-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
New Epstein Emails: Elon Musk Repeatedly Asked To Visit Epstein Island
- Thread starter adamsapple
- Start date
Ironbunny
Member
Kittehkraken
Member
Totally normal behavior.
Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler referenced "concrete evidence of disgusting criminality revealed in the Epstein files" and asked Bondi point-blank, "How many of Epstein's co-conspirators have you indicted? How many perpetrators are you even investigating?"
Bondi tried to avoid the question, after which Nadler asked again how many of Epstein's co-conspirators Bondi had indicted. This angered Bondi, who started shouting over Nadler, saying, "I am going to answer the question the way I want to answer the question!"
Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, then tried to head off Bondi's attempts to drown out Nadler. Nadler pointed out that the number was zero, which Bondi didn't acknowledge. Then, Bondi brought up the performance of the Dow Jones and Nasdaq indexes.
"The DOW is over 50,000 dollars. I don't know why you're laughing," Bondi said angrily, as some members of the committee clearly saw through her attempt to distract. "You're a great stock trader, as I hear, Raskin.
"The S&P at almost 7,000, and the Nasdaq smashing records. Americans' 401(k)s and retirement savings are booming. That's what we should be talking about. We should be talking about making Americans safe," Bondi said, but then she was heckled. "What does the Dow have to do with anything, that's what they just asked? Are you kidding?"
Pam Bondi Falls Apart at the Seams After Tough Epstein Question
The attorney general bizarrely began citing stock market numbers in a desperate bid to avoid questions on the Epstein files.newrepublic.com
Tiago Rodrigues
Member
They are more worried about investigating Bad Bunny's Superbowl performance. That's where the problem lies. These files? Nah...everything okay.Can you blame other countries (especially Europe and Canada) to distance themselves from US after all the shit trump pulled?
And USA was doing nothing about Epstein for more than 10 years. He got some laughable deal in 2008 and they allowed him to operate for many, many years...
How can anyone defend this shit at this point?
StueyDuck
Member
"How in the world would it be shooting our selves in the foot for going after pedo abusers?"
Well thats what that statement says. If its not what you meant then word it better.
Because I was not saying its shooting yourself in the foot to go after pedos...
Unless you think America is putting boots on the ground to get the Saudi prince?
DiamondHands
Neo Member
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Last edited:
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
The AG is deflecting by talking about the DOW and Nasdaq when asked about Epstein.
ForAcademicPurposes
Member
Bondi scientologist
Rentahamster
Rodent Whores
Wasn't your implication that if we see this through to its conclusion that a lot of our institutions would be heavily damaged due to their associations with these crimes? And that because of our cultural moral differences we'd be intentionally shooting ourselves in the foot because other cultures don't give a shit about this and would emerge relatively unscathed?
Smiggs
Member
You know someone has lost an argument when they follow up with a comment about TDS. Good Lord.
Tiago Rodrigues
Member
The AG is deflecting by talking about the DOW and Nasdaq when asked about Epstein.
yeah fuck that...we don't do that here. Look at the stock market instead! (which has looked better than it is right now lol)
Last edited:
analog_future
Resident Crybaby
The AG is deflecting by talking about the DOW and Nasdaq when asked about Epstein.
Why does the Chief Law Enforcement Officer for the federal government want to talk about the DOW and Nasdaq instead of, you know, crimes?
Last edited:
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Of all the depictions, I think South Park nailed Bondi perfectly.
hollams
Gold Member
They've had these files since 2008 and nothing was done by any prior administration. All these hearing are just to get soundbytes for their re-election campaign. They don't care one bit about the survivors or they would have done something long ago. Our political situation is bad and only going to get worse.
Kittehkraken
Member
Her saying "We should be talking about making Americans safe" while trying to deflect away from evidence of the rich and powerful raping and torturing children is pure insanity.
Last edited:
ForAcademicPurposes
Member
Oh my god she's way out of her depth holy shit
MonkD
Member
Who raped beard bro on the right?
Last edited:
a) I believe the files were sealed for at least part of that time and required a court order to unseal them. This has been previously reported.
b) Past mistakes do not excuse current mistakes. It's pure deflection, screaming "what about the previous guy?" and not making a legitimate argument.
By the way...there really should be a law preventing the AG from acting like either the president's personal lawyer or just a total partisan hack. This hearing has been a disgrace.
Last edited:
P:axMagellanic
Member
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
He's Virginia Giuffre's brother. Standing in her place since she's dead.
Last edited:
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
This administration is full of a bunch of sycophant ghouls.
Ironically Bondi is one of the only ones in the admin who actually has some qualifications for her job but she's an evil asshole like the rest of them.
Ironically Bondi is one of the only ones in the admin who actually has some qualifications for her job but she's an evil asshole like the rest of them.
MonkD
Member
Fucking hell. Jokes aside, I'm glad he's there representing.
Are there only women who have come forward so far?
Lukaku's First Touch
Member
How can anyone defend this shit lol. Talking about epstein rapes and then this rat face bitch starts talking about the DOW (which is just held up by 4-5 companies giving eachother money for AI bullshit).
FullMetalx117
Member
pam bondi is a disgrace
BattleScar
Member
That and, young boys can also be trafficked just as much as young women.
I'm waiting to see that one guy run defence on this.
BattleScar
Member
Why? Even if Vance is clear, he's part of the administration trying to cover it up. Which makes him just as guilty.
Rentahamster
Rodent Whores
Who knows, but Vance's willingness to flip flop on his positions in the name of political expedience as well as his big money connections to the privacy-eroding sectors of big tech make me not want to give him the benefit of the doubt.
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
Vance is Thiel protege, probably one of the creepier people on earth and an Epstein associate. If you really want Palantir-man running the country then sure I guess he hasn't been directly associated with Epstein.
Mortisfacio
Member
I'm not a fan of Bondi, but the example given is an allegation of someone driving someone around who said something they alleged.
That's legally not evidence of a crime.
ForAcademicPurposes
Member
Certainly, calling the granddaughter of a Holocaust victim "antisemitic" is absolutely mind bending.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
I think what Teddy is saying is that person was never followed up on, that person who made the allegation was not interviewed.
Last edited:
StueyDuck
Member
I find this line of thinking strange, the previous administration had literally all this information and hid all of it from the public too.
You should realise ALL the administrations and elite and powerful are trying to cover this up.
Last edited:
Mortisfacio
Member
Yes, that is a separate issue though. His primary statement causing buzz is she lied under oath due to evidence of a crime. An allegation is legally a claim of wrongdoing without evidence (yet). So his statement isn't true in the legal sense.
Last edited:
Boo Who?
Gold Member
So if it isn't Vance, Mike Johnson is next in line, and no thanks on that one. I am assuming the U.S. is literally fucked until 2029. The sad thing is who would even want that job and the next sad thing is there is no one worth a fuck for the job going by the candidates that will most likely be running.
ForAcademicPurposes
Member
I've surmized that she is one of those people who enters the justice system (legal profession, cop, prison guard, whatever) because she gets off on having power over other people and making them suffer.
Grildon Tundy
Member
Deflecting by saying the Dow is over 50,000 dollars. Dow points are not 1-to-1 dollars. Can't even deflect properly.
Hero of Spielberg
Member
So am I correct in reading that the people claiming to be Epstein's victims are suggesting they have been unable to meet with the DOJ who claim there is no evidence to charge anyone else in relation to the Epstein files? I mean, is this not a full blown coverup out in the open now?
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
One of the people straight up asked all the survivors present whether they had been contacted or met by the DoJ, they all said no.
Justice is not blind, it's performative, I guess.
-BLITZ-
Member
THIS reminds me so much of True detective scene with the tape video shown to Woody. The horrors on his face and the screams.
Brazen
Member
It's obvious there's been a coverup and/or no attempt at justice for years-decades, the question is for how long exactly and by whom. Could be hundreds to thousands involved in a mass cover up.
Hero of Spielberg
Member
Where to from here? It seems the current admin have caught the hot potato ... is new investigation launched or do they double down on çase closed'?
Tiago Rodrigues
Member
One was written by Trump, the other by Epstein. That's probably a coincidence more than anything else. But at this point who knows if they are code words or whatever.
Brazen
Member
They should launch an investigation into the possibilities of a coverup and to whatever else that can be investigated that should've already been done prior.
Just note it would be our investigation/law departments internally investigating themselves most likely... Even an independent team would be ex-formers or people with the same connections. Can they? That's a different question and would people even believe in the investigation by the end?
BattleScar
Member
Yes.
Anyone guilty of aiding and abetting need to be thrown in the trashcan. We deserve a better class of politician. Fuck the partisan nonsense.