok, could you specify what he said will be improved in the PRO and XBONEX versions? Also, what did he say about GOG 1.2, I have this game on GOG on PC...