DeepEnigma
Gold Member
I'm still trying to get to that mountain to climb.I'm still waiting for those 200 endings on fallout 3 Todd. You fucker...![]()
I'm still trying to get to that mountain to climb.I'm still waiting for those 200 endings on fallout 3 Todd. You fucker...![]()
I'm still trying to get to that mountain to climb.
I'm pretty sure you do that as one of the first objective in Skyrim![]()
You still have not shown me proof of Todd's lies you keep talking about. I don't give a damn about Todd Howard or Bethesda so i never heard any of his lies. You need to show me proof of his lying. Dont try to explain, give sources.
Todd Howard is a very sweet man, the slander against him is mean
He just wants to dream and let everyone embrace their dreams.
You still have not shown me proof of Todd's lies you keep talking about. I don't give a damn about Todd Howard or Bethesda so i never heard any of his lies. You need to show me proof of his lying. Dont try to explain, give sources.
He's talking about them name dropping Horizon as a free PS5 upgrade initially, then trying to charge £10, then reverting back after backlash.Horizon Forbidden West
GT7 being PS5 only.
Did you see why i hate Xbox and Phil Spencer? I already explained in detail why i have burning hatred for them.
I wish Phil can be like that. Sadly, he is too corporate.
Off to my ignore list you go. Don't need to feed your troll desires.Bullshit LMAO
Its obvious you want love Phil Spencer. His lies are sweet melodies to you.
As to God Howard, blasphemy is punishable by death in some countries.
Luckily for you peasants, our Lord is merciful.
![]()
You missed this.As to God Howard, blasphemy is punishable by death in some countries.
Luckily for you peasants, our Lord is merciful.
![]()
Which in return would leave Sony with a lot of marketing cash for other titles. So yeah, if you are worried about 2 loadout slots being exclusive, i guess you wont be ready for what sony will do once they have the yearly CoD marketing budget free for other moneyhats. Fun times ahead.It will also put an end to all the additional content and perks that have been blocked from Xbox and any other platforms for the last decade.
Since Ryan refused Phil's offer as inadequate which included a guarantee of parity for 3 years after Sony's contract expires, Xbox then should be free to put exclusive content and perks on Xbox and PC should they choose to.
Yup we'll just agree to disagree as I said earlier. It makes way more sense to look at Nintendo as a video game console maker that is competing right along side MS and Sony. To carve out some sort of Nintendo special status is silly.
Make no mistake GAF is a really out of touch place with the reality of the gaming landscape.
Xbox is dead.
My Xbox only gathers dust.
These are statements no one actually makes.
People act like people use their consoles to play exclusives exclusively, but the reality of it is only Nintendo has exclusives to not "really" rely on multiplats.
On Xbox and Playstation people are playing these games and thats about it:
- Fortnite
- Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- This years NBA/FIFA/Madden
- Grand Theft Auto
- Minecraft
- Siege
- Destiny 2
- This years COD.
The odd exclusive that shows up every now and then is nice and all, but realistically no one really gives a shit, cuz the majority.....the vast majority of gamers are in the titles I listed above.
A couple single player third party titles hold their own for a few months here and there but otherwise, the only games that truly matter are the games that most people play and actually keep playing.
Tis why even Sony is starting to invest in going GaaS.
Which in return would leave Sony with a lot of marketing cash for other titles. So yeah, if you are worried about 2 loadout slots being exclusive, i guess you wont be ready for what sony will do once they have the yearly CoD marketing budget free for other moneyhats. Fun times ahead.
You cant rename COD. Just like how you can't rename fifa and fortnite.
COD is a household name. Changing the name, won't do any good.
That was an error on my part.
Both would be like x360 vs ps5.Which in return would leave Sony with a lot of marketing cash for other titles. So yeah, if you are worried about 2 loadout slots being exclusive, i guess you wont be ready for what sony will do once they have the yearly CoD marketing budget free for other moneyhats. Fun times ahead.
That is essentially what makes those consoles big. Those userbase are huge, and the more you advertise your console to them, the more users would join your ecosystem.From another thread, but this explains the point much better than I have.
PlayStation has some pretty massive sales of their exclusive titles for them not to matter much. I'd bet God of War will be a best selling title even though it is exclusive. Again just because Nintendo has found a unique way of competing in the gaming industry doesn't mean they aren't. Their ability to adapt was one of the main points of the CADE analysis. It is about competition and whether or not Sony would be able to compete without CoD. That is undeniably true. In this regard Sony has far more in common with Nintendo than Xbox. I never said hypothetically missing CoD would have zero impact on PlayStation and that isn't the standard regulators should be looking at.From another thread, but this explains the point much better than I have.
It should do well. It will be available on 140 million consoles. If it hits PC next year, I can see this being the best selling God of War ever. Maybe even by a large margin in the end.I'd bet God of War will be a best selling title even though it is exclusive
PlayStation has some pretty massive sales of their exclusive titles for them not to matter much. I'd bet God of War will be a best selling title even though it is exclusive. Again just because Nintendo has found a unique way of competing in the gaming industry doesn't mean they aren't. Their ability to adapt was one of the main points of the CADE analysis. It is about competition and whether or not Sony would be able to compete without CoD. That is undeniably true. In this regard Sony has far more in common with Nintendo than Xbox. I never said hypothetically missing CoD would have zero impact on PlayStation and that isn't the standard regulators should be looking at.
IT runs on a measly RTX 2060, the PS5 and XsX are more powerful
Different companies.IT runs on a measly RTX 2060, the PS5 and XsX are more powerful
It is about competition and whether or not Sony would be able to compete without CoD. That is undeniably true.
He's trying so hard to earn his pittance.Nothing about the future of video games is "undeniably true" in this day and age.
While i have never really played a SOCOM title, i think not many people want a tactical shooter. I would even suggest that games like CoD and BF are dying. I would rather have them invest in a CS/Valorant type game. Something that is clearly missing from modern consoles.Oops, Ansphn banned.
I would love for them to take that advertising budget towards a new SOCOM to compete against COD. How I miss the SOCOM days.
That is an effect. The cause was their efforts with the Switch and Wii. A poster earlier explained Nintendo's multiple evolutions throughout the years. It's not like Nintendo found success by accident.Having half of their top 10 selling games every console gen including the title mario is hardly what you'd call adapting
After 20 years of dominance in this space I'm pretty confident Sony will absolutely be fine. If they can survive price hikes in the middle of a recession and the debacle known as the PS3 launch they have proven their ability to compete. Perhaps I have more confidence in their abilities than some of the fans here do.Nothing about the future of video games is "undeniably true" in this day and age.
That is an effect. The cause was their efforts with the Switch and Wii. A poster earlier explained Nintendo's multiple evolutions throughout the years. It's not like Nintendo found success by accident.
After 20 years of dominance in this space I'm pretty confident Sony will absolutely be fine. If they can survive price hikes in the middle of a recession and the debacle known as the PS3 launch they have proven their ability to compete. Perhaps I have more confidence in their abilities than some of the fans here do.
PlayStation has some pretty massive sales of their exclusive titles for them not to matter much. I'd bet God of War will be a best selling title even though it is exclusive. Again just because Nintendo has found a unique way of competing in the gaming industry doesn't mean they aren't. Their ability to adapt was one of the main points of the CADE analysis. It is about competition and whether or not Sony would be able to compete without CoD. That is undeniably true. In this regard Sony has far more in common with Nintendo than Xbox. I never said hypothetically missing CoD would have zero impact on PlayStation and that isn't the standard regulators should be looking at.
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Release date: November 5, 2013
Sales: 28.98 million
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Release date: November 13, 2014
Sales: 21.76 million
Call of Duty: Black Ops III
Release date: November 6, 2015
Sales: 26.72 million
Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare
Release date: November 4, 2016
Sales: 13.6 million
Call of Duty: WWII
Release date: November 3, 2017
Sales: 19.82 million
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 and Blackout
Release date: October 12, 2018
Sales: 14.3 million
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Reboot
Release date: October 25, 2019
Sales: 30 million
Call of Duty: Warzone
Release date: March 10, 2020
Sales: 100 million downloads
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Release date: November 13, 2020
Sales: 30 million
Call of Duty: Vanguard
Release date: November 5, 2021
Sales: Unknown, but lower than projected
The thing is that the original articles (from mid and late September) had way more info that the one reported by Seeking Alpha:
- Most of the key issues had been covered during prenotification with the EC: The parties' impression is that there is not much more to discuss with the case team, this source said. "A lot has been discussed".
- The EC had not singled out major concerns and the EC's review was not expected to mirror the one from the CMA because for example the EC didn't appeared interested in honing in on cloud gaming.
- The CMA was always destined to go to Phase II with the transaction, according to internal sources.
- Agencies in general were delivering an enormous amount of scrutiny. The CMA was the less flexible one and had become even isolated, the source said. In fact, discussing behavioural remedies with the CMA had become complicated.
- MS believed that the CMA was way too speculative regarding the second theory of harm (MS leveraging its assets in other business areas like Azure and Windows).
- Jim Ryan met with EC officials on September 8th, following his public criticism of the transaction.
- Sony had been working with economic consultants to present evidence to substantiate its foreclosure concerns.
- Agreements for access to publisher content in the sector are usually short-term, often up to a year, and intended for parties to be able to withdraw from quickly. That's why MS believed that offering 3 years went beyond the standard.
- Google made a submission to Brazilian agency CADE as part of its review of the deal in which it flagged Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, Overwatch and Diablo as games that do not have any close competitors (unless this was a redacted comment, it contradicts what was shared publicly).
The full picture is way more interesting: the CMA doesn't seem to care about behavioural remedies (COD 10 years on PlayStation, for example) but they are isolating themselves (in relation to other regulators) with their views.
After reading that, my guess is that MS is expecting to get clearance during Phase 1 with the European Commission. If they do that, that would pressure the CMA quite a bit because the European and UK markets are very similar, so, how would the CMA justify such a different outcome without any obvious horizontal issues in the local market?
However, sources from Reuters said that the EC was expected to go to Phase 2
Well, just a few more days to find out what happens with Europe.
So what is CMA angle here?The full picture is way more interesting: the CMA doesn't seem to care about behavioural remedies (COD 10 years on PlayStation, for example) but they are isolating themselves (in relation to other regulators) with their views.
Some extra info:
Microsoft is said to not have offered any remedies in Europe's antitrust review of the company plan's $69 billion purchase of Activision.
Microsoft didn't offer any remedies before a last Friday deadline for the company to do so for the European Commission's review of the deal, according to traders, who cited an MLex report that was circulating earlier Monday.
The report comes after Microsoft filed its planned purchase of the video game maker late last month and the EC set a provisional deadline for next Tuesday to make a decision on the transaction, after which the EC is expected to open a four-month investigation.
At the end of the day it makes sense that the EC goes to Phase 2. Everyone else is doing it. But the "No major concerns" report maybe it wasn't as accurate as we thought (although DealReporter is usually a good source).
After all, Reuters was right about it!
Microsoft said it continues to work with the Commission on the next steps and to address any valid marketplace concerns, such as those voiced by Sony.
"Sony, as the industry leader, says it is worried about Call of Duty, but we've said we are committed to making the same game available on the same day on both Xbox and PlayStation," Microsoft said in a statement.
Companies typically do not offer remedies during the EU preliminary review when they know regulators subsequently intend to open a four-month long investigation.
What do you mean their efforts with the switch and Wii? What i've said has been the case since the NES.
That most definitely looks more engaging.
And sometimes it comes down to "things change".
Did they lie? No. That was their belief at the time. Why put them on a cross when circumstances change. Hell, my first wife said she would be with me forever. 20 years later she dumped me like yesterdays news. Things changed.
From certain point of view they didn't. Question was about OG game and it's still on PS4. Remaster on the other hand...
No, the end of Phase 1 must be approval without conditions or with remedies. If MS didn't offer any remedies, it means that the EC asked for them because they didn't see a clear option for approval.
MS is probably not offering them because: 1) they are confident and believe that the extra time can help to paint a better picture; 2) the EC prefers divestures and if MS has to offer that, it's better to wait until the end.
Still the same game. Its just that PC gets full edition, if there are dlc.From certain point of view they didn't. Question was about OG game and it's still on PS4. Remaster on the other hand...
Still the same game. Its just that PC gets full edition, if there are dlc.
I don't remember a single lie from Jim. Several times I asked for links showing him lying and nobody has been able to.It crazy how you guys put Jim Ryan as the face of Snake oils salesmen but not Phil Spencer.
Where is the list of all of Jim lies?