I'm really puzzled as to why so many people these days seem to give so much of their attention to these degenerate CEOs. They're often times either straight up sociopaths or super cringy ADHD-infected/autistic edgelords. Their affairs should only concern us insofar as the decisions they make affect us directly. I'm not particularly fond of "CEO gossip" thank you very much.That reads like AI slop lmao.
There's this dumbass trend of them making themselves hyper visible for god knows why. Like you said, a lot of them are not likeable personalities.I'm really puzzled as to why so many people these days seem to give so much of their attention to these degenerate CEOs. They're often times either straight up sociopaths or super cringy ADHD-infected/autistic edgelords. Their affairs should only concern us insofar as the decisions they make affect us directly. I'm not particularly fond of "CEO gossip" thank you very much.
How much have you used Copilot and Grok to say this? And for what?Copilot for me is at the same level as Grok, aka not something I ever utilize unless everything else is unavailable. The latter is where Copilot has an edge because they do have pretty solid data security story on the Enterprise side and that's where it really fits in if you already have M365/Azure.
Between Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini, I'm finding Gemini to be the least pain in the ass to use. Gemini is also the only one that consistently identifies images correctly with simple "identify this image" prompts without me having to guide it to the right answer.I currently use a combination of Copilot and Grok. Copilot because I have a paid tier for free, not sure if it's through Gamepass or mail, so I can iterate in peace without hitting that wall of having generated too many images. And Grok because it's not as strict as said and because Imagine is all sorts of awesome.
They renamed it from Office 365 to Microsoft 365 like 10 years ago. Now they're just adding "Copilot" to the name.They've renamed office to copilot?
Wtf.
That's part of it, but also - he wants to create a market for something he invested billions in. If he can change the perception of AI (he won't) then AI adoption will go up and Microsoft's investment will get validated.It's proper entertainment watching Microslop make desperate moves because of ending up way behind in the AI race, despite being one of the biggest companies in the world.
Not to mention the current AI (LLMs) is not thinking, it's information gathering and synthesis + hallucinations. Every company on earth tried desperately to make us believe AI is truly revolutionary but now the hype is going down they are desperately trying to pivot, since they know people are waking up that's it's "nice to have", not "mission critical".Funny reaction ... don't know if its exactly as reported but it comes across as pretty childish.
Here is the issue ... they are really trying to push the tools as "cognitive enhancing" (as Nadella wants to sell it), but writing is thinking. Coding is thinking. So if you outsource in those areas it's actually cognitive decline because you don't have to think to make anything or engage your brain. And it typically is of pretty low quality in my experience (in the software world) so yeah .. AI slop is an exact term.
This is old news but yes… it also solved the "why do we have an Office app and separate Word and Excel apps?" question in a very shitty wayThat's one way to boost the "engagement numbers for copilot". Just like every item that uses electricity is an xbox etc....
Damn it's already self awareCopilot is an AI and may make mistakes. Your conversations are personalized. Opt out.
Today
what is generative AI slop
Here's the short, clear version — and then we can dig deeper if you want.
"Generative AI slop" (often just AI slop) is a pejorative term for low‑quality, mass‑produced content created with generative AI tools. It's used when the output feels:
What "generative AI slop" means
Think of it as the spam of the AI era — endless, mediocre content created because it's easy and profitable to churn out.
- low‑effort
- inaccurate or nonsensical
- cheaply made at scale
- lacking creativity or meaning
- flooding social media, search results, or marketplaces
Sources describe it as:
- "digital content made with generative AI… perceived to show a lack of effort, quality or deeper meaning"
- "low-quality videos, images, music, and articles… taking over social media and streaming platforms"
- "machine-made junk content… cheap, endless and hard to escape"
The word "slop" implies unappetizing leftovers — something shoveled out quickly with no care. The term caught on because:
Why people call it "slop"
Merriam‑Webster even named "slop" the 2025 Word of the Year.
- AI tools can produce huge volumes of content instantly
- Platforms reward quantity over quality
- It's often hard to tell what's real
- It can drown out human-made work
Examples of AI slop
- Weird, uncanny AI images (e.g., "Shrimp Jesus") that go viral
- Fake news clips or disaster photos that look real at a glance
- Spammy YouTube videos made entirely by AI to farm ad revenue
- Bland AI-written articles stuffed with keywords
AI slop raises concerns about:
Why it matters
If you want, I can also explain why Microsoft's CEO is pushing back on the term, since you have that article open — or we can explore how to spot AI slop, why it spreads, or whether the criticism is fair.
- misinformation
- erosion of trust in online content
- overwhelming human creators
- degrading search and social feeds
Sigh!
Be careful Satya
AI may run the company better than Satya Nadella himself
I work with CoPilot daily. I guess if you want to work with sexy images Grok is needed, lol, but that is not something I care about.How much have you used Copilot and Grok to say this? And for what?
I'm using all AI models, on the art side, and can't relate. For me they all have the same stupid restrictions, Copilot, ChatGPT, Gemini. This is on the paid tier on all. And they also all have a randomized element, which means you have to iterate to get what you want, which essentially means you'll quickly hit a wall and have to pay up. Sneaky…
But with Grok you can at least work around some of the limitations, it's not nearly as strict, Elon just don't give a shit. If you haven't tried it then don't slam it.
Worst case scenario you can trick Grok through video (Imagine) and take a screenshot.
I currently use a combination of Copilot and Grok. Copilot because I have a paid tier for free, not sure if it's through Gamepass or mail, so I can iterate in peace without hitting that wall of having generated too many images. And Grok because it's not as strict as said and because Imagine is all sorts of awesome.
If you're doing artsy stuff then Grok Imagine is real fun. Can give life to your drawings in spectacular ways.I haven't played around with Grok the same way or as much you have. I'm curious to see what it can do now.
Thank you Microsoft.
He just made sure AI-slop will never die.
It's kind of amazing how much MSFT has fucked up in the last 15 years, way before AI anythingEven with all the mistakes AI makes.
![]()
Microsoft CEO Really Wants You to Stop Calling Generative AI 'Slop'
That won't help saleswww.pushsquare.com
![]()
Apparently, "slop" was Merriam-Webster's word of the year – as determined by the organisation's "human editors", it specified in a blog post prior to Christmas.
While we feel the word has lost a lot of meaning due to its undeniable overuse throughout 2025, said fleshy beings defined it as "digital content of low quality that is produced usually in quantity by means of artificial intelligence". Seems relatively accurate to us.
Satya Nadella, whose Microsoft company has poured tens of billions of dollars into the technology, doesn't like the insult, though.
He wrote in an SN Scratchpad post ahead of the New Year:
We've read Nadella's post through several times now, and we're honestly struggling to extract much meaning from the corpobabble it's undeniably stuffed full of. We can't help but wonder whether he employed Copilot to help author it.
But we think he sums it all up with this sentence: "We now have a clearer sense of where the tech is headed, but also the harder and more important question of how to shape its impact on the world."
In other words, the tech is here but no one's really figured out how to best use it yet. Or, in Microsoft's case, how to best sell it.
Like it or loathe it, AI is going to dominate discussion in the games industry this year.
We've already seen studios like Larian come out and admit they're exploring the possibilities of the technology, and they won't be alone. Meanwhile, teams like Sandfall Interactive have said they'll never use it again, after attracting some criticism for including some generated art assets in undisputed Game of the Year winner Clair Obscur: Expedition 33.
We can't see any immediate resolution to the issues: with generative AI largely trained upon the individual endeavour of humans, questions of ethics will continue to be raised.
And moreover, the technology's impact on the environment – and, increasingly, economy – will remain big talking points.
For Nadella and Microsoft, who's seemingly bet everything on generative AI, this year may yet prove a make or break moment.
Cannot see the file, unfortunatelyLoomy Here's some quick fun with Grok Imagine. Everything is built from that one screenshot at the start. Character design consistency is the most difficult part. I wish you could lock the design somehow, fish out some digits from one clip to then put into the next one. As it is you have to edit isolated 6 seconds clips into something coherent.
![]()
Oh, they had their attempts. First with Windows Mobile (which, granted, was absolutely terrible, but it was more in the PDA era) and then with Windows Phone. And that could actually have had some promise. But they absolutely self-sabotaged themselves with it. In a way, it was kinda impressive. Any corporation can shoot themselves in the foot, many often do. But a point-blank grenade shot to take out the entire leg, not many have done that.It's kind of amazing how much MSFT has fucked up in the last 15 years, way before AI anything
They completely missed the boat on mobile. Could've been the major platform holder not named Apple but let Google run away with it.
Weird, it's ping pong rolling here, is it Imgur misbehaving or can you see it through this link?Cannot see the file, unfortunately
![]()
Weird, it's ping pong rolling here, is it Imgur misbehaving or can you see it through this link?
Yeah 6s is unfortunately the limit on Grok Imagine. I did it as explained earlier, took screenshots of the a late frame to feed into another video as the starter frame. That keeps the design intact. Then I put it all together with iMovie. Just a quick example.This one works. Made up of 6 second clips? That's pretty cool.
Weird, it's ping pong rolling here, is it Imgur misbehaving or can you see it through this link?
I'm still pissed that the surface line went the copilot directionWaiting for Microsoft's CEO to change his legal name to Copilot Copilot.
They had no resources (management ability) to do both corporate and consumer business and consumer business proved to require a lot of efforts to make into successful venture.It's kind of amazing how much MSFT has fucked up in the last 15 years, way before AI anything
The bad part is, if AI fails to deliver massive returns its going to crush the US economy. Every big firm and investor has bazillions invested in it.