Game Developers celebrating assassination of Charlie Kirk [Update] Sucker Punch Dev Fired, and SP issue statement



Oh Jesus, did they only put out a statement because Elon tagged Satya?


I mean it was brought directly to his attention and within 2 hours they posted statement confirming they are performing internal investigations... and you are going to turn that into a negative because "Microsoft Bad" ?
 
Am I missing something here? Why is there such an outpouring of sympathy for Charlie Kirk of all people? This is a man who trivialized school children getting shot as the price to pay for having access to guns, among many, many other abhorrent views. Suddenly he's some family man who everyone loved?
You are missing that it isn't sympathy for the guy, many people like me didn't know anything about him before he got murdered. For the little things I saw, in my case pretty likely disagree with things he really said or thought, while agree in other things he said or did.

It's being against being violent with who has different views, and against -specially publicly- cheering or wishing violence against them.

I think most companies should strive to be apolitical, but if their employees drag them into the mess with some stupid comments like this person then they need to respond.

Nintendo is in Japan and reflects Japanese values. PlayStation is in California and reflects California values. That, in a nutshell, is the problem. It has been said many times before by folks like @Bernardougf and I haven't put a lot of stock into it, but seems they were right all along.
They are companies with thousands of employees and stockholders, and millions of customers from all around the world, which includes people with all kind of political/religious/cultural/national views.

So they must be neutral and respectful with the different sides regarding politics, religion, etc. in a common ground where everybody is ok, having common sense basic ethics and rules that are agreed by any sane people.

Which in this case is 'violence against somebody just because thinks differently is bad, and to publicly cheer and wish it too'.
 
Last edited:
That's the problem, he was effective and able to break through the brain rot. It started out with just hostile crowds, but conversations happened. After a while more and more supporters started showing up.

Just look how he handled a discussion with a trans person. He doesn't agree, but listens and tells them not to destroy themself and his opinion on how to proceed.



But so many people with just parrot he was a massive bigot who deserved death. Break through the bullshit and educate yourself.

It's easy to take a 10-30 second clip of what someone said to make anything look a certain way, that should never be done, you need to see what was said before and after

Its very manipulative misinformation and that's almost what's always posted online now, just part of the story not the full story

Example, I could say I stole something from a npc in a game then someone would cut out the game part I mentioned and just have me saying I stole something a lot of videos of Kirk were done this way

So people see these short clips that are manipulated and taken out of a full story, call him a bigot, then that stays with them forever and they never change their mind
 
Last edited:
This…isnt that big.

Not a single person i know is talking about this. And this guy that was killed wasn't that known outside of America anyway.

You guys really need to leave your bubbles and se whats out there. You want Sony to come out and say what exactly?
What? This is a really big news in my country also in Europe and he was well know here too. Looks like the one living in a bubble is you.
 
Funny you use those (empty) words - divisive and provocateur.

Let's find any relevant/prominent leftist who have discussed "divisive" and "provocative" topics to what 75-80% of the USA thinks; trans rights, the gradations on abortion access and rights, medical vaccinations and such…if someone from the other side who was super secular, hedonistic and talked about all those issues (let's say a Dean Withers) and he god forbid had this situation occur, would you use the same words to justify or soften the fact that it happened? Despite, in the context of this hypothetical, his views were actually much more radical? His political affiliation was the one, in present time, committing most of the violence?

Back and Charlie- divisive…because? He held values that many do, and that until 15 years ago, were not divisive? The goal post/definition reframing of this shit is so tiring.

He was provocative guy because he stepped into liberal bastions and dared to debate people based on his beliefs and views? He stood his ground and angled to make a change in our youth towards conservatism?

He's divisive because???? What he espoused traditional conservative values? The woman should serve the man? They both should serve god? In the countless hours of debates, podcasts I'd heard him speak he never once said anything that was offensive or inappropriate; he started hard conversations backed by stats, data and his personal beliefs that, sure, you could NOT like…but to attach words to him like that, especially after what happened, is exactly why people are sick of this bullshit retardation from leftists (I would assume you're one?) who control language and shift definitions to justify their positions and actions.

What else? He was staunch believe in pro-life ideology…OH BUT HE SAID HE WOULD MAKE HIS YOUNG DAUGHTGER GO TO TERM WITH A CHILD IF RAPED…ok…what's the context of THAT answer to the obvious GOTCHA the debater was trying to employ? You can disagree with his point there sure, but what's the context for WHY he is pro life? His love for his daughter and child, and that the life inside her wouldn't matter?

Or he said that gun deaths a year were the price to pay for the 2A? Whats the context behind that? People are dense enough to think, and again this shows they didn't really know Charlie's opinions, that he was just totally COOL with shootings so that he could have "mah guns" - no he explicitly said, backed with data and stats, that he never wants one school or violent shooting - but he approach the gun violence issue from a mental health issue NOT a gun issue. Look who killed him?

One can disagree, hell I don't think I'd agree either with everything he said, but it's bullshit like this where people try to cherry pick and reframe out of context things the man said to justify why.

It's utterly dishonest and disheartening to see that there are enough people who would tacitly make less of what happened to him just because he held values and beliefs that you don't agree with. It's a lighter version of - "well he deserved it because he said things I don't like"
I was not softening shit. The previous poster claimed Kirk was a political figure who sought common ground. Kirk was never open to changing his mind. That is a ridiculous statement and is rewriting history

Saying blacks were better off during the Jim Crowe era and the Civil Rights act was mistake is a divisive opinion. You can agree with it, but it doesn't make it not divisive

Kirk can do whatever he chooses if his 10 year old daughter was impregnated, but he believes it should be illegal for EVERY 10 year old child to be given the option of an abortion. That is a massively divisive opinion

There is a huge irony of everybody rightfully condemning the people who are celebrating or mocking the assassination of Kirk, but not acknowledging that Kirk was guilty of the exact same thing. Kirk called the assassination suspect of a Nancy Pelosi's husband a patriot and joked that his supporters should help bail him out of jail. The hypocrisy of many people here is unreal
 
Last edited:
This thread gives me a little more hope for humanity, thank you.

I was i guess ok with charlie kirk though i didnt agree with some of his viewpoints... never a big fan just neutral really.

The amount of laughing and cheering and dehumanizing i've seen from the left leaning public online since this happened has really bothered me this week.

He was a husband and a father that never hurt anyone physically, who fucking cares if he said things you didn't agree with?

This week almost made me feel kind of hopeless for our current youth, they are so fucking radicalized and brainwashed it makes me sick.
 
I was not softening shit. The previous poster claimed Kirk was a political figure who sought common ground. Kirk was never open to changing his mind. That is a ridiculous statement and is rewriting history

Saying blacks were better off during the Jim Crowe era and the Civil Rights act was mistake is a divisive opinion. You can agree with it, but it doesn't make it not divisive

Kirk can do whatever he chooses if his 10 year old daughter was impregnated, but he believes it should be illegal for EVERY 10 year old child to be given the option of an abortion. That is a massively divisive opinion

There is a huge irony of everybody rightfully condemning the people who are celebrating or mocking the assassination of Kirk, but not acknowledging that Kirk was guilty of the exact same thing. Kirk called the assassination suspect of a Nancy Pelosi's husband a patriot and joked that his supporters should help bail him out of jail. The hypocrisy is unreal

Dude educated BLACKS are saying that shit, not just Charlie... pull your head out of your ass already.

I've seen tons of blacks online saying the civil rights movement, welfare, dei, all of it is a huge mistake and that the black community need to wake up and move past it.

This wasn't just some "divisive" white kid spreading hate.
 
Dude educated BLACKS are saying that shit, not just Charlie... pull your head out of your ass already.

I've seen tons of blacks online saying the civil rights movement, welfare, dei, all of it is a huge mistake and that the black community need to wake up and move past it.

This wasn't just some "divisive" white kid spreading hate.
Just because you believe he is right does not make it not a divisive opinion. Looney toons
 
There is a huge irony of everybody rightfully condemning the people who are celebrating or mocking the assassination of Kirk, but not acknowledging that Kirk was guilty of the exact same thing. Kirk called the assassination suspect of a Nancy Pelosi's husband a patriot and joked that his supporters should help bail him out of jail. The hypocrisy of many people here is unreal

Wrong. He called for a "patriot" to bail the suspect out so he could be questioned. He never called the suspect himself a "patriot". I don't agree with what Kirk said there, but if you are going to start yapping about hypocrisy then at least get it right.
 
Last edited:
I was not softening shit. The previous poster claimed Kirk was a political figure who sought common ground. Kirk was never open to changing his mind. That is a ridiculous statement and is rewriting history

Saying blacks were better off during the Jim Crowe era and the Civil Rights act was mistake is a divisive opinion. You can agree with it, but it doesn't make it not divisive

Kirk can do whatever he chooses if his 10 year old daughter was impregnated, but he believes it should be illegal for EVERY 10 year old child to be given the option of an abortion. That is a massively divisive opinion

There is a huge irony of everybody rightfully condemning the people who are celebrating or mocking the assassination of Kirk, but not acknowledging that Kirk was guilty of the exact same thing. Kirk called the assassination suspect of a Nancy Pelosi's husband a patriot and joked that his supporters should help bail him out of jail. The hypocrisy of many people here is unreal

Nobody should kill anybody. Period

There is no more conversation to be had about this subject. You didn't like the guy, fine. He should not be dead even if he was an asshole or said this or said that. This is not the way we should do things in a civilized society, we are not animals.
 
Last edited:
Free speech crowd suddenly renounces freedom of speech and embraces cancel culture. Ironic.

The free speech crowd is getting attacked and assassinated by the non-free speech crowd. Those supporting and celebrating this violence actually still have their free speech. No one is killing them for speaking out. They get to say whatever they want. Free speech doesn't mean you can say whatever you want without consequence. If I told off my boss, I'd probably get fired. Rightfully so. Similarly, if I openly supported terrorism as these people are, I would also get fired. And rightfully so.
 
What? This is a really big news in my country also in Europe and he was well know here too. Looks like the one living in a bubble is you.
The dude hasn't heard about something called 'the world wide web' where American videos have a big spread around the world on this tiny website called youtube.
 
What? This is a really big news in my country also in Europe and he was well know here too. Looks like the one living in a bubble is you.
Yup, there were multiple articles even here in poland on leftists tv stations/their sites (ofc all in polish). Thats just one such a site(national tv, very leftist, think cnn but even more leaning towards EU agenda, full support for alphabet ppl/transformers, green energy at all cost, uncontrolled migration from all possible shitholes etc):
 
This thread gives me a little more hope for humanity, thank you.

I was i guess ok with charlie kirk though i didnt agree with some of his viewpoints... never a big fan just neutral really.

The amount of laughing and cheering and dehumanizing i've seen from the left leaning public online since this happened has really bothered me this week.

He was a husband and a father that never hurt anyone physically, who fucking cares if he said things you didn't agree with?

This week almost made me feel kind of hopeless for our current youth, they are so fucking radicalized and brainwashed it makes me sick.
The saddest part of this is if Charlie would have survived, his methods wouldn't have changed and it would have brought over more people to his cause.

The brainwashed radicalized are a small minority that shout very large. And after this there movement will lose a ton of support. I have a coworker (mid-40s) who was in the lefty camp and came out as none binary and did the who they/them stuff. As about a year and a half he switched away and is probably more right wing than Charlie Kirk. He saw the hate and radicalization had some introspective looks and reformed his world view and this was over a year ago. With what happened here, many more young people will hopefully turn away from all the hate. And that's before you consider that the end of Gen Z and a large chunk of Gen Alpha have very conservative values.


Free speech crowd suddenly renounces freedom of speech and embraces cancel culture. Ironic.
As I said before freedom of speech =/= freedom from consequence. Freedom of speech also only covers the government. Look at the UK jailing people for "hate" speech online.

Seeing the people who embraced cancel culture consumed by the monster they created is invokes feelings of Schadenfreude.
 
Free speech crowd suddenly renounces freedom of speech and embraces cancel culture. Ironic.
Have people really forgotten what cancel culture was? It was purely fabricated claims by mostly bitter women in order to ruin mens lives, their slogan was #believeallwomen with zero evidence and due process.

The idiots losing their jobs the past couple of days are out in the open posting heinous stuff. They provide all the evidence necessary to get fired by themselves like dumb fucks.
 
If they were assassinated, I wouldn't rewrite history and say these people were not divisive. That would be absurd


Divisive is a subjective opinion. That he was shot for his ideology is not. The guy is being grossly depicted with the only purpose of dehumanizing him and justify his assassination, so this point needs a clarification, which you call "rewrite history". In a sane world, people on both sides of the spectrum would not even argue this.

And the worst is yet to come. The shitshow we will read about his wife will top whatever is being said right now.
 
E Ebrietas

Sadly, while in principle I'd agree with you, one side played by a different set of rules and mores; this has been shifting for a few years, but after this situation, I think the "high ground" approach with regards to this is warranted to NOT be taken. This is the game leftists want to play, just like they did with the Lawfare bullshit in 2023-2024, then the other side will use those same manipulations and techniques.

As an aside - I think the real telling element when people say what you're saying and pointing out the "irony" is that it's like a soft acknowledging that "yeah, we wanted to cancel or censor or deplatfrom you for your thoughts/speexh/ideas but we were justified" - but now an "eye for an eye" is being instituted and you guys will somehow try an "gotcha" by trying to say "guess you aren't so moral anymore?".

Your side never was, never wanted to be, so now you'll reap you sow.

(You is being used in the royal sense, but I assume it actually could be you)
 
Last edited:
No one is suggesting Kirk was "unbiased", but fact of the matter is that he organized events where people were able to discuss and disagree with each other freely face to face. That's as close to someone trying to find "common ground" as you are going to get. One of the points he made repeatedly was the danger of a society that doesn't have these types of discussions. The coward who shot him proved that point.

Because what's at stake here is the opportunity of discourse between two discordant ideologies. By claiming ones view (e.g., political ideology) is "right" (as in better), or "more right" (the better option) you've already lost the plot because "right" means different things to different people. Idiosyncrasies and nuance.

Taken to the extreme extent - I'm so "right" that I have justification to kill someone no matter what side of the ideological/political spectrum your on is.... well.... indicative of someone who lacks intelligence, full stop.

In a democracy, people share their ideologies, discuss them, and vote to elect those that reflect those beliefs. I'm not saying that's how it works in practice, but that was the idea.
 
Last edited:
If they were assassinated, I wouldn't rewrite history and say these people were not divisive. That would be absurd
Let's hope we never have that conversation,

but the fact that he WAS is reality, and you're sitting here making opinionated statements and trying to parse them out as fact; that "well he was provocateur and divisive (subjective not objective claims) so there was level of merit to what happened".

That's how your statement read.
 
Last edited:
This has been brewing a long time. This was the moment I left ResetEra and returned to GAF.

Can physical violence in response to political beliefs ever be morally justified?

KW3nfVhzczBjZGiR.jpeg

I had an Account on ResetEra. It was during the BlackLivesMatter Time.

The People were demonstrating for Peace, Justice and more Rights for Black People which was absolutely fine. But then these People were demonstrating by being violent in New York. They destroyed the Window of the Nintendo New York Store, and Cars on Streets, and alot more while demonstrating for Peace, Justice and more Rights for Black People.

Then I said on ResetEra that I personally don't think it's right to destroy other Peoples things especially when you're demonstrating for Peace and Justice, and that they should instead demonstrate in Peace and Respectfully without destroying New York.

After posting this I got instantly permanent Banned for being a Racist.

This was the Moment I realized that ResetEra is full of Extremists.
 
I heard Batya say on Pier Morgan yesterday that the real and eye-opening admission when people try and "both sides" the political violence and extremism discussion happening today- (leftists trying to water down their side)- that not one city, town etc was worried that the right would up and start rioting the loss over Charlie.

If this was someone of equal prominence and power on the left assassinated by someone you bet there'd be riots and violence in response.
 




I'm not saying this is just a Sony issue either by the way. At the moment this topic is centred on them actually releasing a statement. They delayed the launch event of a console for this.

Where is the political violence is abhorrent theme?

I still think we need a sense of perspective, there are probably around 200+ employees here who just want to do their job. Who are like us, they have health concerns, sick relatives, financial and tax issues, divorces, general shit life throws at you etc.





I'm not saying this is just a Sony issue either by the way. At the moment this topic is centred on them actually releasing a statement. They delayed the launch event of a console for this.

Where is the political violence is abhorrent theme?

I still think we need a sense of perspective, there are probably around 200+ employees here who just want to do their job. Who are like us, they have health concerns, sick relatives, financial and tax issues, divorces, general shit life throws at you etc.


LOLNO. There's maybe like 5 or 10 people out of the 200+ who don't support the celebratory commentary on at least some level, all the major tech and creative companies are dominated by the same demographic, across the board, by an overwhelming super majority. All of Sony's studios staged a coup and mass walkout when Jimbob Ryan sent a benign ass memo politely asking them to respect each other on abortion. They haven't released a statement cause they absolutely do NOT want to unless a high level bean counter deems the financial risk too great and a high level Sony corp executive makes them.
 
Last edited:
I had an Account on ResetEra. It was during the BlackLivesMatter Time.

The People were demonstrating for Peace, Justice and more Rights for Black People which was absolutely fine. But then these People were demonstrating by being violent in New York. They destroyed the Window of the Nintendo New York Store, and Cars on Streets, and alot more while demonstrating for Peace, Justice and more Rights for Black People.

Then I said on ResetEra that I personally don't think it's right to destroy other Peoples things especially when you're demonstrating for Peace and Justice, and that they should instead demonstrate in Peace and Respectfully without destroying New York.

After posting this I got instantly permanent Banned for being a Racist.

This was the Moment I realized that ResetEra is full of Extremists.
I was there too, I got banned for saying Elon cutting goverment waste could be a good thing, not even an extreme take or anything
 
Last edited:
I was there too, I got banned for saying Elon cutting goverment waste could be a good thing, not even an extreme take or anything

Obviously that shouldn't be ban-worthy.

It's a shame that DOGE turned out to be mostly a scam (and, btw, a huge info security risk), including trying to cut things folks didn't personally agree with, even if they had been legally funded by Congress.
 
Last edited:
Obviously that shouldn't be ban-worthy.

It's a shame that DOGE turned out to be mostly a scam (and, btw, a huge info security risk), including trying to cut things folks didn't personally agree with, even if they had been legally funded by Congress.
I don't think it was scam, he just wasn't able to cut as much as he thought, plus the cuts they did do weren't even ever voted in like they were supposed to be
 
Last edited:
I don't think it was scam, he just wasn't able to as much as he thought, plus the cuts they did do weren't even ever voted in like they were supposed to be
I agree to a point - the DOGE cuts, lot of them didn't need bills to stop them from being spent or continuing contracts or agreements - large amounts are at the federal (Trump) power to just stop.

Adding in legislation takes time - it sucks because all these stupid politicians vow for "day one" bullshit they can't or won't enact, but a lot of the stuff Elon brought to light would need legislation and that wasn't the type of budget/bill that was being passed in July.

I'm still optimistic we will see a lot of it come to pass, but may not even be during Trump's term.
 
Tmz caught laughing at the death



I've seen someone doing a timestamped comparison with both the footage of the stream and the car chase. The car chase was still going on when they were cheering.
This explanation in general makes no sense. People dont cheer like this when watching a car chase unless its something you are super invested in for some reason.
 
This…isnt that big.

Not a single person i know is talking about this. And this guy that was killed wasn't that known outside of America anyway.

You guys really need to leave your bubbles and se whats out there. You want Sony to come out and say what exactly?
Everybody I know who is on the left was completely absorbed by this and they say the most disgraceful things.

Yesterday I was with the family, there was a long dicsussion about him and how hateful he was, these people were clearly reached by the counter propaganda, some going as far as saying that the killer was sent by Trump to distract the population from something big that was about to happen.

I did my best not to join the conversation, Charlie was much more conservative than me, and I think he got killed because that frustrated the left activists that they could not find a good angle of approach to his arguments. Also, obviously he might have made a big difference in favor of Trump.

Some people on the local radio jokingly announced his death by saying (before anything else) "there is someone who will not be doing any public events anymore", then laughing... then saying he got shot.

In a lot of the mainstream media here (somehow this gets a lot of attention) "experts" in extremism, which appear to be extremists themselves, point the finger at him for radicalizing the shooter (somehow). They never explain their methodolygy, trust the experts they say.
 
Last edited:
Did I just spot the biggest psychopath of them all? She watched a 1-min compilation of Charlie Kirk and now wants that people not stop with him, but to get rid of them all. She also wants that someone gets rid off Charlie's wife and his kids. Even the grandma she wouldnt spare. She might be trolling, but its certainly not something to make fun of.

 
Did I just spot the biggest psychopath of them all? She watched a 1-min compilation of Charlie Kirk and now wants that people not stop with him, but to get rid of them all. She also wants that someone gets rid off Charlie's wife and his kids. Even the grandma she wouldnt spare. She might be trolling, but its certainly not something to make fun of.


lets give these ppl a break guys this is just an edge joke, right DrFigs DrFigs ?
 
Last edited:
I had an Account on ResetEra. It was during the BlackLivesMatter Time.

The People were demonstrating for Peace, Justice and more Rights for Black People which was absolutely fine. But then these People were demonstrating by being violent in New York. They destroyed the Window of the Nintendo New York Store, and Cars on Streets, and alot more while demonstrating for Peace, Justice and more Rights for Black People.

Then I said on ResetEra that I personally don't think it's right to destroy other Peoples things especially when you're demonstrating for Peace and Justice, and that they should instead demonstrate in Peace and Respectfully without destroying New York.

After posting this I got instantly permanent Banned for being a Racist.

This was the Moment I realized that ResetEra is full of Extremists.
I remember the need to tip toe around here to not end up banned for well over a year. Then the other site was created, I spent a week or two seeing how things were going to settle and never made an account.

For all we have to say about ResetEra, all of that was here when those mods were in control. While it's not impossible to be banned from here. @EvilLore deserves a ton of props for maintaining a site that allows debate instead of becoming an echo chamber for any one side.
 
Free speech crowd suddenly renounces freedom of speech and embraces cancel culture. Ironic.
The free speech crowd is saying to the violent and anti free speech crowd that headshotting people who disagrees with you is bad and contrary to free speech.

Maybe we'll needed Sesame Street to explain it more effectively to certain kind of people.
 
I've seen someone doing a timestamped comparison with both the footage of the stream and the car chase. The car chase was still going on when they were cheering.
This explanation in general makes no sense. People dont cheer like this when watching a car chase unless its something you are super invested in for some reason.
If you watch the video. The car chase reporter, reported Charlie's death and that is Wren they cheered.
That's the first time I'm seeing the initial TMZ video. How is the celebration in the other room supposed to be about a "car chase"? That doesn't make any sense.
Ask yourself when any women has been that excited from watching a cat chase ?
 
The clock is ticking. The longer it takes for SP and Sony to release some statement the worst it's going to get

No it isn't. General gamers are not waiting for an apology. They don't owe you anything and firing that person was statement enough. If they came out and said that we fired this person because they violated some predefined rules we established at hire, would that be enough for you? I highly doubt it, because you and others in this thread want them to take a particular stance.....your stance.

From a business perspective, they shouldn't say anything anyway because whatever they say is going to piss one or the other side off. You got people here wanting to cancel them for no statement, and people on the other side (era, etc) who are pissed because they fired the person and are claiming they will never buy a game again.

You say nothing and let this crap blow over. Will their still be a small amount of people that want to "cancel" them by not purchasing their products anymore? Sure. Plenty of those here. But generally outside of your circle, and forums like this one, it's not that deep.
 
This is on the other thread, but to put to rest that the murderer was somehow a conservative. His parents already said he was recently radicalized.

https://nypost.com/2025/09/13/us-ne...yler-robinson-lived-with-transgender-partner/
Clearly he was radicalized. I think rn the smart money is on the far right. But I don't see the quote in this article from his parents.

If the transgender girlfriend thing turns out to be true, then i'd just say that i am wrong. but it sounds insane. in Utah, from a mormon family. I just don't believe it.
 
Last edited:
Hw had facist propaganda. That in no way conservative.

Lazy libtards making false narratives.
 
In Canada, Phantasy Star 2 and Sword of Vermilion were $120. I know because I got both after begging my older siblings to chip in and help me get them. Normally Genesis/SNES games were around $80, but "it was a steal" if some were dumbed down to $60 or 70. N64 games were about $100. I dont remember if any broke past $100. But wouldnt be surprised if some did.

Game prices here basically correlate to the US price +/- currency exchange. Then its generally rounded up or down to the nearest $5.

The only time game prices were actually good is the rare time every decade or two exchange rates get parity 1:1. Then suddenly, holy shit! A game disc is only $60 like the states? Wow.
Price dropped to 50$ with the PSone gen though. Was tough justifying a N64. I didn't keep mine.
 
Top Bottom