Considering how prudish and super weird the US are on all things related to sex, it's very surprising they're fine with this.mean, I guess, but Kotaku's hosted in the US, no? They're fine.
If they get blacklisted from era they lose about 99% of their readers.but I hope that little SJW infected trash website gets blacklisted from Era
That section of the Protect Act was deemed unconstitutional in US v. Handley actually. It bears no power in US court today.
Because they don't play games or know anything about video gamesWhy can't they just stick to making articles about video games? Notify the FBI or The Center for Missing and Exploited Children online if you find anything to report.
Schreier must be proud
These articles are being published by Kotaku. For those who may not be aware or who may have forgotten, Kotaku had an article where it intended to gain attention using child pornography, as well as for support of harassment, doxxing, and other extremely damaging behaviours.
Kotaku provided no response to this fiasco except foran apology claiming they did not do enough researchblaming the readers who felt uncomfortable with child porn and removing the pictures. As the website is unlisted by Google, they had spoken to the media owner about removing "nasty stuff", and content was viewable both before and during the campaign, this claim is beyond belief. The individuals responsible are known not to be rogue PR interns, but go up to Kotaku's board. Kotaku has not dealt with the individuals responsible.
Consider that by linking to their articles, you are supporting a publisher that is complicit with child pornography.
The individuals responsible are known not to be rogue PR interns,
No sir, and/or ma'am.Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.
The pictures on kotaku weren't censored?
I go by "ThemFuzSelves".No sir, and/or ma'am.
Oh wow, she's obsessed. Obsexed.
My apologies ThemFuzSelves.I go by "ThemFuzSelves".
No as a double negative or as "no, they weren't censored"?
Because that would be absolutely unbelievable.
As someone who identifies as a pre pubescent cartoon character, I'm literally shaking right now. I feel like the Kotaku editorial staff has just raped me while Jason Schreier tries to convince me to let him watch me fuck his wife.
This article is the perfect amalgamation of everything wrong with Kotaku. Useless blogpost about video game porn that says nothing of value, written by someone who probably doesn't even play video games, and ends with a meme that's been stale for a decade.
YOU JUST KNOW
This isnt CP.
Cartoons can't be cp.
This is honestly one of the less offensive Kotaku articles out there and people are freaking out over nothing.
Everyone at RE right nowWill reeera cancel Schreier? Guilt by association, like with THQ, and all.
Will reeera cancel Schreier? Guilt by association, like with THQ, and all.
Like a lot of other, the funniest part will be to see how Era will behave in future post about Kotaku.
It's going to be a lot of fun.
Use this insteadLive footage of ResetEra
Live footage of me at ResetEra
(removed, too graphic)
Edit: Too graphic? I respectfully disagree. One was John Travolta in front of shirtless guys, and the other was just made to look like people fapping while they're clearly from a cooking show![]()
Will reeera cancel Schreier? Guilt by association, like with THQ, and all.
it is such bullshit that a site which will never refrain from calling Quiet a horrible sexist thing that should be banned will go ahead and describe & post animated sex with a 12 year old. this disgusting bullshit that belongs on 4chan, or some anonymous message board, not some mainstream video game publication. shame.
what a trash rad. Kotaku is bargain bin Jerry Springer trash, just like Gawker. flush this shit down the toilet.
How did this shit even get past an editor? I mean how on earth does that article get any sort of approval to get posted?