Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

GigaBowser

The bear of bad news
The power of Playstation is so powerful.

Even in times of weakness, in the coldness of night,

thinking of Playstation's immense power somehow gives me power.

Rlhm.gif
 
Seems like Microsoft are done pussy footing around these regulators curtailing to Sony's bullshit.

Yeah, sure, Sony can just easily shit out a FPS on the level of COD overnight. I mean that's exactly what happened with...

Killzone...

Resistance...

Disruptor...

...yeah, those are easily COD giants alive and well right no--

I can agree Sony are exaggerating COD's impact to a degree, but Microsoft trying to pretend any platform holder can simply make a COD-caliber game overnight with that type of revenue power is equally ridiculous. If it were true, their own current big FPS, Halo Infinite, would be a smashing success and not struggling to maintain 3K concurrent players on Steam (and at best 30K concurrent on Xbox) while dying a painful death.

They wouldn't even need to buy ABK for COD (among other things) if that were true, so the act of this acquisition alone contradicts their claims you're quoting.

True, I never really thought of that. They probably have some deal in the works or already done and just waiting to announce it lol

If they were smart, I think the two big things they'd be trying to work on deal-wise would be:

1 - Square Enix (either acquisition, or buying a lot of shares into the company since they are looking for companies to do so)

2 - Strategic partnership with Google for Stadia tech & cloud expansion (not necessarily for cloud gaming, but scaling out their services support infrastructure on a larger server network, and providing backend cloud-based dev tools, support & services at a mass scale globally to 3P partners).

Those two things I feel are paramount for them to be having some discussions at the very least into, right now. Maybe some smaller things/less pertinent (IMO) things as well tho like working out something with Ember Lab, Deviation Games, maybe buying shares into Capcom and/or more shares into Kadokawa & From Software, etc. I also think them trying to net something with Asobo would be great; those devs are doing some great work with small budgets and I'd love to see what story-driven type of games they could make with a Sony 1P-tier budget and tech/resources/talent support.
 
Last edited:

EDMIX

Writes a lot, says very little
Yeah, sure, Sony can just easily shit out a FPS on the level of COD overnight. I mean that's exactly what happened with...

Killzone...

Resistance...

Disruptor...

...yeah, those are easily COD giants alive and well right no--

I can agree Sony are exaggerating COD's impact to a degree, but Microsoft trying to pretend any platform holder can simply make a COD-caliber game overnight with that type of revenue power is equally ridiculous. If it were true, their own current big FPS, Halo Infinite, would be a smashing success and not struggling to maintain 3K concurrent players on Steam (and at best 30K concurrent on Xbox) while dying a painful death.

They wouldn't even need to buy ABK for COD (among other things) if that were true, so the act of this acquisition alone contradicts their claims you're quoting.

Agreed on all points.

Sony has tried for a long time and I think it was correct to give it up with Killzone, move on to Horizon and just get a better team to do some FPS thing later, so they are trying and Destiny is the best they could do and a smart move, but their other endeavors, that is just....unlikely to take on the giant that is COD right now. If MS felt such a thing was easy to just do in house ,they would have been getting 343 working on some new FPS IP or something.

MS know they teams trash, just like Sony knew their teams were trash for FPS titles, both did something about it. So I feel the claim that COD isn't that big of a deal is silly and the claim that Sony can just make a COD killer is also silly.

Neither publisher felt they could internally take on COD. They both tried with their respective IPs Halo and Killzone, failed and both did something about it. Sony bought Bungie, MS bought Activision. I think Sony had the smarter move as its cheaper and just as big without all the bloat and rape charges and Governments looking into the buy lol Regardless, I feel both parties are just to comment how they are. MS must remind them that Sony is still a giant, Sony needs to walk in their with a black eye and a neck brace and a good ass story on why MS didn't have the right of way lol


This is business and I'd expect any company to do the same as both are doing currently.

solidus12 solidus12 Watch MS be like "take that shit down, you know the feds watching" lol Be like "your Honor, we don't have shit, we are not leading shit, shant lead shit with this small purchase" lol
 
Last edited:
Agreed on all points.

Sony has tried for a long time and I think it was correct to give it up with Killzone, move on to Horizon and just get a better team to do some FPS thing later, so they are trying and Destiny is the best they could do and a smart move, but their other endeavors, that is just....unlikely to take on the giant that is COD right now. If MS felt such a thing was easy to just do in house ,they would have been getting 343 working on some new FPS IP or something.

MS know they teams trash, just like Sony knew their teams were trash for FPS titles, both did something about it. So I feel the claim that COD isn't that big of a deal is silly and the claim that Sony can just make a COD killer is also silly.

Neither publisher felt they could internally take on COD. They both tried with their respective IPs Halo and Killzone, failed and both did something about it. Sony bought Bungie, MS bought Activision. I think Sony had the smarter move as its cheaper and just as big without all the bloat and rape charges and Governments looking into the buy lol Regardless, I feel both parties are just to comment how they are. MS must remind them that Sony is still a giant, Sony needs to walk in their with a black eye and a neck brace and a good ass story on why MS didn't have the right of way lol


This is business and I'd expect any company to do the same as both are doing currently.

solidus12 solidus12 Watch MS be like "take that shit down, you know the feds watching" lol Be like "your Honor, we don't have shit, we are not leading shit, shant lead shit with this small purchase" lol

Well, I wouldn't necessarily say all of MS's teams are trash, there are some solid teams there like Playground Games, Turn 10, and Coalition. However, do they have any great teams the way Sony or Nintendo have them? That's honestly still up for debate, even after the Zenimax acquisition. Off the top of my head, based on modern content, maybe iD Software?

And by great teams, I mean those who have put out some kind of industry-leading game (or games) in the past decade, in at least one area or another. Sony have multiple teams of that ilk like Naughty Dog (UC4, TLOU Part 2), Insomniac (Spiderman, basically the gold standard for modern superhero open-world games), Sucker Punch (Ghosts of Tsushima), Media Molecule (Dreams, in terms of being an innovative content creation software), SSM (GOW 2018) etc. Nintendo basically have the gold standard in 3D platformers (3D World, Mario Odyssey), arguably one of the gold standards in open-world games (BOTW), kart racers, and non-traditional fighters (Smash).

I can't really name much over the past 10 years from MS 1P (or 3P that near-exclusively worked with MS) having done the same. The only one off the top of my head is maybe Playground Games, but most of their other marquee games that I maybe would've qualified (like Flight Sim) are made by 3P developers outright.

But to the greater point regarding COD, yes exactly, both MS and Sony have had trouble competing with that game with their own 1P content. MS could've kept that going I think with Halo, but the moment Bungie left that IP had an expiration date activated and it's probably now reaching past that end date. 343i have more or less diluted the IP of all its worth. Sony's FPS games were always technical marvels but in hindsight maybe bringing in some collab with a more experienced 3P FPS dev would've helped those games out a ton. They had an opportunity to bring in Bungie and maybe pair them up with GG on Killzone: ShadowFall or something like that, but at least now going in the future if Bungie and GG were interested in forming a team for a new FPS, they can easily do that going forward.
 

ZehDon

Gold Member
Yeah, sure, Sony can just easily shit out a FPS on the level of COD overnight. I mean that's exactly what happened with...

Killzone...

Resistance...

Disruptor...

...yeah, those are easily COD giants alive and well right no--

I can agree Sony are exaggerating COD's impact to a degree, but Microsoft trying to pretend any platform holder can simply make a COD-caliber game overnight with that type of revenue power is equally ridiculous. If it were true, their own current big FPS, Halo Infinite, would be a smashing success and not struggling to maintain 3K concurrent players on Steam (and at best 30K concurrent on Xbox) while dying a painful death.

They wouldn't even need to buy ABK for COD (among other things) if that were true, so the act of this acquisition alone contradicts their claims you're quoting...
Think I hit a nerve with that one...

The issue your post has is a very simple one: does Sony have an inalienable right to every game on their platform if that game is so successful? Using history as a guide, they didn't have access to Halo during its hay-day, when it was the biggest entertainment product - in history. Last I checked, PlayStation still beat Xbox in every console generation, and made plenty of their own games that were immensely successful. If Sony didn't have a right to Halo when it was the biggest thing ever, then the answer is objectively no - Sony, as a platform holder, does not have the right to demand access to the biggest games simply because those games are big. Which is obvious: that's not how the world works.

Sony chose a strategy that placed a third-party game they didn't own near-center to their platform adoption strategy - now, they're seeing the repercussions of that dependency. They chose not to maintain an FPS in the same arena, to ignore all of their other potential franchises in the same vein and put all their eggs in the Call of Duty basket. They chose to focus virtually all of their studios on single player third person cinematic action-adventure games, and kill off their COD-competing franchises. They - happily and proudly - used Call of Duty to compete against Microsoft, and they tried to buy as many exclusives as they could prior to the PS5 to leave Microsoft with nothing. If Sony have the freedom to pursue that kind of aggressive exclusive strategy, then so does everyone else. So, Microsoft bought up their own exclusives - one of which is a company central to Sony's strategy, an ill-advised dependency because Sony has no controlling stake in said company. Now, Sony will need to adapt to this change and compete. Welcome to the real world.
 
Last edited:

pasterpl

Member
Agreed on all points.

Sony has tried for a long time and I think it was correct to give it up with Killzone, move on to Horizon and just get a better team to do some FPS thing later, so they are trying and Destiny is the best they could do and a smart move, but their other endeavors, that is just....unlikely to take on the giant that is COD right now. If MS felt such a thing was easy to just do in house ,they would have been getting 343 working on some new FPS IP or something.

MS know they teams trash, just like Sony knew their teams were trash for FPS titles, both did something about it. So I feel the claim that COD isn't that big of a deal is silly and the claim that Sony can just make a COD killer is also silly.

Neither publisher felt they could internally take on COD. They both tried with their respective IPs Halo and Killzone, failed and both did something about it. Sony bought Bungie, MS bought Activision. I think Sony had the smarter move as its cheaper and just as big without all the bloat and rape charges and Governments looking into the buy lol Regardless, I feel both parties are just to comment how they are. MS must remind them that Sony is still a giant, Sony needs to walk in their with a black eye and a neck brace and a good ass story on why MS didn't have the right of way lol


This is business and I'd expect any company to do the same as both are doing currently.

solidus12 solidus12 Watch MS be like "take that shit down, you know the feds watching" lol Be like "your Honor, we don't have shit, we are not leading shit, shant lead shit with this small purchase" lol
It is funny to see how people let themselves drive to that corner where they believe this deal is only about CoD for ms.
 

nikolino840

Member
Yeah, sure, Sony can just easily shit out a FPS on the level of COD overnight. I mean that's exactly what happened with...

Killzone...

Resistance...

Disruptor...

...yeah, those are easily COD giants alive and well right no--

I can agree Sony are exaggerating COD's impact to a degree, but Microsoft trying to pretend any platform holder can simply make a COD-caliber game overnight with that type of revenue power is equally ridiculous. If it were true, their own current big FPS, Halo Infinite, would be a smashing success and not struggling to maintain 3K concurrent players on Steam (and at best 30K concurrent on Xbox) while dying a painful death.

They wouldn't even need to buy ABK for COD (among other things) if that were true, so the act of this acquisition alone contradicts their claims you're quoting.



If they were smart, I think the two big things they'd be trying to work on deal-wise would be:

1 - Square Enix (either acquisition, or buying a lot of shares into the company since they are looking for companies to do so)

2 - Strategic partnership with Google for Stadia tech & cloud expansion (not necessarily for cloud gaming, but scaling out their services support infrastructure on a larger server network, and providing backend cloud-based dev tools, support & services at a mass scale globally to 3P partners).

Those two things I feel are paramount for them to be having some discussions at the very least into, right now. Maybe some smaller things/less pertinent (IMO) things as well tho like working out something with Ember Lab, Deviation Games, maybe buying shares into Capcom and/or more shares into Kadokawa & From Software, etc. I also think them trying to net something with Asobo would be great; those devs are doing some great work with small budgets and I'd love to see what story-driven type of games they could make with a Sony 1P-tier budget and tech/resources/talent support.
Well sony already invested some millions in epic .. i still don't know why 🤷‍♂️
 

zedinen

Member

nikolino840

Member
Microsoft keep shooting themselves in the foot

NA (since 360 launch)

Xbox 88 m

PS 78 m

UK (since 360 launch)

Xbox 17 m

PS 15 m


Forbes: Microsoft Is Making A Poor Case For Its Activision Blizzard Acquisition

“if you have to make a website to convince people you should be able to buy a company, maybe you shouldn’t be able to buy a company.”




FTC has ‘significant concerns’ about Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard


ATVI is tanking ...


fRbkLC3.jpeg
Can we look at uk software sales?
 

silent head

Member
poYmuJD.jpg

No battlefield or destiny 2?
https://www.dexerto.com/call-of-duty/call-duty-revenue-30-billion-warzone-success-1844467/

How much money did Call of Duty make in 2021?
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/8604...year-making-call-of-duty-exclusive/index.html

The totals for 2021's revenues from customers, for example, were as follows:

Apple - $1.496 bn
Google - $1.496 bn
Sony - $1.320 bn
Microsoft - <$880 m
Total - $5,192 from top customers (does not include Nintendo, or retailers like Best Buy, Walmart, etc)


battlefield
https://www.eurogamer.net/ea-admits...less-than-10-percent-of-annual-revenue-anyway


https://progameguides.com/destiny/how-much-is-bungie-worth-destiny-2-player-base-and-sales-numbers/#:~:text=Destiny 2 is now estimated,as one of the best.
Destiny 2 is now estimated to bring in anywhere from $100-$500 million dollars in revenue every year.
 
Last edited:
Nothing is too big to fail. Playstation has failed before. Yeah it won't outright die but they can lose significant marketshare. Especially when you take away key ip. Which is clearly microsofts goal here.
And we can't have that can we? 🙄 I remember when Nintendo and Sega were the Market leaders, competition drives the industry forward pal. PS are in a very dominant position and have incredibly loyal fans (as you continue prove). They'll be absolutely fine don't worry.
 

Snake29

Banned
Whatever they do, they can have ABK, but for weeks people were triggered just for one statement from Jim. But in the meantime it was MS themselves who were constantly crying about how others are “better” then them. MS has Brazil in their pockets for generations so i can’t really take them serious. CMA is mostly looking through MS bullshit right now.

They want Sony to compete? Sorry MS should have done better instead of lying and keep their fanbase waiting for almost 2 generation to release something amazing. I’m sure they need CoD since their beloved Halo is dead, who next CoD? They are just playing it tough but by downplaying yourselves as a company you don't come across as convincing. It will bite them hard because after this their stance will be different again, they will act as if they are the greatest.

Every word they throw out now will be remembered in the future.
 

DForce

NaughtyDog Defense Force
Yes, other third-party publishers want this deal to go through because they'll benefit from it.

If Call of Duty is removed from PlayStation consoles, then that means a lot of PlayStation gamers will seek alternatives.
 

Three

Member
Did anyone here talk about operating systems when discussing the potential impact of this deal? Because I've not seen it.

Not in this thread but it was discussed extensively a month ago with very similar talking points as the one in the document about WINE/proton and how most games run on a windows only API:
Obviously competition in OS and platforms cares. This would be like saying who cares about the EU antitrust cases that MS was guilty in, you could have just ran WINE for Office!
 

phil_t98

#SonyToo
Not just the xbox 360 days but they had it during the cross gen period on xbox one because they still had the crossgen playerbase.



I think people misunderstand the argument. It's not that they are arguing against content nor have they demanded anything. They have only pointed out to the CMA that post merger these things might happen, where even though MS is still selling it on PS, MS might intentionally sell an inferior product and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it. They can't compete for that content or hardware interoperability anymore no matter what offer or dev support they were willing to give. The argument isn't against the content.

it is in nobody's interest to see an inferior product, all the money to develop on that system and make it worse to not sell? also with the content addition that could happen Sony is paying for that type of extra right now. there are exclusicve skins on PS for Fortnite , Call of duty and the Hogwarts game is getting exclusive content to. I hate to see people/companys complain about a practice they already do themselves. if it were Microsoft complaining I would say the same to
 

zzill3

Banned
"Naah, you're too big to fail" - said the $1750 billion company to the $83 billion one - "let me buy this modest $70 billion supplier and make it exclusive to me in a couple of years, so we can stand equally. You'll be fine!"

This is about xbox and playstation, though, not MS and Sony.
If xbox get blocked when they try to use some of the benefits of having a trillion dollar company behind them, we can’t use the trillion dollar company line when talking about xbox.
Being about playstation and xbox, blocking this deal does make playstation too big to fail. There’s no reason for regulators to rule on how best to keep Playstation as the market leader, they should be ruling on what is best for the industry and consumers.

Several industry big players (EA, Take Two) have come out in favour of it. Unions, regarding labour relations, have come out in favour of it. Getting ATVI games guaranteed on series S and gamepass ensures a significantly cheaper option for consumers to play the games.

The only reason to block the deal is if your end goal is keeping Sony as market leader. Regulators should not have that.
 

hinch7

Member
Yeah, a multi-trillion dollar conglomerate trying to play coy and play victim when its all there in the books. They aren't a small player in the industry, they are a huge platform holder with a lot of influence and hold in this sector. PlayStation is a huge part of Sony's business, Xbox is a tiny portion of MS. If Sony PlayStation business went to the gutter Sony would be hurt badly. If MS decided to pack up Xbox, it wouldn't faze them at all.

In reality, MS just want to gobble up the big players and IP's and stunt its competitors. That's what the ABK purchase was for, and the same with Bethesda.

Competition.. there is none because MS is a monster compared to most companies. They can just buy out the competition to get to where they want to be.
 

MOTM

Banned
Whatever they do, they can have ABK, but for weeks people were triggered just for one statement from Jim. But in the meantime it was MS themselves who were constantly crying about how others are “better” then them. MS has Brazil in their pockets for generations so i can’t really take them serious. CMA is mostly looking through MS bullshit right now.

They want Sony to compete? Sorry MS should have done better instead of lying and keep their fanbase waiting for almost 2 generation to release something amazing. I’m sure they need CoD since their beloved Halo is dead, who next CoD? They are just playing it tough but by downplaying yourselves as a company you don't come across as convincing. It will bite them hard because after this their stance will be different again, they will act as if they are the greatest.

Every word they throw out now will be remembered in the future.
WTF 😂
Martin Lawrence Lol GIF by Martin
 

EDMIX

Writes a lot, says very little
Would be amazing if this didn't go through and also Sony were forced to drop their year long exclusivity bullshit on COD, DESTINY or whatever. Basically big triple A games should be void of marketing deals that strip another platform.

That would be cool for all of us.

That would be such a wild story that we'd be talking about that shit for generations to come.

We'd be out here telling younger generations this crazy shit lol Be like "you know, MS once almost bought Activision, even tried to pretend it was Merger, saying shit like "ActiviSoftBlizMicro X", Call Of Duty was being made on fridges and Skyrim was still being put on Toasters"

E1zw.gif
 
Last edited:

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
That would be such a wild story that we'd be talking about that shit for generations to come.

We'd be out here telling younger generations this crazy shit lol Be like "you know, MS once almost bought Activision, even tried to pretend it was Merger, saying shit like "ActiviSoftBlizMicro X", Call Of Duty was being made on fridges and Skyrim was still being put on Toasters"

E1zw.gif

I want it to not go through just for this hahaha.
 
"Naah, you're too big to fail" - said the $1750 billion company to the $83 billion one - "let me buy this modest $70 billion supplier and make it exclusive to me in a couple of years, so we can stand equally. You'll be fine!"
Never know how much Sony worth.
So this $70 billion deal is just little bit smaller than Sony worth. It's crazy.
Yet M$ still act like they are small and miserable lol.
 

Three

Member
it is in nobody's interest to see an inferior product, all the money to develop on that system and make it worse to not sell? also with the content addition that could happen Sony is paying for that type of extra right now. there are exclusicve skins on PS for Fortnite , Call of duty and the Hogwarts game is getting exclusive content to. I hate to see people/companys complain about a practice they already do themselves. if it were Microsoft complaining I would say the same to
Nobody is complaining about the practice, that's the point. It's about leveraging something that was otherwise independent and preventing access.

Why wouldn't it sell though? Does COD not sell on xbox currently? The point is that there is market leverage. It's akin to say Google owning something popular like Youtube then Google giving it less features on Windows phone, which ironically is something that MS is currently complaining about to regulators.
 
Last edited:

Banjo64

cumsessed
This is about xbox and playstation, though, not MS and Sony.
If xbox get blocked when they try to use some of the benefits of having a trillion dollar company behind them, we can’t use the trillion dollar company line when talking about xbox.
Being about playstation and xbox, blocking this deal does make playstation too big to fail. There’s no reason for regulators to rule on how best to keep Playstation as the market leader, they should be ruling on what is best for the industry and consumers.

Several industry big players (EA, Take Two) have come out in favour of it. Unions, regarding labour relations, have come out in favour of it. Getting ATVI games guaranteed on series S and gamepass ensures a significantly cheaper option for consumers to play the games.

The only reason to block the deal is if your end goal is keeping Sony as market leader. Regulators should not have that.
I can’t believe the blinkers some of you have on when you make this all about Sony, despite the CMA being clear that this is also about existing infrastructure and future competition in the cloud and subscription service space.

Well, I can. It’s pretty damning though.
 

Melchiah

Member
Microsoft keep shooting themselves in the foot

NA (since 360 launch)

Xbox 88 m

PS 78 m

UK (since 360 launch)

Xbox 17 m

PS 15 m


Forbes: Microsoft Is Making A Poor Case For Its Activision Blizzard Acquisition

“if you have to make a website to convince people you should be able to buy a company, maybe you shouldn’t be able to buy a company.”




FTC has ‘significant concerns’ about Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard


ATVI is tanking ...


fRbkLC3.jpeg

Good article, but this part picked my eyes.

“In addition, we hope that players will be eager to play traditional console games from Activision Blizzard on other platforms via our cloud game streaming technology." – Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer, Sept. 1, 2022

This is perhaps one of Microsoft’s only coherent arguments that Activision Blizzard games will now in fact reach more overall players due to inclusion in Xbox’s cloud streaming. So I’ll give them that one, I guess.

Yet streaming games is currently only available on Samsung TVs, and there's no word of it coming to Sony's Bravias. Seems to go hand in hand with their narrative; "We want to enable world-class content to reach every gamer more easily across every platform" (except those of Sony's).
 

kuncol02

Banned
Sony offered similar "lite" service on Xbox.
Sony is (or at least was) blocking their PC games on nvidia service (and it allow you to play only games you bought yourself it's basically PC you rent to play games you own) if you tried to run it on XBox. That will never happen.
 

ZehDon

Gold Member
…Yet streaming games is currently only available on Samsung TVs, and there's no word of it coming to Sony's Bravias. Seems to go hand in hand with their narrative; "We want to enable world-class content to reach every gamer more easily across every platform" (except those of Sony's).
I’d wager it’s Sony who doesn’t want Game Pass on their TVs. Every TV they sell with Game Pass adds more potential customers to their video game competitor. Samsung doesn’t care - they don’t make video games or video game platforms.
 
And we can't have that can we? 🙄 I remember when Nintendo and Sega were the Market leaders, competition drives the industry forward pal. PS are in a very dominant position and have incredibly loyal fans (as you continue prove). They'll be absolutely fine don't worry.

Real competition drives the industry. Not buying established games. How does this drive competition exactly? Competition would be Microsoft creating their own ip. How does anyone gain anything from this? Activision games were already on xbox so theres no difference. Nothing new is being added. I guess console warriors like you want to see it happen so your favourite brand can have a stronger position in the market. Don't even deny it you green rat.
 

Godot25

Banned
CMA is a joke. Literally.
Arguing that Nintendo is not in competition with Microsoft and Sony because they made Wii Fit? This is literally "we need stupid argument so we can continue to pretend that Call of Duty is vital to existence of platform" so they can parrot Sony's points.

Also. CMA is wrong. Switch is able to run Call of Duty games. Through cloud. Same as Guardians of the Galaxy, Hitman 3, Control and many other games on the platform. I guess that this is the way Microsoft wants to get Call of Duty on Switch after merger.
 
Last edited:

Darsxx82

Member
Not just the xbox 360 days but they had it during the cross gen period on xbox one because they still had the crossgen playerbase.



I think people misunderstand the argument. It's not that they are arguing against content nor have they demanded anything. They have only pointed out to the CMA that post merger these things might happen, where even though MS is still selling it on PS, MS might intentionally sell an inferior product and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it. They can't compete for that content or hardware interoperability anymore no matter what offer or dev support they were willing to give. The argument isn't against the content.
That does not mean that Sony is being less hypocritical in its writing.

The CMA also does not go into that exclusive content is out of MS' reach or costs much more to achieve due to Sony's use of its market leadership position.
If you, as a Comision, do not solve this in some way, the competition does not exist either.

And it is that if today there are three protagonists of the console market, it is because Nintendo has successfully reinvented itself and adapted and Xbox has the economic strength of MS behind it. Otherwise today there would only be Playstation and in fact it is something that many bet (and celebrated not long ago).

Therefore, pretending that PlayStation cannot survive without COD is the reason why the CMA is not interested in adding, inexplicably, Nintendo into the equation. Is it that Nintendo is not subject like all to the changes and changing trends of the video game market? Why does only Playstation require such a defense of their position? Doesn't Xbox require the same concerns?
Does the CMA believe that the Xbox console can survive without the power of the Playstation brand, with more than 2:1 in hardware sales and with agreements with third parties that cost much more or are denied?

That is what is shocking about the attitude expressed by the CMA. One very different from that of the Brazilian CADE, which certainly does not argue its position any worse.
 
Last edited:

nikolino840

Member
Real competition drives the industry. Not buying established games. How does this drive competition exactly? Competition would be Microsoft creating their own ip. How does anyone gain anything from this? Activision games were already on xbox so theres no difference. Nothing new is being added. I guess console warriors like you want to see it happen so your favourite brand can have a stronger position in the market. Don't even deny it you green rat.
Isn't better for us have all the abk catalog for 1$€?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom