Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?

  • Yes, will be approved without changes.

    Votes: 221 24.9%

  • Yes, will be approved but with structural changes to ABK.

    Votes: 102 11.5%

  • Yes, will be approved but only with behavioral concessions.

    Votes: 262 29.6%

  • No, will not be approved.

    Votes: 301 34.0%
  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
MMaRsu said:
And nobody from Sony, or Nintendo has ever lied?

What are you saying bruh :messenger_tears_of_joy:
Click to expand...
I got you this form. You're wasted in GAF
aFJ1Nqk.png
 
bender said:
zbunjeni-pas.gif
Click to expand...
Ive had to purchase Nintendo consoles to play Nintendo games, or games exclusive to the system.

Same for Sony consoles

Same for Xbox consoles

I dont see the difference tbh.
Topher said:
You don't even think about what you are posting, do you?

"If Sony is allowed to be greedy fucks why cant MS?"

Your posts are dripping with irony.
Click to expand...

Where exactly is the irony? Im saying let them be equal.

I think yall are misunderstanding my posts lmao.
 
MMaRsu said:
What excuses exactly?

Holy shit I didnt think id be dogpiled by 100 users who love Sony and hate MS. Neither of these corpo's are your friends.

All is fair in capitalism.

Forget it

Sony and MS are both arrogant pricks. But it won't be the consumer who suffers in the end.
Click to expand...

So "just" Sony & Microsoft. No Nintendo?

The company that forbade 3P from even making games on competitor systems in the 8-bit era?

The company that got sued for antitrust violations in '91 (and lost)?

The company that barely ever lowers the prices on their own games even after 7+ years?

The company that intentionally put out a collection of games for like 3 months availability to drive up demand when supply was never an issue for them?

The company that overcharges for its hardware relative the capabilities?

It's funny that Sony is always the scapegoat for anti-consumer & anticompetitive practices that Microsoft are more guilty & willing to engage in, and Nintendo actually have arguably the worst history of in gaming 🤔
 
Tutomos said:
Am I the only one that thinks the judge will block the deal? All these going back and forth just proves Phil Spencer holds all the power and he can do whatever he wants once the deal is thru.
Click to expand...
I've seen this from a mile away. Phil can do whatever he wants once the deal is thru. The judge is not that stupid.

 
thicc_girls_are_teh_best said:
So "just" Sony & Microsoft. No Nintendo?

The company that forbade 3P from even making games on competitor systems in the 8-bit era?

The company that got sued for antitrust violations in '91 (and lost)?

The company that barely ever lowers the prices on their own games even after 7+ years?

The company that intentionally put out a collection of games for like 3 months availability to drive up demand when supply was never an issue for them?

The company that overcharges for its hardware relative the capabilities?

It's funny that Sony is always the scapegoat for anti-consumer & anticompetitive practices that Microsoft are more guilty & willing to engage in, and Nintendo actually have arguably the worst history of in gaming 🤔
Click to expand...
Nintendo have always been cunts in business for sure, 100% agreed there.

Only team I'd stan for is SEGA. too bad they stopped making consoles.
 
MMaRsu said:
Ive had to purchase Nintendo consoles to play Nintendo games, or games exclusive to the system.

Same for Sony consoles

Same for Xbox consoles

I dont see the difference tbh.


Where exactly is the irony? Im saying let them be equal.

I think yall are misunderstanding my posts lmao.
Click to expand...
Cant See Cheech Marin GIF
 
Nydius said:
Which is precisely why the FTC has pursued their line of questioning today. They have proven that Spencer lied under oath before and willfully lied to regulators about Zenimax, proving the Judge cannot take their "promises under oath" at face value. They will do whatever they want.
Click to expand...

What specifically did Spencer lie about under oath re: Zenimax ?

-

Second thing leaked unwittingly by FTC, sloppy.
 
Last edited:
adamsapple said:
Commitments under oath from Phil and Satya don't mean nothing.
Click to expand...
you mean phil who said this will help reach more players and help make games more accessible whilst taking games away from a big player base and satya who doesnt like exclusives but clearly has a goal of buying everyone to make everything exclusive?

 
Vognerful said:
other than the ESVI one, what other things do we have on him specifically lying under oath?
Click to expand...
He said that it was difficult to determine which platforms their games would be releasing on in the future a few days ago, under oath, when two years ago, he made the direct decision, and enforced it against everyone's doubts, that ALL Zenimax games would be exclusive. The emails have been posted here and you can read them.
 
MMaRsu said:
Why?

What. Because they are buying the company?

Lots of anti Xbox guys in here I guess, sjeesh.
Click to expand...
You're making a strawman argument to support your reasoning for wanting a company to literally attempt to monopolize the entire videogame industry. There is ZERO, and I mean ZERO benefit to this deal going through for anyone except people who want to define this like some big rallying cry against the big bad Sony corporation and to prop up nonsensical CoNsOLe WaRs. If you are able to look past all the information that has been exposed regardless if the deal goes through concerning Microsoft then you are nothing but a corporate cheerleader and saying things like "I don't even own an Xbox so trust my totally unbias opinion bro" is a lame attempt to give any opinion you share validation.
 
Heisenberg007 said:
For one ES6 exclusivity hasn't been decided. Then the lawyer made him read his own prior deposition in which he confirmed that ES6 is an Xbox exclusive. 😄
Click to expand...




He said its too far out to make any commitments about platforms. Which is right, when the game comes out who knows what platforms will be in the market.
 
DeaDPo0L84 said:
a company to literally attempt to monopolize the entire videogame industry.
Click to expand...

Holy shit overreaction much haha.

Activision Blizzard literally doesn't produce anything worthwhile except COD (which is also debatable, not my bag but lots of folks love it)
And aside from that, there is only the Blizzard Side who make a new game maybe every other 10 years.

But hey, im just gonna agree to disagree with yall and leave the thread. No interest in discussing it any further really considering I've been called an astroturfer already.
 
Last edited:
graywolf323 said:
honestly all the trolling/bad faith arguments/astroturfing here lately is exhausting, you can't even try to have honest discussions because the threads just get flooded with BS… you correct one person only to have another suspicious account popup not long after trying to push the same lies
Click to expand...
quoting myself because it's happening once again, some of us just want to have an actual honest discussion about what's going on in the hearing right now but the thread gets flooded with disingenuous at best whataboutisms to the point we're instead wasting time debunking obvious lies 😑

somehow GAF has gotten to the point we don't have many crazy fanboys left but the ones we do have left all seem to favor the same plastic box (even if they claim they don't even own one)

edit: honestly I think I'm just not going to bother for the next week, what's the point when these accounts are like a hydra
 
Last edited:
MMaRsu said:
Zenimax non exclusivity was never promised and isnt even in question during this hearing.

Yeah you wouldnt reply with some actual substance would you?

This thread is horrible full of dogpiling motherfuckers
Click to expand...

Look at it this way: at least you get to openly complain about it here. If this were a certain other forum you'd already been reported and banned. Enjoy this freedom to mope 👍
 
Heisenberg007 said:
But he had already made a commitment and confirmed, under oath, in a prior deposition that ES6 is an Xbox exclusive. That's the lie.
Click to expand...

I'm just finding results from this hearing when searching for any prior depositions like that, if you have the link handy I'd love to see it please.


Thirty7ven said:
2 million year ahahaha

Wow
Click to expand...


GP must be more profitable/ revenue generating than we realize if it just takes 2 million new users to offset Activisions lost revenue.
 
Last edited:
Tutomos said:
I've seen this from a mile away. Phil can do whatever he wants once the deal is thru. The judge is not that stupid.

Click to expand...

Am I reading the other posts correctly, that MS only needs 2M additional GP subscribers to remove CoD from PS and not notice a difference? That seems way low, wish I could play with the model.
 
Solidus_T said:
He said that it was difficult to determine which platforms their games would be releasing on in the future a few days ago, under oath, when two years ago, he made the direct decision, and enforced it against everyone's doubts, that ALL Zenimax games would be exclusive. The emails have been posted here and you can read them.
Click to expand...
so again, we are talking about zenimax games which the only thing he lied under oath was the status of ESVI? right?

also, not that not all zenimax leadership were against it. as per the testimony we heard it today. If phil has the power to dictate which games will go exclusive or not, then I would trust he has the power to keep CoD multiplatform and not other people in his company. Therre is also a lot of talk that the next quake thing is going to be multiplatform anyway, so I don't know about this.

another note I have about the Zenimax model thing:

I feel that their initial model with exclusivity on new IPs was made without assuming that ABK deal was in mind. I feal that once they saw how much money that deal could bring that it could offset the losses from zenimax going fully exclusive
 
MMaRsu said:
It's not? Isnt Sony why the FTC is trying to stop this acquisition?
Click to expand...

FTC's purpose and goal in this is to stop anti-competitive practices and future harm to the industry. Not protect Sony as so many seem to believe. Sony is not on trial but are 100% free to voice their opposition to the deal.
 
adamsapple said:
GP must be more profitable/ revenue generating than we realize if it just takes 2 million new users to offset Activisions lost revenue.
Click to expand...
This is possible for sure, especially since we don't even know if they keep a certain percentage as profit before revenue sharing. But it is not an absolute based on the projections IMO. Those could be assuming revenue they would never receive without it being exclusive I think.
 
What did he just say doesn't generate profit? Was that Xbox or Game Pass?

adamsapple said:
GP must be more profitable/ revenue generating than we realize if it just takes 2 million new users to offset Activisions lost revenue.
Click to expand...

No, not really.

MMaRsu said:
Yeah wow im so glad this forum isnt an actual police state like reee. IM SO HAPPY

Why anyone would post there is beyond me
Click to expand...

Well, it's become a haven for hardcore Xbox fanatics (whether they also play Nintendo and/or PC doesn't matter) and pro-acquisition fans. That's one reason :/
 
thicc_girls_are_teh_best said:
If this were a certain other forum you'd already been reported and banned.
Click to expand...

Yep, but if he keeps going the way he's been going the last few posts, he might find himself in the timeout corner here soon.

Annnnnd, as I was typing that he's completely flipped out yet again. Figure he's about one post away from a forced vacation. :messenger_hushed:
 
Last edited:
adamsapple said:



He said its too far out to make any commitments about platforms. Which is right, when the game comes out who knows what platforms will be in the market.
Click to expand...

I have a feeling that if ABK deal fails, they will revert back their plan and look at which games they can release multiplatform from zenimax. maybe starfield but after a year or 6 months.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Locked
‘Microsoft’ said they were streamlining 9000 people across XGS/ABK/ZM
Rumor 
19
467
Topher replied
Microsoft wins FTC appeal challenging $69 billion Activision Blizzard deal
News Business  2 3
125
3K
Unknown? replied
MS/ABK is advertising games that don't exist for data collection
46
3K
POKEYCLYDE replied
My apologies to Ubisoft, Sony, Activision, EA, MS etc. for making a big deal out of $70 games
2 3 4
156
8K
MDSLKTR replied
Battlefield 6 Beta |OT| Open Beta/Closed Weapons.
|OT|  60 61 62 63 64
3K
5K
Branded replied
Top Bottom