• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

[MLiD] Why XBOX Helix is Still (Kinda) a Console

John C Reilly Seriously GIF
That settles it. I'm deactivating my 800 game Steam account and getting a lifetime subscription to Xbox Live
Reason I'm asking is this whole stupid fight seems moot lol
 
Not gonna happen. It will allow you to install steam client or epic. But it will be in the back end . You won't see anything. You won't have a browser and go there on your own. Just an app icon for you as a UI. It will go grab link and install it on its own without you seeing anything but probably a loading screen or download bar

Think of it as a very restricted windows PC you find in a library or a work company with a limited access to specific apps. But with Xbox app interface on top
The more launchers it has the more it can be exploited, this thing will be cracked open like a tin of tuna within days
 
I've been seeing the xbox warriors come out in full force being morons since this thing was announced. Apparently the xbox community is over 1.8 billion people now.

pkjsg9JErXIEiG5U.jpg
 
Last edited:
Reason I'm asking is this whole stupid fight seems moot lol
It comes down to building a library you have confidence that you'll be able to play down the line. Having a Steam account old enough to vote, the value prop on that gets higher for me every year. I didn't even consider it until fairly recently when I was debating on a launch PS5. Thankfully the hassle put me off. I was expecting a sequel to the PS4 first party output and wouldn't have had much use for it the way things turned out.
 
Whatever it is, it's a device to funnel you to Steam to buy and play Steam games and Valve makes all the proceeds.

Microsoft can call it an Xbox if it makes them feel better about producing a device for Valve to run their store.

Most people call that a Steam Machine, though.
 
Whatever it is, it's a device to funnel you to Steam to buy and play Steam games and Valve makes all the proceeds.

Microsoft can call it an Xbox if it makes them feel better about producing a device for Valve to run their store.

Most people call that a Steam Machine, though.

Snoop Bruno Mars GIF by Morphin
 
Last edited:
Whatever it is, it's a device to funnel you to Steam to buy and play Steam games and Valve makes all the proceeds.

Microsoft can call it an Xbox if it makes them feel better about producing a device for Valve to run their store.

Most people call that a Steam Machine, though.

Valve fans can it a Steam Machine if it makes them feel better about Steam Machine turning into vaporware.
 
KeplerL2 say no.
SneakersSO too?

MLID's contact is quite "relevant" or "reliable" regarding PS hardware.
But for the rest... I'm not sure.
K KeplerL2 always defended and say Magnus/Helix was/is a custom Soc for a Xbox CONSOLE.
HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4
For over a year, it has maintained that its nature is Console, and the ability to load games from other stores is a bonus.

MLiD says it's a console.

SneakersSO?? According to him, Helix, it shouldn't exist, since two weeks ago he argued that there would be no first-party Xbox hardware and that P. Spencer's departure was the final nail in the coffin.

If your decision is going to be based on what some people that you mentioned have said...
 
Last edited:
It's normal to be hung up about it, if you you have to lick MS ass everyday for a living

But you are right, the label means nothing

Running PC games/stores it's a fact though, already confirmed by MS a week ago
I have told people it was going to at least run Steam for about 2 years now, most here that have paid attention knew that wasn't truly shocking news

You were hammering "it's a console" pretty hard yourself there bro
I still call it a console.

If it plays all my past Xbox games and plays GTA 6 the day this machine comes out and there isn't a PC version of GTA 6 yet, its a console

Edit - I was more referring to the same crowd that seems to want to force it to be labeled a PC
 
Last edited:
I have told people it was going to at least run Steam for about 2 years now, most here that have paid attention knew that wasn't truly shocking news

I know that...

Still

No console in the history of gaming has ever run contemporary Windows PC games/ports natively, let alone multiple game stores from supposed "competitors"
 
Last edited:
The more launchers it has the more it can be exploited, this thing will be cracked open like a tin of tuna within days
Very possible. Everything I said is just my speculation.
Other possible solution is a dual boot. Either boot to Xbox or normal PC . But I don't see this happening to be honest. As this mean devs will make 2 sku for the same game. One for Xbox and one for PC and that is extra development MS want to cut
 
Last edited:
Very possible. Everything I said is just my speculation.
Other possible solution is a dual boot. Either boot to Xbox or normal PC . But I don't see this happening to be honest. As this mean devs will make 2 sku for the same game. One for Xbox and one for PC and that is extra development MS want to cut
Yeh, it will certainly be interesting to see what MS does and what Sony and Nintendo do to react to it (if anything)
 
I still call it a console.

If it plays all my past Xbox games and plays GTA 6 the day this machine comes out and there isn't a PC version of GTA 6 yet, its a console

Edit - I was more referring to the same crowd that seems to want to force it to be labeled a PC

But that's being just as "hung up" about it being labeled a console. Honestly, everything I've read says PC to me. I respect your info so I'm not diving in headfirst into that pool, but I understand why others say it is a PC. It is hardly "forced" either way.
 
You were hammering "it's a console" pretty hard yourself there bro
He simply relayed what he knew, and how Xbox and Microsoft described it as the next first-party hardware.

Certainly, I've never seen him show any obsession or stubbornness about what it should be called; rather, he's stated that it's a secondary issue for him, and he focuses more on the product itself (premium product, power, accessible game catalog, etc.).even noting its niche product nature due to the price.

The point is that the obsession and stubbornness over whether or not it should be called a "console" comes more from others, and in the vast majority of cases, those "others" are motivated by the reason we all know deep down.

Because look like it doesn't matter if it's designed as a console, in a console-like shape, with console-like features, if it offers a console experience, runs console games, back catalogs from previous consoles, and even it could also come with certain limitations of a console...

But eh!! In the end, what importance do those things have VS what the dictionary considers? 🤷
 
Last edited:
He simply relayed what he knew, and how Xbox and Microsoft described it as the next first-party hardware.

Certainly, I've never seen him show any obsession or stubbornness about what it should be called; rather, he's stated that it's a secondary issue for him, and he focuses more on the product itself (premium product, power, accessible game catalog, etc.).

The point is that the obsession and stubbornness over whether or not it should be called a "console" comes more from others, and in the vast majority of cases, those "others" are motivated by the reason we all know deep down.

Because look like it doesn't matter if it's designed as a console, in a console-like shape, with console-like features, if it offers a console experience, runs console games, back catalogs from previous consoles, and even it could also come with certain limitations of a console...

But eh!! In the end, what importance do those things have VS what the dictionary considers? 🤷

Well there are probably motivations for this being called a console as well. I don't get any of that, but that's how this stuff typically works. I'm not saying HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 is wrong at all, btw. Terms have gotten really loose when it comes to Xbox stuff so I'm trying to stay as much in the "wait and see" camp as I can.

As U Unfortunatecookie said, "hybrid" is probably the most accurate term.
 
Alright then. If it boots up and completely blurs the lines between console and PC then it's a hybrid device.

If by hybrid you mean the worst of both worlds, I agree

The closest comparison would be probably a gaming laptop

Can't upgrade anything (maybe RAM for laptops)

But you pay more than a desktop

In that case you have at least the convenience of a display built-in
 
It's (kinda) confusing for no reason.

Microsoft need to get ahead of the messaging for this thing. By all indicators it sounds like a PC with an Xbox mode; so it's a PC.
Im sure they'll clear it up at some point, but MS has said they are releasing a console, if they do confuse things when they announce it then they haven't learnt a single thing (although that was likely Spencers doing to try and get a jump on Sony's Pro console by releasing the base and Pro at the same time.... It didn't work.... At all)
 
Well there are probably motivations for this being called a console as well. I don't get any of that, but that's how this stuff typically works. I'm not saying HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 is wrong at all, btw. Terms have gotten really loose when it comes to Xbox stuff so I'm trying to stay as much in the "wait and see" camp as I can.

As U Unfortunatecookie said, "hybrid" is probably the most accurate term.
The fact that there are arguments on both sides means that "hybrid" is also a useful term... yes.

So, at this point, what should focus the user's interest is the proposal itself, not so much the definition.

As you say, there are still many things to learn and key points that are a big question mark and "wait and see" is a good position.

That said, if anything emerges from GDC and the information from the various MS/Xbox and Helix panels, it's that, in principle, the treatment, logistics, and infrastructure that MS is giving to Helix is very similar, if not identical, to that of a traditional console and even the current XS.
 
I know that...

Still

No console in the history of gaming has ever run contemporary Windows PC games/ports natively, let alone multiple game stores from supposed "competitors"
You're describing one of their major selling points, the first device that will play your console and PC games. Everything that has ever happened (except for maybe the creation/existence of the universe 😁) has a "first time".
 
Last edited:
I've been seeing the xbox warriors come out in full force being morons since this thing was announced. Apparently the xbox community is over 1.8 billion people now.

pkjsg9JErXIEiG5U.jpg

What a fucking tit.

Sorry, but whichever way you slice it... if a device doesn't have all the advantages of being an open system, with freedom to load up whatever software you want on it - including rival storefronts... its not a PC.

And if its a PC, by definition it cannot be console! Because one of a console's defining features is that its tied to a walled-garden ecosystem. Curation, simplicity, and uniformity = a standardized branded service.
 
The fact that there are arguments on both sides means that "hybrid" is also a useful term... yes.

So, at this point, what should focus the user's interest is the proposal itself, not so much the definition.

As you say, there are still many things to learn and key points that are a big question mark and "wait and see" is a good position.

That said, if anything emerges from GDC and the information from the various MS/Xbox and Helix panels, it's that, in principle, the treatment, logistics, and infrastructure that MS is giving to Helix is very similar, if not identical, to that of a traditional console and even the current XS.

That's not the impression I've got from GDC, but I'm not going to argue it. I need to know more.
 
You're describing one of their major selling points, the first device that will play your console and PC games. Everything that has ever happened (except for maybe the creation/existence of the universe 😁) has a "first time".

The major selling point would be to pay double the price of a console to get a non-upgradable/locked PC???

WOW

Big stuff
 
Last edited:
The major selling point would be to pay double the price of a console to get a non-upgradable PC???

WOW

Big stuff
Considering we don't have access to a universe where there's another console with the same specification, I'm not sure how you are determining that it's going to cost double the amount than it normally would.

Also my guy, we don't even know how much it is going to cost.
 
Last edited:
Considering we don't have access to a universe where there's another console with the same specification, I'm not sure how you are determining that it's going to cost double the amount than it normally would.

Also my guy, we don't even know how much it is going to cost.

Like I said: worst of both words

It doesn't have either the convenience of a console nor the flexibilty of a PC

About the price: you can dream if you want to...

Then reality will hit like always
 
Last edited:
Like I said: worst of both words

It doesn't have either the convenience of a console nor the flexibilty of a PC
Yeah that was a losing argument, I would have changed tactics as well.

Edit: you added to your post after I responded, so I'll address that here.

What exactly am I dreaming of? I didn't assert anything other than the fact that you're just claiming things that you cannot prove.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom