Yes, it is private. How much is it worth then? Everything I'm seeing says around $7-10 billion.
If this is a real possibility it is likely coinciding with retirement for the owners and the monumental shift occurring from this merger, and people feeling it is safer to cashout and sell to someone smaller that is held in similar regard to Valve by gamers.Gabe would never do us dirty like that, may he live a long life.
We saw how relatively cheap Insomniac were because of their lack of IP, maybe with so little actual games owned by valve themselves a valuation is less inflated.Sounds way to low. That's less than the revenue they bring in.
We saw how relatively cheap Insomniac were because of their lack of IP, maybe with so little actual games owned by valve themselves a valuation is less inflated.
Sounds way to low. That's less than the revenue they bring in.
I'd probably wager they'd start at around $20 billion if they were to ever go public
Yeah, but they don't keep all that revenue. 30% of it goes back out to publishers/devs.
But when Microsoft can leverage 110m active monthly CoD players will it stay that way? That's their risk, stick and potentially sell for a lot less, or sell to someone that can build on that.But they have a platform that brings in over 100 million MAU
Ah right yeah. Forgot about that. They're estimated was $12 billion or something last year. No idea if that's before or after that deduction
I honestly do not know. But from my understanding. how much a company is valued in general as private doesn't mean its worth that much. usually, it's much higher.Yes, it is private. How much is it worth then? Everything I'm seeing says around $7-10 billion.
CDPR with GOG would be a more likely go, to have their own PC store/launcher and WRPG maker that MS seems to be gobbling all up on. And they'd more than likely still keep them third party like Bungie.
But again, fuck all this consolidation by platforms.
Why do people still take the chain of these shit posts and rumours on acquisitions/mergers? These deals are incredibly secretive, no one is going to have the beans to spill until it actually gets announced as happening.
Damn, 2 weeks of nothing happening. Might as well just lock this thread until then.
The fact that you think Sony will be able to buy T2 or EA is cute.When you start your argument with a false premise like this, the rest of your argument starts to lack of all credibility
Would never pass the regulators.This sounds almost as real as Phils talk about more games for more players bullshit
The fact that you think Sony will be able to buy T2 or EA is cute.
It fits in with their business.We'll see if Amazon has the guts and the drive for it. I could see EA being a great fit for them if so.
EAs market cap is 34 Billion. To buy them you would need maybe a 20% premium, putting it at 40 Billion.If you think it's impossible for a company of Sony's size to acquire companies a fraction of their size you are not well versed on corporate mergers and acquisitions
EAs market cap is 34 Billion. To buy them you would need maybe a 20% premium, putting it at 40 Billion.
T2 is 25 Billion, making a sale around 30 Billion.
As I said before, it wouldn't just be Sony putting an offer in, they would be competing with a whole host of much bigger companies with deeper pockets.
It's a nice pipe dream, but it ain't happening.
Damn, 2 weeks of nothing happening. Might as well just lock this thread until then.
Lol the company being acquired will not give a fuck who is buying. It's to the highest bidder. They are selling.there is no loyalty for share holders. Unless there is calculated chances of buying failure . Say for example US buying a Japanese protected company. Then that Japanese company might have to look for lower bidder based on Japan or not sell at all.The company being acquired has input on who acquires them. Right now it does not appear that other big tech companies care to make big investments into AAA games. The suitors are relatively limited, and big companies aren't going to make stupid valuation decisions.
Even though Microsoft was desperate and had lots of cash, their deal for ATVI wasn't irrationally valued.
Bigger acquisitions on a relative basis occur literally all the time. Sony could acquire either of them and match or exceed offers from alternative suitors. It would just require a lot of debt.
I'm not saying it's realistic, but acting like it's impossible isn't historically accurate
Lol the company being acquired will not give a fuck who is buying. It's to the highest bidder. They are selling.there is no loyalty for share holders. Unless there is calculated chances of buying failure . Say for example US buying a Japanese protected company. Then that Japanese company might have to look for lower bidder based on Japan or not sell at all.
Why didn't big Techs outbid Disney on Fox?EAs market cap is 34 Billion. To buy them you would need maybe a 20% premium, putting it at 40 Billion.
T2 is 25 Billion, making a sale around 30 Billion.
As I said before, it wouldn't just be Sony putting an offer in, they would be competing with a whole host of much bigger companies with deeper pockets.
It's a nice pipe dream, but it ain't happening.
Wait what is the October extension about?
BufferWait what is the October extension about?
The company being acquired has input on who acquires them. Right now it does not appear that other big tech companies care to make big investments into AAA games. The suitors are relatively limited, and big companies aren't going to make stupid valuation decisions.
Even though Microsoft was desperate and had lots of cash, their deal for ATVI wasn't irrationally valued.
Bigger acquisitions on a relative basis occur literally all the time. Sony could acquire either of them and match or exceed offers from alternative suitors. It would just require a lot of debt.
I'm not saying it's realistic, but acting like it's impossible isn't historically accurate
Lol the company being acquired will not give a fuck who is buying. It's to the highest bidder. They are selling.there is no loyalty for share holders. Unless there is calculated chances of buying failure . Say for example US buying a Japanese protected company. Then that Japanese company might have to look for lower bidder based on Japan or not sell at all.
EAs market cap is 34 Billion. To buy them you would need maybe a 20% premium, putting it at 40 Billion.
T2 is 25 Billion, making a sale around 30 Billion.
As I said before, it wouldn't just be Sony putting an offer in, they would be competing with a whole host of much bigger companies with deeper pockets.
It's a nice pipe dream, but it ain't happening.
What tech company that is willing to outspend Disney in a bidding contest to acquire Fox AND their strategy is to get as biggest pie as possible in the entertainment business? The only company that would have had such an interest is Sony, but they would never have been able to match them in price.Why didn't big Techs outbid Disney on Fox?
Dunno where you find 'em, but glad you do.
Sony getting take 2 or EA is very unlikely. They will get a Japanese publisher at best. Or just another studio.If you think it's impossible for a company of Sony's size to acquire companies a fraction of their size you are not well versed on corporate mergers and acquisitions
Sony getting take 2 or EA is very unlikely. They will get a Japanese publisher at best. Or just another studio.
I'd say say it's possible but the odds are low. Less then 30 percent. The companies need to want to sell and Sony will face extreme scrunity. Way more then MS. Since their the market leader. Sony will likely get a japanese publisher or studio.I agree it's unlikely. But it's certainly possible. These sorts of acquisitions happen regularly on a relative size basis
What Tech companies are willing to spend so much on a publisher in an industry they have no knowledge and experience of? Why do we all pretend it is certain big techs will definitely get into gaming?I think saying "very unlikely" is a better description.
we are also forgetting that if Valve was indeed looking for a buyer, so many players in the market would be interested. For one, I don't know if Microsoft would be allowed to buy them, but they would be willing to do anything to beat anyone to it. Apple would be also interested as it could be their gate to increase porting games to their OS. Not to mention there are other parties with similar interest that would hate to miss this opportunity.
Yeah, Sony theoretically can maybe get 20 or 30 billion USD to buy valve, but this scenario means no one else is trying to fight them for this prize.
What tech company that is willing to outspend Disney in a bidding contest to acquire Fox AND their strategy is to get as biggest pie as possible in the entertainment business? The only company that would have had such an interest is Sony, but they would never have been able to match them in price.
I'd say say it's possible but the odds are low. Less then 30 percent. The companies need to want to sell and Sony will face extreme scrunity. Way more then MS. Since their the market leader. Sony will likely get a japanese publisher or studio.
What about the VR Market?Sony would get less scrutiny, since it wouldn't represent a monopoly especially with Microsoft now owning a 70B company just for gaming itself and the largest first party by far.
The market leader post Activision acquisition isn't exactly clear, and it shouldn't be on the basis of console sales
T2 at 30 billion, Sony would only need 16 billion to get 51+% and take control.EAs market cap is 34 Billion. To buy them you would need maybe a 20% premium, putting it at 40 Billion.
T2 is 25 Billion, making a sale around 30 Billion.
As I said before, it wouldn't just be Sony putting an offer in, they would be competing with a whole host of much bigger companies with deeper pockets.
It's a nice pipe dream, but it ain't happening.
EA is publicly traded they'd want to sell just as willingly as Activison, as in if the price per share is good enough they would sell. Activison wasn't looking to sell if that's what you're suggesting.I'd say say it's possible but the odds are low. Less then 30 percent. The companies need to want to sell and Sony will face extreme scrunity. Way more then MS. Since their the market leader. Sony will likely get a japanese publisher or studio.
If they bought Square and forced them to do Playstation versions of every game from the start (no more pc+switch only launches) I think they would get more output than with T2 (in quantity, not necessarily in quality).EA is publicly traded they'd want to sell just as willingly as Activison, as in if the price per share is good enough they would sell. Activison wasn't looking to sell if that's what you're suggesting.
As for market leader I don't think this is as much of an issue after what has transpired regarding Activison. The judge concluded that Nintendo is a competitor and so Sony aren't market leader. All they would need to do is sign a 10 yr deal for Fifa which isn't even called FIFA anymore and they can get away with it like Activision. Question is why would they want to for EA? T2 is a better buy.
A hostile takeovers you say?T2 at 30 billion, Sony would only need 16 billion to get 51+% and take control.
A hostile takeovers you say?
First you have to find 51% of people who want to sell.
They arnt so easy.
It's been going ahead since the CMA backed down after the FTC lostSo this deal is going ahead then?
The fact that you think Sony will be able to buy T2 or EA is cute.
Would never pass the regulators.
Of course it is.So this deal is going ahead then?