NYR
Member
So $299 for ipad 1 then?
They will kill it.
So $299 for ipad 1 then?
Okay, selling an iPad 2 that is strictly worse than the product called the iPad is stupid as hell.
iPods also didn't have a gen number on their official name. No problem there.
We can go back to the (G3) or (3G) route, eventually we'll just call them by the release year.
An iPad 15 or iPhone 20 would sound totally ridiculous.
is it just me or is just calling it 'the new iPad' going to cause confusion to buyers, especially with the 'iPad 2' still on shelves?
no u![]()
![]()
How is this not confusing to the average consumer?! The iPad 2 is inferior to the iPad.
Yeah, the state of mobile internet usage is just awful in the states. I just don't even consider it outside of my grandfathered unlimited iPhone plan.
So they're selling the ipad 2, and the new ipad, but the one without the number is the better one. Kinda strange.
What happens when the iPad 4 comes out, do they call that "The New iPad" and rename the 3 to "The Old iPad"?
Wait...the A5X is quad-core? I thought they were sticking with dual-core. Is Stevens just talking shit, or has this been confirmed?
That's bending people over on that iPad 2 price. I know Apple fans are going to jump all over me for saying this, but gosh damn for a year old device and compared to the upgrade to the iPad 3 $400 for the iPad 2 seems redonkulous.
1080p, new interface, same shape, same price, and iTunes DRM rules are changing to allow redownload of some movies/TV shows.
Sooo... Why isn't it iPad3?