PS4 Pro never allowed me to play PS4 games at double the frames with better IQ/setting on top.No, even less value than the ps4 pro, and that wasn't amazing.
People just have no idea what they are talking about in here anymore and you can tell...PS4 Pro never allowed me to play PS4 games at double the frames with better IQ/setting on top.
he really did say that wtf? even when its a pain in the ass to get uhd bluray disc to play off on pc....god that girl.....Alex: "What if put the money I invest for a disc drive into a PC"
Like wtf are you talking about.
Gaming discourse in general is not worth it right now. Just looking at the threads with new info and giving my two cents now.People just have no idea what they are talking about in here anymore and you can tell...
Not for me, no.
Shocked about your first sentence /sNot for me, no.
I'll rather just wait a year or two for the new generation.
PS4 Pro never allowed me to play PS4 games at double the frames with better IQ/setting on top.
That’s his intelligent face.Why is the dude in the thumbnail sleeping?
And they will still get oneThe Pro has not been released and they are dismissing it. Pretty lame from them. All those people that want the Pro to fail, will be pretty pissed off if the thing is sold out at Day one.
This isn't a CD drive, it doesn't read CDs.Maybe if the cd drive was included.
They dismissed the original PS5 also, so nothing new for themThe Pro has not been released and they are dismissing it. Pretty lame from them. All those people that want the Pro to fail, will be pretty pissed off if the thing is sold out at Day one.
Same dude that has random meltdown on twitty?That’s his intelligent face.
Same dude that keeps promoting crt monitors for fucking modern gaming
Disc drive sucks, bad.how about that disc drive and price though?
The whole CPU narrative could be already outdated. As already explained by many users:Personally I would never spend $700+ on a machine with such an outdated CPU, it just makes no sense, but that's likely because I'm used to building my own PCs, most people on this forum prefer to buy the boxes, so if you want a bit of extra fidelity, this is your only choice, for now..
Not gonna get dragged into the whole CPU limited argument again, but what I will say is that most things we say are CPU limited... aren't. They are just poorly optimized for a multi-core CPU. Has always been the case. In a manner of speaking, the PS5 would benefit more from a Zen2 CPU running at 4.5Ghz than from a Zen4 one running at 3.5Ghz in the current development climate.
But the fix is now to just brute force everything, that is what the misguided fix to "CPU bottlenecks" has become, just throw in the fastest CPU you can in there (in hindsight this has always been the PC thing). Whereas, if anyone takes anything more than a cursory glance at CPU usage and utilization charts while running their games, they would see what we should be doing is asking devs to optimize their shit better.
Regarding CPU limited games, something you should be aware of is that devs can, and have been using GPU resources to perform tasks that would typically be handled by the CPU for ages. Pointing out that the games are CPU limited comes with the asterisk that, AS CURRENTLY CODED the games are CPU locked. If the devs had chosen to do so, they could have tapped into the GPU to offload some of the CPU tasks as well.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter how much brute strength CPU and GPU power you give the devs, the end result is dependent on how well the devs harness that power.
Vast majority of PS5 games already offer a 60fps mode so the CPU can't be an issue. The 4K30 and 1440p60 split is a popular configuration for a lot of titles, and the former being 30fps is likely because the game is being GPU limited.
Not only is the GPU better in the Pro, PSSR will take a lot that load off anyway AND it's 2-3x faster at ray tracing.
The only AAA game off the top of my head to really hammer the CPU as of late is Dragon's Dogma 2. But that's the case even on top end rigs and is an outlier.
... Also who the fuck wants to play Dragon's Dogma 2?
YupSame dude that has random meltdown on twitty?
Alex: "What if I put the money I invest for a disc drive into a PC"
Like wtf are you talking about.
That's right. It's a DVD DriveThis isn't a CD drive, it doesn't read CDs.
Disc drive sucks, bad. But they had their figures to realize a TB increase made more sense than disc drive. Price it's perfecty fine for it could be able to do.
People expecting Sony to necessarily need to sell their products at a loss, even Premium ones, get me confused.
Sorry, it's disc drive or dvd drive or blu-ray drive, or, what do you call it?This isn't a CD drive, it doesn't read CDs.
The whole CPU narrative could be already outdated. As already explained by many users:
A disc drive or a BR drive.Sorry, it's disc drive or dvd drive or blu-ray drive, or, what do you call it?![]()
Honestly, 350€ more than PS5 for, lets say 6-7 years of better performing games? It's just a bit over 50€ per year, and the difference seems big enough.
It sucks that it's the first Sony console following the Nintendo route, making money per hardware sold since day 1, compared to the standard PS5 that was 400€ and no PC under 1000€ could match it, but Sony's looking for more ways to raise their profits, and this was one of the most obvious steps to do it.
Bro still reminiscing of the 360 era, it’s time to move on.Shocked about your first sentence /s
The second is just not realistic. Even if MS releases a new console in 2026 it won't be seen as "next gen". Not whilt ehy have a Series S to feed and a PS6 to release in 2028 lmao.
They made money on PS4 Pro from day one, they are also making money on all hardware peripherals such as controllers, Portal, PSVR2. It's only the main console they ever subsidise afaik.Honestly, 350€ more than PS5 for, lets say 6-7 years of better performing games? It's just a bit over 50€ per year, and the difference seems big enough.
It sucks that it's the first Sony console following the Nintendo route, making money per hardware sold since day 1, compared to the standard PS5 that was 400€ and no PC under 1000€ could match it, but Sony's looking for more ways to raise their profits, and this was one of the most obvious steps to do it.
Ps6 is probably coming out in less than 6 years though. I doubt anyone who is going to buy a $700+ midgen upgrade is the type of buyer that will wait 3 years before getting a Ps6.
It is.$400 vs $700 minus a disk drive is a massive pill to swallow.\
Eh.. not really.And the main point being it will run games at 60fps locked isn't known as a fact. Sony said that, but it will be proven after DF and others get their hands on it. It's entirely possible that "performance" modes using base PS5 still run at 45-60fps. Most do. So even PS5 pro is flawless 60fps, you're netting +15fps in most cases, usually far less when looking at averages.
So you're essentially left with a slight FPS/IQ bump
I get what you mean.. but PS6 would be a new generation entirely. For what we get now, they thought their solution to the CPU problem is sufficient. I trust Mark Cerny.You are buying CPU architecture from 5 years ago, and it's not even the top of the line chip or anything, it's a horrible proposition no matter how you spin it.
If this wasn't an issue, why upgrade to a new CPU for the PS6? Just keep using Zen 2...
Are you sure all games are gonna run double the frames? GTA VI probably won´t.PS4 Pro never allowed me to play PS4 games at double the frames with better IQ/setting on top.
Not sure about the Ps4 Pro, maybe, they also said in like 2021 that they were making money on PS5, but in some of their latest quarter finantials they claimed that some of the reasons for the lower profits were that they were selling more PS5's (or that they made more money because they sold less PS5's than usual, i don't remember 100% now) i expect this to not happen anymore, not just for Nintendo but for all the console manufacturers.They made money on PS4 Pro from day one, they are also making money on all hardware peripherals such as controllers, Portal, PSVR2. It's only the main console they ever subsidise afaik.
I get what you mean.. but PS6 would be a new generation entirely. For what we get now, they thought their solution to the CPU problem is sufficient. I trust Mark Cerny.