archangelmorph
Gold Member
This game has been in development forever.
Do we have a release date for this yet?
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Graphical Fidelity I Expect This Gen
- Thread starter ResetEraVetVIP
- Start date
- NSFW
This game has been in development forever.
Do we have a release date for this yet?
GudOlRub
Member
The discourse around Crimson Desert is so bizarre to me. It's a beautiful and technically impressive game, no one in the reviews is denying that, it seems to have quite a few flaws and bugs but it was this studio's first try at a massive singleplayer game, if they learn the right lessons from this it can only get better from here on.
The doomerism from shills just because it's not being reviewed as a 10/10 game is hilariously idiotic.
The doomerism from shills just because it's not being reviewed as a 10/10 game is hilariously idiotic.
Last edited:
Gonzito
Gold Member
if I recall correctly, they said 2027....
Lokaum D+
Member
Just for the record I am pro dlss5 but these made me laugh
Lore accurate Kratos
Last edited:
mrBarrelNut
Member
BlownUpRich
Member
Really good & well-balanced take on this whole DLSS 5 thing, from our friend Dallas. A must watch if you're interested. This is from a game developer who is also an Artist, he's making his own indie game AND he's making another game under a development studio.
Last edited:
analog_future
Resident Crybaby
From the other thread on Crimson Desert's benchmarks:
This is 4K native. With DLSS everyone will be enjoying the path traced glory of the game.
Ray Reconstruction is not enabled in these benchmarks, and you lose like 70% performance with it on. With a 5080 you'd probably have to go DLSS Balanced + Frame Gen or even DLSS Performance + Frame Gen or you'll be dipping below 60fps. Just an FYI
Last edited:
winjer
Gold Member
Where did you see that it doesn't have RR enabled in those benchmarks?
analog_future
Resident Crybaby
It's definitely less visually offensive, but if DLSS5 is going to be expensive to render, then what's the point? You might as well use those resources on RT/PT or textures or lighting or detail or whatever.
I know they say they'll have it running on one card when it releases, but the fact that it took two 5090s today and this tech is supposedly releasing in like 6 months doesn't make me confident that this is going to be a performant technology when it releases.
mrMUR_96
Member
Yeah I agree, it seems likely it's relying on MFG currently too.
PeteBull
Member
Here we actually see how demanding game is trully maxed(including ray reconstruction) at 4k native on 5090 25-30fps:
To get mostly stable 60 u need to go with 4k dlss balanced, coz quality stays below 60 all the time:
Obviously no fake frames coz fk dat shit (personally i can somewhat tolerate 2x if i play on joypad but thats it)
Edit:
For 5080 peons like myself:
4k dlss perf(so internal 1080p, IQ is still solid enough)and ultra preset(so not maxed/cinematic) + ray reconstruction makes fps stay in the 40s, sometimes above 50s too.
To get mostly stable 60 u need to go with 4k dlss balanced, coz quality stays below 60 all the time:
Obviously no fake frames coz fk dat shit (personally i can somewhat tolerate 2x if i play on joypad but thats it)
Edit:
For 5080 peons like myself:
4k dlss perf(so internal 1080p, IQ is still solid enough)and ultra preset(so not maxed/cinematic) + ray reconstruction makes fps stay in the 40s, sometimes above 50s too.
Last edited:
Bojji
Gold Member
38% improvement on 1% lows and 39% on avg fps between 4080 and 4090 is already huge gap, but:
+63% improvement on 1% lows and 60% on avg fps between 5080 and 5090 is basically digital colorado canion, no wonder those gpu's sell for 4k in the wild
Dont even wanna imagine what will happen between 6080 and 6090 lool
You get half of the 5090 with 5080
Wolzard
Member
Obviously, there are differences or else we wouldn't be talking about it. What I'm saying is her features and structure are unchanged. Same thing that happens in real life when makeup and lighting changes our perception:
Those who don't understand the power of photography are doomed to fall victim to scams...
Bojji
Gold Member
Ubisoft flexing here? See people, even fucking Ubisoft have virtualized geometry in their engine - silence in Sony studios...
SlimySnake
Represent.
Represent(ative) of bad opinions
The immensely negative feedback to DLSS5 has given me zero hope for the future of this industry.
Gamers are literally PETRIFIED of ANYTHING new.
This is first-gen tech. Of course it's not perfect. That's the point. The real value is where it leads, not where it starts.
You're all just screaming out A.I sLoP without even giving it a shot
Crying about needing 2 5090's when they clearly stated, multiple times, it would be optimized to run on 1 consumer level GPU by launch.
As if they would be fucking dumb enough to launch a thing that requires 2 5090's....
Crying about aRtIst InTent, when the first fucking thing 95% of you do in a game is disable Film Grain, C/A, Motion Blur... which all play into how the artist intended the game to look.
Crying about artist intent, when you willingly uglify the game, in order to improve performance.
This tech has the potential to cut YEARS off of development time and give us generational leaps in visual fidelity at the same time....
But no, we cant even fucking give it a chance? You're just going to make memes and shout out Ai Slop like a fucking programmed robot?
Holy christ, fucking no wonder the industry has been so stagnant for years.
Companies like Nvida, who clearly actually care about pushing visuals forward are demonized for embracing new tech all the fucking time.
Then people wonder why progress feels slow.
Companies that actually try to move things forward get dragged the hardest. Meanwhile, everyone complains about stagnation. You don't get both. You either accept early, imperfect innovation OR you stay stuck refining the same ideas over and over. Period.
We wont get anywhere like this, just blatant hate before you even fucking try the thing.
Its the very first iteration of a brand new technology - and instead of having an open mind and realizing how insane this tech can be for future games down the line, we have people making disingenuine memes, and screaming out whatever it is their alghorithm tells them to.
The fact that EVERY SINGLE YOUTUBER has the same "opinion" is just absurd.
The backlash feels very uniform. Every. Single. Major YouTuber lands on the exact same talking points, like it's prepackaged, down to the thumbnail. That's not organic skepticism, that's herd behavior, hating what the internet tells you to hate.
At this point, it's not even about DLSS anymore. It's about a community that refuses to engage with change unless it's already safe, proven, and polished.
We will never get anywhere with an industy full of fans who just want the same old graphics at 60fps every goddamn gen
Gamers are literally PETRIFIED of ANYTHING new.
This is first-gen tech. Of course it's not perfect. That's the point. The real value is where it leads, not where it starts.
You're all just screaming out A.I sLoP without even giving it a shot
Crying about needing 2 5090's when they clearly stated, multiple times, it would be optimized to run on 1 consumer level GPU by launch.
As if they would be fucking dumb enough to launch a thing that requires 2 5090's....
Crying about aRtIst InTent, when the first fucking thing 95% of you do in a game is disable Film Grain, C/A, Motion Blur... which all play into how the artist intended the game to look.
Crying about artist intent, when you willingly uglify the game, in order to improve performance.
This tech has the potential to cut YEARS off of development time and give us generational leaps in visual fidelity at the same time....
But no, we cant even fucking give it a chance? You're just going to make memes and shout out Ai Slop like a fucking programmed robot?
Holy christ, fucking no wonder the industry has been so stagnant for years.
Companies like Nvida, who clearly actually care about pushing visuals forward are demonized for embracing new tech all the fucking time.
Then people wonder why progress feels slow.
Companies that actually try to move things forward get dragged the hardest. Meanwhile, everyone complains about stagnation. You don't get both. You either accept early, imperfect innovation OR you stay stuck refining the same ideas over and over. Period.
We wont get anywhere like this, just blatant hate before you even fucking try the thing.
Its the very first iteration of a brand new technology - and instead of having an open mind and realizing how insane this tech can be for future games down the line, we have people making disingenuine memes, and screaming out whatever it is their alghorithm tells them to.
The fact that EVERY SINGLE YOUTUBER has the same "opinion" is just absurd.
The backlash feels very uniform. Every. Single. Major YouTuber lands on the exact same talking points, like it's prepackaged, down to the thumbnail. That's not organic skepticism, that's herd behavior, hating what the internet tells you to hate.
At this point, it's not even about DLSS anymore. It's about a community that refuses to engage with change unless it's already safe, proven, and polished.
We will never get anywhere with an industy full of fans who just want the same old graphics at 60fps every goddamn gen
Last edited:
analog_future
Resident Crybaby
We've seen tons of improvements & innovations in recent times. There's always going to be naysayers, you can't control people's opinions, but the community has largely accepted and adopted:
- Temporal upscaling
- Ray-tracing / Path-tracing
- HDR rendering
- Frame Generation
- 60fps standard on consoles
- Cloud streaming / in-home streaming
- Virtualized geometry
etc.. etc..
People are pushing back hard on DLSS 5 because it was an extremely poor first showing, nvidia has been repeatedly dishonest about it (devs involvement / it's genAI nature / etc..), and Nvidia can make vague performance claims all they want, but it needing two 5090s to run when it's supposedly due out 6 months from now should be concerning to anyone with half a brain. No one thinks it's going to require two 5090s when it launches, obviously, but the performance concerns are completely valid.
And that's without even factoring in the moral/ethical dilemma that many have around genAI already.
I'm so sick of some people blaming the general public's reaction around this instead of, I don't know, maybe holding the highest valuated company in the world, larger than Apple, larger than Google, larger than Amazon, larger than Microsoft, to an actual standard of responsibility in the way in which they rolled out this absolute clusterfuck of a reveal.
Last edited:
Lokaum D+
Member
March Climber
Member
Represent.
It's not that deep.They just need to admit the faults of early tech instead of doubling down and saying 'everyone else is wrong', improve the tech a bit more, and then have a better second rollout.
This is a fleeting moment in time. The important thing is that a message was made clear about what people don't want. That doesn't mean they should 'abandon the tech entirely'
Dust-by-Monday
Member
One thing that's bothering me is, does everyone who enables DLSS5 get the same exact look to the game? Does it change from run to run or PC to PC?
Bitstream
Member
Last edited:
Killer8
Member
Interesting thread on Reddit about fixing DLSS5. I tried to show with my photoshop a few pages back how developers could get rid of the AI look, but this guy goes way further:
Basically just by fixing Nvidia's shitty tonemapping he restores the original look of the game.
Some examples with image slider:
A few points:
1. Most of the 'slop' look is actually down to the tonemapping Nvidia employed in this reveal. I don't know why they did that. Maybe to try and either make the games look more realistic or to make DLSS5 look like a bigger leap than it is. It's like adding a "Cyberpunk FULL GAME 60FPS HDR ULTRA REALISM" mod to each game (since those mods mostly achieve what they do by changing tonemapping and color lut).
2. With the original artistic intent™ restored, the difference which DLSS5 brings is much more subtle, but awesome looking in my opinion. It just becomes another welcome layer of lighting enhancement. The only question is whether that is worth the performance cost of (presently) a whole ass RTX 5090.
3. Nvidia are actually telling the truth when they say DLSS5 is not changing the assets or geometry of the game, as the poster on Reddit shows that you can completely restore the look of the character models just by changing the tonemapping.
4. Presumably tonemapping is an aspect of DLSS5 which Nvidia are referring to the developers having some control over. All the artists really need to do here is eschew any Nvidia tonemapping changes and stick to the lighting enhancements only.
Basically just by fixing Nvidia's shitty tonemapping he restores the original look of the game.
Some examples with image slider:
A few points:
1. Most of the 'slop' look is actually down to the tonemapping Nvidia employed in this reveal. I don't know why they did that. Maybe to try and either make the games look more realistic or to make DLSS5 look like a bigger leap than it is. It's like adding a "Cyberpunk FULL GAME 60FPS HDR ULTRA REALISM" mod to each game (since those mods mostly achieve what they do by changing tonemapping and color lut).
2. With the original artistic intent™ restored, the difference which DLSS5 brings is much more subtle, but awesome looking in my opinion. It just becomes another welcome layer of lighting enhancement. The only question is whether that is worth the performance cost of (presently) a whole ass RTX 5090.
3. Nvidia are actually telling the truth when they say DLSS5 is not changing the assets or geometry of the game, as the poster on Reddit shows that you can completely restore the look of the character models just by changing the tonemapping.
4. Presumably tonemapping is an aspect of DLSS5 which Nvidia are referring to the developers having some control over. All the artists really need to do here is eschew any Nvidia tonemapping changes and stick to the lighting enhancements only.
geary
Member
FightinCowboy said in his video that playing at 4K, Cinematics, DLSS 4.5 Quality w/ FG uses ~9-9.5 GB VRAM with 70-80 FPS. If he enables RR, loses ~15 FPS.
analog_future
Resident Crybaby
Hardware Unboxed just did a nice analysis of Ray Reconstruction. Long story short is that it's a ~67% performance hit. DLSS Performance + Ray Reconstruction runs even slower than DLAA max settings:
Also, using Ray Reconstruction kills all rain in the game. The denoiser interprets rain as noise and removes it from the image.
Also, using Ray Reconstruction kills all rain in the game. The denoiser interprets rain as noise and removes it from the image.
Last edited:
Bojji
Gold Member
Hardware Unboxed just did a nice analysis of Ray Reconstruction. Long story short is that it's a ~67% performance hit. DLSS Performance + Ray Reconstruction runs even slower than DLAA max settings:
Also, using Ray Reconstruction kills all rain in the game. The denoiser interprets rain as noise and removes it from the image.
So there is this dilemma of having better graphics most of the time vs. having better graphics when it's raining.
CowboyLou
Member
Awesome writeup dude. Thanks for the info. Be interesting to see how this develops. I highly doubt the "AI slop" look will be much of an issue when we start seeing the final product, it was just a shitty demo.Interesting thread on Reddit about fixing DLSS5. I tried to show with my photoshop a few pages back how developers could get rid of the AI look, but this guy goes way further:
Basically just by fixing Nvidia's shitty tonemapping he restores the original look of the game.
Some examples with image slider:
A few points:
1. Most of the 'slop' look is actually down to the tonemapping Nvidia employed in this reveal. I don't know why they did that. Maybe to try and either make the games look more realistic or to make DLSS5 look like a bigger leap than it is. It's like adding a "Cyberpunk FULL GAME 60FPS HDR ULTRA REALISM" mod to each game (since those mods mostly achieve what they do by changing tonemapping and color lut).
2. With the original artistic intent™ restored, the difference which DLSS5 brings is much more subtle, but awesome looking in my opinion. It just becomes another welcome layer of lighting enhancement. The only question is whether that is worth the performance cost of (presently) a whole ass RTX 5090.
3. Nvidia are actually telling the truth when they say DLSS5 is not changing the assets or geometry of the game, as the poster on Reddit shows that you can completely restore the look of the character models just by changing the tonemapping.
4. Presumably tonemapping is an aspect of DLSS5 which Nvidia are referring to the developers having some control over. All the artists really need to do here is eschew any Nvidia tonemapping changes and stick to the lighting enhancements only.
BlownUpRich
Member
Very interesting, turns out Grace's Path Traced face in cutscenes IS the furthest one from the original look and that's due to PT's massive change to lighting that isn't necessarily account of by the developers' rather pre-baked and hand-places lights. That's not a flaw of PT, that's just a misalignment by the developer's implementation of it in cutscenes.
Now to the main point, it's actually DLSS 5 being closer to the Ray Traced one which is quite something.
Now to the main point, it's actually DLSS 5 being closer to the Ray Traced one which is quite something.