Mass Effect 3 SPOILER THREAD: LOTS OF SPECULATION FROM EVERYONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
That reminds me:

rXzUf.jpg


BioWare's writing is like the gaming version of Rizzoli and Isles.
The Square Enix storytelling is fucking hilarious.
 
Totally just figured out bioware's huge plot!

Breaks down like this:
>Canon ending for ME3 is the synthesis one
>Joker and crew, all now synthesized, land on jungle planet
>Start rebuilding, synthesized gives way to new powers
>After many years, able to rebuild to a medieval-esk era
>Synthesis powers are claimed to be magic
>Dragon Age is the sequel to Mass Effect 3

Bam! Send me a note discussing payment bioware. Or maybe not.

....then what's the fade?
 
I agree. His character serves absolutely no purpose that Thane couldn't have served better. He exists only to be the unbeatable guy from the Thessia mission.

What they cut, and what I thought was a very important part for the development of Kai Leng as a character and enemy was the scene where you saw him shred on his guitar when noone was around. It both characterized how badass and awesome Kai was while showing off his creative artistic side.
 
I agree. His character serves absolutely no purpose that Thane couldn't have served better. He exists only to be the unbeatable guy from the Thessia mission.

He is literally the 'awesome button' from that Dragon Age 2 video. Hell, they could've even had Thane's Son instead. Working for Illusive Man because Cerberus are the only people willing to cure his father.
 
What they cut, and what I thought was a very important part for the development of Kai Leng as a character and enemy was the scene where you saw him shred on his guitar when noone was around. It both characterized how badass and awesome Kai was while showing off his creative artistic side.

Shredding his guitar with biotics while combing his luscious mane.
 
What they cut, and what I thought was a very important part for the development of Kai Leng as a character and enemy was the scene where you saw him shred on his guitar when noone was around. It both characterized how badass and awesome Kai was while showing off his creative artistic side.

You can't be serious.
 
Rebeat it from my previous save as I didn't feel like killing the Geth was fair. Here's hoping they resurrect me in a sweet Geth Prime body or in Legion's. I tried shooting the Catalyst.. a lot, and even after I realized it wasn't going to do anything, I kept shooting.
 
He is literally the 'awesome button' from that Dragon Age 2 video. Hell, they could've even had Thane's Son instead. Working for Illusive Man because Cerberus are the only people willing to cure his father.

I don't think Cerberus would trust an alien for anything. Kai Leng is simply supposed to represent Cerberus's potential strength being able to rival Shepard.

If Dietz saw Kai Leng's script in ME3 plus the way he taunted Shepard in the email like a true douchebro, I can actually see why he would write in that terrible cereal eating scene.
 
I noticed during the snowy space moon fan art scene you can hear wolves, owls, and crickets. So Earth 2?

Why would it need to be Earth 2? Earth doesn't get destroyed in any of the endings, does it? I guess it can't be Earth though, considering the scenery.

Hell, I'm still trying to figure out why Shepard is in prison/detained at the beginning of Mass Effect 3. I take down a reaper and destroy a collector base for you fuckers, and I get detained? What?
 
Why would it need to be Earth 2? Earth doesn't get destroyed in any of the endings, does it? I guess it can't be Earth though, considering the scenery.

Hell, I'm still trying to figure out why Shepard is in prison/detained at the beginning of Mass Effect 3. I take down a reaper and destroy a collector base for you fuckers, and I get detained? What?

In Arrival you blew up a mass relay and it wiped out a bunch of Batarian colonies.
 
Im so going to laugh if Bioware really comes out and tells us the ending was simply Shepard hallucinating while on pain killers or whatever. I will buy all DLC for the game Bioware releases, because goddamn do i love a good troll like that.


Dammit Bioware. Explain that in the opening got'damn cinematic if you don't detect that DLC pack on my system.
I was really disappointing the game didnt start with Shepard on trial for his war crimes, and the shit hitting the fan during said trial.
 
Dammit Bioware. Explain that in the opening got'damn cinematic if you don't detect that DLC pack on my system.

The funny thing is they do mention it when you import a save that finished Arrival, but they say nothing if you haven't. Same with Shadow Broker. I imported a save without it, and Liara said she was an "information broker."
 
So, just thought everyone in this thread might be interested that one of the Bioware writers who posts on another board that I frequent said that there were only two writers on the ending and that the rest of the writing team didn't vet it before it was implemented.

It actually makes sense given the way the ending goes.
 
So, just thought everyone in this thread might be interested that one of the Bioware writers who posts on another board that I frequent said that there were only two writers on the ending and that the rest of the writing team didn't vet it before it was implemented.

It actually makes sense given the way the ending goes.

WTF? How the hell do you not have everyone involved in what should be the most important part of the story?
 
So, just thought everyone in this thread might be interested that one of the Bioware writers who posts on another board that I frequent said that there were only two writers on the ending and that the rest of the writing team didn't vet it before it was implemented.

It actually makes sense given the way the ending goes.

I'm sorry, but I need to see a link and some proof before I believe that. There's no way that's possible.
 
Come to think of it the fact that everyone is so mad should really be taken as a compliment to Bioware. People must love the series very much to react so vocally to its ending.
 
The funny thing is they do mention it when you import a save that finished Arrival, but they say nothing if you haven't. Same with Shadow Broker. I imported a save without it, and Liara said she was an "information broker."

That was a surprise to me as well. I knew Liara was involved in the Lair of the Shadow Broker DLC, but when she came out and said "Oh, yeah, I'm the Shadow Broker now" I was kind of floored. I went and read the wiki about the Shadow Broker and was kind of let down by how insignificant the whole thing turned out to be.

Come to think of it the fact that everyone is so mad should really be taken as a compliment to Bioware. People must love the series very much to react so vocally to its ending.

I guess. I really just dislike open ended conclusions to video games. They aren't master craftsmen who are imparting some Earth shattering artistic vision unto us, the likes of which we're going to carry with us the rest of our lives. Their job was to provide an ending that made at least a little bit of sense, and they failed.
 
Im so going to laugh if Bioware really comes out and tells us the ending was simply Shepard hallucinating while on pain killers or whatever. I will buy all DLC for the game Bioware releases, because goddamn do i love a good troll like that.

Aren't they re-releasing that Deception book to fix the errors and complaints people had? If they are willing to that, I could easily see them releasing an ending DLC pack for $20 so players could finish the saga the way they wanted to.
 
I just beat this and I'm trying to make sense of these 3 endings. So if you choose to destroy synthetics, how does Shepard still survive?
 
I just beat this and I'm trying to make sense of these 3 endings. So if you choose to destroy synthetics, how does Shepard still survive?

You can fight like a Krogan, run like a leopard, but you'll never be better than Commander Shepard.
 
You know, saying the ending is all a dream and calling into question the ending sequence's reliability actually gives this a lot of depth and makes it intriguing in an Inception sort of way.

The ending also makes a hell of a lot more sense if you get the scene where you talk to Liara about her Data Box that made in case the Reapers win.
 
hmm ok...

I'm curious to know the reasoning of those that picked the option 'destroy synethics option' knowing that the cycle will continue.

and also, what's the consensus on what the best option was?
 
The ending also makes a hell of a lot more sense if you get the scene where you talk to Liara about her Data Box that made in case the Reapers win.

It really doesn't though, because they refer to her/him as "The Shepard" as if the story has been passed down through verbal lore.
 
It really doesn't though, because they refer to her/him as "The Shepard" as if she's been passed down through verbal lore.

Buzz Aldrin states that it's been a long time. My best guess is that it's like a gigantic galaxy-wide game of telephone. That's how legends and myths begin.
 
So, just thought everyone in this thread might be interested that one of the Bioware writers who posts on another board that I frequent said that there were only two writers on the ending and that the rest of the writing team didn't vet it before it was implemented.

It actually makes sense given the way the ending goes.

I have not idea if this true or not (without links is even harder to judge) but it certainly *feels* that way from the game. The first 99% of the game were very typical Bioware, with a cliche story but some nice dialogs, and a lot of fan service. The ending just feels so disconnected... completely different styles, going against the whole theme of Quarian/Geth conflict, introducing such gigantic plot holes, that really feels like it was decision from the top to take the franchise in a certain direction, without any regard for internal consistency.
 
Buzz Aldrin states that it's been a long time. My best guess is that it's like a gigantic galaxy-wide game of telephone. That's how legends and myths begin.

Yeah, but they also talk like space travel is impossible. I'm not sure how the story would have gotten around the galaxy.

I'm making myself angry rewatching the ending on youtube. Who refers to anyone, anywhere, as "my sweet"? He sounds like a diddler.


date raping aliens

Shepard, truly the Space Jesus

Get drunk in the Citadel nightclub, and you wind up on the couch next to Aria T'Loak. No indication is given of how much time had passed, and I'm pretty sure my Shepard got ridden around the club like a bicycle before ending up on Aria's couch.


hmm ok...

I'm curious to know the reasoning of those that picked the option 'destroy synethics option' knowing that the cycle will continue.

and also, what's the consensus on what the best option was?

"The Cycle" might be a hundred thousand years of intergalactic peace before synthetics take over again. That's a whole lot of peace.
 
I'm curious to know the reasoning of those that picked the option 'destroy synethics option' knowing that the cycle will continue.

Because the Catalyst is a self-interested twat who says it would start again, but who says it has to? The Quarians and Geth could resolve their differences, so could future organics and synthetics. The only reason why this cycle started in the first place was because Sovereign got the heretic Geth all riled up into joining him. The Geth weren't interested in wiping out everyone.

Let organics forge their own destiny. It's too bad that EDI/Geth have to die, but it's better than taking the freewill of everyone away and merging them into synthetics.

I mean it's still a crappy ending, but that's the way you can rationalize it.

I guess. I really just dislike open ended conclusions to video games. They aren't master craftsmen who are imparting some Earth shattering artistic vision unto us, the likes of which we're going to carry with us the rest of our lives. Their job was to provide an ending that made at least a little bit of sense, and they failed.

Well said.
 
hmm ok...

I'm curious to know the reasoning of those that picked the option 'destroy synethics option' knowing that the cycle will continue.

and also, what's the consensus on what the best option was?

I don't think the cycle will continue. Shepard literally just proved the Catalyst wrong not only by ending the Geth/Quarian war (one that was started by the stupidity of the Quarians and not by the Geth's desire for conflict) AND by forming a true friendship with EDI while bringing out human aspects in her character. Regardless of what the Catalyst says happens, the experience with my Shepard was completely the opposite. Also, who knows what would happen to both the organics and synthetics in the synthesis option. What if it rewrote their entire being? What if they forgot everything in their past? If any of those had a chance of happening, then what Shepard is doing would be no different than indoctrination or even outright murder.

Based on that logic, the destroy option allows organics to continue living unchanged and permanently eliminates the Reapers with the Geth/EDI/other AI being casualties.
 
what do you imagine the different colors of space magic taste like? I think red is cherry and green is mint.

blue might be anti-freeze or something.
 
hmm ok...

I'm curious to know the reasoning of those that picked the option 'destroy synethics option' knowing that the cycle will continue.

Because it would negate the need for the Reapers, as well as give future generations the best shot at reinventing Mass Relay tech.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom