• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

New Epstein Emails: Elon Musk Repeatedly Asked To Visit Epstein Island

SJRB said:
Let's focus on the dude who wanted to go and not the people in these files talking about torture, "pizza" and children.
Click to expand...
If you're gullible and uninformed enough to buy any of that shit - ie not to realise that bullshit tips from randoms is included in this "transparency dump".
 


bro what the fuuuuuuck.....

I guess now we know why the houser brothers went their separate ways / stepped down?! this shit is crazy I feel a bit sick reading some of this stuff

According to one of the files Robin Leach (allegedly) strangled a girl to death at one of the parties.
 
adamsapple said:




G_9Ta1MWAAAld6j
Click to expand...


Wait, apparently the (girls FTW) email isn't real.

leadstories.com

Fact Check: NO 'Epic Island Vacation' Email Thread With Elon Musk In Epstein Files Released In January 2026 | Lead Stories

Was there an email thread with Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein discussing an "epic island vacation" included in the latest...
leadstories.com leadstories.com

Anyone know for sure?
 
SJRB said:
Let's focus on the dude who wanted to go and not the people in these files talking about torture, "pizza" and children.

There's straight up harrowing stuff in these files.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Elon got off "easy" in these files. There are a lot of other people who have some very damning stuff in there. Trump and Gates particularly.
 
Last edited:
Kilau said:
Wait, apparently the (girls FTW) email isn't real.

leadstories.com

Fact Check: NO 'Epic Island Vacation' Email Thread With Elon Musk In Epstein Files Released In January 2026 | Lead Stories

Was there an email thread with Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein discussing an "epic island vacation" included in the latest...
leadstories.com leadstories.com

Anyone know for sure?
Click to expand...


The problem with that is the DoJ is constantly uploading then deleting stuff, so if that file isn't currently on their search list, it doesn't mean it wasn't there before.

There's other examples of some heinous shit they deleted but then re-uploaded after public backlash. Cause you know ... once something goes on the internet .. it's always there.
 
Last edited:
adamsapple said:
The problem with that is the DoJ is constantly uploading then deleting stuff, so if that file isn't currently on their search list, it doesn't mean it wasn't there before.

There's other examples of some heinous shit they deleted but then re-uploaded after public backlash. Cause you know ... once something goes on the internet .. it's always there.
Click to expand...
Good point, and it works both ways. People can create fake shit and then cover "it was deleted". Elon is obviously scum because he wanted to go to the island well past the "this dude is a convicted pedo" timeline.
 
SJRB said:
Let's focus on the dude who wanted to go and not the people in these files talking about torture, "pizza" and children.

There's straight up harrowing stuff in these files.
Click to expand...
I can imagine that at least a few were likely seduced into these parties. They were asked, sold on it. Here we have Elon* begging to go, which just shows how craven and depraved he is. And this is the guy publicly going on and on about how against Epstein and pedophilia he is while he was BEGGING to go and then lies to everyone about it as easily as he breathes. And this is the guy personally tweaking one of the largest AI out there and twitter. Literally one of the most brazen liars of all time controlling what a ton of idiots see and think, literally. This is just exhibit #9999 of why anytime this guy's mouth is moving he is literally lying.

*Also known as World's #1 Diablo player
 
Last edited:
Kilau said:
Good point, and it works both ways. People can create fake shit and then cover "it was deleted". Elon is obviously scum because he wanted to go to the island well past the "this dude is a convicted pedo" timeline.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be surprised if Musk didn't know.

I also wouldn't be surprised if Musk didn't really care that much about Epstein's relations with a 17 year old back in the 2010s. That's where "convicted pedo" comes from.
 
Sophist said:
One was 14 years old, multiple were 15 years old according to https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00172125.pdf
Click to expand...

That is true and it's spelled out in the official indictment against him as well.

EPSTEIN's victims were as young as 14 at the time he abused them, and were, for various reasons, often particularly vulnerable to exploitation. Moreover, EPSTEIN knew that many of his victims were under 18, including because, in some instances, victims expressly told him they were underage.
Click to expand...
 
Sophist said:
One was 14 years old, multiple were 15 years old according to https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00172125.pdf
Click to expand...
adamsapple said:
That is true and it's spelled out in the official indictment against him as well.
Click to expand...
I'm talking about his convictions from the 2008 Palm Beach plea deal. When you say "convicted pedo" you have to have convictions, not just charges. Certainly not charges years after the date Musk supposedly sent this stuff.

He was convicted of 2 counts of prostitution by guilty plea; one of them being a 17 year old minor. The other an adult woman.

It is worth mentioning that one of the only two other actually adjudicated victims who was ruled as such in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial said the following. Ie, this is from her own statements:

'At 14 years old, I was big breasted and I definitely could pass for 21 when I was made up. I did my own make-up but Virginia gave me clothes. She gave me these really tight skimpy shorts with a spaghetti strap top with all my cleavage hanging out.
'She just said whatever you do, don't say your age. And I didn't even ask why. I went along with it.'
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
adamsapple said:
The problem with that is the DoJ is constantly uploading then deleting stuff, so if that file isn't currently on their search list, it doesn't mean it wasn't there before.

There's other examples of some heinous shit they deleted but then re-uploaded after public backlash. Cause you know ... once something goes on the internet .. it's always there.
Click to expand...

This pattern is why it's silly to believe there is nothing fishy going on. There are too many files to pour over, so they screwed up and took files down after someone else raised the alarm of their content. Only to put it back, when people ask what happened.

And we are supposed to believe that they released "all" the files, and didn't hold back anything too damaging, while we see this happening. LOL
 
Senua said:
No, ther are paedophiles all over the globe regardless of wealth, it's just that the elites can get away with it (mostly).
Click to expand...
Its more than that. Being a billionaire is inherently corrupting and not natural. Studies from 2010 showed happiness for most non-sociopaths capping when wealth hit $75k a year.

Now imagine you make $500k a year. You can pretty much live anywhere you want. Eat anything you want every day. Buy pretty much anything you want. Travel nonstop. And have tons left for saving, investment, and growing your wealth.

There isn't even anything real to buy when you're a billionaire. You're basically just trading in power at that point. You've done everything. You've seen everything. You are probably a sociopath to some degree so you still want more, more, more. Pedo parties is clearly one of the things they get up to. What do you get the man who has everything? 13 year olds. Tale as old as time. Just look at what kings and emperors used to get up to. Wealth at that level is a disease. If you want any hope of holding on to your humanity you give almost all of it away since our government is too weak to tax it and redistribute it through democratically decided programs.
 
Last edited:
Punished Miku said:
Its more than that. Being a billionaire is inherently corrupting and not natural. Studies from 2010 showed happiness for most non-sociopaths capping when wealth hit $75k a year.

Now imagine you make $500k a year. You can pretty much live anywhere you want. Eat anything you want every day. Buy pretty much anything you want. Travel nonstop. And have tons left for saving, investment, and growing your wealth.

There isn't even anything real to buy when you're a billionaire. You're basically just trading in power at that point. You've done everything. You've seen everything. You are probably a sociopath to some degree so you still want more, more, more. Pedo parties is clearly one of the things they get up to. What do you get the man who has everything? 13 year olds. Tale as old as time. Just look at what kings and emperors used to get up to. Wealth at that level is a disease. If you want any hope of holding on to your humanity you give almost all of it away since our government is too weak to tax it and redistribute it through democratically decided programs.
Click to expand...
Disagree with everything you said here if I can be honest
 
SJRB said:
Let's focus on the dude who wanted to go and not the people in these files talking about torture, "pizza" and children.

There's straight up harrowing stuff in these files.
Click to expand...
We can talk about more then one thing.

The torture thing for instance is redacted so it's not getting discussed as much.
 
HeisenbergFX4 said:
Disagree with everything you said here if I can be honest
Click to expand...
Well its the truth. Thats the price of historic wealth inequality. Laws break down. Democracy breaks down. Morality breaks down. People can still be rich, just not that rich unless everyone's just fine with a system rigged in every possible way for lawless oligarchs to rape and pillage the innocent.

How in the world could we even pretend we have a democracy when 1 person had enough wealth to pay to primary anyone who disagrees with him while buying all forms of media to shape what people are allowed to see and think? Washington post, tik tok, CBS, Twitter. Pedos out in the open. Murders out in the open. Its right there for everyone to see. All of it boils down to people with unnaturally disproportionate wealth.

Just look at the 1st thing I said. Laws break down. Everyone knows that is true. We're watching it. They're too rich and powerful to even be held to laws about human trafficking, rape and murder of KIDS. Think about that. Think about how we would be treated for minor crimes compared to this. So much wealth inequality we don't have universal laws. Why no laws? They're too rich.
 
Last edited:
adamsapple said:
'worth mentioning', no .. it really isn't. But do go on ....
Click to expand...
You don't care about the specifics of what an actually adjudicated victim says? Quite the admission, but no surprise. Most people seem more interested in self aggrandizement and gratification of their personal critical theory than the facts or the "survivors"

BlackTron said:
This pattern is why it's silly to believe there is nothing fishy going on. There are too many files to pour over, so they screwed up and took files down after someone else raised the alarm of their content. Only to put it back, when people ask what happened.

And we are supposed to believe that they released "all" the files, and didn't hold back anything too damaging, while we see this happening. LOL
Click to expand...
adamsapple said:
www.yahoo.com

DOJ Briefly Erases Long List of Tips Against Trump in New Epstein Docs

The file was taken down just hours after the Department of Justice released it—and then put back up.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
Click to expand...

There's nothing damaging here.

The trove included one particularly shocking document: an FBI tip line record that included previously unreported sex abuse allegations against the president, some of which involved minors.
The tip line includes unsubstantiated and potentially uninvestigated claims of abuse, sometimes by way of secondhand information.


In one such undated line, a self-described friend of one of Trump's alleged victims submitted a tip.
Click to expand...
"[Redacted] reported an unidentified female friend who was forced to perform oral sex on President Trump approximately 35 years ago in NJ,"
Click to expand...

Maybe cut out the maximalist conspiracy theories and acknowledge that 8 week rushes to publicly release tens of thousands to millions of anything, let alone files that have to adhere to a bunch of redaction rules (by way of the alleged victims' attorneys btw), is going to come with hiccups.
 
adamsapple said:
I don't care for anyone appearing to be playing apologist for a convicted pedo. The fact that THAT is the quote you chose to highlight is pretty telling to what you're attempting to do here.
Click to expand...
It's not apologia. You can say convicted pedo, all I've done is provide the facts around it. I highlight the quote because it's more substantial to the point than what you inaccurately threw out. Inconvenient factoids from the same people you pretend to crusade for don't make me the bad guy. But then, your posting has never indicated an interest in facts on any issue on your part.
 
Last edited:
adamsapple said:
I don't care for anyone appearing to be playing apologist for a convicted pedo. The fact that THAT is the quote you chose to highlight is pretty telling to what you're attempting to do here.
Click to expand...
In 2008 he was only in his 50s and the girl was almost 18, why are you making such a big fuss about this bruv? Nothing to see here, relax!
 
ProtoByte said:
It's not apologia. You can say convicted pedo, all I've done is provide the facts around it. I highlight the quote because it's more substantial to the point than what you inaccurately threw out. Inconvenient factoids from the same people you pretend to crusade for don't make me the bad guy. But then, your posting has never indicated an interest in facts on any issue on your part.
Click to expand...

"More substantial to the point". :messenger_tears_of_joy:

Bro, fucking stop, lol. You chose to highlight the quote where the girl says she appeared older with makeup, for what exactly? To emphasize that Epstein couldn't have known what her age was? Elaborate as to the substance you derived that others aren't seeing.
 
I wouldn't believe any screen shot posted unless it is linked directly to the DOJ website, even if it's deleted after it provides time to verify.
 
Punished Miku said:
Well its the truth. Thats the price of historic wealth inequality. Laws break down. Democracy breaks down. Morality breaks down. People can still be rich, just not that rich unless everyone's just fine with a system rigged in every possible way for lawless oligarchs to rape and pillage the innocent.

How in the world could we even pretend we have a democracy when 1 person had enough wealth to pay to primary anyone who disagrees with him while buying all forms of media to shape what people are allowed to see and think? Washington post, tik tok, CBS, Twitter. Pedos out in the open. Murders out in the open. Its right there for everyone to see. All of it boils down to people with unnaturally disproportionate wealth.

Just look at the 1st thing I said. Laws break down. Everyone knows that is true. We're watching it. They're too rich and powerful to even be held to laws about human trafficking, rape and murder of KIDS. Think about that. Think about how we would be treated for minor crimes compared to this. So much wealth inequality we don't have universal laws. Why no laws? They're too rich.
Click to expand...
We can 100% agree to disagree here
 
GudOlRub said:
In 2008 he was only in his 50s and the girl was almost 18, why are you making such a big fuss about this bruv? Nothing to see here, relax!
Click to expand...
I'll be clear about what I think on a man in his 50s and an 18 year old female: I think it's morally objectionable. I don't think it's pedophilia.

Senua said:
You in these files or something bro?
Click to expand...
You expect to get something out of asking this dumb question?

BlackTron said:
This thread has thrown your credibility out the window.
Click to expand...
I'm interested to know how that's the case, given that no one has actually addressed my points as they are stated if at all.
You stated, surely without reading the article, that it was evidence something fishy is going on. Trump's been found civilly liable of sexual misconduct and still got elected president. The fuck do they care about a random hotline tip alleging something that happened in the 80s??

Where's your credibility if you can't be bothered to read the things meant to substantiate your arguments?
 
GudOlRub said:
She wasn't 18 though was she?
Are we going to argue how 17 is almost 18? Isn't that a slippery slope? 16 is almost 17 which is almost 18.
Click to expand...
17 in Florida is illegal and even more morally objectionable than 18 for someone significantly older, let alone middle age. I'm not interested in splitting the hair beyond that. Reasonable people can apply the pedo label where it applies.
 
GudOlRub said:
She wasn't 18 though was she?
Are we going to argue how 17 is almost 18? Isn't that a slippery slope? 16 is almost 17 which is almost 18.
Click to expand...

My man's already posted quotes from the then-14-year-old victim saying how she looked older with makeup. Most people reading that would assume he's giving off very strong epstein-apologist vibes. 🤷‍♂️
 
ProtoByte said:
I'm talking about his convictions from the 2008 Palm Beach plea deal. When you say "convicted pedo" you have to have convictions, not just charges. Certainly not charges years after the date Musk supposedly sent this stuff.

He was convicted of 2 counts of prostitution by guilty plea; one of them being a 17 year old minor. The other an adult woman.

It is worth mentioning that one of the only two other actually adjudicated victims who was ruled as such in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial said the following. Ie, this is from her own statements:

Click to expand...
When we are talking about people ignoring age of consent laws and passing a girl around their friends I really don't give a shit about the difference between a pedophile and an ephibophile or whatever it's called.

And good fucking lord at you quoting that statement about the 14 year old.
 
When you read the stuff about the 14 year old and realize it came from a mindset that it actually helps his case...you know then you are arguing with an entity from a different planet.
 
IntentionalPun said:
And good fucking lord at you quoting that statement about the 14 year old.
Click to expand...
Hope you're somewhere beside your fainting chair. You're not making an actual point here.
It's pretty funny: As much as you guys take my posting this as an affront to the victimhood of this person (you probably don't know her name), most of the interview is her stating her opinion that Virginia Giuffre - the originator of the trafficking ring assertion that you now espouse - was no victim at all.

IntentionalPun said:
When we are talking about people ignoring age of consent laws and passing a girl around their friends
Click to expand...
Well the bolded is not what we're talking about because there's no evidence for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
There is no Epstein Client List
42 43 44 45 46
2K
14K
Heimdall_Xtreme replied
Elon Musk vs Sam Altman
2
52
2K
ReBurn replied
Elon Musk Just Became The First Person Ever Worth $500 Billion
News Business 
48
858
Unknown Soldier replied
Elon Musk announces Grok being returned to revise history
2
72
2K
Enlightenedfool replied
  • Locked
Epstein Files Released! oh wait... where are they?
2 3 4 5
246
4K
RJMacready73 replied
Top Bottom