Family of Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch seeks arrest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who in their fucking mind would walk up to someone *seconds* after a gunshot goes off? Are you fucking stupid?
That's because he made it up. NO witnesses walked up to him. There were a couple of women that saw him immediately after the shooting and one of them asked him what was going on, but they asked him from their house/baclony. They never approached him. The male witness that confirmed seeing what they saw never approached him either. The first person to was an officer.
 
Beaten so badly he feared for his life so he was forced to shoot an innocent kid? Yeah, not seeing that shit at all. But thanks for the update.

By posting that link I'm most certainly not suggesting that Zimmerman having head wounds excuses his shooting of anyone, but that also doesn't mean I wish to write my own reality about what happened.


That's because he made it up. NO witnesses walked up to him. There were a couple of women that saw him immediately after the shooting and one of them asked him what was going on, but they asked him from their house/baclony. They never approached him. The male witness that confirmed seeing what they saw never approached him either. The first person to was an officer.

I made something up?
 
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...c-news-neighborhood-watch-volunteer-zimmerman

"ABC News has re-digitized video of George Zimmerman taken shortly after Trayvon Martin's shooting.

The video was unveiled as an exclusive this morning on "Good Morning America." ABC was the first news organization to show the original tape."

"Reporter Matt Gutman said the clearer video shows "what appear to be a pair of gashes or welts on George Zimmerman's head."

Neighborhood Watch volunteer Zimmerman has said he shot 17-year-old Trayvon in self-defense. The video shows Zimmerman arriving at the Sanford Police Department within an hour after the shooting.

Gutman said the video had been "clarified" by Forensic Protection Inc. Former FBI Special Agent Brad Garrett told ABC that the clearer video shows "marks on the back of Mr. Zimmerman's head."

WTF is re-digitized?
 
I guess you two had better direct your questions to this lady.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-eOl1Iq332o#t=182s


Who? What? Where?

Did you even watch what you linked? They *saw* him, they weren't *near* him. And if I recall, wasn't the police the FIRST person that was near him? I like how you linked it to a witness that said they saw Zimmerman on top and the crying was from a child.

That's because he made it up. NO witnesses walked up to him. There were a couple of women that saw him immediately after the shooting and one of them asked him what was going on, but they asked him from their house/baclony. They never approached him. The male witness that confirmed seeing what they saw never approached him either. The first person to was an officer.

But BruiserBear knows his story and facts, surely he can't be wrong?
 
Like I said earlier, meaningless. Trayvon had every right to defend himself from a guy with a weapon.

Of course its meaningless--except for those that look for anything to justify Zimmerman's bullshit story. For common sense folk, it means that Trayvon defended himself; for others, it will be a reason to have murdered him. "Welts" or not, the former doesn't change.
 
I'm most certainly not suggesting that Zimmerman having head wounds excuses his shooting of anyone, but that also doesn't mean I wish to write my own reality about what happened.

Dunno if anyone is specifically saying that he could not have gotten head wounds - but that scratches on the back of the head do not denote a tussle of the epic proportions that were declared. In fact, if he told EMT's that his head was being bashed on the sidewalk repeatedly, the would probably take him in to check for a concussion, regardless. But the level of his wounds were so insignificant, they didn't even bother putting anything on them.

Basically, if something happened, it was innocuous, but it is being played up to greater levels to give his reaction legitimacy - something that I have been saying for quite a while (and quite a few others in the thread as well).
 
By posting that link I'm most certainly not suggesting that Zimmerman having head wounds excuses his shooting of anyone, but that also doesn't mean I wish to write my own reality about what happened.

You doing alright so far...
 
Dunno if anyone is specifically saying that he could not have gotten head wounds - but that scratches on the back of the head do not denote a tussle of the epic proportions that were declared. In fact, if he told EMT's that his head was being bashed on the sidewalk repeatedly, the would probably take him in to check for a concussion, regardless. But the level of his wounds were so insignificant, they didn't even bother putting anything on them.

Basically, if something happened, it was innocuous, but it is being played up to greater levels to give his reaction legitimacy - something that I have been saying for quite a while (and quite a few others in the thread as well).

Bingo.
 
The devil's advocate routines here are a fucking bore and do nothing to help the discourse. The pertinent facts have been discussed ad nauseam but that doesn't matter to some people. Is there any way the OP can be altered to show the arguments of both sides + the facts and let people decide for themselves? There are so many angles and facts here that get buried really quickly and that just keeps this thread going in the same circular direction.
 
Dunno if anyone is specifically saying that he could not have gotten head wounds - but that scratches on the back of the head do not denote a tussle of the epic proportions that were declared. In fact, if he told EMT's that his head was being bashed on the sidewalk repeatedly, the would probably take him in to check for a concussion, regardless. But the level of his wounds were so insignificant, they didn't even bother putting anything on them.

Basically, if something happened, it was innocuous, but it is being played up to greater levels to give his reaction legitimacy - something that I have been saying for quite a while (and quite a few others in the thread as well).

Am I right in remembering the total time elapsed between the police arriving on scene and him arriving at the police station was 36 minutes? I can't even walk to Starbucks and back in 30 minutes. Ridiculous to think he was even properly processed at the scene, never mind treated for head wounds.
 
WTF is re-digitized?

Probably some form of uprezzing, like we see with DVD's put in a bluray player, etc.

Did you even watch what you linked? They *saw* him, they weren't *near* him. And if I recall, wasn't the police the FIRST person that was near him? I like how you linked it to a witness that said they saw Zimmerman on top and the crying was from a child.

It's like some people aren't even reading what I say. There should be a study done on this psychology playing out before our eyes.

You take what I post as a defense of Zimmerman, even though I've probably said 50 times in this thread by now that Zimmerman committed a horrible crime that night, and should got to jail for a long time for what he did. Who are you arguing with? Because it's not me.

Of course its meaningless--except for those that look for anything to justify Zimmerman's bullshit story. For common sense folk, it means that Trayvon defended himself; for others, it will be a reason to have murdered him. "Welts" or not, the former doesn't change.

It's particularly relevant in this discussion because we have people suggesting they don't even believe there was an altercation. So anything brought to light that might help clarify details would seem helpful.


Dunno if anyone is specifically saying that he could not have gotten head wounds - but that scratches on the back of the head do not denote a tussle of the epic proportions that were declared. In fact, if he told EMT's that his head was being bashed on the sidewalk repeatedly, the would probably take him in to check for a concussion, regardless. But the level of his wounds were so insignificant, they didn't even bother putting anything on them.

Basically, if something happened, it was innocuous, but it is being played up to greater levels to give his reaction legitimacy - something that I have been saying for quite a while (and quite a few others in the thread as well).

Yes, there were PLENTY of people suggesting in this very thread that they saw NO wounds on Zimmerman in that video.

But yes, you're completely right. Zimmerman's story that there was a life and death struggle happening clearly seems unrealistic. He may have thought he was in a life or death struggle in his own mind, but then again, he also thought Treyvon was on drugs, up to no good, etc, etc.
 
Am I right in remembering the total time elapsed between the police arriving on scene and him arriving at the police station was 36 minutes? I can't even walk to Starbucks and back in 30 minutes. Ridiculous to think he was even properly processed at the scene, never mind treated for head wounds.

If the surveillance video time stamp is accurate, correct.
 
Regardless, the superficial wounds that Zimmerman may have had to the back of his head and his nose are consistent with someone defending themself. They still don't prove that they were even close to being life threatening. More importantly, it wouldn't explain why Martin was crying for help 41 seconds before being shot. Who yells for help while allegedly bashing someone's head in the ground and breaking their nose...for 41 seconds.
 
I just watched it on the ABC website and Its strange.

It looks like a huge red branding on the back of the head.
But its so big and so red I dont see how you couldn't see it on the original video.
 
I just watched it on the ABC website and Its strange.

It looks like a huge red branding on the back of the head.
But its so big and so red I dont see how you couldn't see it on the original video.

"Enhance!"

"Sir if we Enhance is more there will be artifacting!"

"I SAID ENHANCE DAMNIT!"
 
Toure exposed himself outside of his Dylan Ratigan bubble, he comes as racist as he claims other people are about this case. As I said before, put this much venom and energy towards the fact black on black violence since as a black man I am much much more likely to get killed by another black man than random racist white guy


He actually does talk about black on black violence. But of course that doesn't get shown or repeated a million times because most people don't care.
 
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/New-Trayvon-Martin-dispatch-recordings-raise-questions/-/1637132/9959562/-/v7bf3g/-/index.html
A Trayvon Martin family spokesperson says information within the newly released fire rescue dispatch recordings from the night George Zimmerman shot and killed Martin is just another reason why Zimmerman should be arrested.

In the recordings, you can hear rescue workers talking about Zimmerman, just minutes after his family says Martin repeatedly pounded his head into a sidewalk.

"Do they have a second patient?" a person says on the recording. "That's affirmative, there's a second patient."

What rescue workers said next has Martin family lawyers intensifying calls for Zimmerman's arrest.

"You can cancel the second rescue," a rescue worker says on the recording, adding that the second patient, Zimmerman, didn't have a gunshot wound.

A spokesman for the attorneys working for the Martin family told Local 6 that if Zimmerman really had his head repeatedly smashed into the sidewalk during a life and death struggle with Martin, there's "not a chance" the ambulance would have been cancelled.
 
I've hard a particular 'scenario' in my head of what probably happened, but it's baseless so I haven't shared it. I'll share in now, just for conversation - but I don't have anything to support this so I don't put any real weight on it.

Zimmerman catches up to Martin, and words are exchanged. Martin decides to get a bit aggressive, tells Zimmerman to shove it - maybe shoves him too. Zimmerman maybe shoves him back, regardless - something as benign as a shoving match occurs. In this however, a shove occurs hard enough to knock Zimmerman to the ground and smack his head on the sidewalk (maybe it was a punch to the nose, maybe it was a shove to the nose, maybe it was neither and his nose actually wasn't bleeding). Regardless, Zimmerman gets up (maybe knocks Martin to the ground) and pulls out his gun. He is furious that he got wounded and is in some sort of adrenaline fuelled rage. This is where the screaming begins. Maybe he gets ontop of Martin and starts cussing him out with the gun in his face or chest or something, threatening him with the bravado that happens in these situations (Do you know who I am? Etc) - maybe his intention was never to shoot, but just to scare him shitless. Obviously Martin is fucking frantic and tries grabbing for the gun at this point, or with some adrenaline rush, is now substantially stronger and is fighting back in some way (all the while screaming for help) - eventually, Zimmerman gets scared because this kid is a bit too strong with the adrenaline pumping through his veins - so he takes the shot.

Again, I'm not even 50% sure on this scenario, this is just what my original idea of what happened was.
 
I've hard a particular 'scenario' in my head of what probably happened, but it's baseless so I haven't shared it. I'll share in now, just for conversation - but I don't have anything to support this so I don't put any real weight on it.

Zimmerman catches up to Martin, and words are exchanged. Martin decides to get a bit aggressive, tells Zimmerman to shove it - maybe shoves him too. Zimmerman maybe shoves him back, regardless - something as benign as a shoving match occurs. In this however, a shove occurs hard enough to knock Zimmerman to the ground and smack his head on the sidewalk (maybe it was a punch to the nose, maybe it was a shove to the nose, maybe it was neither and his nose actually wasn't bleeding). Regardless, Zimmerman gets up (maybe knocks Martin to the ground) and pulls out his gun. He is furious that he got wounded and is in some sort of adrenaline fuelled rage. This is where the screaming begins. Maybe he gets ontop of Martin and starts cussing him out with the gun in his face or chest or something, threatening him with the bravado that happens in these situations (Do you know who I am? Etc) - maybe his intention was never to shoot, but just to scare him shitless. Obviously Martin is fucking frantic and tries grabbing for the gun at this point, or with some adrenaline rush, is now substantially stronger and is fighting back in some way (all the while screaming for help) - eventually, Zimmerman gets scared because this kid is a bit too strong with the adrenaline pumping through his veins - so he takes the shot.

Again, I'm not even 50% sure on this scenario, this is just what my original idea of what happened was.

I think that's similar to what I've imagined myself. I'd imagine Trayvon landed a shot to Zimmerman's nose or something, they fall to the ground in a scuffle, roll around for a moment or two, Zimmerman gets him under control, Trayvon is yelling for help, and maybe eventually goes for the gun, and Zimmerman shoots.

But I could still imagine other scenarios going down as well, with slight differences.
 
I'm not completely sold, because that's pretty big mark for it not show up on the original.

It was visible in the original. Just not as obviously. I had a debate with several people at the time about it. They told me I was crazy for believing there were visible marks there, even though there were visible marks there.
 
I'm not completely sold, because that's pretty big mark for it not show up on the original.

Is that the only angle they have?

Its probably the only angle the artifacts shows up at. I'm assuming it's more shadows that have been 'Re-Digitized' then actual wounds.

I'd love to see a side by side shot of the original and the redigitized.
 
Please tell me you are kidding

they are trying to cover up the entire thing and let Zimmerman go, thus the "why would they."

Sure, its just my opinion, but if anything were to leak. A picture is worth 1000 words.

All of this Zimmerman scratches stuff just proves that they fought, and he shot trayvon for wearing a hoodie and walking down his street, who defended himself. Which I think most people have figured by now.

It really is like the kid has no right to defend himself, but zimmerman does. After provoking the entire situation.

I mean for fucks sake, we had Rhiannas busted up face within a day of the incident, but we can't see Zimmermans trayvon-rage-beaten face by now... please.

I know the SPD are pretty big fuck ups, but is it standard procedure to allow someone with blood on their head to walk around without bandages and without them using gloves while handling them?

Exactly.

I think something like that would be visible at all angles - but that 'wound' is only visible around the time where (I think) shadow is bouncing off a head bump/ridge. I mean, if there is a bright red gash like that on the back of the head - it's not invisible until JUST the right moment, then disappears shortly afterward. It would be visible during the entire run of the enhanced video.

Exactly, as was the phantom scratch in the first place.

And the phantom broken nose.
 
I'm not completely sold, because that's pretty big mark for it not show up on the original.

Is that the only angle they have?

I think something like that would be visible at all angles - but that 'wound' is only visible around the time where (I think) shadow is bouncing off a head bump/ridge. I mean, if there is a bright red gash like that on the back of the head - it's not invisible until JUST the right moment, then disappears shortly afterward. It would be visible during the entire run of the enhanced video.
 
I think something like that would be visible at all angles - but that 'wound' is only visible around the time where (I think) shadow is bouncing off a head bump/ridge. I mean, if there is a bright red gash like that on the back of the head - it's not invisible until JUST the right moment, then disappears shortly afterward. It would be visible during the entire run of the enhanced video.

Exactly. You only see the 'wound' at that angle because of how the light is casting shadows on his head. Notice the two lines going down are mirrored? That's a classic sign of an artifact.
 
I know the SPD are pretty big fuck ups, but is it standard procedure to allow someone with blood on their head to walk around without bandages and without them using gloves while handling them?

If Zimmerman is cleaned up, being stopped bleeding, blood cleaned up and sanitized. I dont see why the police should be concerned with wearing gloves especially after the EMTs cleared him.
 
Trayvon Martin EMC Ambulance Audio Recording between dispatchers and ambulance/emt personnel on February 26th, 2012.

An additional ambulance was requested at one point in the recording and then cancelled. The second ambulance is presumed to have been for George Zimmerman.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K8lnzDqIEc&feature=player_embedded

I'm not sure why this is important. We already knew Zimmerman's injuries did not require an ambulance.
 
Is the heat focused more on the PD than Zimmerman, is that now the 'story'? Originally people were implying this was racially motivated. What's the narrative now?
 
Is the heat focused more on the PD than Zimmerman, is that now the 'story'? Originally people were implying this was racially motivated. What's the narrative now?

Police probably don't have enough evidence to convict Zimmerman, hence no arrest. Additionally they are not releasing all their information because its an active case.

Public unrest is building so blame is being thrown all over the place. Mob mentality.
 
I'm not sure why this is important. We already knew Zimmerman's injuries did not require an ambulance.

A broken nose and trauma to the back of the head that causes bleeding sure as hell requires an ambulence. If zimmerman actually suffered those wounds, which he probably didn't.
 
Then he shouldn't be free

They all KNOW he shouldn't be free. They just keep arguing around the reasons that the around bottom line not changing.

Which is why this thread makes ones face hurt, unlike zimmermans, over and over.

Zimmerman didn't have life threatening injuries, not that he NEEDS to have them, but his defense is that, and thats the reason he shot trayvon. Its clear from several facts, including a video that needs to be "re-Digitized" to see his phantom wounds, that are only visible at one point of a video, as the video was just sharpened and saturated, more than likely in just that area. I wish we could have another thread of just Fact/Story updates.

Again, Trayvon more than likely hit the guy, defending his self. But the same people debating this and trying to get a AH-HA! moment, are ignoring this right of his. And that if he was being beaten and screaming for help, then shot, there is no way in christs hell he was a threat to zimmerman, until he went for his gun to defend himself, again. Which is all questionable, but hell. Zimmerman started this entire thing, lied a few times, police messed up, and still.

Here we are.
 
Its probably the only angle the artifacts shows up at. I'm assuming it's more shadows that have been 'Re-Digitized' then actual wounds.

I'd love to see a side by side shot of the original and the redigitized.

Actually, now that I look at the original video, there definitely are marks there. Watch the original in 480p here from 0:17 to 0:25, you can clearly see the marks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HqKSMMEYHxA#t=17s

Original video, then enhanced video on right:

gz.png
 
Is the heat focused more on the PD than Zimmerman, is that now the 'story'? Originally people were implying this was racially motivated. What's the narrative now?

The story is the Sanford PD and the DA at this point, because they are the ones standing in the way of him getting arrested. I would love for that story last night to come true that the Department of Justice is taking comments on doing an investigation on the whole areas justice system and not just for this particular case as its clear this isn't the first time the Sanford PD has had some controversial decisions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom