Yeah releasing investigation files without context is too dangerous in a time where when people say things it can be distorted to say the oppositeThere is no way any 1 person could processes even a tenth of those millions and millions of files. So name searches is about the best you can do and im sure these guys/gals were talking about all sorts of current events, pop culture, and whatnot, hence all the famous names.
This is exactly the reason those "files" were never released, as almost all of it is devoid of context and can be spun into anything you want. Everyone has emails that could sound really bad.
Not that that covers everyone, of course, but the vast majority of these releases is just chaff that acts as confirmation bias of a negative opinion.
Yeah releasing investigation files without context is too dangerous in a time where when people say things it can be distorted to say the opposite
Somehow I forgot to put the second part of what I wanted to say which was « but it seems that this was the only way to push forward investigations/trials on this »It would have been awfully nice then if the people whose jobs it is to investigate these kinds of crimes actually did their jobs so that we didn't have to rely on this. The justice of the untrained mob is an unfortunate but eventually inevitable result when the system fails the people for far too long.
Why are you standing up for pedophiles?Please cut back on posting these narcissists talking to a camera. Who even are they? Most of the time, it sounds like they don't even know what they're talking about.
Not only are they obnoxious; it takes away from the gravitas of some of this information.
Why are you standing up for pedophiles?
People are torturing kids and being unalived.Learn to read.
You're the one posting narcissist grifters who are more interested in their face being on camera than the content.
The media and alt media space will refuse to properly inform themselves or there audiences as long as there's money to be made peddling nonsense on the bot reservation that is Xitter and social media as a whole.Please cut back on posting these narcissists talking to a camera. Who even are they? Most of the time, it sounds like they don't even know what they're talking about.
Well that's quite different. Mandelson seems to be the only clearly "implicated" individual on the files by way of insider trading, not sexual misconduct.In the UK at least we're coming down hard on the cunts associated with Epstein, meanwhile in the US![]()
Well said.... The justice of the untrained mob is an unfortunate but eventually inevitable result when the system fails the people for far too long.
You and the rest of the public are overly confident that you're qualified to make a judgement on whether or not the job has been done. You've read nothing but email snippets and spent years using Joe Rogan podcasts and cranks on social media as an information source and philosophical model.It would have been awfully nice then if the people whose jobs it is to investigate these kinds of crimes actually did their jobs so that we didn't have to rely on this. The justice of the untrained mob is an unfortunate but eventually inevitable result when the system fails the people for far too long.
Listen, I have absolutely nothing nice to say about the current administration (in fact, its a lot of bad things), but let's not forget the real issue here--this has been going on for DECADES. That means multiple administrations have been in power while this was going on. Hell, Clinton was probably going to the island while he was in office doing unspeakable things. This is a systemic breakdown of our country, that's likely been going on for longer than most of us have been alive.Well said.
The US Government had its issues, but the true legacy of Donald Trump will be shattering of any and all confidence in anything from the US Government for generations to come. Every policy, every agency, every report - it will all be tainted with the stench of the most corrupt Administration in American history for decades and decades. That kind of systemic collapse will result in lots of problems, like this one: the Department of Justice is openly running the largest cover-up in American history to protect the paedophile President, so people will try and step in to do its job for it. I can't imagine this is going to have good results.
Let "us" interpret it for you.There are things in the files that are pretty clear and don't lack any context.
unalived
The benefits of selling your soul.Wow she's really 60
"Presley, Elvis"Epstein List dropped by Bondi
![]()
I thought it was a joke, but it is not ?Epstein List dropped by Bondi
![]()
I thought it was a joke, but it is not ?
Like Janis Joplin, who was dead when Epstein was like 17 or something ?
Isn't it literally every name printed in the files, not implicated. so like it literally could be epstein saying "im not a fan of Joplins music"I thought it was a joke, but it is not ?
Like Janis Joplin, who was dead when Epstein was like 17 or something ?
They're just trying to muddy the waters by listing every name mentioned in the files. Like someone wanted Janis Joplin's first song but didn't know the name... Or someone wanted an Elvis impersonator for their birthday.
Or folks talking about Trump on the Apprentice....right...RIGHT?!?!Isn't it literally every name printed in the files, not implicated. so like it literally could be epstein saying "im not a fan of Joplins music"
You on some wacky cracky my man...Or folks talking about Trump on the Apprentice....right...RIGHT?!?!
But yes, using search to troll for # times a name appears is EXACTLY the sort of disingenuous think that can trigger a wave of lawsuits based on libel and slander. Context and careful investigatory research trumps clickbait knee-jerk responses.
Point being that making "a list" out of every name found in the "Epstein files" which is really just a hodge-podge of collected documents, creates the illusion that names on said 'list' were in some way vetted and determined to be at least suspicious of nefarious activity.You on some wacky cracky my man...
Im not sure what any of what you said here has to do with what I said.
Point being that making "a list" out of every name found in the "Epstein files" which is really just a hodge-podge of collected documents, creates the illusion that names on said 'list' were in some way vetted and determined to be at least suspicious of nefarious activity.
When the reality is these jokers could have had email chains between themselves talking about movies, TV, and music (and assuredly politics, business) with a LOT of names used for people that have NOTHING to do with anything related to the island, ranch, or any shady shit.
This is one evil cunt
Hyatt hotels guy is a scumbag.
Or even the involvement may be completely unrelated to crime.
For example, the name of a physicist appeared on the list simply because Epstein liked to fund various scientific research projects.
He was a billionaire, I have no doubt that many people were directly involved with him simply because of money, and that was the trap he used to attract people and then throw out some other bait, depending on the need and the person.
Hyatt hotels guy is a scumbag.
Is this guys brother the governor.the entire Pritzker family is a bunch of crooks. Sucking Chicago dry.
cousin i think, maybe nephew.Is this guys brother the governor.
Actual investigation to Zorro ranch
Under a slide titled "Prominent Names," the slideshow read: "[Redacted] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out. (date range 1983-1985, [redacted] would have been 13-15)."