No one? Millions are.No one's trying to justify his murder. We don't want to whitewash his legacy. He had abhorrent views. If he was typical Christian conservative, we have a long way to go.
No one? Millions are.No one's trying to justify his murder. We don't want to whitewash his legacy. He had abhorrent views. If he was typical Christian conservative, we have a long way to go.
Adding to the witch hunt because X person said something Y person didn't agree with. AKA, supporting the handle.I don't agree with witch hunts of any type, but what is the violence you are comparing here ?
He's here to troll and do nothing else. Nothing but inflammatory posts in this thread, nothing but laughing emojis and bad faith responses to those who reply.please show me where he is inciting violence. he is linking people with their employers.
at best he is inciting action to contact the employers. But you do you and make up whatever they hell you want to.
This is true and the his assassination was awful. But we have to be honest that Charlie Kirk was part of the handle at times. We can condemn his murder without whitewashing who he was. Here's a handful of some things he said:
- Gun violence was "unfortunate" but necessary to protect 2A
- Women must be raped for the survival of the species
- Children should be forced to watch public executions
- He was disappointed that Nancy Pelosi's husband survived the attack
- We cannot allow victims of mass shootings to emotionally hijack the narrative
- Trans people should be lynched
- Called for gay people to be stoned to death
He is too far gone. You cannot talk to people that indoctrinated into the leftSo fucking what?
That's justification for him to be shot?
Can you hear yourself? Any insight in there?
If you can't comprehend that words shouldn't mean you are shot, then what on earth are you getting at exactly?
If you're really advocating a world where people, like Charlie, should be shot on a premise of simple debate then fuck me, what's the point here?
That's an abhorrent point of view to have. What you're advocating here is a world where if you don't like what people have to say you have full rights to not think critically and just outright kill someone on your complete lack of reasoning..
You really want to live in that world?
I guarantee you don't.
Who says that I will not? MSNBC is a propagandist Left wing network. I would never believe anything from them.Why only Ghost of Yotei, shouldnt you be boycotting PlayStation Studios as a whole as they own SuckerPunch and should have put out a statement condemning this by now.
Hell even MSNBC did something when their peoples were talking breezy ASAP........PlayStation Studios on the chill.
I agree.Absolutely agreed. Just needs to be pointed out that it's a personal account that clearly states views are his own. His personal X account doesn't exist (at least in his mind) to help him sell or market his studio's games.![]()
It is indeed. Actions have consequences.I agree.
But I will say- regardless of personal or company or whatever- you essentially represent your employer. Those employers will let you go if you are drawing negative attention. So i get it, its this persons account- but thats a gamble they are taking with their income.
People don't need to know specifically who she is. All they need to know is the fact she is a dev working for sucker punch who are about to release their biggest game in years. Potentially Sonys biggest game in years. She has inexplicably become the face of sucker punch now. Sony will be furious.
Yup.I agree.
But I will say- regardless of personal or company or whatever- you essentially represent your employer. Those employers will let you go if you are drawing negative attention. So i get it, its this persons account- but thats a gamble they are taking with their income.
Well said. The best description of Charlie Kirk I heard was that he was just right of center and was the olive branch offered by the right and always ready to debate ideas. And his most extreme viewpoint was "please stop giving Israel my tax money that they use to fund their wars".He was a typical conservative Christian in terms of worldview. Most of the bullet points above are heavily distorted strawmanning used to produce an emotional reaction and justify his murder.
Isn't that somewhat of a strawman?No one? Millions are.
He is too far gone. You cannot talk to people that indoctrinated into the left
They are highlighting that they work for these companies in their bios because they know it gives them clout amongst certain tech/gamer/youth circles so they're actively using the name of Sony/Sucker Punch to promote their extremist views.Yup.
To me it doesn't matter if it's "my own personal account".
The profile has a banner pic of GoY and in the profile bullets says she works at Sucker Punch. Sounds like company representation to me whether it's intended or not. And it's a public account. If it's supposed to be a off-work profile, then get rid of anything work related and it might help the situation better.
It might be a bit different if it was a private FB account only meant for fam and friends, where someone backstabbed her by leaking a FB message to the net. But given what was said in the current situation, it's fair game to link person with employer.
It the publisher's don't handle them...I will be skipping many games.Well I won't be touching their titles anymore.
It actually doesn't matter who he was. In civilized society (which is what we live in), there is no justification for political violence. You fight words with words. Change minds with your ideas. So while a lot/ most of the above you'd need to show actual context, it ultimately doesn't matter because none of it would justify assassination. Just as if no matter what you said, there'd be no justification to assassinate you or anyone else based on any "really bad stuff you've said". Words on their own cannot compel justification for harming another person. The only justification to harm another person would be self-defense or in the context of fighting in a war.This is true and the his assassination was awful. But we have to be honest that Charlie Kirk was part of the handle at times. We can condemn his murder without whitewashing who he was. Here's a handful of some things he said:
- Gun violence was "unfortunate" but necessary to protect 2A
- Women must be raped for the survival of the species
- Children should be forced to watch public executions
- He was disappointed that Nancy Pelosi's husband survived the attack
- We cannot allow victims of mass shootings to emotionally hijack the narrative
- Trans people should be lynched
- Called for gay people to be stoned to death
His views were very extreme, IMO.
That is immaterial though to the point that folks shouldn't be celebrating political assassinations. That's just dumb.
I never thought of it this way. I guess it's similar to a creepy Boy Scout Leader using his job and position to take advantage of kids who trust them not knowing any better.They are highlighting that they work for these companies in their bios because they know it gives them clout amongst certain tech/gamer/youth circles so they're actively using the name of Sony/Sucker Punch to promote their extremist views.
Well said. The best description of Charlie Kirk I heard was that he was just right of center and was the olive branch offered by the right and always ready to debate ideas. And his most extreme viewpoint was "please stop giving Israel my tax money that they use to fund their wars".
If you didn't agree with him, simply go to one of his free events and debate him. To way to kill an idea is to change people's minds about it. This uncalled for violence will simply drive people away from murderer's cause to bring moderates to Charlie's views.
Charlie was extremely dangerous to the left because it was willing to go to college campuses and engage in open debate. People's minds were changed because of this. But now we have a young child (3y) who's main memories of her father will be him being murdered in front of her, and another too young (1y) to remember him.
Incite violence with violence. Way to go Asmongold.
The best course of action would be to just keep quiet about it, certainly on social media.He said some pretty messed up stuff, esp about women, children and people of color. He wasn't exactly a good role model when it came to stuff like equality, tolerance etc....so I'm not exactly sure why people are trying to prop him up as if he was a caring humanitarian of ALL peoples.
That said, no one deserves to lose their life just because you heavily disagree with their rhetoric. No one should be "celebrating" mindless violence/killing. Nor should they "have to" mourn someone they didn't see as a "good person" in life.
That's correct. You can also tell a lot of a person by how OTHERS react when THEY die.
The best of us strive to remain cognizant of both.
Not personally, but have followed his debates and university campaigns quite a bit. My issue isn't usually his views (though I disagree with a lot of his rhetoric) but his debating style. It's very high on "let me take you down with my truth bombs" instead of "try to see my point of view and I see yours". I find that grating and in the end, more demagogic and evangelical than rational and open minded. Highly effective to activate university bros though.Did you personally know him?
Anyway, I'm not buying this woke piece of trash either. Time to take a stand against these fucking clowns. I'm sick and tired of bending the knee. They have lost my money and will not see a dime from me ever again.
I can't tell if this is joking. None of those individuals are liberal. Unless you're in some alternate reality where you've somehow managed to alter the definition of 'conservative' in the context of 200+ years of US politics. The Republican party is very different nowadays vs before 2016, true, but that doesn't turn the people above into "liberals". That's just patently ridiculous, quite frankly.Charlie Kirk was all but an official arm of MAGA and the Whitehouse. All of MAGA is far to the right of every conservative that has ever been a republican prior to Trump, including well known liberals like Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Paul Ryan, and Mitt Romney.
That's the joke. And apparently we are in an alternate reality, because Charlie "just a tip to the right" Kirk is way past all of them.I can't tell if this is joking. None of those individuals are liberal. Unless you're in some alternate reality where you've somehow managed to alter the definition of 'conservative' in the context of 200+ years of US politics. The Republican party is very different nowadays, true, but that doesn't turn the people above into "liberals". That's just patently ridiculous, quite frankly.
I have the same take when I see people trying to bring this up. It's such immature way to think and disingenuous framing of what he said.I've been hearing a lot about the first bullet point. What I read was he said:
"It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights...That is a prudent deal," he said during an appearance at the Salt Lake City campus of Awaken Church on April 5, 2023.
Ok, good. I don't care about Kirk's politics, given what happened. May he rest in peace, and I just feel terrible for his wife, kids, friends & family. I just want to make sure you didn't think those individuals were actually liberals. Knowing you genuinely thought that would make me very sad.That's the joke. And apparently we are in an alternate reality, because Charlie "just a tip to the right" Kirk is way past all of them.
II'll save my empathy for the Evergreen children who died terrified at at school because of this dudes views. Their horror overshadowed by the death of a dude who considers their deaths necessary.
Lmfao @ all the braindead retards ITT screaming "woke!", latching on to death and politics to re-affirm their anti-woke views in gaming as if that matters here, and then patting themselves on that back after posting "RIP thots and prayers Charlie((("
Lost fkn timeline
I can't imagine he did, especially when you consider he and his wife *have young kids*. Won't make excuses for comments made in poor judgement, but I'm guessing the context they were made in would be enlightening.When did he say those deaths were 'necessary'?
I wonder if this will include visa revoking for ones already here.
I'm with you.I'm just so tired of it all:
Of the man's more despicable views. Of the fact those views were part of what brought him fame. Of the awful and sadly ironic way which he died. Of the fact that he was murdered for nothing more than being very disagreeable. Of the disgusting public responses to the death of a person who was ultimately harmless and easy enough to ignore.
It's all just so ugly.