TheDrizzlerJ11
Member
Or that Marshall is simply better when no one is playing defense against him.
His 3rd and 4th TDs disagree.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f73KD_tSMl4&feature=related#t=2m03s
Or that Marshall is simply better when no one is playing defense against him.
A 9-7 team that was once 7-7 and left for dead and is in the Super Bowl certainly still warrants some of that underdog mentality. The difference today is the run isn't quite as "surprising" specifically because of how 07-08 turned out and the opposing team isn't looking to make history by going undefeated. So of course the pundits are going to pick the Giants.Baconsammy said:It was warranted in 2008.
His 3rd and 4th TDs disagree.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f73KD_tSMl4&feature=related#t=2m03s
I don't much stock into that though. The Giants defense was ranked 27th during the season. Do you think Brady and company are going to take that number for granted?TheDrizzlerJ11 said:You guys are also going up against the 31st ranked defense in league..
Marshall is a head case. Literally. Talking him up because of that joke of a game is Dolphin-like
I don't much stock into that though. The Giants defense was ranked 27th during the season. Do you think Brady and company are going to take that number for granted?
A 9-7 team that was once 7-7 and left for dead and is in the Super Bowl certainly still warrants some of that underdog mentality. The difference today is the run isn't quite as "surprising" specifically because of how 07-08 turned out and the opposing team isn't looking to make history by going undefeated. So of course the pundits are going to pick the Giants.
I would argue this run is more impressive considering how poorly the Giants had played during portions of the season. The '07 team was inconsistent but didn't get destroyed and give up against the Saints, lose to a VY led Eagles at home or sleep walk through the Redskin games, etc.
ArianFoster Baby goats. RT@ESPNMag Hey there! We're polling athletes to ask what they eat as their go-to pre-game/race/match meal. Care to share yours? 28 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
Oh Arian...
Without Nicks actually, but it's a fair point.Baconsammy said:Those were some really impressive wins, and they played the Pats extremely well without one of their RBs, without Osi, and without Manningham.
Meh. Whatever the team needs to do to get them ready to get on the field and win. It's all about as harmless as Brady's comments about a post-win party (still amazed that was turned into some bulletin board material story).Baconsammy said:The Giants players aren't pussies, so seeing them whine about being disrespected is just pathetic. Talk some serious shit like you did prior to GB and SF. Unlike the Jets, the Giants back that shit up. Even with Gomer Pyle at QB.
What happened to Rors.
Without Nicks actually, but it's a fair point.
Am I reading that correctly? Foster eats baby goats before a game?
Goat is pretty good and so is lamb, so baby goat is probably pretty good too.
Oh Arian...
Without Nicks actually, but it's a fair point.
Meh. Whatever the team needs to do to get them ready to get on the field and win. It's all about as harmless as Brady's comments about a post-win party (still amazed that was turned into some bulletin board material story).
I love that Pats list Faulk as a FB. That position has become a joke. Pats are overpaying Ocho and Deion and seriously underpaying Gronkowski and Hernandez.
heh I read that today in the Daily News and was like come on, son. That's some reaching shit right there. i think the pats, or rather, brady, has learned his lesson after his reaction to plax's prediction of the score in 2007. i do wish the giants would talk some trash though; would make the week interesting at least. drop some cromartie a-hole bombs and then destroy them sunday, fuck it. unless you guys shit the bed, that's exactly what i think is going to happen, especially since gronk's gonna be gimpy and they can't stop the pass. hopefully it will be entertaining for at least a quarter.
http://static.nfl.com/static/content/catch_all/nfl_image/Built_Giants_Pats_v3.jpg[IMG]
Tuck is only making 625k? Wow. He's up for contract after 2012 so he'll need to be paid. Cruz, JPP and Nicks will also be up for contract soon. I'm glad I don't have Jerry Reese's job.[/QUOTE]
Uh...that's got to be wrong on Tuck. His last deal was signing a 5 year, $30 million extension. Even with any potential contract fuzzy math, I don't see any way it could get down to $625,000. Rotoworld lists his 2011 base salary as $3.45M.
What would kid goat be called if I were to ever see it on a menu?
Osi is most likely gone after this season, so he will get that money.Tuck is only making 625k? Wow. He's up for contract after 2012 so he'll need to be paid. Cruz, JPP and Nicks will also be up for contract soon. I'm glad I don't have Jerry Reese's job.
The formal name is "slikë meat."
I love that Pats list Faulk as a FB. That position has become a joke. Pats are overpaying Ocho and Deion and seriously underpaying Gronkowski and Hernandez.
Google says whaaaaaaaaaaaat
Speaking of goat... I had goat cheese for the first time last night.
T'was delicious.
Sounds too responsible.A nice salad with goatcheese, honey and walnuts is a pretty good meal.
Speaking of goat... I had goat cheese for the first time last night.
T'was delicious.
Goat cheese doesn't sound appetizing.
Goat cheese doesn't sound appetizing.
Stumbled upon this site with variations of team logos, but designed with the Lombardi era in mind. I think some are good, some are bad, but they are interesting none the less.
http://gridiron-league.com/#2436060/-ABOUT
eat goat cheese you pussyI'm a pussy with new foods.
I'm sure it's good, but it's something I'd have to eat without knowing beforehand.
Stumbled upon this site with variations of team logos, but designed with the Lombardi era in mind. I think some are good, some are bad, but they are interesting none the less.
http://gridiron-league.com/#2436060/-ABOUT
I'm weird with new foods.
I'm sure it's good, but it's something I'd have to eat without knowing beforehand.