reinking
Gold Member
Still have not seen any proof of this after a decade+ of these accusations.

Still have not seen any proof of this after a decade+ of these accusations.
Easy mark identified
It's not a conspiracy that in 2021 Xbox had not had a good year in a very, very, very, long time. 2021 was a good year for them, including Infinite. We know how much MS butters the press with paid shills, especially after this whole merger Acquisition deal brought them all to light. They were eager to pounce and claim Xbox had turned it around, publisher of the year, game of the year, yada yada. It was just a good year, don't make it more than it was. Phil Spencer even admitted Xbox lived or died with Halo....so that's how important it was to them, the audience, the press. It was an existential moment for them. When Halo failed to deliver that, them acquiring Activision was the existential moment - if Microsoft doesn't get Activision, Xbox dies (see: Jez Corden and crew)
Calling Halo Infinite GOTY is to me like claiming Call of Duty is game of the year. They're kind of in that same situation of being fun playable games, obviously Call of Duty has much more massive appeal, but largely not soemthing that hits the GOTY lists because it just simply isn't. Halo COULD be a GOTY type game in the future with better direction, but Infinite isn't it.
Reviews are nothing more than an individual opinion of the reviewer. They are no more "right" or "wrong" than any other opinion.
Check his property for secret locked rooms inside the walls or basement.That's one creepy looking dude
He drives a white van BTW. On weekends he plays ice cream music at max volume while driving around thr neighbourhood.
Still have not seen any proof of this after a decade+ of these accusations.
So I was right. Just a crazy conspiracy theory from you. Because getting an 87 MC with reviews from 98 outlets is a clear statement.
'publisher of the year' was a Metacritic thing, taking the critical reception of games released by Microsoft Games into consideration.
Apparently these same press shills that comfort MS with great reviews after having a barren year had all died off when Redfall showed up for reviews?
Sure, but people have long used Metacritic or Opencritic as an aggregator to determine a game's quality. MC scores for Baldur's Gate are being discussed on the homepage with the clear context that It's directly related to quality.
Why make an exception when it comes to Halo Infinite?
Neither was an existential moment for them.It's not a conspiracy that in 2021 Xbox had not had a good year in a very, very, very, long time. 2021 was a good year for them, including Infinite. We know how much MS butters the press with paid shills, especially after this whole merger Acquisition deal brought them all to light. They were eager to pounce and claim Xbox had turned it around, publisher of the year, game of the year, yada yada. It was just a good year, don't make it more than it was. Phil Spencer even admitted Xbox lived or died with Halo....so that's how important it was to them, the audience, the press. It was an existential moment for them. When Halo failed to deliver that, them acquiring Activision was the existential moment - if Microsoft doesn't get Activision, Xbox dies (see: Jez Corden and crew)
Calling Halo Infinite GOTY is to me like claiming Call of Duty is game of the year. They're kind of in that same situation of being fun playable games, obviously Call of Duty has much more massive appeal, but largely not soemthing that hits the GOTY lists because it just simply isn't. Halo COULD be a GOTY type game in the future with better direction, but Infinite isn't it.
There is simply no way people are in this thread trying to rearrange the debacle that was Halo infinite. That game died a horrific death and even worse the community abandoned that game en masse. Turning what was once a marque franchise into something that was ridiculed and so financially unsuccessful that the studio behind it was gutted.
I don't want to hear about the 20/10 reviews the game got from Jez/Windows central or stevivor either. Especially since we have documented receipts of their sycophantic behaviour.
Imagine the scores if the reviewers had to actually spend months (like the consumers) on the GaaS game before reviewing on day one flash and flare. I would think they would read differently. This goes for a lot of GaaS games.There is simply no way people are in this thread trying to rearrange the debacle that was Halo infinite. That game died a horrific death and even worse the community abandoned that game en masse. Turning what was once a marque franchise into something that was ridiculed and so financially unsuccessful that the studio behind it was gutted.
![]()
Imagine the scores if the reviewers had to actually spend months (like the consumers) on the GaaS game before reviewing on day one flash and flare. I would think they would read differently. This goes for a lot of GaaS games.
Reread what I said.Many outlets reviewed both modes separately…
![]()
There is simply no way people are in this thread trying to rearrange the debacle that was Halo infinite. That game died a horrific death and even worse the community abandoned that game en masse. Turning what was once a marque franchise into something that was ridiculed and so financially unsuccessful that the studio behind it was gutted.
I don't want to hear about the 20/10 reviews the game got from Jez/Windows central or stevivor either. Especially since we have documented receipts of their sycophantic behaviour.
The savior we needed, but probably don't deserveLet's get this thread back on topic. If there's no new information pertaining to the deal- then discuss the off-topic content in their relevant threads.
The savior we needed, but probably don't deserve![]()
Let's get this thread back on topic. If there's no new information pertaining to the deal- then discuss the off-topic content in their relevant threads.
I was with you until that part.
Their games aren't complete dumpster fires, but they are as far away from being GOTY as humanity is from having room temperature super conductors. And funnily their games got worse over time instead of better.
This is…not reality.
If we ever needed proof that brainwashing is real...
I thought the CMA originally said around the 21st but then some rumours arrived of it being sooner.I still think we won't hear anything substantial until September. Just let this thread lie dormant if there's no news TBH
I never thought any rumors about it being sooner were reliable, it's clear that MS and CMA started out very far away from each other in terms of negotiating positions. MS likely demanded to have the acquisition approved without any further concessions, CMA likely were firm in demanding some kind of divestment for approval.I thought the CMA originally said around the 21st but then some rumours arrived of it being sooner.![]()
Joined in 2020, still Neo Member.Halo 4, 5 and Infinite all won and were nominated for multiple GOTY awards at various outlets, and although I personally HATED Infinite with a passion for multiple reasons that doesn't mean I'll just blatantly disregard the all the high praise, great reviews and the awards it got.
Except everything I said about each studio is 100% reality.
Stating facts means I am brainwashed? GTFO.
Enlighten me then, fucko.
There is simply no way people are in this thread trying to rearrange the debacle that was Halo infinite. That game died a horrific death and even worse the community abandoned that game en masse. Turning what was once a marque franchise into something that was ridiculed and so financially unsuccessful that the studio behind it was gutted.
I don't want to hear about the 20/10 reviews the game got from Jez/Windows central or stevivor either. Especially since we have documented receipts of their sycophantic behaviour.
Seems legit, Tupperware is big in the UK.If this info is legit, we should expect to see some proper journalism on the topic in the UK Sunday papers with a actual source, tomorrow(today, it is past midnight here). If not it is more than likely someone just guessing IMO
Australia, I'm disappointed ... where's your backbone?
No clue - through participating in this thread - I've no idea what's "legal" anymore when it comes to UK and their commonwealth...Is this legal? They should only decide if the deal is harmful for Australia? UK market has nothing to do with Australia market?
And another one:
Australia, I'm disappointed ... where's your backbone?
This might be part of recent post-Brexit trade-deal between the UK and Australia, rather than a historical commonwealth issue.Still beholden to the UK, innit.
The inquiry group had no such change - as that would be to pre-empt their analysis.I'm confused. Didn't the CMA change their stance because Microsoft was going to change the deal?
The inquiry group had no such change - as that would be to pre-empt their analysis.
I I don't quite understand your post, so will explain what I think is the situation.They are going to accept the old deal?
Now I'm definitely confused.
I I don't quite understand your post, so will explain what I think is the situation.
The CMA front of house that interface with the merging companies and third parties with an interest, had accept to put Microsoft's "new" proposal to the inquiry group - assuming as Microsoft claimed it wasn't the same merger - provided the Judicial Review appeal was adjourned. They made no pre-emptive claims about the decision of the inquiry group. In fact they repeatedly said to the judge they couldn't do that.
So here we are waiting to see if the accept the same deal in new wrapping, or reassert the finds of the original report and refute Microsoft's claims of special reasons, and material different market conditions.
Tweet from the Aussies probably means they've been informed of a preliminary decision and are now awaiting the CMA to write it up and let us all know.
Everything you noted above, except that last sentence, makes sense. It gives the impression that Australia is simply going to wait and follow what UK decides instead of standing up and delivering their own decision.I I don't quite understand your post, so will explain what I think is the situation.
The CMA front of house that interface with the merging companies and third parties with an interest, had accept to put Microsoft's "new" proposal to the inquiry group - assuming as Microsoft claimed it wasn't the same merger - provided the Judicial Review appeal was adjourned. They made no pre-emptive claims about the decision of the inquiry group. In fact they repeatedly said to the judge they couldn't do that.
So here we are waiting to see if the accept the same deal in new wrapping, or reassert the finds of the original report and refute Microsoft's claims of special reasons, and material different market conditions.
Tweet from the Aussies probably means they've been informed of a preliminary decision and are now awaiting the CMA to write it up and let us all know.