Lmao i'm an idiot, but in my defence, almost no game show dlss like this, with the internal resolutions, they usually just say quality, balanced etc.
So how impressed we are with bananza??
that i dont know. i guess higher the better? AA never bothered me but people prefer MSAA over FXAA and apparently SMAA is the best because its downsampling from a higher resolution. Go with whatever you like. DLSS 4k quality typically handles all the AA for me anyway.
Yeah smashing things all the time with probably a piss easy challenge like all nintendo games is pinnacle gameplay allright.I mean gameplay wise it will crush these soulless UE5 slops. Dunno why people expecting ground breaking graphics from a handheld device. It looks great for what it is. MK world also looks lovely in motion on an OLED tv in HDR
I mean gameplay wise it will crush these soulless UE5 slops. Dunno why people expecting ground breaking graphics from a handheld device. It looks great for what it is. MK world also looks lovely in motion on an OLED tv in HDR
I always turn AA off, i keep the C1 with the sharpness set to 0 so the image is naturally a bit soft and edges are invisible most of the times in 4k quality.
I mean it looks like a fun gimmicky game, the red factions have done this shit since forever, without even talking about all the indies on steam with advanced destruction systems, but since it's a nintendo game, people get a collective memory loss like it's the first time they see total destruction, i mean delivery at all cost has that and it released a couple of weeks ago
I guess we will see if Nintendo manages to find their own way around this.
I expect nintendo fans to not find any flaw as their usual even if the game could have plenty so i don't hold my breath.
So how impressed we are with bananza??
Has more interactivity & simulations than any Sony game since 2009.
zelda totk, yes. donkey kong, hell no. just breaking ps1 era levels isnt anything special. you need to build the entire game around physics simulation which is only done in totk. this is just as basic as astro bot.
DK Bananza's physics & destruction have actual depth & they provide much more usage & interactivity to the gameplay & the design of levels rather than being predominantly showy like in Astro Bot.
So how impressed we are with bananza??
I love you, I wish Sony had that same push & ambition like Nintendo, as soon as they got their hands on the Switch 2, we're already seeing Switch 2's tech being used towards gameplay immediately, it's not even a month from its release, and they're not using destruction for the sake of showcasing what the system can do, they're already showing off how much more depth it adds to gameplay, it opens the door for gameplay experiences that weren't possible on Switch 1, the idea doesn't feel tacked-on at all, of course the pure brute-force graphics are cool, but Nintendo is doing both here.
late ps3 graphics.
This are Wii graphics at best.
This is a graphical fidelity topic, of course we look at microdetails in character models, but nice try, buddy.
Nintendo games are basic in both gameplay and graphics. Totk is an exception but Mario kart, dkw, odyssey? These are s as basic as you can get. Sony and most modern studios have given up on physics based systems but at least they have continued to invest in combat systems which have gotten more and more complex and systems heavy since the ps3 era when they were fairly simple. Gow, horizon, days gone combat systems are far complex than this basic ass destruction Nintendo is selling as groundbreaking.
I mean it looks like a fun gimmicky game, the red factions have done this shit since forever, without even talking about all the indies on steam with advanced destruction systems, but since it's a nintendo game, people get a collective memory loss like it's the first time they see total destruction, i mean delivery at all cost has that and it released a couple of weeks ago
Everything destructible is fun on paper until you get bored of not having a proper level design or a less basic combat or all the things this game is gonna probably lack in favour of that one gimmick.
Maybe i just out-grown (or whatever the term is) the type of fun that nintendo provide, who knows.
Dude you got all wrong, in this topic we both praise graphic and shit on boring ass games like hellbalde 2 all the time.
Because only 120hz tv peoppe would be able to enjoy it is probably why they didnf maks that the default.
Dude you got all wrong, in this topic we both praise graphic and shit on boring ass games like hellbalde 2 all the time.
I could have played that game for free and i still didn't wasted time, ask in here what do i think about hb2\the order\callisto\ryse, it's gonna be an eye-opener
And no one is gatekeeping any discussion, some people are just more impressed than others by bananza because some of us have played games with equal if not better destruction and bananza doesn't seem to offer shit other than that gimmick unless you think that half the trailer being collecathlon shit or some animal trasformations to get abilities or some physics puzzle is impressive in 2025.
Also, i'm not gonna feel guilty if i say that nintendo games have no challenge or dont represent the pinnacle of gameplay to me, this is a free forum, not a reddid circle jerk.
Its funny so many people here complain about UE5 being blurry but as someone who has only played UE5 games maxed out on PC at native 4k I have no idea what there talking about.....join us.
I've out grown it too. Lasted maybe 5 hours in astro bot. I was shocked at how bland and basic it was and why everyone pretended like it was the best game of the year.I mean it looks like a fun gimmicky game, the red factions have done this shit since forever, without even talking about all the indies on steam with advanced destruction systems, but since it's a nintendo game, people get a collective memory loss like it's the first time they see total destruction, i mean delivery at all cost has that and it released a couple of weeks ago
Everything destructible is fun on paper until you get bored of not having a proper level design or a less basic combat or all the things this game is gonna probably lack in favour of that one gimmick.
Maybe i just out-grown (or whatever the term is) the type of fun that nintendo provide, who knows.
No offesne but i think that cartoony lookng destruction with everything disappearing immediately and with "low precision" because dk use the punches and make big holes is not comparable to semi-realistic building collapse physics where you can strategically take down a building with precision.
Last week i played 10 hours of freakin holocure save the fans so i'm not sure about that dude
No that doesnt sound right. It isnt very performant though. Remedy hve been dropping the ball lately. Im scared to admit it as a fanboy of theres but i think there best days are long behind them. Max Panye remake is there last chance to get me assumig there smart enough to pay off Jame's family so they can use his AI voice and not recast max. That would be the nail in the coffin for me.
Nothing of what i saw in the trailer impress me, sorry if this "attitude" disturb you, we can't all be impressed by everything nintendo does, some of us find that type of gameplay vvery basic and boring, if we all had fun with the same things we would not have a huge variety of games on the market.I have never seen physics before /s
I am impressed with DKB not because of very specific little part of a physic system that I have to make a list of games that did this tidbit or that tidbit before like someone autistic, but that the whole package looks fun and these new systems is something Nintendo is exploring to make it different from their previous platformers
Holy shit really. As if its raining games with physic based game play.
Red faction 1 with Geomod 1 was super limited (rightfully so for hardware it released). Also there's like 2 or 3 times in the entire game you have to use it? To circumvent locked doors? There was a limit of holes, then even explosives didn't do anything.
Red faction 2 dialed it everything back. Barely any environmental destruction.
Red faction guerilla with geomod 2 was just buildings, no digging through ground.
But you know, we could be having a nice conversation about what DKB is doing because clearly it is not geomod 1.0's solution, but with that kind of attitude I've seen so far, naw.
And notice it didnt stop them from using Pre-rendered cgi Donky Kong on the videos thumbnail or for general advertising...probably same for the games packageing too. Its like they clearly undefstand that good graphics sell and there game is way way outdated.
We discovered the mistake, i was playing 4kdlaa
Early PS4 is being way too generous.
I was not strictly talking about what tech was the heaviest but what was the more impressive piece of tech, that's why i said, more is not always better or more impressive.
Late Xbox 360 is accurate enough. Late PS3 has the edge due to the Cell and Sony having many legendary coders back then... Not even sure what we have seen of Bananza looks that much better to Knack.late ps3 graphics.
This are Wii graphics at best.
Late 360 had 343i's Halo 4, Gears Judgement by Bulletstorm devs, GTA5 and Far Cry 3. All games that look way better than 99% of Switch 1 games and 100% of Nintendo games on Switch 2. Cyberpunk shows what can be done on this handheld. Albeit at 30 fps.
Aren't most TVs in console owning homes going to be 120 hz by the time this shit comes out?
Personally at this point I don't think it's all that impressive if the graphics take that much of a hit to accomplish what we're seeing in donkey Kong. Even if it's on a handheld the graphics look like they're from 15 years ago — I'll take the trade off cus I love devs pushing this stuff but I really think they could do more given the switch 2's specs.
You have like 2-3 topics to discuss the trailer but you went here and this was your first post in a topic about graphic fidelity:
That doesn't sound right, usually the majority try do to the easier stuff, not the hardest one, and that's why you have "many" games with total destruction but barely anyone trying to outperform guerrilla and their building collapse tech, i don't know man...
