Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
and Microsoft can say the same when porting COD with xbox being lead console

Dave Chapelle GIF by MOODMAN
 
So same news as before but now with Sony's response?


It's is what is.
Sony can't count on COD being and Playstation and should plan accordingly.

I hope COD is enough to reverse xbox fortunes, but I doubt it.
 
Last edited:
a bit tired to try and parse alot of redacted documents sadly, it does seem like Sony aren't happy with CMA's speculation and would like them to adopt their own. Obviously that's rather natural.
 
CMA flip-flopped harder than Crap Gamer when MS said PC will get day one Xbox games.
Sony is just repeating what the ex CMA layer and other leading antitrust lawyer said right after the flippy floppies.



One leading antitrust lawyer said: "This is a very unusual development. In CMA-era cases, there has only been one other occurrence of 'updated' provisional findings that I'm aware of." "
This is extremely unusual," said an ex-CMA lawyer. "Restating your provisional findings is something you would rather die than do."
 
Last edited:
Sony is just repeating what the ex CMA layer and other leading antitrust lawyer said right after the flippy floppies. They both said those exact same words.



[/URL][/URL]


The problem is that the U-turn makes their case look weak and marred by procedural mistakes (by their own admission) that cannot be realistically fixed in a single month. They need to re-examine things properly.
This will be used by both parts if the verdict is not what they want.
It also turns out that even Sony can complain to CAT.
And the language used in their response suggests they're already preparing the ground for such action.
They basically told them their U-turn is irrational, affected by mistakes and requires a full re-examination.
 
Last edited:
The problem is that the U-turn makes their case look weak and marred by procedural mistakes (by their own admission) that cannot be realistically fixed in a single month. They need to re-examine things properly.
This will be used by both parts if the verdict is not what they want.
It also turns out that even Sony can complain to CAT.
And the language used in their response suggests they're already preparing the ground for such action.
They basically told them their U-turn is irrational, affected by mistakes and requires a full re-examination.
I'll be surprised if we don't see an extension to the decision date. Heck i was expecting if they did accept behavioural remedies for the cloud SLC it still gets delayed, i mean the EU even delayed it for that twice.

Unless they say fuck it where blocking it just for the cloud SLC on the 26th.
 
Last edited:
I'll be surprised if we don't see an extension to the decision date. Heck i was expecting if they did accept behavioural remedies for the cloud SLC it still gets delayed, i mean the EU even delayed it for that.

Unless they say fuck it where blocking it just for the cloud SLC on the 26th.
CMA has lost credibility in any case.
If they block Microsoft will go to CAT claiming their analysis is bullshit affected by mistakes.
If they approve Sony will use the U-turn to do the same and tell CAT that the whole procedure was compromised by mistakes and there was no time to re-examine the evidence.

And they'd be both right. The u-turn was just eggs on their faces by the cma.
 
CMA has lost credibility in any case.
If they block Microsoft will go to CAT claiming their analysis is bullshit affected by mistakes.
Mistakes for what though? The console market foreclosure calculations? At the moment they don't have that as a concern and that is where the mistake where found.

But for the cloud market that isn't the case is it? Unless I missed something.
 
Mistakes for what though? The console market foreclosure calculations? At the moment they don't have that as a concern and that is where the mistake where found.

But for the cloud market that isn't the case is it? Unless I missed something.

from reading the report on cloud gamine they say anybody who tried to set up cloud as a service has failed like google with its game only service and there are many different versions of cloud gaming. I can't see them having a problem with it
 
Mistakes for what though? The console market foreclosure calculations? At the moment they don't have that as a concern and that is where the mistake where found.

But for the cloud market that isn't the case is it? Unless I missed something.
They will use evidence that there were mistakes in the case to suggest the whole thing is flawed.
Microsoft is already stating that if the conclusions about the console market are right there is no reason they shouldn't extend to cloud for example.

Both can use the u-turn as a weapon to ask CAT to force a full re-examination of the case if the final judgement doesn't please them. That's because CMA has hurted the validity of their case with the 180.
 
Last edited:
This u turn does seem crazy from the CMA. It's almost like they sabotaged their own case on purpose to take the heat off them and on to CAT.
 
This u turn does seem crazy from the CMA. It's almost like they sabotaged their own case on purpose to take the heat off them and on to CAT.
The case would still go back to CMA.
CAT can only confirm that the procedure was compromised by mistakes and requires a full re-examination that must be conducted by the same CMA. That's how the UK legal system seems to work about antitrust.
 
"Such a strategy would be in direct contrast to the interests of gamers in the UK and around the world. Rather than limit choice or access, Microsoft intends to use the merger to bring more games to more people on more platforms and devices."

Sony has some nerve to say this bullcrap.
 
a bit tired to try and parse alot of redacted documents sadly, it does seem like Sony aren't happy with CMA's speculation and would like them to adopt their own. Obviously that's rather natural.
Honestly I feel the CMA consulted with Sony on the initial calculations and provisional findings. When MS pointed out how they were factually wrong it made them lose trust in Sony's arguments. So they axed the Console SLC as a consequence.
 
CMA has lost credibility in any case.
If they block Microsoft will go to CAT claiming their analysis is bullshit affected by mistakes.
If they approve Sony will use the U-turn to do the same and tell CAT that the whole procedure was compromised by mistakes and there was no time to re-examine the evidence.

And they'd be both right. The u-turn was just eggs on their faces by the cma.
I thought that the EU was your golden ticket to a block, they sided with MS and suddenly became corrupt and didn't matter. THEN the CMA was the knight in shining armor and now they are corrupt and don't know what they are doing because they side with MS and then all the other bodies are bought off by MS. Don't you get tired of constantly moving goal posts to suite your narratives?
 
I thought that the EU was your golden ticket to a block, they sided with MS and suddenly became corrupt and didn't matter. THEN the CMA was the knight in shining armor and now they are corrupt and don't know what they are doing because they side with MS and then all the other bodies are bought off by MS. Don't you get tired of constantly moving goal posts to suite your narratives?
They were corrupt prior tho when one of the EU guys tweeted he liked his PS.

Which corruption to believe.
Dance Dancing GIF by AFV Pets
 
I thought that the EU was your golden ticket to a block, they sided with MS and suddenly became corrupt and didn't matter. THEN the CMA was the knight in shining armor and now they are corrupt and don't know what they are doing because they side with MS and then all the other bodies are bought off by MS. Don't you get tired of constantly moving goal posts to suite your narratives?


Lol where did you read any claim about corruption my dear member with 83 posts all focused on defending Microsoft?
 
and Microsoft can say the same when porting COD with xbox being lead console
Or there has been issues in the past and Sony didn't go out of business like they are crying. So if .05 loss on digital foundry would end playstation are sony paying to have the performance lead andhandicapping xbox versions?

 
The case would still go back to CMA.
CAT can only confirm that the procedure was compromised by mistakes and requires a full re-examination that must be conducted by the same CMA. That's how the UK legal system seems to work about antitrust.
The U turn is in fact based on the CMA's own acknowledgment of errors in the process and on the data evaluation of the effects on the console market...

That is, the CMA detected and found those own errors and corrected them. Surely knowing that those were very likely to be taken to the CAT by MS and it was something CMA wanted to avoid to avoid an image of incompetence.

If Sony asks the CAT it will be very difficult to argue about something already fixed and adjusted. Sony would have to claim against the entire evaluation process and I think that it has very, very little chance.

Having said that, my impression is that the CMA has left the impression of haste, ignorance of the market and lack of basis for the correct evaluation of the matter and that does not help its image as a responsible and serious regulator.

In this case, the EU, being more discreet, has achieved that image of greater seriousness even though (according to the information and leaks) right now it is concluding in the same way as the CMA by eliminating the console market as a primary concern, focusing only on the cloud market.
 
Because its cheaper to get 10-20 day1 gamepass deals for 10 year, which will make Xbox a very attractive console, compared to gambling it with 1 company.

If day1 AAA game cost $100m, that would result in $1b-$2b a year for those games.
With a console cycle of 7 years, that is spending of $7b-$14b worth of content. That could seriously make Xbox a very attractive system, without paying for timed exclusive.

Spending the money to acquire an asset means you're left with an asset worth that amount.

In this scenario, they'll own ABK which brings in annual revenues north of $7bn and growing.

In your scenario, they'd be out $7 - 14 bn and be left with much lower annual revenues.

I wouldnt be suprised if they ditch Xbox for Xcloud.

They'd build console hardware for cloud gaming, then ditch the lucrative console market for a product that could easily be disrupted by strong competition?
 
lZWWvwx.png



They're saying this after putting out TLoU on PC in the state that it did.

jim-ryan-laughing.gif





I thought that the EU was your golden ticket to a block, they sided with MS and suddenly became corrupt and didn't matter. THEN the CMA was the knight in shining armor and now they are corrupt and don't know what they are doing because they side with MS and then all the other bodies are bought off by MS. Don't you get tired of constantly moving goal posts to suite your narratives?

Never forget how brave Brazil's CADE was for raising concerns and asking input from publishers, and how they completely got forgotten the moment they announced their approval of the acquisition.

round and round and round
 
Last edited:
The U turn is in fact based on the CMA's own acknowledgment of errors in the process and on the data evaluation of the effects on the console market...

That is, the CMA detected and found those own errors and corrected them. Surely knowing that those were very likely to be taken to the CAT by MS and it was something CMA wanted to avoid to avoid an image of incompetence.

If Sony asks the CAT it will be very difficult to argue about something already fixed and adjusted. Sony would have to claim against the entire evaluation process and I think that it has very, very little chance.

Having said that, my impression is that the CMA has left the impression of haste, ignorance of the market and lack of basis for the correct evaluation of the matter and that does not help its image as a responsible and serious regulator.

In this case, the EU, being more discreet, has achieved that image of greater seriousness even though (according to the information and leaks) right now it is concluding in the same way as the CMA by eliminating the console market as a primary concern, focusing only on the cloud market.

Sony's point based on the new document is that the mistakes were NOT fixed but other mistakes were made and that one month can't be considered realistically enough time to discard your whole case built in the previous nine months to reach an opposite conclusion. They're right?
Microsoft would also have realistic ground to appeal if CMA tries to block or ask for crazy remedies due the cloud market alone.
The problem is that CMA has compromised the credibility of their judgement with the sudden u-turn leaving them open for an appeal to CAT from both sides depending on their final judgement.
 
So if either party complains to the CAT what happens? I can't imagine they would let the same people fuck this up again if they ordered a reexamination?
 
"Such a strategy would be in direct contrast to the interests of gamers in the UK and around the world. Rather than limit choice or access, Microsoft intends to use the merger to bring more games to more people on more platforms and devices."

Sony has some nerve to say this bullcrap.
I need a quote on that.

Theres no way Sony can sound this stupid, this is your wording.
 
I would laugh if the CMA brings partial foreclosure back on the table somehow maybe its the plan. Swing between both extremes so you can land in the middle.
 
I would laugh if the CMA brings partial foreclosure back on the table somehow maybe its the plan. Swing between both extremes so you can land in the middle.
They already lost too much face from doing u turn. Doing that again would undermine their organization.
 
I would laugh if the CMA brings partial foreclosure back on the table somehow maybe its the plan. Swing between both extremes so you can land in the middle.
How sony is screaming to the rooftops anything less than the superior version of COD ends them. Sony has made this black and white. I do hope a regulator catches sony in the digital foundry crying and investigates sony paying off publishers to handicap xbox versions to win digital foundry. Since .005% COD win by the series x ends playstation now according to Sony's crying.
 
"Such a strategy would be in direct contrast to the interests of gamers in the UK and around the world. Rather than limit choice or access, Microsoft intends to use the merger to bring more games to more people on more platforms and devices."

Sony has some nerve to say this bullcrap.
Why are you spreading misinformation so blatantly?

This is a quote submitted by Microsoft, not Sony.

y44U2Ih.jpg


P.S. The_Mike The_Mike - here is the answer you were looking for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom